babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Feminism: Pushing Beyond "Equality Talk"

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Feminism: Pushing Beyond "Equality Talk"
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 07 December 2006 04:58 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was poking around the rabble news page, and came across this, which wasn't already listed in the rabble news forum. And even though the topic is the Dec 6 anniversary, after reading it, the issue raised for me is the rather vague and non-inclusive continued use of the term "equality" in the context of feminism. Thoughts?

Rabble story here


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
babblerwannabe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5953

posted 07 December 2006 07:06 AM      Profile for babblerwannabe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We don't know what she meant by equality so I don't really have any thoughts. It a pretty brief article.
From: toronto | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
babblerwannabe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5953

posted 07 December 2006 07:21 AM      Profile for babblerwannabe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's not like Status of Women Canada alone will save women from male violence so maybe the author needs to focus on other type of feminism that is beyond the talk of merely funding “feminist organizations across Canada.” It’s a pretty generic statement

"Harper and his tightly controlled cabinet minister, Bev Oda, are brazenly maintaining that fighting for women's equality is no longer necessary in this era. "


Poor Bev Oda, she is being controlled by Harper.

[ 07 December 2006: Message edited by: babblerwannabe ]


From: toronto | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
morningstar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12378

posted 07 December 2006 09:32 AM      Profile for morningstar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We really need a status of women portfolio on its own with a decent budget and a minister for whom this is the only job that she does.
many countries are going this way as nothing else seems to work very well or very quickly.

Norway has a woman's ministry and although things aren't perfect there, they are doing better than we are.
Oda is a faithless trull and may find herself growing a penis if she isn't careful---she didn't even go to one single meeting of the House of Commons SWC committee before making any policy or budget decisions.


From: stratford, on | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
morningstar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12378

posted 07 December 2006 09:36 AM      Profile for morningstar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
also, I loathe this constant focus on "equality" as if it's the only issue facing us---it somehow often limits and even misrepresents what is actually going on with women and what needs to happen. It is far too limiting , although to ommit it from SWC is absurd.
From: stratford, on | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
EmmaG
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12605

posted 07 December 2006 06:07 PM      Profile for EmmaG        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by morningstar:
We really need a status of women portfolio on its own with a decent budget and a minister for whom this is the only job that she does.
many countries are going this way as nothing else seems to work very well or very quickly.

Norway has a woman's ministry and although things aren't perfect there, they are doing better than we are.
Oda is a faithless trull and may find herself growing a penis if she isn't careful---she didn't even go to one single meeting of the House of Commons SWC committee before making any policy or budget decisions.



Okay, that is offensive morningstar. Feminism means that a woman can hold any opinion she wants and still be considered a woman - not someone destined to grow a penis! The first Japanese-Canadian cabinet minister is a woman and happens not to believe that SWC is worth funding. She has a right to her opinion as a woman.

If we are moving past ambiguous "equality" talk, surely we should respect that women can disagree quite strongly with each other and not be called "masculine" by other women, simply due to their ideas.

[ 07 December 2006: Message edited by: EmmaG ]


From: nova scotia | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
babblerwannabe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5953

posted 07 December 2006 09:16 PM      Profile for babblerwannabe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oda is oppressing other women, for shame. Gay republicans piss me off equally. Mary Cheney pisses me off as well.

Beyond equality can mean that you can be crtical of the hypocrisy of women and call them on it regardless if they are Japanese or not.

The bigger question is, of course, having a penis does NOT make you a man.

Perhaps its inappropriate to say she should grow a penis, but she is a shameful hypocrite and should know better than to turn around and oppress women. She might not have even have the chance of entering into politics if Status of Women did not exist in the first place.

Anyone who have benefited from feminism and turn around to side with the enemy is a either a dumb ass or an extremely unappreciative hypocritical and shameful person. Biting the hands that have fed you? Disgusting.

She is her own person, the article made it sound like she is controlled by Harper. If we believe in equality, than we should blame her, not just Harper. She doesn’t have to do anything she doesn’t want to do as a woman mp in Canada.
Instead of acknowledging that feminism helped her to get to where she is and further advanced feminism, she used the privileged she received through decades of feminism and turned it upside down to prevent other women from succeeding. Isn’t that equally disgusting?

Of course, she is a woman, so maybe we should give her the benefit of her doubt. Maybe she is still oppressed by the system and we should try to make her see the light instead of criticizing her.

[ 07 December 2006: Message edited by: babblerwannabe ]


From: toronto | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
babblerwannabe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5953

posted 07 December 2006 09:42 PM      Profile for babblerwannabe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And morning star is not actually saying she is “manly”, she is saying that she will start to become the oppressor (has a penis) if she continues to oppress other women. If she really want to do that, she should become a man, because it would be self destructive to destroy feminism as a female mp at the same time. MS is simply giving friendly advice to another human being.

Equality means that women can never be the same kind of oppressor that men can be as far as sexism go.

So MS is acknowledging that if Oda really wants to become an oppressor, she should grow a penis.
Its her opinion and she has the right to it.

babblerwannabe ]

[ 07 December 2006: Message edited by: babblerwannabe ]


From: toronto | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 21 December 2006 11:18 PM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Are alot of feminist organizations dependent on the sttus of women to fund them - out of the whole I mean.
From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 December 2006 07:03 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by babblerwannabe:
Oda is oppressing other women...Anyone who have benefited from feminism and turn around to side with the enemy is a either a dumb ass or an extremely unappreciative hypocritical and shameful person. Biting the hands that have fed you? Disgusting.

She is her own person, the article made it sound like she is controlled by Harper. If we believe in equality, than we should blame her, not just Harper. She doesn’t have to do anything she doesn’t want to do as a woman mp in Canada.
Instead of acknowledging that feminism helped her to get to where she is and further advanced feminism, she used the privileged she received through decades of feminism and turned it upside down to prevent other women from succeeding. Isn’t that equally disgusting?


She is controlled by Harper, they all are. Welcome to our minority dictatorship!

And yes it is disgusting!


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 22 December 2006 07:34 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
She's what I would call a hardcore neocon. From the 'property rights' thread:

"Durham Tory MP Bev Oda would certainly prefer this course of events. She's part of a large group of Conservatives who were pushing for property rights long before this election."


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 22 December 2006 09:37 AM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
she didn't even go to one single meeting of the House of Commons SWC committee before making any policy or budget decisions.

quote:
The first Japanese-Canadian cabinet minister is a woman and happens not to believe that SWC is worth funding. She has a right to her opinion as a woman.

We have a right to get an educated opinion from Oda because she’s an elected official. That’s not what we got. We got a paternalistic “There, there dears – your equal – end of story”. So don’t try and use feminism to excuse her oppressive ignorance – I don’t respond well to guilt trips.


From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
laine lowe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13668

posted 22 December 2006 11:34 AM      Profile for laine lowe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read somewhere a while back that the only group Oda agreed to meet with on the SWC file was Real Women and that meeting took place shortly before the announced budget cuts.
From: north of 50 | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca