Author
|
Topic: Male survivors of abuse look for feminist allies
|
|
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050
|
posted 20 March 2006 07:31 PM
quote: It is also that men dealing with sexual abuse and violence get more attention than women.
Auntie, I can't help but disagree with this statement. Most men who face sexual abuse will keep it hidden and let it eat them up inside. Most men's experiences will go unnoticed. I agree that as more women are abused then men they should get a greater amount of funding to meet their needs, but you know...Just because you're given a gender at birth doesn't mean you have to live your life serving that gender exclusively as this article alludes to. People can and should help each other without any thought exclusivity. An inclusiveness of women for helping men and men for helping women idea would get far more accomplished than sectoring it and then having joint strike forces going out to fund-raise occasionally. Mind you, this is a very touchy topic for many people.
From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474
|
posted 24 March 2006 08:53 PM
In general, abuse gets applied according to relative power, the greater applying it to the lesser. Kids can find themselves facing deflected anguish from both their papas and their mamas. But where do they put it? That's what I always wanted to know, because I couldn't see how I could contain it. So from experience, I'm willing to bet that for all the abused kids who grow up to abuse others, there's an equal number who don't deflect, but let it infect. And where do you find those statistics? Well, to get an accurate picture of the whole scheme, I'd take a chunk of the stats on depression, drug/alcohol abuse, all the various self-destructive pastimes, and add it to the numbers that already measure the more overt victims. No wonder we're always off to war, etc.
From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Grape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12275
|
posted 24 March 2006 08:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by Makwa: Oh for gosh sakes, do some math and look at the stats. It's not that far from the truth.
That depends on which stats you look at - the 1999 General Social Survey found that 7% of men and 8% of women reported experiencing violence from a spousal partner (common law or marrited) in the preceding 5 years. The stats vary depending on the means employed in their gathering and the areas of domestic violence examined - data taken from police records and clinical samples (IE samples consisting entirely of abused women) show one thing, while studies conducted on random representative samples show entirely another. It differs depending on the type of abuse as well - sexual is generally male-perpetrated, child abuse/maltreatment is generally female-perpetrated, spousal murder is male-dominated, etc. Where physical assault and verbal abuse are concerned (in intimate relationships - married, dating, etc) gender parity seems the norm. If you're interested in reading the research, I accumulated a bunch of studies on the topic for a paper a while back. I have some of these in PDF if you're interested: Foo, L. and Margolin, G. 1995. “A Multivariate Investigation of Dating Aggression”. Journal of Family Violence. 10. Grandin, E. et al. 1997. “Couple Violence and Psychological Distress”. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 88. Greene, Kelly and Marion Bogo. 2002. “The Different Faces of Intimate Violence: Implications for Assessment and Treatment”. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 28. Hamby, Sherry L. and David B. Sugarman. 1999. “Acts of Psychological Aggression Against a Partner and their Relation to Physical Assault and Gender”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 61. McNeely, R. L. and Gloria Robinson-Simpson. 1988. “The Truth about Domestic Violence Revisited: A Reply to Saunders”. Social Work. 33. Murty, Susan A et al. 2003. “Physical and Emotional Partner Abuse Reported by Men and Women in a Rural Community”. American Journal of Public Health. 93. Schafer, John et al. 1998. “Rates of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States”. American Journal of Public Health. 88. Sommer, Reena. 1994. “Male and Female Perpetrated Partner Abuse: Testing a Diathesis-Stress Model”. University of Manitoba PhD dissertation (unpublished)[I don't have this one in PDF unfortunately] Straus, Murray A and Stephen Sweet. 1992. “Verbal/Symbolic Aggression in Couples: Incidence Rates and Relationships to Personal Characteristics”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 54. quote: Sure a handful of women abuse men, but it's far from the norm.
Read the studies - it's not just a handful. There's a good book I read a while back called "Biopolitics Rising" by John Fekete that discusses the issue (as well as many others). You should give it a read if you're interested. [ 24 March 2006: Message edited by: Grape ]
From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050
|
posted 25 March 2006 12:24 AM
I don't care who it happens to, abuse is abuse.Men deal with it differently (at least from what I know) then women. And you know what? It doesn't matter! ABUSE IS ABUSE. And it needs to be stopped and it needs to be prevented and the victims need HELP. Stop turning this into a political issue, you know why? Because it is only hurting people, plain and simple.
From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724
|
posted 03 April 2006 01:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by Haruo Nakagawa: The scars their victims suffer are just as traumatic, but cannot be verified, because their abusers were too smart to "hit" or "sexually abuse" them. Those who are emotionally or psychologically abused get left out in the cold, YET again.
This is what I mean. Yes, perhaps many men in relationships feel emotionally or psychologically abused. However, they were never beaten or bruised. Shall we then equate them, and demand equal assistance, i.e. housing, support etc? Perhaps, and perhaps this process, as so many processes appear to, attempts to universalize the kinds of historical brutality which concerned advocates work within because it is life saving. Yes, some white folk feel upset by Black Nationalist rhetoric, but should we organize solidarity with black folk who have been harassed by neo-Klansfolk? I think not. This, to me, is merely another method by which the reasonable needs of wymmen who support those who flee life threatening situations are regularly undermined.
From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 03 April 2006 01:22 PM
CN, I don't think that that was Makwa's point, actually, and it wouldn't be mine.I think that Makwa was focused on the stats concerning the physical abuse of women by male partners. I don't happen to have those to hand, but I must say that the figures Grape is giving us above look curious to me. This is becoming a very disturbing discussion.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024
|
posted 03 April 2006 01:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by skdadl: CN, I don't think that that was Makwa's point, actually, and it wouldn't be mine.I think that Makwa was focused on the stats concerning the physical abuse of women by male partners.
If so, I retract my earlier statement.
From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 03 April 2006 02:03 PM
Ok. How do we deal with this?I know the problem best as a problem of adult women, which is in no way to deny that other groups of people experience abuse - clearly, they do. Above all, children do, children of both sexes. I also know, though, that traumatized people are usually a very long way short of being able to think generously or in politically neutral terms about anybody else's problems, and it seems to me obviously cruel to expect them to do so. Maybe everyone who is, at the moment, feeling well and strong can think of forming anti-abuse alliances, but I cannot believe that any such campaigns will do genuine good if they attempt to efface the particularity of the oppression suffered by any distinct group.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Grape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12275
|
posted 07 April 2006 03:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by Makwa: This is what I mean. Yes, perhaps many men in relationships feel emotionally or psychologically abused. However, they were never beaten or bruised. Shall we then equate them, and demand equal assistance, i.e. housing, support etc?
They should certainly be offered support in the form of professional counselling or support groups as any other victims of abuse should. The question, as I see it, isn't whether abused men and abused women should be treated equally - I doubt anyone would assert that gender should play a role in deciding the "value" of one's experience of abuse. The major issue you seem to be raising is how types of abuse are dealt with - should psychologically abused people be treated/given the same resources as physically abused people? It's a good question. I believe physically abused people should have housing alternatives available because their physical well-being could depend upon it. That being said, those that are psychologically abused may also be at risk physically if the abuse escalates. It's a tough problem to address, I think.
From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Critical Mass2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10908
|
posted 13 April 2006 05:58 PM
bumpRebick may have blundered terribly with Audra but someone with her record deserves more consideration than being drowned out.
From: AKA Critical Mass or Critical Mass3 - Undecided in Ottawa/Montreal | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
virge47
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12389
|
posted 18 April 2006 09:21 PM
quote: I don't care who it happens to, abuse is abuse. Men deal with it differently (at least from what I know) then women. And you know what? It doesn't matter!ABUSE IS ABUSE. And it needs to be stopped and it needs to be prevented and the victims need HELP. Stop turning this into a political issue, you know why? Because it is only hurting people, plain and simple.
Papal Bull very well said. You took the words right of my mouth. [ 18 April 2006: Message edited by: virge47 ]
From: U.S. | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
GT Snowracer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12474
|
posted 30 April 2006 09:46 PM
quote: Originally posted by paxamillion:
I must admit to being relatively poorly informed on this issue. However, isn't this often the case for women as well?
I have to agree. I think that MOST victims in general are reletively poorly informed. Knowledge is power and we can only provide the tools. Victims either get help in 3 situations. A) They are encouraged and become informed. B) Their abuse is reported and help offered C) They break down years later and finally deside to deal with it. Getting to the breaking point is saddly how most learn of their abuse. I think abuse awareness should be taught at elementary schools as a class and not as a reason to sit in the Gym for an hour video show. GT
From: In the echo chamber | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Expatriate
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7868
|
posted 07 May 2006 11:46 PM
It's amazing just how uninformed people are about Male Survivors of abuse... As a Survivor, I can tell you there is NOT much out there for men who were sexually abused...When I first started dealing with my abuse, I was sent away from organization after organization because they only helped women Survivors. It took me years to finally be ready to deal with my abuse, and then it took me years to find a place to find other male Survivors. I even had to put up with women telling me that if I was abused I MUST be an abuser now that I was an adult. Yeah, we get all the attention... Sure...
From: California/Toronto | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873
|
posted 25 May 2006 06:07 PM
This is a pretty complex issue, which is probably why Auntie's "they get all the attention" comes off as too blunt, and tactless.It's not entirely true that men's issues get all the attention. It's just easier for men, once they find their voice about a particular issue, to get the attention of people who hold power. And who holds the balance of power in almost every significant sector? Well, men of course. Not the average man, of course. A very small cadre of the power elite. Monied, connected, smug and arrogant. But I'm not going to supply the condescendingly simplistic "of course male survivors of sexual abuse deserve support and assistance", because that much is obvious. It's more complex than that. Just as women survivors faced enormous obstacles when they began to tell of their experiences, men do too. The obstacles just come from different places in the patriarchy. Women who show public strength, who insist on being heard, get shut down, labelled with whatever your favourite sexual slur, epithet, etc., by those in power. Men who discover the courage to speak out about their experiences with abuse come up against a whole other series of societal expectations of what it means to be male, a man, how as a man you're expected to suck it up and move on. It's just another angle on the same power politics. I, for one, am really really tired of so-called progressive people fighting for a piece of an ever-shrinking social funding pie. By doing so, we play right into the hands of those who would see us forever divided, disunified and dysfunctional. We hand them our power, our ability to make progressive changes and empower the most vulnerable in society. The only way to address the funding issue is to continue to demand it from government - demand more, a lot more. And in the mean time, fundraise your ass off, create projects that are self-sustaining, that generate revenue that can be put towards the various forms of support required. And help each other when help is asked for and needed.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|