Author
|
Topic: Surprising stats regarding retirement savings.
|
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554
|
posted 17 December 2001 11:48 AM
According to an article in Saturday's Globe and Mail, high-income earners are least likely to have enough saved for retirement.41% of those who make $75'000 or more don't have enough saved for retirement. 35% of those who make less than $10'000 don't have enough saved. The best savers were those who make between $20'000 and $29'999. Only 22% of them didn't have enough saved. I'd link to the article, but it's in the G&M. Their links never work. The article was written by Krista Foss, in case you would like to go hunting for it. The headline is "Freedom far off, retirement study finds."
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
clockwork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 690
|
posted 17 December 2001 12:22 PM
A key point here to remember, though: quote: As a result, 41 per cent of families whose employment incomes are $75,000 or more will not be able to generate two-thirds of that when their major breadwinner retires, according to Statistics Canada. One-quarter of families earning $20,000 to $40,000 will be in the same position.The Statistics Canada formula on how much needs to be generated after retirement doesn't go unchallenged. "At the risk of encouraging people to become complacent, this formula is simply too high for some, especially those expecting inheritances or who have off-balance-sheet assets such as interest in a business or rental property that may not be accounted for," Mr. Christianson said.
I’d be willing to wager that the people making $70K+/yr are going to inherit much more than the people making $20K/yr. However, it adds credence to a pet theory of mine that states that no matter how much money you make, you never have enough. There's a capitalism critique in there, but that isn't my department.
From: Pokaroo! | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|