babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Taiwan Opp. Leader Lien Chan to visit China

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Taiwan Opp. Leader Lien Chan to visit China
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 25 April 2005 12:06 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
TAIPEI, Taiwan - The leader of Taiwan's biggest opposition party would have once been jailed or executed for what he plans to do Tuesday: fly to rival China for a weeklong tour that's supposed to climax in a handshake with the Chinese president.

Lien Chan's trip will be the first time in 56 years that the leader of his once staunchly anti-Communist Nationalist Party sets foot in China — just 100 miles west of this leaf-shaped island.

His tour will mark one of the biggest political ironies in the past decade of dizzying change in Taiwan, one of Asia's youngest and most dynamic democracies. The trip might also calm tensions across the Taiwan Strait, where a war could quickly involve U.S. forces.


Yahoo News

[ 25 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 25 April 2005 02:39 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So Lien Chan is going to teach Mainland Chinese about spousal abuse and tax evasion?

From what I hear, it's all he's good at.

I heard he's even taught some of his "tricks" to C"C"P insiders and Hong Kong tycoons.

[ 25 April 2005: Message edited by: NDP Newbie ]


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 25 April 2005 07:42 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Don't you think maybe Taiwan should be reunited with the rest of China?
From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 25 April 2005 11:19 PM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I believe there's a good chance to destabilize the current Taiwan regime. In 2004 the current president, Chen Shui-bian, was trailing badly in his re-election bid when he was shot twice. The hospital released photos, a glancing wound on the abdomen and an entrance wound on his leg. Chen made a remarkable turnround in the polls, jumping 30 points, and narrowly claiming victory.

Chen will not now show the wounds. Think about that..would Winnie refuse to showcase his cigars? Would Fidel? Those wounds should be on TV more often than Madonna's tits. The last time I saw Chen was in Palau, on the beach. He was the guy in full scuba suit, tank and mask.

Obviously, I could be proved wrong easily enough, but if I'm right..


From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 25 April 2005 11:56 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd trust Stephen Harper before I trusted anything that the Kuomintang says.

Remember...The Kuomintang and its allies are the far-right parties in Taiwan, while the pro-Taiwan parties are centre-left parties whose leaders have fought for democracy and freedom against the totalitarian, right-wing, and pro-USA Kuomintang throughout the 70s and 80s.

The Trojan Horse wing of the Kuomintang (progressive Taiwanese nationalists who towed the party line until the Chiang family all started rotting away in Hell) have now formed the radical anti-China and anti-US Taiwan Solidarity Party. (The DPP, in contrast, is too soft on China and too trusting of the Bush administration, but still superiour to the pan-blue parties.)


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Panama Jack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6478

posted 26 April 2005 08:37 AM      Profile for Panama Jack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Academics are denoucing Lien's trip -- warning him of the good chance that he'll be charged for treason for his actions. That probably won't happen but China is clearly trying (and succeedng) to divide and conquer the Taiwanese- R.O.C. people by treating Lien as a de-facto head of state.

Has for the destabilizing effect ... we will certainly see in a month with the next round of elections in the Legislative Yuan. The KMT has been looking to retake control of the legislature, but many are worried that Lien's trip might derail this (so in a way Newbie you might be thanking Lien for his treasonous activities ! )


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 26 April 2005 10:47 AM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Panama Jack:
Academics are denoucing Lien's trip -- warning him of the good chance that he'll be charged for treason for his actions. That probably won't happen but China is clearly trying (and succeedng) to divide and conquer the Taiwanese- R.O.C. people by treating Lien as a de-facto head of state.

Has for the destabilizing effect ... we will certainly see in a month with the next round of elections in the Legislative Yuan. The KMT has been looking to retake control of the legislature, but many are worried that Lien's trip might derail this (so in a way Newbie you might be thanking Lien for his treasonous activities ! )


Huh? The pan-Blue parties won the Legislative Yuan elections in December.

Why the Mainlanders who allowed this situation to happen are allowed to vote given the terrible things they've done to both Han and non-Han Taiwanese is beyond me.

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: NDP Newbie ]


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659

posted 26 April 2005 03:07 PM      Profile for swallow     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by robbie_dee:
Don't you think maybe Taiwan should be reunited with the rest of China?

Why? Should Austria be reunited with Germany?


From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 26 April 2005 05:18 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Taiwan is a province of China. The KMT would not have been able to occupy and hold it after the civil war if not for significant U.S. intervention. It served U.S. interests to have such a major military installation just 160 km off the coast of the second-largest Communist country in the world. And it also served U.S. interests to prop up the brutal KMT dictatorship that ran the place for them. Yes that's the same party that Lien Chan belongs to today, and yes this turn towards reconciliation with China mostly represents following a change in the strategic interests of the KMT's benefactors.

Still, I do think Taiwan ultimately is, was and always will be a part of China and it would be nice if they could work out an amicable resolution.

You ask:

quote:
Why? Should Austria be reunited with Germany?

A better question maybe would have been should East Germany have been reunited with West Germany?


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659

posted 26 April 2005 06:04 PM      Profile for swallow     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Taiwan as an independent state was created by US strategy, yes. (Although bear in mind Taiwan was not part of China before 1945 either: it was a Japanese colony with a separate historical development.) But, does that mean the wishes of the people in Taiwan are now immaterial? Eritrea was a province of Ethiopia too, but its people did not thereby lose their right to self-determination.

A wrong was committed in 1945-9 in Taiwan: the bloody KMT takeover and the transformation of Taiwan into a US "unsinkable aircraft carrier." But don't the generations of people who have grown up in a de facto independent country, and freed themselves from the KMT dictatorship, have some say in what happens to their lives now?


From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 26 April 2005 06:33 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The right to self determination does not mean a right to declare unilateral independence at any time for any reason.

China has not been the one who was oppressing the Taiwanese people over the last 50 years. That was clearly the U.S. and its puppets.

I think it would be highly preferable for Taiwanese representatives to negotiate some form of autonomy within a unified China. Most of the world supports this position. I expect that there is also a fair amount of support for that position among the Taiwanese people, otherwise the Pan-Blue alliance wouldn't enjoy anywhere near the support it does. I am not much enamored with Pan-Blue because of their ties to the past corrupt and repressive regime. But that doesn't mean I can't recognize the inherent justice in restoring the territorial integrity of sovereign China.

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 26 April 2005 06:43 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Why the Mainlanders who allowed this situation to happen are allowed to vote given the terrible things they've done to both Han and non-Han Taiwanese is beyond me.

I guess you'll support the disenfranchisement of anglophone Quebeckers in the next provincial election, too?


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 26 April 2005 06:47 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
robbie_dee, for the first time ever I think we disagree. Whatever the past, Taiwan is miles ahead of China in terms of democratic rights; it has also ruled itself for decades (with the exception of American interference, but I mean really: Hi there NAFTA). Also, I think mainland China has as much of a vote as the ROC does in a Quebec referendum: zip.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 26 April 2005 06:59 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, frankly I have big problems with the lack of democracy in mainland China, too. But I am concerned that some well-meaning Westerners (and Taiwanese) who oppose reunification out of concern for human rights and democracy, may find themselves the unwitting dupes of powerful USian interests who don't want to see a reunited China for other, different reasons.

USian Capital wants to suck up to China because its a huge market for them. But they also recognize China is a major if not the major geopolitical rival to the United States as a nation. It helps them if China is strong enough to buy their stuff. But not too strong. Labour costs have to be low enough so they can make their stuff there, cheaply. The ongoing situation with Taiwan also helps divert Chinese military and strategic attention towards the Taiwan Strait and away from, say, the Middle East and the world's largest remaining oil reserves.

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 26 April 2005 07:12 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The situation with Quebec is also an interesting analogy because while I support Quebecois people's right to self-determination in general terms, I do have practical concerns about the sovereigntist movement's almost total blindness (or even enthrallment) to the power of USian capital. Last year Gilles Duceppe was calling for a North American common currency, FFS!

Canada lacks the geopolitical power of China and we are much closer to the US in a lot of other ways, too. But we have been known to get uppity. It may serve US interests to keep Canadians little bit distracted by our internal divisions as long as the oil keeps flowing south.

In any case, what most Quebec sovereigntists claim to want is some form of "sovereignty-association" rather than outright independence. This is pretty much what is on offer from China to Taiwan, too, isn't it? "One Country, Two Systems?" At the very least, its akin to asymmetrical federalism, something else which is unfortunately not in the cards for Canada currently.

Of course, we've seen in the case of Hong Kong that notwithstanding its prior obligations, the Chinese government has begun to get more than a little heavy-handed in HK local politics. That's an unfortunate consequence of the continuing lack of democracy in mainland China. A fully democratic Hong Kong would be too much of a threat to them. But China itself is changing, very slowly mind you, and I think Hong Kong helps change China.

In any case, Taiwan is in a much better negotiating position than Hong Kong was because Taiwan is already democratic. The British who ran Hong Kong only implemented local democratic measures after they'd already agreed to give the place back, and were actually in the process of handing it over. I think the British were more motivated by the desire to destabilize China by chucking them a live hand grenade, than they were motivated to deliver liberty and justice to the HK people.

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 26 April 2005 10:57 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by robbie_dee:

China has not been the one who was oppressing the Taiwanese people over the last 50 years. That was clearly the U.S. and its puppets.
[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


Many of these same Chiang-era American puppets are the same shitstains playing kissy-face with the C"C"P.

Ahhh...

Who cares?

They're all idiots except for Leung Kwok-hung.


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Panama Jack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6478

posted 27 April 2005 08:50 AM      Profile for Panama Jack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by NDP Newbie:

Huh? The pan-Blue parties won the Legislative Yuan elections in December.


Their is an election for the "National Assembly", a mostly (but still important) obselete institution on May 14th. I think the pan-Green's still control that house.

What Elections in May ?


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Panama Jack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6478

posted 27 April 2005 08:57 AM      Profile for Panama Jack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Robbie ---

Why shouldn't Taiwanese be just as scared of authoritarian "Chinese capital" as opposed to "USian" and (I'd guess you'd lump them up together) "Japanese" captial ?

The fact of the matter is MOST Taiwanese would love for the status quo to be preserved [aka, de facto political independance with Mainland China despite growing economic interdependance].

Both major Taiwanese parties (DPP, KMT) have stipulated that China be an open, democratic society before the "rebel province" would consider reuniting...

I tend to agree with NDP Newbie's assessment on how trustworthy the olde school KMT goons are (too bad their affiailated with one of the most corrupt political organizations EVER).

[ 27 April 2005: Message edited by: Panama Jack ]


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 28 April 2005 05:53 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Why shouldn't Taiwanese be just as scared of authoritarian "Chinese capital" as opposed to "USian" and (I'd guess you'd lump them up together) "Japanese" captial ?

Well, I wouldn't totally lump anyone together. My analysis depends on recognizing distinctions between different national capitalist classes: USian, Japanese, Chinese and even local Taiwanese. In the end, they are all still capitalists and ultimately they have a common agenda in opposition to workers interests. But in the short run, they do compete and I think workers around the world (and particularly in the developing world) benefit from the existence of national-capitalist counterweights to USian hegemony. I think a stronger China, along with the EU, may together offer the best prospects for this.

Plus, my reading of the history convinces me that China does have a legitimate claim to sovereignty over Taiwan, certainly moreso than Japan or the United States, which either directly or through their puppets have occupied it over the years.

quote:
Both major Taiwanese parties (DPP, KMT) have stipulated that China be an open, democratic society before the "rebel province" would consider reuniting...

This would also be my ideal preference. I agree that I wouldn't trust the KMT much, but I don't trust anybody. I still think reunification is ultimately a good idea. The point of my original comment was also to goad NDP Newbie a bit.


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 29 April 2005 11:52 AM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Taiwan KMT, Chinese Communist Party formally end hostilities.

quote:
BEIJING (Reuters) - Taiwan opposition leader Lien Chan and Chinese President Hu Jintao closed the book on decades of hostility on Friday with a simple handshake in Beijing's Great Hall of the People.

The civil war enemies agreed in a two-hour meeting that they described as frank and friendly to work to end enmity between the Kuomintang (KMT), or Nationalist Party, and the Chinese Communist Party and avoid military conflict in the Taiwan Strait, one of Asia's most dangerous flashpoints.

"The two parties will work together to facilitate the resumption of negotiations as soon as possible ... and facilitate the ending of a hostile state to achieve a basis for peace," Lien's spokesman told a news conference.

But that will depend also on Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), whose independence stance has heightened tension with a mainland China, which views Taiwan as its own and is bent on bringing the self-governed island back under its rule.



From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 29 April 2005 02:53 PM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The right to self determination does not mean a right to declare unilateral independence at any time for any reason.

And do you agree with this Robert? Why should it not?


From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 29 April 2005 03:04 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
And do you agree with this Robert? Why should it not?

Because such an unbounded right would be practically impossible to recognize and enforce.


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Panama Jack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6478

posted 30 April 2005 03:20 AM      Profile for Panama Jack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by robbie_dee:
[QB]
I still think reunification is ultimately a good idea. [QB]

Even if it goes against the wishes of the Taiwanese people ?


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 30 April 2005 11:38 AM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Even if it goes against the wishes of the Taiwanese people ?

Have they voted on the subject?


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659

posted 30 April 2005 04:51 PM      Profile for swallow     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
C'mon Robbie, you're not seriously suggesting the majority of Taiwanese people want to be ruled by the current government of China, are you? Canadians haven't voted to be separate from the US explictly either, but we don't need referenda to tell us that most Canadians want to be independent.
From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
The Other Todd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7964

posted 30 April 2005 05:25 PM      Profile for The Other Todd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by robbie_dee:
Well, I wouldn't totally lump anyone together. My analysis depends on recognizing distinctions between different national capitalist classes: USian, Japanese, Chinese and even local Taiwanese. In the end, they are all still capitalists and ultimately they have a common agenda in opposition to workers interests.

Just off-hand, do you know what the capital situation is in Taiwan? How much Taiwanese capital there is looking for a cheap place to go? If there's a lot of home-grown capital there, the best investment for it would be in China, for pretty much the same reasons why capital from other countries is going there, with the added bonus that it's being invested close by (and, on China's part, Taiwan could represent an excellent "bread basket" from which to draw capital for its own use, as well as taxes); wonder how much of _that_ is pushing the reconciliation process . . . .


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 01 May 2005 03:13 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Todd, I don't know off-hand, but I would suspect their is some truth to your speculation.

Swallow - I can't say I know clearly what the "majority of Taiwanese people want" because (1) I am not Taiwanese, (2) I haven't conducted any polling or other study of Taiwanese public opinion, (3) I am not sure that the majority of Taiwanese people are sure what they want, either.

I certainly haven't suggested that Taiwan just "go back" to China without qualification, but I have suggested that a negotiated resolution of the dispute would be better than a unilateral declaration of independence. I suspect, although I have no means of being certain, that quite a lot of Taiwanese and mainland Chinese people feel that way, too.

China's current government is somewhat in a state of flux, anyway. I am going to start a new thread about some interesting political developments I have been reading about.


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
sgm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5468

posted 01 May 2005 07:20 PM      Profile for sgm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
FWIW, two opinion polls mentioned in the story linked to below suggest more people in Taiwan favoured the visits to the mainland than opposed them.

quote:

Opinion polls released by Taiwan's two leading newspapers on Saturday showed many Taiwanese viewed Lien's trip as conducive to peace.

The United Daily News poll said 56 per cent of respondents believed the trip will help improve ties, while 27 per cent said it will not. The remaining had no opinion.

Another poll by the China Times said 50 per cent of the respondents held positive views about Lien's trip and 15.7 per cent were negative. The remaining either had no opinion or did not believe it had any impact.

The polls, both conducted by telephone on Friday, had margins of error of 3.3 and 3.6 per cent points respectively.


Globe link.

I've been following Taiwan a bit recently because it's tied up with Bush's missile defence plans: for some time, the US has backed a major military sale to Taiwan of submarines, patrol planes and 6 PAC-3 Patriot missile defence batteries. The total cost is estimated at about US $15 billion.

Chen Shui-ban's party supports the sale, but has faced opposition from other parties, including the KMT, who are interested in trimming the costs, according to this story..

There's an interesting interview here with a former USAF Lt. Colonel on the necessity of the arms buy.


From: I have welcomed the dawn from the fields of Saskatchewan | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 02 May 2005 04:36 AM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I still think it's all a show, and that the U.S. has been pro-China since the Sino-Soviet Split (Interesting that Taiwan began to politically liberalise under the laters years of Fuhrer Chiang II, or at about the same time that the denouement occurred. When you're not anti-Beijing, you don't need to maintain a totalitarian anti-Beijing regime.)

The U.S. is only selling weapons to Taiwan as a token gesture to the religious right (The one positive side of China's intolerance for religious freedom is the inability of American fascist groups like FotF to operate ion the Mainland), to economic nationalists of both the right (Pat Buchanan) and left (Bernie Sanders), and to left-leaning civil libertarians (Nancy Pelosi), all of whom despise China.


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 03 May 2005 06:37 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Taiwan may get something out of this. Pandas.
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca