Author
|
Topic: We should abandon the idea of finding the 'perfect' female candidate - Janet Bagnall
|
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684
|
posted 16 May 2007 02:30 PM
Montreal Gazette Op-Ed May 16th, 2007I thought this was an interesting article. Excerpt: *** quote: For a party looking for a scapegoat, Royal presents a perfect target. Her campaign floundered over unsourced spending promises and a surprising ignorance of world affairs.Beyond the question of Royal's own political survival is a larger issue: Whether her failure will be used to shoulder aside other women seeking top office. Women do not get many chances in politics, British pollster Peter Kellner of YouGov told the London Times. Women's best chance of winning, he said, is when their country is in the midst of significant political change, as Britain was in 1979 when Margaret Thatcher came to power. Voters in France and the U.S. show few signs of wanting a big change, Kellner said.
Very interesting, I'm not sure what to think. I didn't know political parties were disrespecting the parity law - let alone disrespecting it flagrantly. I didn't really follow the French election because I'm not French. If she had really used her children to threaten the politician father into supporting her, I probably would have held that against her and not voted for her. I like to believe I would have done the same with respect to a male politician. I think the first reaction though would have been to be incredibly skeptical about the veracity of the claim, and question the motive. Some female friends had told me recently that they find the most successful female politicians often look like men, and they'd relate more to female politicians who look and dress like women. Personally, I've never voted for a woman. Actually, I can't recall ever seeing a female name on my ballot after like 4 elections. Hopefully it will change sometime, as law schools seem dominated by female students, and in Canada we have an irrational fetish for politicians who want to law schools. [ 16 May 2007: Message edited by: 500_Apples ] [ 16 May 2007: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]
From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545
|
posted 16 May 2007 04:29 PM
quote: Michelle: You know, I don't think I've ever voted for a woman either, come to think of it! I don't think I've ever had the opportunity. Regarding the "perfect female candidate", I have a slightly different take on it. I think we should abandon the idea that female candidates have to be "perfect" in order to nominate them and then vote for them.
What is perfection anyway? Why gauge a candidate based on gender? What counts is political philosophy and ability to do a good job. You should move out here Michelle. I have had the opportunity to vote for and even help elect a number of women, at all levels of government, and in candidate selection contests.
From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 19 May 2007 09:38 AM
quote: Originally posted by kropotkin1951: Proud to have helped elect women MLA's in two provinces and numerous municipal politicians.
Me too, both provincially and municipally. Federally, I have never lived in a riding that had a woman NDP candidate running, or who was wanting to run, though often the riding next door did. Now moving along to All Candidates Forums, having sponsored several at one point, and was audience member in even more, I know that no matter the gender of the NDP candidate, things will be skewed against them, if at all possible. Also, women candidates were fielded low level questions, while pre-formatted questions were given to the "select" male candidate. This is why direct questions from the floor has become limited, as opposed to written down and handed to the moderator questions.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|