babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Iraq PM: ‘Our forces will be ready by June ’07’

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Iraq PM: ‘Our forces will be ready by June ’07’
Atavist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14189

posted 01 June 2007 04:36 PM      Profile for Atavist   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is something I have yet to see even mentioned on FauxNoise or CNNvy...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15946832/

AMMAN, Jordan - Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said Thursday that his country's forces would be able to assume security command by June 2007 — which could allow the United States to start withdrawing its troops.

"I cannot answer on behalf of the U.S. administration but I can tell you that from our side our forces will be ready by June 2007," Maliki told ABC television after meeting President Bush on Thursday in Jordan.

Maliki was replying to a question about whether U.S. troops could start withdrawing at that time.

Bush pledged Thursday that U.S. troops will remain in Iraq to strengthen the authority of embattled prime minister and said the two agreed to speed a turnover of security responsibility to Iraqi forces.

“One of his frustrations with me is that he believes that we’ve been slow about giving him the tools necessary to protect the Iraqi people,” Bush said. “Today we had a meeting that will accelerate the capacity for the prime minister to do the hard work necessary to help stop this violence...”

Just to add a bit of spice, I feel I have to mention that 126 US soldiers were killed last month, the third highest number since the beginning of Emperor George II's Excellent Iraqi Adventure. Almost 2000 Iraqi Armed Forces/Police were killed in May, as well...I just can't seem to figure this out...

Does this make any sense at all? To anyone? Why do I continually believe that I MUST be going INSANE? That I COULDN'T have heard what I thought I heard, or saw what I had seen...Help me - anyone!!!

[ 01 June 2007: Message edited by: Atavist ]


From: "Sitting stoned, alone in my backyard..." | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 01 June 2007 09:31 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Perhaps 06 June is the date for Iraq to pass the bill to privatize the oil industry. Then the US can retreat to its monster "embassy" and concentrate on securing the oil.
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
laine lowe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13668

posted 01 June 2007 09:54 PM      Profile for laine lowe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Seems to me that siren has a point. I would add that it's a free market free fall for all sorts of corporations: telecommunications, engineering, healthcare, education, etc. You only have to look at the contracts page for the US State and Defense departments to see how well US contracters are doing.
From: north of 50 | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 06 June 2007 07:01 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
U.S. ADMITS PLANNING PERMANENT MILITARY BASES IN IRAQ

The United States is constructing multiple military bases in Iraq, and a gigantic embassy in Baghdad. Even as the US Congress, media, and citizenry debate withdrawal from Iraq, indisputable evidence on the ground shows a permanent imperialistic plan for US-occupied Iraq, says Patrick Seale.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 06 June 2007 07:09 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Iraq Oil: Follow the money

excerpts:

7. August 30, 2005: Bush says U.S. troops would continue fighting in Iraq in order to protect the country's vast oil fields, which he said would otherwise fall under the control of terrorist extremists.

9. March 15, 2006: Gen. John Abizaid, the Army general overseeing U.S. military operations in Iraq said the United States may want to keep a long-term military presence in Iraq to bolster moderates against extremists in the region and protect the flow of oil.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 08 June 2007 03:11 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Attack on Iraq police chief's home

quote:
Gunmen in Iraq have attacked the house of a senior police officer, killing his wife and 13 other people and taking away three of his children.

The attack took place late on Thursday on the house of Col Ali al-Jurani, the head of emergency police in the town of Kanaan, in Diyala province. [...]

"Several armed men attacked my house at 2200 (1800 GMT) and killed 14 people, including my wife, brother and my 12 bodyguards," Col Jurani told AFP news agency.


[emphasis added]

Not only are the Iraqi puppets ready to crush the insurgency, but they have also solved the unemployment problem!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca