babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Russia and Tadhzikistan Hammer Out Soldier Agreement

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Russia and Tadhzikistan Hammer Out Soldier Agreement
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 17 October 2004 02:39 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tadzhikistan: First Permanent Russian Military Base Opened

quote:
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Tajik President Imomali Rakhmonov dedicated the first permanent Russian military base in Tajikistan today. Russian troops have been in Tajikistan for years, but the presidents have legally agreed on a new way to look at their presence.

17 Ocober 2004 -- The two presidents watched as the Russian flag was raised today at the military base in Dushanbe to mark the new status for some Russian troops in Tajikistan.

Yesterday, Presidents Vladimir Putin and Imomali Rakhmonov signed an agreement establishing permanent posts in Tajikistan for the troops of Russia's 201st Motorized Rifle Division. The division had been stationed in the country since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but the agreement formalized the legal status of the unit's presence.


What I also smell as far as the rat goes is that Russia is wanting to serve notice to the USA that it will not be a pushover for dominance of the Central Asian Republics.

If you watched "The Truth And Lies of 9-11", you know that the speaker extensively quoted Zbigniew Brzezinski in regard to the requirement for United States dominance of those Central Asian Republics to get the oil and natural gas.

The Russians, presumably, know the US's desperation to maintain its oil import requirement and therefore will wish to maintain its own sovereignty in this area.

The extreme economic weakness of Russia and its relative lack of power in the -stans again smells like a deliberate act by United States officials to weaken the Russian economy by giving them bad advice so that Russia's internal troubles would prevent it from adequately telling the USA to back off from the -stans.

The USA would never have dared even think about putting troops inside those Central Asian republics if the USSR was still around.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 17 October 2004 02:46 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Given that moving troops into the USSR would have been war, no.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 17 October 2004 02:53 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Also, was it here that I saw a the Russians and the Chinese were having talks about oil. Also, there is some motions going on around the Sudan and the Chinese oil concessions there. It seems like there is a loose axis forming up.

It is interesting how these strategic considerations go beyond ideology.

When I was younger I really thought there was some meat and potato issues that devided Communist ideology and capitalist ideology. Now I see, as I have read more, that this game being played out in Asia conforms very much to the same slow dance that Britain and Russia, and the later the US and Russia, have been doing since 1820.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 20 October 2004 03:50 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Beijing hands Moscow a long rope

quote:
How should we understand the future of a Sino-Russian strategic partnership? Is it simply a revival of the 1970s China-America-Russia strategic triangle in which China joins Russia against the United States? Or does it mean, from the standpoint of some Americans who wanted to improve diplomatic ties with Beijing to offset the Soviet superpower, that "my enemy's enemy is my friend"?


[ 20 October 2004: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca