Author
|
Topic: The US exports nothing but bombs and misery.
|
|
|
billF
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12284
|
posted 07 February 2007 09:27 AM
We are misguided people.We are so foolish as to think the air we breathe, the food we eat, the water we drink, the future of our species and human life and dignity are more important than the wealthy getting wealthier. Oh, when will we learn? War without end is the sane thing to do to keep us in line. Poverty and ignorance must prevail in order to keep the short sighted but powerful in their rightful place. We need to back North American “harmonization” and give up universal healthcare, think of the poor US health insurance companies! We must trash every social program there is so there’s more money to spend on bigger armies and more prisons! We must obliterate every environmental program we know about to protect the oil companies! We must undermine our educational system. People who know how to read and think pose a great threat to institutions founded in greed and the lust for power! Buy the biggest luxury liner SUV you can find, drive to your local polling station and vote Conservative !!!! (did I mention I fell on my head today?)
From: Thunder Bay ON CAN. | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603
|
posted 07 February 2007 12:06 PM
Eddited: Read the article
[ 07 February 2007: Message edited by: Noise ] [ 07 February 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603
|
posted 07 February 2007 02:58 PM
quote: Did you read the article? Or do you think you are funny?
Lil of both... I was responding to the title of the thread more than anything... I dislike any critism that implies the target cannot do anything right whatsoever. The US does export more than bombs and misery unlike the title does suggest, such as my silly little orange comment. Though if you wish to discuss the article some... It does raise the implication that the only thing keeping the US afloat is it's populaces stupidly extreme rate of consumerism... When the consumerism gives way, down plummets the greenback:
quote: The central banks around the world are now watching for any sign that the American consumer is about to give up the ghost. As soon as that happens, bank managers everywhere will swing into action, ditch their U.S.Dollars and head for the exits.
Sadly, thats exceedingly self distructive and I don't think other central banks would make a 'breaking point' move like that. Like it or not, China has several trillions invested into the American dollar as well as several other nations. The US dollar devaluing rapidly extremely degrades the value of their investment... Several of these nations have vested interests in keeping the Dollar elevated and I don't think Whitney is putting that segment together: quote: The other reason the dollar hasn’t succumbed to hyperinflation is because the current account deficit is running at roughly $800 billion per year. The Asian giants (China and Japan) and the oil exporting countries are mopping up more than $700 billion of our red ink every year!
and quote: It’s blackmail, pure and simple; and yet, the Chinese, Japanese etc. continue to play along knowing full-well that we neither have the inclination nor the resources to pay them back in kind?
So he's got the idea there but then: quote: Besides, how long will China and Japan continue to abet Washington’s war-mongering adventurism? My guess is that the daggers have already been sharpened in Beijing, Caracas, Delhi and Moscow. Everyone is just waiting for Bush to cross that invisible line in the sand before they fling their greenbacks into the jet-stream and wait for Goliath to tumble.
It's an interesting situation for China to be in... I'd be curious what writers from China's perspective would have to say on this topic. A period of hyper-inflation for the US dollar is potentially destructive to all these nations investing within the US dollar, including every nation Whitney has listed so far. What exactly would China's motivation be to devalue their investment by that much?
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 07 February 2007 03:38 PM
quote:
Lil of both... I was responding to the title of the thread more than anything... I dislike any critism that implies the target cannot do anything right whatsoever.
It doesn't suggest that at all. It suggests exporting bombs and misery is the one thing the US does very well. But of course that isn't the point. You are falling into the habit of focusing upon the least important aspect of the entire article. Thread titles are like packaging; intended to entice not to be the conversation.
quote: Though if you wish to discuss the article some... It does raise the implication that the only thing keeping the US afloat is it's populaces stupidly extreme rate of consumerism... When the consumerism gives way, down plummets the greenback:
It raises far more than that. The implication of your argument that it does not, implies you really have no interest in discussing the merits of the essay so much as finding mole hills out of which to build mountains. quote:
It's an interesting situation for China to be in... I'd be curious what writers from China's perspective would have to say on this topic. A period of hyper-inflation for the US dollar is potentially destructive to all these nations investing within the US dollar, including every nation Whitney has listed so far. What exactly would China's motivation be to devalue their investment by that much?
Critical to the essay is that the US economy is in decline while an eastern based economy is in ascendence. From the Chinese perspective, it would be better to cut and run than to anchor themselves to a sinking ship. There have already been news reports indicating the Chineses have already begun the process of limited divestment.
quote: On the other side I find the argument that China is afraid to divest in the U.S. because they'll lose money by causing a crash, rather weak. A gambler whose up 200% isn't afraid to lose some money to put on a good show - and China doesn't need to totally divest. They only have to THREATEN it to scare the world.
Why China is rising quote: Renewed fears that the Chinese central bank may be poised to start liquidating its $1-trillion stash of U.S. dollars briefly drove the greenback to a 20-month low against the euro and a two-year low against the British pound in trading yesterday.The euro surged to $1.3172 (U.S.) against the greenback and the pound to $1.9469, before losing ground by day's end. The loonie and the yen have also gained on the U.S. dollar in recent days. The sudden weakness of the U.S. dollar began late last week, soon after Chinese officials suggested that holding a lot of dollars might be a losing investment strategy. Investors read that as a signal that the massive trade and financial imbalances between Asia and the U.S. may be about to unwind.
G & M [ 07 February 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 07 February 2007 07:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by Noise: Several of these nations have vested interests in keeping the Dollar elevated and I don't think Whitney is putting that segment together
I think those same nations are beginning to realize that U.S.-style consumerism is unrealistic for the other 95 percent of humanity, and that the largest single country source of GHG emissions is the U.S. As well, most of those countries, including China, have been worried about increasing U.S. military presence in that region of the world. The U.S. and Britain once believed they would divide China up for their respective colonial-economic interests. Asia was the largest freely trading economy in the world centuries ago. It will be again in the next few decades. Those nations will someday set the pace and standard for what is consumed, in fashion, and will become world leaders in science, technology, and culture. This is why the U.S. will change foreign policies after this menace to humanity is finally given the heave-ho from Washington. The Pacific Rim of countries, S. Korea, Taiwan, China, and Japan have already surpassed the U.S as the largest generator of wealth in the world. I think the time has come for the rising sun, red dragon, and Asian Tiger economies. Korea will unify at some point after the American economy tanks, and then another Asian Tiger economy will surge ahead. Those countries as a whole will become economic trend setters in the not so distant future.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 07 February 2007 07:31 PM
quote: FWIW, a recent commentary by Ken Rogoff, who's probably in most observers' Top Ten List of People Who Know This Stuff.
Similar in content, but maybe not as stuffy: quote: The dragon twitched. The dragon, which is China, twitches every so often, and when it does, ears prick up across the world of trade and finance. Dragons can, as you know, breathe fire when they choose to, and should the Chinese dragon emit a plume or two of flames, ordinary people living as far away as Ashtabula, Ohio, may get their fannies scorched.
Will China choke on US dollars?
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470
|
posted 08 February 2007 12:42 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: If he were any dumber, there'd have to be two of him.
Although I don't think we can discount the importance of rank stupidity as a benefit for being a politician. Bush for instance accusing neighbouring Persian/Shi'ite Iran of meddling in the affairs of Iraq. Ralph Klein bombastically supporting the policies of Augusto Pinochet. Harper stating his position on Hamas & Hezbollah is in support of democracy in the middle east. To vociferously spout inanities on Monday and still manage to spout different inanities on Tuesday -- well I think you can only do that as a result of monumental ignorance. The rest of us would feel shamed.
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791
|
posted 23 February 2007 03:09 PM
737 U.S. Military Bases = Global Empire (world domination?)preface: With more than 2,500,000 U.S. personnel serving across the planet and military bases spread across each continent, it's time to face up to the fact that American democracy has spawned a global empire. excerpt: The total of America's military bases in other people's countries in 2005, according to official sources, was 737. Reflecting massive deployments to Iraq and the pursuit of President Bush's strategy of preemptive war, the trend line for numbers of overseas bases continues to go up.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 23 February 2007 07:43 PM
quote: Its overseas bases, according to the Pentagon, contained 32,327 barracks, hangars, hospitals, and other buildings, which it owns, and 16,527 more that it leased. The size of these holdings was recorded in the inventory as covering 687,347 acres overseas and 29,819,492 acres worldwide, making the Pentagon easily one of the world's largest landlords.
So the Pentagon is landlord to a discontinuous total landmass slightly larger then North Korea in area. And they're still in Europe, supposedly to protect them from a cold war threat that doesn't exist anymore.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|