Author
|
Topic: Steve Irwin - 'Croc' hunter - stung to death by stingray
|
Jimmy Brogan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3290
|
posted 04 September 2006 11:22 AM
Steve Irwin - 'Croc' hunter - stung to death by stingray quote: Sep. 4, 2006. 11:57 AMCAIRNS, Australia (AP) — Steve Irwin, the hugely popular Australian television personality and conservationist known as the Crocodile Hunter, was killed Monday by a stingray while filming off the Great Barrier Reef. He was 44. Irwin was at Batt Reef, off the remote coast of northeastern Queensland state, shooting a segment for a series called Ocean's Deadliest when he swam too close to one of the animals, which have a poisonous barb on their tails, his friend and colleague John Stainton said. "He came on top of the stingray and the stingray's barb went up and into his chest and put a hole into his heart," said Stainton, who was on board Irwin's boat at the time.
What a stupid bugger. [ 04 September 2006: Message edited by: Jimmy Brogan ]
From: The right choice - Iggy Thumbscrews for Liberal leader | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 04 September 2006 11:34 AM
quote: What a stupid bugger
Which we had already learned when he held his newborn son inches away from the mouth of a hungry croc. It's horrible for his family that his colossal stupidity and arrogance caused his demise. I do send my condolences to his family, though. [ 04 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ] [ 04 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 04 September 2006 11:37 AM
quote: Originally posted by Sineed: Come on, people. My kids are very upset about this. Steve may not have been on the Jacques Cousteau level of raising wildlife awareness, but he got my kids to see the beauty of some nasty creatures. He was a great showman, and funny as hell.
I wonder if they got his last stunt on tape... Could be extremely educational, no? On a more serious note, I strongly recommend the BBC series "Life On Earth", for kids and adults alike. I still want to know how the stingray is doing.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Sineed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11260
|
posted 04 September 2006 12:06 PM
quote: On a more serious note, I strongly recommend the BBC series "Life On Earth", for kids and adults alike.
That's a great show; I watch that with my kids. But surely there's nothing wrong with having a nature show that isn't all National Film Board humourless and earnest. Anybody remember those "Ontario Wilderness Minutes?" Anybody get all fired up about Ontario wildlife after seeing one of these?
From: # 668 - neighbour of the beast | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791
|
posted 04 September 2006 01:17 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
Sea Hunt was FICTIONAL??!!?!
My bad. I didn't know what else to call it - a TV crew, a plot, and some actors out at sea. I watched every episode - wish it would reply on one of the networks.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062
|
posted 04 September 2006 03:38 PM
I regret not making this post before the silly one. No doubt about it, Irwin was a consumate entertainer. He knew how to put on a show and enjoying taking personal risks to do so. Who can complain about dying doing what one loves? [ 04 September 2006: Message edited by: otter ]
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 05 September 2006 12:39 AM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ken Burch: [QB]Which we had already learned when he held his newborn son inches away from the mouth of a hungry croc. It's horrible for his family that his colossal stupidity and arrogance caused his demise. I do send my condolences to his family, though. ] I know it was silly, but don't exagerate about a dead guy, his son was held minimum of 5 feet from the croc, which was distracted by blood dripping meat held just above it's nose. Ask your mum if she ever held you on her knee in the front seat of a car travelling on the open road. Did your parents ever drive drunk with you in the car? When I was a child neither of these things were illegal, not considered dangerous, and they were quite commen. I assume Steve did not think it was dangerous.
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
$1000 Wedding
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11486
|
posted 05 September 2006 06:33 AM
I heard his last words were, "Crikey!"But seriously, who would have ever thought that trying to pin down wild animals is a dangerous thing to do?
From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 05 September 2006 08:22 AM
Aussies are quite upset about this, my friend from Austrailia emailed me within an hour of it happening, which was about 12 hrs before it hit the news here, she was in a literally a state of shock.Then this am was playing cards on line, the Aussies were very distressed, and a Canadian man piped up with: "who cares about croc man, we have 5 dead soldiers who shouldn't be". Then another Canadian woman, no not me, piped up and said; "ya one of them in friendly fire, damn americans" Then the verbal back and forth was on. The Americans wanted respect, the Aussies wanted to mourn steve, and the Canadians don't give a shit about either, they only cared about the 5 soldier who died needlessly.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 05 September 2006 10:20 AM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander:
I know it was silly, but don't exagerate about a dead guy, his son was held minimum of 5 feet from the croc, which was distracted by blood dripping meat held just above it's nose. ... I assume Steve did not think it was dangerous.
Well, why don't you judge for yourselves. Here it is on video, followed by his "modest" explanation: Steve, his baby, and the crocodile You have to click on the link just below his photo which reads: "Watch - Irwin with crocodiles". By the way, most crocodiles can jump forward a distance equal to their body length, and several feet into the air. Watch the video and do the math. Mind you, I'm no expert at how to stay alive around wild animals, as Steve Irwin obviously is was.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 05 September 2006 10:50 AM
He was snorkeling and surprised a hidden stingray. It is extremely rare for a stingray to kill anyone - it was a freak accident, and it's a shame. It could have happened to anyone, and it wasn't because he was taking chances (at the time anyways). I'm not much for TV, but he obviously had an enthusiasm for his work that most of us only dream of. Well, if you're going to be 'The Crocodile Hunter', there are worse ways to go. Not the sort of approach to life that tends to result in some anonymous death of old age.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 05 September 2006 12:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by writer: Well, not all Australians are in mourning: 'That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin'
Brilliant! I love it. And how wonderful to hear from Germaine Greer again after all these years (my fault, I'm sure she has been active throughout, but my memories date from the 1960s). Wikipedia is nothing if not up to the minute: quote: In September 2006 Greer launched a scathing attack on recently deceased compatriot Steve Irwin, declaring "the animal world has finally taken its revenge". She also claimed in her column in the Guardian newspaper that the wildlife warrior displayed the "sort of self-delusion it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin". Her attack has been criticised by the Australian press, and by Irwin's numerous admirers as a distasteful and cruel display.
So, Steve was an admirer of Bush and Howard. What a croc.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 05 September 2006 10:34 PM
The latest tragic news indicates that Steve may have been partially responsible for making the injury fatal:From the Bangkok Post quote: Australian wildlife documentary maker Steve Irwin's final act of ripping a stingray's jagged barb from his chest cut his chances of surviving the underwater wound, experts said Wednesday.Irwin, 44, died Monday while snorkelling on the Great Barrier Reef when the serrated, venomous tip of a stingray's barb pierced his heart. "The more you start pulling things around, the more damage you do to yourself," Queensland marine biologist Peter Fenner told The Australian newspaper. "That's against the basic principles and could well have made things worse." An autopsy on the famed Crocodile Hunter showed the cause of death was the injury to his heart, inflicted by the 20-centimetre-long spike, but did not establish whether it was blood loss, a heart attack or organ damage that took the life of the khaki-clad showman and millionaire zookeeper. Bryan Fry of Melbourne University's venom research unit concurred with Fenner's view that Irwin would have been better to leave the barb in place.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
timmah
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6658
|
posted 06 September 2006 02:09 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
Let's hope you read up on the subject before putting yourself in the kinds of situations Steve Irwin did.
Not that you'd have the time or presence of mind to remember what you had "read up on", after you'd been stung in the heart by a stingray...
From: Alberta | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603
|
posted 06 September 2006 02:17 PM
quote: I'd love to see a Stingray live
They are interesting to watch... Theres south american tourist resorts where you can jump in and play with the rays (they're pretty simplistic... If they hit something they can't swim over, they rise to get over top of it and right into your arms had you wanted) I guess to clarify... It's very unlikely Irwin had a chance to ever see the stingray responsible. It was likely covered in sand and Irwin swam overtop of it. As Irwin himself proved several times, it's a complete reflex reaction by the stingray (touch it's back with anything and it's stinger slaps at what ever was ontop of it). Knees or legs dragging a bit behind him along the sand he hit the front of the Stingray while chest overtop of the tail. You know the rest of the story. As arbor puts it... Freak Accident. [ 06 September 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 06 September 2006 02:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by timmah:
Not that you'd have the time or presence of mind to remember what you had "read up on", after you'd been stung in the heart by a stingray...
Well, I hope Steve Irwin didn't panic and his mind didn't go blank every time one of his wild animals snarled at or attacked him, or we would have been mourning him long ago. It just appears to me that people who deliberately and unnecessarily put themselves in extreme danger should have an elementary understanding of what to do if things turn sour. I'm not saying Steve Irwin acting wrongly - I was just saying to Nanuq that Steve Irwin likely had more information on the matter going into the situation that Nanuq, you or I have.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
timmah
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6658
|
posted 06 September 2006 02:38 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
I'm not saying Steve Irwin acting wrongly - I was just saying to Nanuq that Steve Irwin likely had more information on the matter going into the situation that Nanuq, you or I have.
That's fine...I agree...I'm sure he had much more knowledge than I do (or ever will) regarding that particular situation. I'm just saying that being stung in the heart is not a typical dangerous situation, and that it is not necessarily reasonable to expect someone to react rationally in that situation, no matter how well trained they may be.
From: Alberta | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 09 September 2006 03:03 AM
Fidel, could you please edit the quote you put in the above post so that it is clear that it is not MY quote, but actually something someone said in rebuttal to my quote?Thanks. [ 09 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 09 September 2006 07:59 AM
quote: Originally posted by scooter:
I hold my newborn son inces away from being run over by traffic every day while I walk on sidewalks.Lighten up dude.
Yeah, Ken, lighten up. Steve Irwin was a serious professional who would never put himself or a family member at risk in the vicinity of wild animals. Well... almost never.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062
|
posted 09 September 2006 11:37 AM
You gotta wonder what world some folks live in when they can spend so much time sitting in righteous judgement of others. There probably is not a single parent on the planet that has not done something that others [including themselves] would call stupid, careless, negligent or inappropriate when it comes to their children. By far, the most common are ignoring them, demeaning them with name calling and being far to critical of everything they do.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 09 September 2006 12:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by otter:
There probably is not a single parent on the planet that has not done something that others [including themselves] would call stupid, careless, negligent or inappropriate when it comes to their children.
Putting your child at risk for money and fame? That's what we're talking about here, otter, not some imperfect parent which we all are. Judge for yourself (click on the video link under the photo), keeping in mind that crocs can spring forward a distance equal to their body length and a couple metres off the ground.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 09 September 2006 03:38 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
Putting your child at risk for money and fame? That's what we're talking about here, otter, not some imperfect parent which we all are.
Why is it excusable if you're drunk, or depressed, impressing your friends, or pissing of your parents, but not if your famous? Tall poppy syndrome?
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 09 September 2006 03:44 PM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander:
Why is it excusable if you're drunk, or depressed, impressing your friends, or pissing of your parents, but not if your famous?
It's never excusable. But if you're famous (and doing it to increase your fame and fortune), it is despicable and mercenary. No parent worthy of the name would do such a thing. To admire such a person is to lose a piece of decency that is difficult to restore. I love children and animals. I have little respect for those who would profit from either. You may be different from me, and that's what makes a world.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062
|
posted 09 September 2006 03:55 PM
For many its the sincerely righteous syndrome where one gets to present themrself as more evolved than the suspect.For others, its a kind of Dissociative mental state whereby the individual is completely unable to perceive themselves in a like manner. Then there are the rare few who just cannot imagine such an action. The politically correct term is pre-contemplative. It used to be ignorant. In either case, 'it just does not compute'. [ 09 September 2006: Message edited by: otter ]
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 09 September 2006 08:15 PM
We aren't really sitting in judgment of the guy as much as we are noting that his passing does tend to look a great deal like cosmic payback.And I could turn this around and ask why YOU are spending so much time defending a reckless, reactionary jerk(and no, it isn't REALLY redundant to say he was also Australian)who happened to cause his own early death and the bereavement of his innocent family through his own stupidity? Why not put a little more energy into, say, defending those who don't DESERVE to suffer? Y'now, workers, the poor, gays and lesbians, people of color? Seems to me they're far more worthy of your sympathy than the Croc Teaser. Meanwhile, the question is, how soon will Irwin be nominated for a Darwin Award? [ 09 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708
|
posted 10 September 2006 07:01 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: We aren't really sitting in judgment of the guy [...]
LOL!! Nice one, Ken. Saying it doesn't actually make it true. The guy has been judged left, right and centre on this thread, so why would you bother to deny it? Everyone else taking part seemed pretty much at ease with it.
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: And I could turn this around and ask why YOU are spending so much time defending a reckless, reactionary jerk(and no, it isn't REALLY redundant to say he was also Australian)who happened to cause his own early death and the bereavement of his innocent family through his own stupidity?
Err... he wasn't doing anything reckless when he died. I've been diving many times on the Barrier Reef and could have had the bad luck to come too close to a ray in the same way he did. Can't say I've ever thought it reckless. But then, I'm Australian too, so I guess that makes me a drooling, bacon-stained moron as well, right? And "innocent" family? His wife--North American, so obviously somewhat more evolved--was a wildlife wrestler as well. How is she more "innocent"? quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: Why not put a little more energy into, say, defending those who don't DESERVE to suffer? Y'now, workers, the poor, gays and lesbians, people of color? Seems to me they're far more worthy of your sympathy than the Croc Teaser.
HA HA HA HA HA!!!Oh Ken, you just kill me! While people are suffering in the world, we can't pay any attention to anything else? Devoted your life entirely and without diversion solely to worthy causes? Don't own a TV or car or anything like that? Ever wept over a deceased relative or pet? Do you ever go to the movies and waste money that could be going to worthy causes? Or do you ever, perhaps, diddle around on discussion boards when you could be down at the local soup kitchen putting in the good work? For heaven's sake, Ken.And I'm curious: "those who don't DESERVE to suffer"? Who are these people? And who are the ones who do deserve it? And who is making that distinction? And so the conversation comes a full circle: quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: We aren't really sitting in judgment of the guy [...]
By implying that he "deserves" to suffer, what are you doing other than judging him?Thanks, Ken. It's been a slice.
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 10 September 2006 08:50 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist: I love children and animals. I have little respect for those who would profit from either. You may be different from me, and that's what makes a world.[/QB]
Teachers, farmers, vets, circus workers, zoo staff, clothing manufacturers, TV writers, pet food maufacturers, dentists, toy makers, pediatritions, ........ You must live in a very small world.
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 10 September 2006 09:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander:
Teachers, farmers, vets, circus workers, zoo staff, clothing manufacturers, TV writers, pet food maufacturers, dentists, toy makers, pediatritions, ........ You must live in a very small world.
Yeah, it's a fairly small world called Earth, where we all need to look out for each other. Some of the "professions" you mention (farmers, circus workers, zoo staff, toy makers, perhaps others) may individually, or on occasion, be guilty of exposing animals or children to unnecessary risk or abuse, often for profit. If they do, they are condemned and they deserve to be. So on this interesting comparison you've made, we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'll leave you with this thought:
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
dackle
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3870
|
posted 10 September 2006 09:33 PM
quote: I love children and animals. I have little respect for those who would profit from either. You may be different from me, and that's what makes a world.
Would that include unionized daycare workers?
From: The province no one likes. | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 10 September 2006 09:38 PM
quote: Originally posted by dackle:
Would that include unionized daycare workers?
Yeah, dackle, when they bring crocodiles to work.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 11 September 2006 01:43 AM
quote: HA HA HA HA HA!!!Oh Ken, you just kill me! While people are suffering in the world, we can't pay any attention to anything else? Devoted your life entirely and without diversion solely to worthy causes? Don't own a TV or car or anything like that? Ever wept over a deceased relative or pet? Do you ever go to the movies and waste money that could be going to worthy causes? Or do you ever, perhaps, diddle around on discussion boards when you could be down at the local soup kitchen putting in the good work? For heaven's sake, Ken. And I'm curious: "those who don't DESERVE to suffer"? Who are these people? And who are the ones who do deserve it? And who is making that distinction? And so the conversation comes a full circle:
In response to your ever so sensitive questions, suzette. 1. Yes, I've mourned the deaths of my friends and relatives(including my own wife). I grieve the loss of people I CARE about. Not arrogant TV stars who think they can bend the entire natural world to their own whims. 2. Yes, I've engaged in activities that weren't purely altruistic and devoted to the elimination of suffering. That's beside the point. I wasn't saying nobody should ever engage in escapism. We all need that to stay sane. My point was that the other poster was spending a great deal of time self-righteously denouncing people for mocking a reactionary anti-environmentalist idiot who should have known what to do and not to do around dangerous animals. Steve Irwin, with his support of John Howard and George W. Bush, was an apologist for two of the most rabidly anti-environmentalist politicians in human history. He is responsible, in supporting them, for abetting the loss of endangered species around the planet and the imperiling of all life on earth through those leaders' refusal to admit that global warming is increased by human choices and corporate greed. His family should be left to mourn in peace. I sympathize with them. Not with him. Not sure why YOU are so torn up about the loss of someone who treated the world's animals as nothing more than sources of human enjoyment and personal profit. You want to mourn the guy, fine, go ahead. Meanwhile, thousands are being killed in Iraq as a result of the arrogant imperial intransigence of the men the Croc Hunter supported so robotically. I choose to mourn them. I choose to CARE about them. Do you? Steve Irwin... "A true Aussie larrikin" indeed. (btw, does "larrikin" mean "selfish asshole"?) [ 11 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ] [ 11 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708
|
posted 11 September 2006 04:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch:
Not sure why YOU are so torn up about the loss of someone who treated the world's animals as nothing more than sources of human enjoyment and personal profit.You want to mourn the guy, fine, go ahead.
Actually, I don't recall giving my opinion one way or another about his death, let alone being "so torn up about" it or wanting to "mourn the guy". They're your ideas, not mine. Since you've chosen to dodge all the other points I've made above, I'll take this as a useless discussion and leave it there.
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 11 September 2006 06:12 PM
I responded directly to your points, suzette. Reread my post.As to his wife, yes she was also a "croc wrestler", but no, she didn't deserve to end up a widow as a result of her late husband's actions. And I haven't been the only person to call him reckless. And I'd say that people who DON'T use animals for human entertainment and who DON'T support reactionary antienvironmental politicians whose policies make life much worse for animals AND human beings are much less deserving of suffering than those who do. Does THAT clarify it for you? I haven't dodged anything. [ 11 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 12 September 2006 12:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: I responded directly to your points, suzette. Reread my post.And I'd say that people who DON'T use animals for human entertainment and who DON'T support reactionary antienvironmental politicians whose policies make life much worse for animals AND human beings are much less deserving of suffering than those who do. Does THAT clarify it for you? [ 11 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 12 September 2006 12:47 AM
But Ken I do see your point. You don't approve of people who make money out of making animals perform. Fair enough, and you don't like Steve also because he spoke out about his politics, and it's different to yours.But he did do a lot of positive work for animals, and I'm no expert but I think the balance is in the animals' favour. Assuming animals act stressed if not happy, no signs of stress at Aust zoo, so I'm happy. Should famous people speak politically? Yes. Does it influence my opinion of them or the politics? I'm open to listening, but I don't think anyone can talk me into liking Bush! I think the rest of what you wrote was crap, influenced by your strong feelings on animal rights and anti Bush feelings. People don't deserve to die because they differ from you in these two areas, even if you're right.
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 12 September 2006 01:12 AM
No. But that's hardly the same thing. I don't want your daughter to die because of what she does. I guess I find it hard to see Irwin as any sort of a figure deserving of anyone's grief(other than his family's, of course). And no, I don't think he actually deserved to DIE. I suppose I'd say I don't see it as any truly great loss, considering the effect on the world he had in my view. And at some level it seemed to be kind of a cosmic response on the hubris with which he did his work. Enough said. [ 12 September 2006: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 12 September 2006 04:28 AM
Irwin fans 'in revenge attacks' quote: Dead stingrays with their tails cut off have been found in Australia, sparking concern that fans of naturalist Steve Irwin may be avenging his death.Mr Irwin, a TV personality know as the "Crocodile Hunter", was killed while diving in Queensland when a stingray's barb stabbed him in the chest. Since then, 10 stingrays have been found mutilated on Queensland beaches. [cont.]
Government officials said they were investigating the deaths and there could be prosecutions.
Two stingrays were found at a beach north of Brisbane with their tails cut off, while eight were found on another beach on Monday, The Australian reported.[/quote]
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 12 September 2006 05:20 AM
PETA sheds no crocodile tears for Steve Irwin quote: It comes as no shock at all that Steve Irwin should die provoking a dangerous animal, PETAs Dan Mathews tells The Scoop. He made a career out of antagonizing frightened wild animals, which is a very dangerous message to send to kids.Does Irwins career as a naturalist impress the animal-rights group? Says Mathews: If you compare him with a responsible conservationist like Jacques Cousteau, he looks like a cheap reality TV star.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 12 September 2006 12:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by otter: ... self-righteous ... superior ... delusions ... poor distorted little egos.
Surely you can do better than that: Roget's Interactive Thesaurus
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
head
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10717
|
posted 12 September 2006 01:37 PM
unionist, I almost always enjoy reading your posts, even the ones I disagree with. You always present a decent argument and your dry sense of humour and wit are always keen. Although I don't know much about Irwin, from what I can gather he lived and died doing what he loved. He also left behind a grieving family, friends and fans. You may not respect what he did, or you may find the risks he took stupid but you could at least try shutting your bitter pie- hole for once, out of respect for someone who has died and for those that might have a different opinion of him than you do. Isn't it enough that you continuosly pound other posters for their spelling mistakes and any point of views you might not agree with? I recognize that you're bitter, but you don't have to be so putrid all of the time.[ 12 September 2006: Message edited by: head ] [ 12 September 2006: Message edited by: head ] [ 12 September 2006: Message edited by: head ]
From: canada | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 17 October 2006 05:24 AM
8-year-old Bindi follows in Daddy's footsteps - TV career and fitness DVD quote: BINDI Irwin is set to release a fitness DVD.The 50-minute program marks Bindi's song and dance debut and features a cooking segment with her late father, Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin. Irwin's manager, John Stainton, said the DVD, shot this year, is due for a Christmas release. "Steve is in the show, but Bindi is leading the way," Stainton said. "She performs 10 songs. She sings and dances and she's really good. [...] The fitness DVD is the start of a Bindi Irwin juggernaut set to make her a global superstar within the next year. She has shot seven of 26 episodes of her wildlife series Bindi The Jungle Girl, which will screen on the US Discovery Channel and a local network. Stainton rejected criticism the eight-year-old is doing too much too soon after her father's death. [...] "It's not too soon for Bindi. There is no pressure on her to do anything. If she wants to be a nurse tomorrow, she can be. "Bindi does it because she loves it."
I just think it's wonderful. What a great way to deal with a child's grief. I wish her success and lots of sales.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 13 January 2007 08:57 PM
Heartwarming! Crocodile Hunter's 8-year-old daughter carries on dead Dad's money-making exploitative legacy:Death video destroyed, widow says quote: The last remaining footage of Australian "Crocodile Hunter" Steve Irwin's deadly encounter with a stingray has been destroyed, says his widow.[...]Terri Irwin and Bindi [note: 8 years old!] have been in the U.S. promoting Bindi's upcoming wildlife series Bindi, The Jungle Girl. She has been giving interviews and fending off criticism that her parents have pushed her into show business, saying that she's doing it in memory of her father. "I want to make him the proudest dad to have me and I want to show everybody, and nearly be as good as him because he was the best,'' Bindi said on CNN this week, also pointing out that she had already been scheduled to accompany him on a tour of the U.S.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 13 January 2007 09:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist: Heartwarming! Crocodile Hunter's 8-year-old daughter carries on dead Dad's money-making exploitative legacy:
What has Steve Irwin exploited?
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 13 January 2007 10:01 PM
quote: Originally posted by Legless-Marine:
What has Steve Irwin exploited?
Animals and both his children at various times. To make $$$$$$$.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 13 January 2007 10:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
Animals and both his children at various times. To make $$$$$$$.
How?
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 14 January 2007 10:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
-- Originally posted by unionist: Heartwarming! Crocodile Hunter's 8-year-old daughter carries on dead Dad's money-making exploitative legacy: -- Animals and both his children at various times. To make $$$$$$$.
I have done some casual searching, and have not found Steve to be guilty of anything more than grandstanding. Hardly "exploitive".
On the other hand, Steve has done a great deal for conservation awareness, and has used his money to buy massive tracts of land for nature preserves on several continents. If that's the "Exploitive legacy" you are referring to, I hope young bindi serves up more in heaping helpings.
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
jas
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9529
|
posted 15 January 2007 07:40 AM
Never watched the guy, but if this quote: Originally posted by unionist: Stingrays mutilated in wake of Irwin's death
is his legacy, if THIS is what his fans "learned" about wildlife and conservation at the end of the day, then doesn't it suggest that maybe "the message" he was putting out was a little distorted? Do you think fans of a dead David Suzuki or Jacques Cousteau would start mutilating animals in their grief? What was about about Steve Irwin that would inspire this kind of fan, and this kind of actions?
From: the world we want | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 15 January 2007 11:26 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stargazer: I'd like to ask how Steve Irwin's dangling of his baby in front of a crocodile is any less acceptable that Michael Jackson dangling his baby off a balcony. One answer: it isn't.
Interesting analogy, Stargazer. Reminded me of this: Manager orders Bindi Irwin to deny exploitation claims quote: Steve Irwin's daughter Bindi has made a series of carefully stage-managed media appearances to refute claims she is being manipulated. "Dad's manager told me to tell you that I'm totally in control," Bindi said at a live press conference, now also available on DVD. "And I really want to get those toys he promised me." [...]Since her father's death, Crocodile Hunter director John Stainton has become Bindi's chief male role model. "John's like a father to me", she told Australian Story recently. "Like Michael Jackson's father."
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 15 January 2007 12:57 PM
it seems that many people who don't like steve are motivated by the fact that he started poor, acts silly, didn't do well at school, and still made millions. He is making money out of animals, but so do farmers, vets, and zoos. Farmers mulse sheep, vets take tails off for cosmetic reasons, they all interfere with their sex lives. Can I justify Steve's behavour by comparing him to others? No. Does the good balance the bad? He has been good for australian TV and tourism, the town he's based in is happy, there are more native parks, the entourage is happy, the animals?? I don't think the croc's care. He goes out in the wild and eg wrestles animals to the ground. This no doubt upsets them, however any scientist studying an animal treats it about the same if they have to examine it. Australians have a multitude of native animals, some not even named yet. Steve's work has been good for their future. Overall he's had a positive effect.Seperatly, are you realy blaming him cos some idiots killed some stingrays? After 9/11 some idiots killed some Arabs, do you blaim the people dead in 9/11? Thirdly Bindi, if she's like Steve she probably wouldn't enjoy school (except playtime!) I too worry that she's being exploited, but I hope our labour laws will protect her. Many children work, and we either need to trust the law, or work to change it. She is riding the creast of a wave, and making loads of money. This may be her only chance to catch the wave. Who are you to deny her?
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 15 January 2007 11:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist: Interesting analogy, Stargazer. Reminded me of this:"Manager orders Bindi Irwin to deny exploitation claims"... [QB][/QB]
You know that's a satire site, right?
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 15 January 2007 11:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
He bothered, provoked, and used animals. He inspired the worst, lowest anti-animal instincts in others. And he exploited his own children and exposed them to danger.
While I acknowledge that Irwin was somewhat irresponsible, your criticism is overblown and selective, and manages to completely ignore Irwin's massive conservationist impact and legacy.
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 16 January 2007 09:47 AM
quote: Originally posted by Legless-Marine:
You know that's a satire site, right?
Yeah, maybe, but in Steve Irwin's case, satire and reality are close cousins: quote: Bindi Irwin, the daughter of Australian naturalist Steve Irwin, is not being pressured into the spotlight, according to the family's manager, John Stainton.The eight-year-old is travelling to the US this week, ahead of the launch of her TV series Bindi, The Jungle Girl. She will appear on several talk shows, perform with children's entertainers The Wiggles and attend a gala dinner with Russell Crowe and Naomi Watts. But Mr Stainton said Irwin was able to cancel commitments at short notice. "My criteria is if Bindi doesn't want to do it that day, if she wants to go to the zoo or the beach, then that's what we're doing," he told ABC radio in Australia.
I can't decide if that's funnier or sadder than the satire piece.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 16 January 2007 02:36 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle:
Really? Show me where you see that in this thread. Who said that?
My reasoning was that many other people make money out of hurting animals, eg framers mulse sheep, farmers and vets amputate tails for cosmetic and cleanliness reasons (farmers don't use painkillers), and most people with animls mess with their sexuality. No one is hanging it on them, and there are thousands of them. So, why do people pick on Steve as opposed to these people? He's fat, he's silly, he's uneducated (school type) he made millions. I assumed tall poppy syndrome. Why do people pick on Bindi as opposed to other child workers( eg actors, models) I won't believe she is being poorly treated unless I can see her schedule. If her tour takes two weeks, with days off, it's fun. If it takes four days with internal flights, it's bad. Talk shows and meeting famous people -I think many kids would love this. If she was falling asleep anywhere there would be lots of photos, it's not happening. Child labour laws are quite tough in Aussie, she's OK.
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 16 January 2007 02:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander: Child labour laws are quite tough in Aussie, she's OK.
Indeed. John Howard, Steve Irwin's biggest fan, ensures kids are well looked after. Culture of fear and silence in the rag trade quote: An estimated 70,000 Australian children as young as eight have been caught up in a shift to outworking in the garment industry, the Textile Clothing and Footwear Union (TCFU) says.They are toiling in backyard sweatshops under Third World conditions or working alongside their newly arrived migrant parents in the family home. The union says the problem is hidden behind a wall of fear and silence caused by a combination of poor language skills, blackmail and a lack of understanding of workers' rights. Child garment workers risk injuries and diseases ranging from skeletal malformations and asthma to byssinosis, a potentially fatal lung disease caused by breathing cotton fibres. ...
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Centerfield
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13025
|
posted 16 January 2007 06:47 PM
quote: Originally posted by Makwa: A picture of the stingray that killed Steve Irwin.
(ed to give thanks to myconfinedspace.com for the hotlink)[ 15 January 2007: Message edited by: Makwa ]
Good Job Makwa,this makes us all feel a little bit better today. I just wish more people would become a little bit more desensitized. [ 16 January 2007: Message edited by: Centerfield ]
From: Ontario | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Centerfield
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13025
|
posted 16 January 2007 07:45 PM
quote: Originally posted by unionist:
I wonder if they got his last stunt on tape... Could be extremely educational, no? On a more serious note, I strongly recommend the BBC series "Life On Earth", for kids and adults alike. I still want to know how the stingray is doing.
quote: I still want to know how the stingray is doing
The stingray is doing fine. And so are it's children lol.
From: Ontario | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Legless-Marine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13423
|
posted 16 January 2007 08:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander:
I assumed tall poppy syndrome
Southlander, thanks for a new term. It does seem applicable here.
From: Calgary | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 16 January 2007 08:50 PM
Legless, thanks for the that, I didn't realise it was a colloquialism.Unionist your article was from the year 2000. Due to Aust. tough child labour laws the Govt set up a taskforce, passed an act of parliment, and established a council to combat these criminal acts. Progress has been made with these mostly emmigrant groups to teach them the ways of australia. http://www.business.vic.gov.au/BUSVIC.196780/STANDARD/PC_50608.html PS unionist, where are your shoes and clothes made? Do you buy firecrackers?
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 16 January 2007 09:19 PM
quote: Originally posted by Southlander:
PS unionist, where are your shoes and clothes made? Do you buy firecrackers?
My shoes are made of crocodile skin, my clothes of palm leaves, and I unfortunately have to steal firecrackers (it's illegal to buy them here). Thanks for the reference on the new child labour laws. I'm pleased to read that under the new Code for children in the entertainment industry, an 8-year-old like Bindi would only be allowed to work 5 days a week, 8 hours per day, between the hours of 6:00 am and 11:00 pm. And on any day where she spent (say) from 8:30 am to 3:00 pm in school, she could only be forced to work a maximum of 4 additional hours. Source - 553 kb PDF. That's only in Victoria, mind you. Still, I think it shows a great deal of respect for budding young stars and helps teach them the ways of Australia.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|