babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Iraq: Sistani issues fatwa against gays

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Iraq: Sistani issues fatwa against gays
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 15 March 2006 05:10 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Whaaaat??? Y'mean he actually needs to TELL them to murder 'mos in the streets?

quote:
As Iraq sinks closer and closer to all-out civil war the country's most influential Shiite cleric, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, is reportedly calling for death to gays and Sunni Moslems.

[...]

On his Web site, used to communicate with Shiite masses throughout the country, Sistani this week issued a fatwa against Sunnis and gays. He urges followers to kill homosexuals in the "worst, most severe way".

"Sistani's murderous homophobic incitement has given a green light to Shia Muslims to hunt and kill lesbians and gay men,² says exiled gay Iraqi, Ali Hili, of the London-based gay human rights group OutRage.

Hili also heads up the new Iraqi LGBT ­ UK Abu Nawas group, which consists of exiled gay Iraqis and has close links with clandestine gay activists inside Iraq.

"We hold Sistani personally responsible for the murder of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Iraqis. He gives the killers theological sanction and encouragement,² Hili in a statement on Wednesday.

Hili accused the West of allowing Sistani and the Badr Corps to go on a witch-hunt of lesbian and gay Iraqis. "Despite Badr¹s murderous record, the UK allows its political arm, SCIRI, to have offices and fundraise in the UK. Badr is the terrorist wing of SCIRI. Badr should be proscribed as a terrorist organization," said Hili.

He also alleged that Badr militants are entrapping gay men via internet chat rooms. 

"They arrange a date, and then beat and kill the victim," Hili said. "Our sources inside Iraq report the murders of the following gay and bisexual men. All the killings bear the hallmarks of the execution-style murders for which the Badr organization is notorious.

"These killings are just the ones we have been able to get details about. They are the tip of an iceberg of religious-motivated summary executions. Gay Iraqis are living in fear of discovery and murder,² said Hili.

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: Hephaestion ]


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
The Evil Twin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11561

posted 15 March 2006 05:29 PM      Profile for The Evil Twin     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Terrific...."Operation Iraqi Freedom"...making the world safe for violent homophobes!

Where the hell are all the so-called "liberal" apologists for the Iraq War like Andrew Sullivan, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Ignatieff, Tammy Bruce, et al? Among their reasons for supporting the Bush "war for democracy" was that it would alleviate the suffering of gays and women. Some "Iraqi Freedom".


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 15 March 2006 05:46 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You never actually believed any of that crapola, did you ET?

BTW, did you realize that if one were to use the full acronym for your handle -- TET -- it could be really "offensive"...?

"Tet offensive".... geddit? ......

BWA-HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHA !!!

(Okay, I admit, it *was* lame, but I'll take any excuse for a laugh right now... )


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 15 March 2006 05:53 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That seems to be the Ayatollah answer for bloody everything. If it moves, issue a fatwa on it.

"I swear by Allah the Most Peaceful, the Most Merciful, that if that paperboy doesn't stop leaving the paper between the doors, he's going to get a Fatwa!"


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
The Evil Twin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11561

posted 15 March 2006 05:59 PM      Profile for The Evil Twin     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
You never actually believed any of that crapola, did you ET?

No, but unfortunately this (women's and/or gay rights) is one excuse (for the Western wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) I've heard trotted out by the people named in my last post as well as by many supposedly "progressive" people I know in my personal life. Even some babblers use the Taliban's treatment of women or gays as reasons why Canadian troops should stay there (in the Afghan threads). I would like any of these people to explain to me how either American troops in Iraq or Canadian troops in Afghanistan help reduce sexism or homophobia. In Iraq,especially, the situation seems to have gotten WORSE as Shia fundamentalists like SCIRI have replaced the secular and socialist Baathists.

quote:
BTW, did you realize that if one were to use the full acronym for your handle -- TET -- it could be really "offensive"...?"Tet offensive".... geddit? ......


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 15 March 2006 07:35 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hephaestion:
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, is reportedly calling for death to gays...

...making him part of George Bush's 'base.'


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831

posted 15 March 2006 09:56 PM      Profile for Boarsbreath   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read all those right-wing boys as the war gathered steam, since only they made any sense (lefter sources indeed seemed to take the WMD farce seriously). Then as now, the point seemed to be to destabilise all those stagnant autopcracies in the area, and promote a minimal liberal democracy. And business, of course. (The neo-con dream; Marshall Plan with the preliminary war included wilfully.)

Nowhere did I ever see anything about gay rights. Even talk of women's rights was pretty gassy...the objective was just votes with minimal rule of law. I don't think you can say we were promised a pink rose garden.

(Mind you, they have more than failed at what they were trying to do, the neo-cons who squandered the sympathy from 9/11 -- but that's not news here.)


From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 16 March 2006 12:24 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The point is, Boarsbreath, that the "Bush-is-bringing-democracy-to-Iraq" bullshitters have fallen most *remarkably* silent when it comes to issues such as this.

Where ARE the clusters of Little Boots Fan Klubs that used to swarm us not that long ago?

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Heavy Sharper
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11809

posted 16 March 2006 12:27 AM      Profile for Heavy Sharper        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't believe I actually want Saddam Hussein back.

Oh yes, and now for the obligatory:

Freedom's on the March!

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: Heavy Sharper ]


From: Calgary | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 16 March 2006 12:30 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't it nice how easily it is that we decide what it is that we want for them.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Heavy Sharper
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11809

posted 16 March 2006 12:31 AM      Profile for Heavy Sharper        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If this is the sort of regime we're going to see in the new Iraq, I fail to see how kidding rid of Saddam is good for anyone.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099

posted 16 March 2006 12:35 AM      Profile for deBeauxOs     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
posted by Mr. Magoo: That seems to be the Ayatollah answer for bloody everything. If it moves, issue a fatwa on it.
Well, why then has no one issued a fatwa against Pat Robertson? Don't the imams get the '700 Club' via their satellite dish? I'm not advocating that someone should, only wondering why no one has. Robertson seems quite comfortable in declaring a fundamentalist Christian version of a fatwa againt his perceived enemies.


From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 16 March 2006 12:39 AM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is awfully surprising coming from al Sistani who has, for the most part, played the role of moderator of religious outrage. I don't know his ideas regarding homosexuals, but if he is calling for the killing of Sunni -- he is calling for civil war.

Is there another source?


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 16 March 2006 12:46 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, why then has no one issued a fatwa against Pat Robertson?

Collegiality, and the realization that if they both play the game right, there are plenty of gullibles to go around? Otherwise, beats me.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 16 March 2006 02:39 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Heavy Sharper:
I can't believe I actually want Saddam Hussein back.

You're kidding.........................right?


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
obscurantist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8238

posted 16 March 2006 02:46 AM      Profile for obscurantist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heavy Sharper is just someone who writes about politics with the intensity of a high schooler confiding his or her crushes, hatreds, and other turbulent thoughts to a diary.
From: an unweeded garden | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 16 March 2006 03:20 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And Sven is what. The life was better under Saddam line is something I read often in the press, said by Iraqis. Even conservative estimates number civilian dead in the range of 30,000 (Bush said it to know didn't he) so one can see why people would not be pleased.

Add to that the no end in sight business, and you can see why people might feel the way they do.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 16 March 2006 03:29 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:

Isn't it nice how easily it is that we decide what it is that we want for them.



I want them to stop murdering LGBT folk. And yeah, it's an easy decision to make. For me to want it, AND for them to do it.


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 16 March 2006 04:16 AM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Heavy Sharper:
If this is the sort of regime we're going to see in the new Iraq, I fail to see how kidding rid of Saddam is good for anyone.

Hmm. According to the British medical journal The Lancet, some 100,000 dead Iraqis. A formerly secular society to be super-ceded with a theocracy -- sharia law to replace secular law. The burqa where none were worn for years. A formerly nationalized economy forcefully broken open -- no more 5 cent a litre gasoline, no more free up to and including PhD level education, the destruction of 13 museums recording the history of the cradle of civilization, destruction of the hanging gardens of Babylon . . . and on.

America -- defeated, its credibility lying in ruin at the hands of a cretin. Thousands of dead American soldiers. A nation never to be trusted again.

State repression? Hussein still ranting in Iraq. Abu Graihb still operative. Shift from Sunni repression of Shia to Shia repression of Sunni. Less electricity, less safety, less water for the Iraq population.

Yeah, totally demented to think perhaps Hussein in power might be a better trajectory.

On edit: to respect the thread -- I don't know what Hussein's response to homosexuality was, but I'll bet dollars to donuts, it is not better for GBLT people under the new chaos.

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: siren ]


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 16 March 2006 04:24 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hephaestion:

I want them to stop murdering LGBT folk. And yeah, it's an easy decision to make. For me to want it, AND for them to do it.


I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about the semantic structure of "I want Saddam back." Like it is "us" that have to live with what we decide for them. But we don't. It is "they" that has to live with our ideas about how they should run their lives.

And where does it get them? It gets them destruction and more tyrrany, as opposed to mere tyrrany.

At the root of it I think it is our arrogance to believe that we have the right to determine the future of their lives by the use of force.

War to prevent war? Tyrrany to prvent tyrrany? Death to prevent death? Bismark called this logic "commiting suicide for fear of death"

Besides, I don't know the statistics, but I highly doubt that the Baath party was working up plans for SSM.

Would Saddam be better or worse than what they have now? I don't know. But I think the moral relativism of this question is painfully obvious, and more often than not a mode to justify crime.

Why are we even asking this question, when we should be asking Iraqis what would be better for them now, rather than making up justifications for our own abuse of them.

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 16 March 2006 05:04 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:

I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about the semantic structure of "I want Saddam back." Like it is "us" that have to live with what we decide for them. But we don't. It is "they" that has to live with our ideas about how they should run their lives.



No arguments. But I also agree that...

quote:
I don't know what Hussein's response to homosexuality was, but I'll bet dollars to donuts, it is not better for GBLT people under the new chaos.

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 17 March 2006 05:45 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From Fatwa to Witch-hunt?

quote:
"Sistani's murderous homophobic incitement has given a green light to Shia Muslims to hunt and kill lesbians and gay men,” says exiled gay Iraqi, Ali Hili, of the London-based gay human rights group OutRage.

Hili also heads up the new Iraqi LGBT – UK Abu Nawas group, which consists of exiled gay Iraqis and has close links with clandestine gay activists inside Iraq.

"We hold Sistani personally responsible for the murder of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Iraqis. He gives the killers theological sanction and encouragement,” Hili in a statement on Wednesday.

Hili accused the West of allowing Sistani and the Badr Corps to go on a witch-hunt of lesbian and gay Iraqis.

"Despite Badr’s murderous record, the UK allows its political arm, SCIRI, to have offices and fundraise in the UK. Badr is the terrorist wing of SCIRI. Badr should be proscribed as a terrorist organization," said Hili.

He also alleged that Badr militants are entrapping gay men via internet chat rooms.

"They arrange a date, and then beat and kill the victim," Hili said.

"Our sources inside Iraq report the murders of the following gay and bisexual men. All the killings bear the hallmarks of the execution-style murders for which the Badr organization is notorious.



From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Heavy Sharper
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11809

posted 17 March 2006 07:26 PM      Profile for Heavy Sharper        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Baath Party was propped up by Washington for the purpose fo subverting any sort of socialist (good...And the far-left was gaining tons of ground in the power vacuum that followed British colonisation and the fall of the Iraqi Monarchy) or Islamist (bad) revolution in Iraq.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca