babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


  
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » archived babble   » auntie.com   » Male survivors of abuse look for feminist allies

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Male survivors of abuse look for feminist allies
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090

posted 20 March 2006 11:21 AM      Profile for Sharon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
One community is finally developing counselling services for male survivors of sexual and physical abuse. But when it comes to issues of funding, some in the women survivors' community are not supportive as they fear that new services may take away from other more well-established services. Read auntie's advice for the men who are looking for a fair solution.

Here's auntie


From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 20 March 2006 07:31 PM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
It is also that men dealing with sexual abuse and violence get more attention than women.

Auntie, I can't help but disagree with this statement. Most men who face sexual abuse will keep it hidden and let it eat them up inside. Most men's experiences will go unnoticed.

I agree that as more women are abused then men they should get a greater amount of funding to meet their needs, but you know...Just because you're given a gender at birth doesn't mean you have to live your life serving that gender exclusively as this article alludes to. People can and should help each other without any thought exclusivity. An inclusiveness of women for helping men and men for helping women idea would get far more accomplished than sectoring it and then having joint strike forces going out to fund-raise occasionally.

Mind you, this is a very touchy topic for many people.


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 20 March 2006 07:43 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Well said, PB.

I like Aunty's idea of a joint fundraiser, though. After all, it isn't a matter of male survivors and female survivors, it's just... survivors. Right?

That being said, in a perfect world such things would be adequately funded through my tax dollars, and not NEED "fundraisers" to start with!

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Raos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5702

posted 20 March 2006 08:02 PM      Profile for Raos     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Well, at least your tax dollars will fund your health bill for whatever damage you do holding your breath waiting. Well, for now, at least.
From: Sweet home Alaberta | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
lawgirl
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12295

posted 20 March 2006 11:33 PM      Profile for lawgirl        Edit/Delete Post
While I support Auntie, as a general rule, I think she missed the point of the question here. I agree that a joint initiative is a good idea, but I feel like she didn't really address the reality that this writer was coming from.
If what he says is true, there have not been resources in his community for male survivors. And they are clearly much needed!
As we know, violence tends to be cyclical, and it is in the interest of every woman that men who have been the victim of violence get the treatment they need. Without suggesting that male victims of violence and abuse will necessarily abuse others, every man who gets the treatment he needs is less likely to assault a woman.
Wouldn't we all prefer that women didn't get assaulted in the first place!?

From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
E.Kootenayt
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12032

posted 21 March 2006 10:20 PM      Profile for E.Kootenayt     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I agree somewhat with auntie. I am 54 and in all this time I have known and know Women;Children and Men who have been abused.Each one of these groups of people have physiological differences that require they work together, the only reason the white ribbon got more funding and recognition is because of the vast amount of people who said " finally ". Some of the really hard core femnists need to lighten up, we all have some of the same end goals.
From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 23 March 2006 03:50 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by lawgirl:
While I support Auntie, as a general rule, I think she missed the point of the question here. I agree that a joint initiative is a good idea, but I feel like she didn't really address the reality that this writer was coming from.
If what he says is true, there have not been resources in his community for male survivors. And they are clearly much needed!
As we know, violence tends to be cyclical, and it is in the interest of every woman that men who have been the victim of violence get the treatment they need. Without suggesting that male victims of violence and abuse will necessarily abuse others, every man who gets the treatment he needs is less likely to assault a woman.
Wouldn't we all prefer that women didn't get assaulted in the first place!?


Well said. I believe we need programs to help families deal with stress and relationship problems before they escalate to violence. I remember watching a couple who were friends yell and secream at each other and then they started to beat each other. It would have been so much better for them and the kids to have some programs to try and deal with the emotional and verbal before it bacame violent.

I found it interesting that despite the fact that the woman in this relationship was physically larger and stronger and had initiated the violent fight when the police came they took the husband into custody. I am making the presumptions about their roles from not only my own knowledge of them as peaople but also from the woman's story of what happened told when she was sober.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Grape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12275

posted 24 March 2006 07:11 PM      Profile for Grape     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by kropotkin1951:
I found it interesting that despite the fact that the woman in this relationship was physically larger and stronger and had initiated the violent fight when the police came they took the husband into custody. I am making the presumptions about their roles from not only my own knowledge of them as peaople but also from the woman's story of what happened told when she was sober.

Such is the reality of domestic violence and public perception. It has been sold as an exclusively male-perpetrated practice but that's far, far from the truth.


From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 24 March 2006 07:48 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grape:
It has been sold as an exclusively male-perpetrated practice but that's far, far from the truth.
Oh for gosh sakes, do some math and look at the stats. It's not that far from the truth. Sure a handful of women abuse men, but it's far from the norm. Not to say that some support services might be useful for the men who do suffer, but please don't try to equate it. Next we'll need affirmative action for white folks who face systemic discrimination. Get a grip, please.

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 24 March 2006 08:39 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
So when does a minority that something bad is happening to get rights. My understanding of the statistics is there is a significant number of men in this situation. A minority of the cases but a significant minority.

Actually it is much like saying you know if your poor and white then there is something really the matter with you becaue we know all white people were born with a silver spoon shoved up their ass. Come on pull up your socks your poor because you have personal failings and your gender, race ethnicity or what ever proves it. Others like you don't have those problems so quit your whining.

[ 24 March 2006: Message edited by: kropotkin1951 ]


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474

posted 24 March 2006 08:53 PM      Profile for bittersweet     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In general, abuse gets applied according to relative power, the greater applying it to the lesser. Kids can find themselves facing deflected anguish from both their papas and their mamas. But where do they put it? That's what I always wanted to know, because I couldn't see how I could contain it. So from experience, I'm willing to bet that for all the abused kids who grow up to abuse others, there's an equal number who don't deflect, but let it infect. And where do you find those statistics? Well, to get an accurate picture of the whole scheme, I'd take a chunk of the stats on depression, drug/alcohol abuse, all the various self-destructive pastimes, and add it to the numbers that already measure the more overt victims. No wonder we're always off to war, etc.
From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Grape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12275

posted 24 March 2006 08:57 PM      Profile for Grape     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
Oh for gosh sakes, do some math and look at the stats. It's not that far from the truth.

That depends on which stats you look at - the 1999 General Social Survey found that 7% of men and 8% of women reported experiencing violence from a spousal partner (common law or marrited) in the preceding 5 years. The stats vary depending on the means employed in their gathering and the areas of domestic violence examined - data taken from police records and clinical samples (IE samples consisting entirely of abused women) show one thing, while studies conducted on random representative samples show entirely another.

It differs depending on the type of abuse as well - sexual is generally male-perpetrated, child abuse/maltreatment is generally female-perpetrated, spousal murder is male-dominated, etc. Where physical assault and verbal abuse are concerned (in intimate relationships - married, dating, etc) gender parity seems the norm.

If you're interested in reading the research, I accumulated a bunch of studies on the topic for a paper a while back. I have some of these in PDF if you're interested:

Foo, L. and Margolin, G. 1995. “A Multivariate Investigation of Dating Aggression”. Journal of Family Violence. 10.

Grandin, E. et al. 1997. “Couple Violence and Psychological Distress”. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 88.

Greene, Kelly and Marion Bogo. 2002. “The Different Faces of Intimate Violence: Implications for Assessment and Treatment”. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 28.

Hamby, Sherry L. and David B. Sugarman. 1999. “Acts of Psychological Aggression Against a Partner and their Relation to Physical Assault and Gender”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 61.

McNeely, R. L. and Gloria Robinson-Simpson. 1988. “The Truth about Domestic Violence Revisited: A Reply to Saunders”. Social Work. 33.

Murty, Susan A et al. 2003. “Physical and Emotional Partner Abuse Reported by Men and Women in a Rural Community”. American Journal of Public Health. 93.

Schafer, John et al. 1998. “Rates of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States”. American Journal of Public Health. 88.

Sommer, Reena. 1994. “Male and Female Perpetrated Partner Abuse: Testing a Diathesis-Stress Model”. University of Manitoba PhD dissertation (unpublished)[I don't have this one in PDF unfortunately]

Straus, Murray A and Stephen Sweet. 1992. “Verbal/Symbolic Aggression in Couples: Incidence Rates and Relationships to Personal Characteristics”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 54.

quote:
Sure a handful of women abuse men, but it's far from the norm.

Read the studies - it's not just a handful.

There's a good book I read a while back called "Biopolitics Rising" by John Fekete that discusses the issue (as well as many others). You should give it a read if you're interested.

[ 24 March 2006: Message edited by: Grape ]


From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 25 March 2006 12:24 AM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I don't care who it happens to, abuse is abuse.

Men deal with it differently (at least from what I know) then women. And you know what? It doesn't matter!

ABUSE IS ABUSE. And it needs to be stopped and it needs to be prevented and the victims need HELP.

Stop turning this into a political issue, you know why? Because it is only hurting people, plain and simple.


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Serendipity
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10327

posted 25 March 2006 01:16 AM      Profile for Serendipity     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Agreed. Survivors of abuse all deserve support. They don't get anything out of it when we pigeon-hole them and play identity-politics with them.
From: montreal | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Haruo Nakagawa
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12362

posted 01 April 2006 12:45 PM      Profile for Haruo Nakagawa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
male survivors of sexual and physical abuse

I guess survivors of these two get the majority of the treatment because their injuries are more apparent. But what about those abusers who apply a more sinister form of abuse, such as psychological and emotional abuse. The scars their victims suffer are just as traumatic, but cannot be verified, because their abusers were too smart to "hit" or "sexually abuse" them. Those who are emotionally or psychologically abused get left out in the cold, YET again.


From: Vancouver, British Columbia | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 03 April 2006 01:03 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Haruo Nakagawa:
The scars their victims suffer are just as traumatic, but cannot be verified, because their abusers were too smart to "hit" or "sexually abuse" them. Those who are emotionally or psychologically abused get left out in the cold, YET again.
This is what I mean. Yes, perhaps many men in relationships feel emotionally or psychologically abused. However, they were never beaten or bruised. Shall we then equate them, and demand equal assistance, i.e. housing, support etc? Perhaps, and perhaps this process, as so many processes appear to, attempts to universalize the kinds of historical brutality which concerned advocates work within because it is life saving. Yes, some white folk feel upset by Black Nationalist rhetoric, but should we organize solidarity with black folk who have been harassed by neo-Klansfolk? I think not. This, to me, is merely another method by which the reasonable needs of wymmen who support those who flee life threatening situations are regularly undermined.

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 03 April 2006 01:12 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
This, to me, is merely another method by which the reasonable needs of wymmen who support those who flee life threatening situations are regularly undermined.

Yeah, that's just what sexually abused 10yo boys are after. You got 'em dead to rights.


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 03 April 2006 01:22 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
CN, I don't think that that was Makwa's point, actually, and it wouldn't be mine.

I think that Makwa was focused on the stats concerning the physical abuse of women by male partners. I don't happen to have those to hand, but I must say that the figures Grape is giving us above look curious to me.

This is becoming a very disturbing discussion.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 03 April 2006 01:33 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Papal Bull:
Most men who face sexual abuse will keep it hidden and let it eat them up inside. Most men's experiences will go unnoticed.

I must admit to being relatively poorly informed on this issue. However, isn't this often the case for women as well?


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 03 April 2006 01:34 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
CN, I don't think that that was Makwa's point, actually, and it wouldn't be mine.

I think that Makwa was focused on the stats concerning the physical abuse of women by male partners.


If so, I retract my earlier statement.


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 03 April 2006 01:39 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by paxamillion:
I must admit to being relatively poorly informed on this issue. However, isn't this often the case for women as well?

In a word, yes.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 03 April 2006 01:44 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Crippled_Newsie:
Yeah, that's just what sexually abused 10yo boys are after. You got 'em dead to rights.
When I wish to address the issues of children, who both male and female are usually harmed by adult males, I shall do so, thank you.

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 03 April 2006 02:03 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ok. How do we deal with this?

I know the problem best as a problem of adult women, which is in no way to deny that other groups of people experience abuse - clearly, they do. Above all, children do, children of both sexes.

I also know, though, that traumatized people are usually a very long way short of being able to think generously or in politically neutral terms about anybody else's problems, and it seems to me obviously cruel to expect them to do so.

Maybe everyone who is, at the moment, feeling well and strong can think of forming anti-abuse alliances, but I cannot believe that any such campaigns will do genuine good if they attempt to efface the particularity of the oppression suffered by any distinct group.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Grape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12275

posted 07 April 2006 03:23 PM      Profile for Grape     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
This is what I mean. Yes, perhaps many men in relationships feel emotionally or psychologically abused. However, they were never beaten or bruised. Shall we then equate them, and demand equal assistance, i.e. housing, support etc?

They should certainly be offered support in the form of professional counselling or support groups as any other victims of abuse should.

The question, as I see it, isn't whether abused men and abused women should be treated equally - I doubt anyone would assert that gender should play a role in deciding the "value" of one's experience of abuse.

The major issue you seem to be raising is how types of abuse are dealt with - should psychologically abused people be treated/given the same resources as physically abused people? It's a good question. I believe physically abused people should have housing alternatives available because their physical well-being could depend upon it. That being said, those that are psychologically abused may also be at risk physically if the abuse escalates. It's a tough problem to address, I think.


From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 April 2006 02:11 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
bump
From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Critical Mass2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10908

posted 13 April 2006 05:58 PM      Profile for Critical Mass2        Edit/Delete Post
bump

Rebick may have blundered terribly with Audra but someone with her record deserves more consideration than being drowned out.


From: AKA Critical Mass or Critical Mass3 - Undecided in Ottawa/Montreal | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 18 April 2006 07:40 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Critical Mass2:
bump

Rebick may have blundered terribly with Audra but someone with her record deserves more consideration than being drowned out.



From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
virge47
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12389

posted 18 April 2006 09:21 PM      Profile for virge47        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I don't care who it happens to, abuse is abuse.
Men deal with it differently (at least from what I know) then women. And you know what? It doesn't matter!

ABUSE IS ABUSE. And it needs to be stopped and it needs to be prevented and the victims need HELP.

Stop turning this into a political issue, you know why? Because it is only hurting people, plain and simple.


Papal Bull very well said. You took the words right of my mouth.

[ 18 April 2006: Message edited by: virge47 ]


From: U.S. | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
Cannon Fodder
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6839

posted 29 April 2006 06:04 PM      Profile for Cannon Fodder     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I agree, abuse is abuse, and men and women should work together to fight it and to help survivors. But I think male victims do get more attention, or at least are taken more seriously than their female counterparts. Take the Maple Leaf Gardens case: front-page stories lauding the victims for their courage for speaking out, national convulsions of outrage and horror that such a thing could happen, quick investigations, charges laid. No one once accused the victims of exagerating, lying or asking for it. I wish it were that way for all abuse victims.
From: Guelph | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
GT Snowracer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12474

posted 30 April 2006 09:46 PM      Profile for GT Snowracer        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by paxamillion:

I must admit to being relatively poorly informed on this issue. However, isn't this often the case for women as well?


I have to agree. I think that MOST victims in general are reletively poorly informed. Knowledge is power and we can only provide the tools.

Victims either get help in 3 situations.

A) They are encouraged and become informed.
B) Their abuse is reported and help offered
C) They break down years later and finally deside to deal with it.

Getting to the breaking point is saddly how most learn of their abuse. I think abuse awareness should be taught at elementary schools as a class and not as a reason to sit in the Gym for an hour video show.

GT


From: In the echo chamber | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
Expatriate
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7868

posted 07 May 2006 11:46 PM      Profile for Expatriate     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It's amazing just how uninformed people are about Male Survivors of abuse... As a Survivor, I can tell you there is NOT much out there for men who were sexually abused...

When I first started dealing with my abuse, I was sent away from organization after organization because they only helped women Survivors.

It took me years to finally be ready to deal with my abuse, and then it took me years to find a place to find other male Survivors.

I even had to put up with women telling me that if I was abused I MUST be an abuser now that I was an adult.

Yeah, we get all the attention... Sure...


From: California/Toronto | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 25 May 2006 06:07 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
This is a pretty complex issue, which is probably why Auntie's "they get all the attention" comes off as too blunt, and tactless.

It's not entirely true that men's issues get all the attention. It's just easier for men, once they find their voice about a particular issue, to get the attention of people who hold power. And who holds the balance of power in almost every significant sector? Well, men of course. Not the average man, of course. A very small cadre of the power elite. Monied, connected, smug and arrogant.

But I'm not going to supply the condescendingly simplistic "of course male survivors of sexual abuse deserve support and assistance", because that much is obvious. It's more complex than that.

Just as women survivors faced enormous obstacles when they began to tell of their experiences, men do too. The obstacles just come from different places in the patriarchy.

Women who show public strength, who insist on being heard, get shut down, labelled with whatever your favourite sexual slur, epithet, etc., by those in power. Men who discover the courage to speak out about their experiences with abuse come up against a whole other series of societal expectations of what it means to be male, a man, how as a man you're expected to suck it up and move on. It's just another angle on the same power politics.

I, for one, am really really tired of so-called progressive people fighting for a piece of an ever-shrinking social funding pie. By doing so, we play right into the hands of those who would see us forever divided, disunified and dysfunctional. We hand them our power, our ability to make progressive changes and empower the most vulnerable in society.

The only way to address the funding issue is to continue to demand it from government - demand more, a lot more. And in the mean time, fundraise your ass off, create projects that are self-sustaining, that generate revenue that can be put towards the various forms of support required.

And help each other when help is asked for and needed.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca