babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Shopping for clothes

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Shopping for clothes
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 05 May 2002 10:03 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A silly topic, I admit. After writing and translating about massacres, the rise of Le Pen and global conflict, I need a frivolity break...

I'm a 40-some woman, too plump for "junior" type clothes and too small for "plus" sizes... Think there must be a lot of people in that category, but even if you are slender, larger, older or younger I'd be interested in your feedback. I find there is very little out there that isn't either too matronly (polyester anything, sweaters with screen prints...) too, too young (the "mutton dressed as lamb" thing, and though I'm in good shape from exercise I don't have the elegant build to get away with that)...

And of course, there is the matter of money.

I do sometimes shop at church bazaars and garage sales but it takes a long time to find anything nice.

Do you like to shop, or is it just something you do when your clothes get threadbare?


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 May 2002 10:24 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I loved to shop for clothes when I lost a lot of weight one time (actually, I still do, really, although the pleasure isn't there so much now that I'm firmly in the large size range and they make so many things boxy and ugly at this size), but I know exactly the point you're talking about.

It's when you're about a size 14-16 or so. The smaller sized stores stop at a 13, or if you're lucky, a 15. The large size stores start at a 14-16. But the large size stores' idea of a 14 and the small size stores' idea of 14 are vastly different, and it sucks when you're in between those two sizes. That's where I was when I lost weight.

But since you're not thinking about teeny-bopper clothes anyhow, and you want more "grown up" but not look like you're ancient, there are a couple of places that I liked when I was 24 and in the same size area as you. Unfortunately this means I have to be a corporate whore for a moment, but oh well.

First, I found that Northern stores were pretty good, because they generally go to a size 18, or if you're really, really lucky, a 20. Now, of course, their idea of a 16 or 18 sure isn't the same idea of a 16-18 that Addition Elle has in mind. But still, I find that smaller-size stores that go up to 18 or 20 are good because it gets you over that size 13-16 breaking point between big and small clothing stores. Northern Experience (I think that's the one where they have career wear) is a nice place for women who want casual to work type wear, the clothes are not old-ladyish, they are tailored, you're not paying Jones New York prices, and they aren't teen-faddy and sure to be out of style next week.

Another place that I found good for getting half decent clothes of all types - career, casual, etc. - without spending a small fortune, is Sears. They have pretty dresses (if you like dresses) that are suitable for an office job in the $50-75 range last I checked, which is pretty good for a half-decent dress. They also, of course, have casuals, separates, you name it. And I think their smaller sizes stop at about 16 or sometimes, if you're lucky, even an 18, so it gets you over that 14-16 hump. Maybe. Problem is, if you're around that size 16-18 hump, then sometimes you're stuck in between their large size lines and their small size lines. And the doubly nasty problem with that is, some of their small size styles from their really nice brands don't continue into the larger sizes brands. There's nothing I hated more than to go and see a gorgeous pair of pants in a size 15, have the line end there, and then when I search for something similar in the large size line, to find that the size 16 and up pants are all elasticized on the wastebands, made of ickier material, made boxy and untailored, etc. But I think Sears is doing a lot better in that respect these days, because they're trying to attract the crowd who wants to see "the softer side of Sears".

Anyhow, that's my 2 cents worth.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 04:59 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like to shop when I travel -- especially when we visit my SIL in Montreal. And when I have some money to spend, of course.

I'm kind of in a size/shape flux right now, having had my second baby a little over a year ago. I'm still chunkier around the middle than I used to be, so what used to be flattering is not always so good now, and what cuts used to fit well are just so-so in a lot of cases.

This isn't helped by the fact that I've always had kind of an atypical build, so it's hard to shop inexpensively. I can't shop at Sears, all the sleeves and inseams are about 1.5 to 2 inches too short. Many women's jeans are cut too high in the waist (band sits on my ribs) and too wide at the lower hip. What often fits in the shoulder gapes at the underarm...

My main place for shopping is at Winners... You can get good quality at a relatively low price. It's kind of hit and miss, though, like any discount store. But I've gotten some really great deals, too.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
meades
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 625

posted 05 May 2002 06:33 PM      Profile for meades     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
heehee, I went shopping yesterday I do it when I have money, and someone to shop with.

Frankly, I find all the women's sizes to be quite confusing. Why not just go with measurements, or something similar?


From: Sault Ste. Marie | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 06:44 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Funny you should ask that, meades...

In some places, measurements are used as sizing. But in North America, we've had numbered sizes.

Now, as a young gal, we only got size 5 and up. Being very tiny, women's clothes were too big and girls' clothes were too short and too wide. I was delighted to find size 3 clothes in the States when our family went there on vacation.

So anyway, as I grew, I started wearing size 5/6... This has steadily gone down, but my actual measurements remained the same. Since my late teens, my clothing size has gone as low as a 1/2, with no appreciable change in weight or measurement. In my mother's day, she had about the same measurements as me, and wore a size 8 dress. I have a couple of her vintage outfits, and they were the same kind of fit as my size 2s.

Now, currently, I'm about 2-3" bigger around in all parts of my body than when I started wearing size 5/6, but what fits me is 3/4... (Note here that I am in no way bitching about gaining weight or complaining about clothing size. And please don't hate me for being small -- it wasn't by design!)

They've been steadily lowering dress/clothing sizes for women because as the boomers age, they want to be able to wear the same "number"... It's actually been proven that women feel better and are more likely to buy something that is a smaller size number, even if the cut is the same size. It's all a marketing ploy.

There you have it. The mystery of women's sizing debunked!

[ May 05, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 May 2002 07:03 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The woman who wrote "No Fat Chicks" (can't remember her name, darn) speculates that women's dress sizes being arbitrary small numbers similar to the age numbering of infant and children's clothes is another aspect of the infantilization of women in our society.

Just to be really obnoxious and pedantic.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 07:10 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
to you, too!

I hate the sizing on kids clothes. Neither of my girls is especially large, but they're always in clothes at least 6 mos out on the age range -- like, for instance, Ms T is wearin 24 mos sizes at 15 mos, but only weighs 22lbs... Too wonky!


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 May 2002 07:19 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, I hear you. I had a 10 lb baby, and he fit into newborn size for a day or two. Then he was in 3 month size for about 2 weeks after that.

He was huge, both weight and height, growing up, and by the time he was 1 year old he was wearing 3 year size clothing.

However, by about a year and a half to two years old, he was quite chubby too (that wore off quickly, once he got to that toddler-living-on-air-and-love-because-he-sure-ain't-eating-any-food stage, and luckily he now has his father's body, not mine) so we would have to buy clothes that were too long, but were fine around. The good news is that at least he had clothes that fit for a long, long time, because his waist size never changed - he just grew longer.

But the sizing pretty much meant nothing when it came to my kid.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 07:24 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mine were both in the neighborhood of 8 lbs, but they weren't especially large... Long, mostly. So we often have trouble with wide waists and short sleeves and pant legs... I tend to go for overalls, otherwise their pants are always hanging down...

Seriously, though, child or adult, if you aren't in a slim minority of body type, finding clothes that fit and look good can be a real pain.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 05 May 2002 08:41 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dear size 3, I don't hate you for being a size 3 - I do confess I'm a bit jealous though...

In answer to the mind gone blank, Canadian journalist Terry Poulton wrote "No Fat Chicks".

I do shop at Winners, but it is as you say, hit and miss, often there are only very small regular sizes and size 3x in plus sizes ... I find Winners is an excellent place to get gym wear such as leggings. Fortunately there are two I can bicycle to from my house.

In response to the first reply, there are nice clothes, even quite large, at Kaliyana (?) in Montreal and Ottawa. They have unusual clothes, kind of arty, and very pretty. The Montreal store is on St-Denis and the Ottawa store is on Sussex Drive by the Market. However, they aren't cheap.

I used to like Cotton Ginny, which fit everyone, but the quality is slipping. They have no stores any more in Quebec, which annoys me, I do shop there when I go to Ottawa.

Northern Reflections has nice clothes - I have never had any problem fitting into them - but I do find them old-ladyish and dowdy at times, with screen prints and too many loons.

I love dresses. I'm a curvy Mediterranean type, I look much better in dresses than trousers. But not corporate-type dresses, I don't have to dress that way often, except for very corporate interpreting gigs.

By the way, I believe Northern Reflections clothes used to be made in Canada, but most are made in the Orient now. Idem Cotton Ginny. Kaliyana too but they claim to be fair trade ... Sweatshops vs "clean clothes" is a whole other topic!


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 08:50 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You and I can then be jealous of each other, Lagatta -- I envy your choices of shopping in Montreal, and would dearly love to be shopping on St Denis.... I bought one of my favourite dresses of all time there. Not that I could afford it just now, but still...
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
LotusGrrrl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1555

posted 05 May 2002 10:19 PM      Profile for LotusGrrrl        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I love to shop. And when I find something I like, I usually buy two or three of them in different colours.
I find pants the worst to buy. Either a person has to be tall and thin or short and huge. Women's pants have to be the worst thing to shop for. Silly thing is, they should make pants for women like they do for men and actually have the waist size in inches and have the length variable so they can be hemmed.
My favourite stores? I guess it would depend on whether it's casual or dressy clothes. I usually like shopping at Winners, Cotton Ginny, or Mountain Equipment Co op.

From: vancouver | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 May 2002 11:22 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm jealous of you, too, LotusGrrrl -- you can go shopping in Kitsilano... I love shopping in Kitsilano.

Maybe this summer....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 11:00 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
After my second child my body is not only heavier than it was, it is proportionately very different. Shopping, never my favourite thing, is a real challenge. And I hate spending the money.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 06 May 2002 11:50 AM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find shopping a challenge....between sizing woes (I'm one of those in between 14ish sizes, too) and wanting to avoid sweatshop wear (I stay away from Northern stores like the plague) while still looking cool is oh so frustrating!

I do frequent Winners when I can, and have bought some great stuff there. For work stuff, I wait until Talbot's has its semi-annual sale.... Eddie Bauer has also been good to me over the years, as has La Cache....am in a clothing slump now, though.


From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 03:03 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never heard of La Cache... Is it a chain?

Of course, even if it's quite a big chain, we don't have one here.

I used to buy some business clothes at Fairweather, but I haven't needed conservative-looking biz wear for a while. Our industry tends to go up-casual, slightly funky.

I am, however, intensely grateful for low-rise and boys' cut jeans....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
shelby9
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2193

posted 06 May 2002 03:07 PM      Profile for shelby9     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OOO, clothes shopping, one of my favorite topics!

I find this a diffucult task, as most clothes today are designed for women with small chests. I do NOT fall into this category. I am also short, and fall into the 16-18 size range. So as you can see, my shopping trips might take a while.

However, I have found that a combination of stores works best. I like Sears, but find that the clothes in the catalogue are more to my liking than that of the stores. Cotton Ginny has become one of my favorite haunts. I love the idea that in "thier" pants - I wear a size 14. Plus they have petite sizes which eliminate me cutting miles of fabric off the bottoms of pants. Reitmans has gotten better with not so old lady looks.

But, silly as this might sound, Zellers has gotten very good at having women's clothing that doesn't look like it was cut from tent material. They are actually beginning to be close to stylish!


From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 03:39 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Clothes shopping. One of the few reasons I love being male. I just go to www.sears.ca, find my size, and place an order. The clothes always fit.

OTOH, if I go to a "stylish" men's store I have to be more careful. I'm a medium at Sears. I'm a small at funky, stylish stores.


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 06 May 2002 03:53 PM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
La Cache is a chain. they have beautiful floral dresses....sadly, don't wear that kind of thing anymore, but when I did, I loved the place (not cheap, though, but a dress or two a year was doable). Their stuff tends to be long, though, and it makes me feel dumpy now (short woman, large chest, long skirt - bad combination).

Chest size is definitely an issue for me. They (whoever 'they' are) are really are making things smaller than they used to, it seems. Such a disappointment when you put on a shirt and you have that nasty gap between buttons.... I don't wear blouses any more, as a rule.


From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 04:23 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Clothes shopping. One of the few reasons I love being male. I just go to www.sears.ca, find my size, and place an order. The clothes always fit.

You must be a mesomorph. The blond guy and I are both ectomorphs, shorter in body and longer in the limbs. Neither of us can shop at Sears. Everything is way too short. So not even males are exempt from the "average is the only build" mentality of clothing manufacture.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 04:33 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've heard so many different definitions for the somatypes, I really don't understand the concept.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 04:39 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Basically boils down to:

Long, lanky, shortish in body with long arms and legs, tend to carry low percentage of body fat = Ectomorph.

Short, stocky, long in body, short in limbs, tends to carry a higher percentage of body fat = Endomorph.

In between the two = Mesomorph.

Most clothes are cut for mesomorphs, petite sizes for women are cut more for endomorphs. Ectomorphs frequently roll up their sleeves and hope nobody notices that their pants are a couple inches shorter than they should be.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 04:42 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was once told that it all really has to do with the difference between how wide your hips are and how wide your shoulders are.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 04:48 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yah, well, that's part of it... Ectomorphs are narrower, endomorphs are wider, and mesomorphs are in the middle. But there are statistical differences in body fat percentages and limb lengths compared to body lengths. They all seem to go hand in hand. Unfortunately, I have no links as I got all this from print materials some time ago...

Body types also don't tend to be accounted for on BMIs, which also annoys me. Lots of people are told they're either too heavy or too light according to the BMI calculation, when they are in actuality just right for their body type.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 07 May 2002 01:44 PM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What about business dress for women? It seems pretty obvious to me what men are wearing to work for that business casual to full out business look.

Women's business wear to me is a lot more complicated and as someone who has just left university and been in the work world for nearly a year now, I still haven't figured it out.

I find the short skirts, Aly McBeal thing way too sexy for work. ( remember that REAL LIFE lawyer who was sent home to change? )


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 08 May 2002 12:51 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you're making decent money and don't have to spend it on student loans, kids and such, you can have a lot of fun with business wear. Women can bend the rules a lot more.... Depending, of course, on what you do.

I've worn short skirts, long skirts, pants, ties, jackets, ruffly blouses, tailored blouses, high heels, low heels, cowboy boots, other boots, fabrics ranging from denim to blue serge to silk... Guys have the shirt/pants/tie uniform, and a lot less freedom.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 08 May 2002 12:54 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When it's hot in the summer, and I'm sweating like a pig in my corporate uniform, I gaze upon the women in their short skirts with extreme envy.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
girlpublisher
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2367

posted 08 May 2002 01:39 PM      Profile for girlpublisher   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm sure you are gazing with more than envy [wink]. Short skirts are good in theory, but there is an unpleasant side effect for those of us who are not a size 6: thigh rub.
From: here to eternity | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 08 May 2002 01:56 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'll get the Latverian Research Council working right on that.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
girlpublisher
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2367

posted 08 May 2002 02:05 PM      Profile for girlpublisher   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm sure their methodology will be interesting, to say the least.
From: here to eternity | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 08 May 2002 02:27 PM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Short skirts are good in theory, but there is an unpleasant side effect for those of us who are not a size 6: thigh rub.

not to mention the dreaded Vinyl Chair Syndrome....


From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca