Author
|
Topic: Life inside the Gaza Ghetto
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 18 January 2008 01:50 PM
quote: The Israeli Defence Ministry has ordered all of the border crossings with Gaza to be closed, preventing the delivery of a UN aid shipment.Only humanitarian cases which receive Defence Minister Ehud Barak's personal approval would be allowed through, it said. "If milk is low in Gaza, the minister will be asked to approve a milk shipment, and it will enter," a spokesman said.
Kiling them slowly
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961
|
posted 22 January 2008 03:54 AM
quote: The strategy worked. On Thursday, 40 rockets were lobbed at Israel from Gaza. By Monday, only one rocket was fired. But the improved security comes at a price. Not only the EU but officials from the United Nations and other organizations have condemned the blockade. They accused Israel of risking the safety of Gazans as a result of mounting fuel and food shortages and power outages at hospitals. They demanded that fuel be flown to the one power plant in the Gaza Strip. In fact, the power Israel provides to Gaza through the electrical grid was never cut; the interruption was to the flow of fuel used to power that plant. As Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni aptly put it, "Israel is the only country in the world that supplies electricity to terror groups which in turn fire rockets at it."Globe and Mail; Jan 22, 2008
Globe and Mail The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry. Israel wisely chose not to use the IDF to stop the rocket barrage against Sderot. It has the right to defend itself against terrorism. As sad and deplorable as are these events let's hope that the terrorist Hamas leadership ends the bombing.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 22 January 2008 08:39 AM
quote: Originally posted by Petsy: I know some here lump me and ohara together but I do not always agree with him. However this post breaks all Babble rules. We don't refer to Babblers (no matter what your beef) as "evil" with "mal-intent". It's just plain wrong.
I think it suits his words just fine. Please note the first and last description of evil below. quote: Main Entry: 1evil Pronunciation: \ˈē-vəl, British often & US also ˈē-(ˌ vil\ Function: adjective Inflected Form(s): evil·er or evil·ler; evil·est or evil·lest Etymology: Middle English, from Old English yfel; akin to Old High German ubil evil Date: before 12th century 1 a: morally reprehensible : sinful wicked b: arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct 2 aarchaic : inferior b: causing discomfort or repulsion : offensive c: disagreeable 3 a: causing harm : pernicious
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evil [ 22 January 2008: Message edited by: remind ]
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553
|
posted 22 January 2008 09:02 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stargazer: Too bad for ohara Petsy. He is a despicable person. Sorry but he has proven himself to be completely lacking any progressive values and compassion. That was his own doing. If we happen to abhor that, then good for us. The issue is, how much of his crap is he allowed to spew on this progressive board simply because 1) he rarely answers direct questions and 2) he continues, constantly, to post only to slyly attack those who do not like the CJC's mandate, and those who speak of progressive Jewish groups. Of course, he does both 1 and 2 without stepping too far over any lines. Read Coyote's post a couple above and you'll get what I mean. I feel no pity for ohara. I think remind was correct about him.
I don't agree. Someone I believe either here or another thread did point out that ohara is on the record that he is against the occupation. It may not meet your test but at least he has posted his position.Secondly so there is no misunderstanding, I do know ohara and while he is sometimes excessive on both israel and cjc, I also know him to be more than progressive on social policy issues from AIDS to child poverty. All this to say that judging anyone by one issue is wrong. And its more wrong to use such ugly and dismmisive language here on Babble short of going after a neo-Nazi or white supremacist.
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 22 January 2008 09:55 AM
I agree that judging anyone by one issue is problematic. And if ohara concentrated himself on the issues where he actually has a progressive perspective, and only occasionally interjected to defend Israel's attacks on the basic human rights of Palestinians, I could have a higher opinion of his contribution here.It could be that ohara is a wonderful person IRL. I'm prepared to believe that. I'm prepared to believe we could share a small carafe of wine (I don't drink much, but I do like wine) and be quite content with each other's company. But that's not the contention here. We have a thread, here, that deals with the absolute horror of what is happening, daily, to the people of Gaza. Ohara's interjections have been designed to derail the discussion from the start. He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier. And this is the vast majority of his contribution to babble. So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553
|
posted 22 January 2008 10:09 AM
quote: Originally posted by Coyote: I agree that judging anyone by one issue is problematic. And if ohara concentrated himself on the issues where he actually has a progressive perspective, and only occasionally interjected to defend Israel's attacks on the basic human rights of Palestinians, I could have a higher opinion of his contribution here.It could be that ohara is a wonderful person IRL. I'm prepared to believe that. I'm prepared to believe we could share a small carafe of wine (I don't drink much, but I do like wine) and be quite content with each other's company. But that's not the contention here. We have a thread, here, that deals with the absolute horror of what is happening, daily, to the people of Gaza. Ohara's interjections have been designed to derail the discussion from the start. He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier. And this is the vast majority of his contribution to babble. So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.
Coyote, anger is one thing calling someone "evil" quite another.And your contention that "He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier",is simply false. See ohara's comment from this thread below
quote: The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry. Israel wisely chose not to use the IDF to stop the rocket barrage against Sderot. It has the right to defend itself against terrorism. As sad and deplorable as are these events let's hope that the terrorist Hamas leadership ends the bombing.
So all I am saying is we ought not let anger blind us so totally.Ohara certainly has his shtik but some of the allegations are wrong and the label "evil" is evil itself.
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 22 January 2008 10:23 AM
quote: Originally posted by Coyote: So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.
Coyote, are you instilling a religious viewpoint onto the word "evil"? As I gave a clear definition of what I meant by the word above which is morally reprehensible as that is how I view said actions in this regard. However, I am unwilling to go further with this line of meta discussion, as I see it as the usual deflection away from the topic started by the same people in all the Palestinian threads. In any of the threads about Palestine and the CJC, dialogue supporting Palestinians, illuminating their plight, and opposing the CJC's stance, is occuring. Then All of a sudden ohara jumps in, making over the top comments, amongst other things, and of course, someone then states disagreement with his less than empathetic stances on the plight of Palestinians, or they contend his remark supporting the CJC's. All of a sudden petsy jumps in, to call it an attack against ohara's person. And by doing so, frames the future discussion towards; how, why, where, when, it was an attack upon the person, and thus the topic at hand, either the plight of Palestinians, or the CJC, or Israel's actions are deflected away from. This happens time after time, after time in ALL of the Palestinian and CJC threads. So much so, that one has to realize that it is done with intent. If it happened just a few times, or sporadically, then one could shrug it off as just meta debate circumstance, or a natural thread drift into other areas. But it isn't just a few times, or sporadic, it is EVERY thread, just look, and think back, over them. And that is what I call mal-intent.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554
|
posted 22 January 2008 11:00 AM
This thread is really ironic. Ohara can be an ass. When I read some of his posts i want to throw the monitor across the room.But guess what that can be said about a lot of people here. He is a defender of the state of Israel. You know what many here are. That does not make him a good or bad person and does not make him evil. One can agree with him, disagree or stay neutral or ignore him But let us focus on the real racists and bigots out there. Ohara is not one of them.
From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553
|
posted 22 January 2008 11:29 AM
quote: Originally posted by remind:
All of a sudden petsy jumps in, to call it an attack against ohara's person. And by doing so, frames the future discussion towards; how, why, where, when, it was an attack upon the person, and thus the topic at hand, either the plight of Palestinians, or the CJC, or Israel's actions are deflected away from. This happens time after time, after time in ALL of the Palestinian and CJC threads. So much so, that one has to realize that it is done with intent. If it happened just a few times, or sporadically, then one could shrug it off as just meta debate circumstance, or a natural thread drift into other areas. But it isn't just a few times, or sporadic, it is EVERY thread, just look, and think back, over them. And that is what I call mal-intent.
Sorry remind but let me remind you that it was stargazer who began this thread drift when he posted: quote: You are despicable ohara.
That was quickly followed by pogge claimng: quote: Now shall I look up the etymology of the word "asshole" or would you like to take care of that yourself?
ohara then posted the Globe editorial with an admission that this was a passionate issue that makes one cry: quote: The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry.
That was followed by another attack on ohara by stargazer: quote: It is a shame, and one has to wonder why such a person is posting on a progressive board when said person has shown absolutely no ability for empathy beyond the CJC and what moves them.
And that remind led to you attacking ohara as evil: quote: Well for me, his posts illuminate the evil ugliness and mal-intent that is driving him and those like him.
So then I would look in the mirror before I cast stones at who started what thread drift.
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 22 January 2008 11:48 AM
Petsy, you are being obtuse. Hand-wring about the "mess" that is the Middle East is not the same thing as recognizing that the Occupation is marked by the acts of the occupier, not the occupied. Commending Israel for "wisely" not obliterating Gaza en toto does not equate to a progressive perspective. In fact, any defense of Israel's brutal, and illegal, decimation of Gaza and its inhabitants cannot be considered progressive; let alone describing the tactics of the occupier's brutal methods as "wise". . You should recognize that. And your defense of such, your characterization of it as anything near defensible, speaks volumes.And remind, I think we fundamentally agree. I just think using a term like "evil" is loaded with all kinds of connotations that are not necessarily helpful in this discussion. But Petsy would do better to pay attention to the substance of what has been said, rather than playing word games.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7209
|
posted 22 January 2008 05:26 PM
It is easy to gang up on Ohara. It is easy to attack Petsy. But you know what. If you walk outside of the babble bubble and talk to real people you may find out the following. Some are in favour of a 1 state Israel, some are in favour of 1 secular joint state and some are in favour of 2 states. Each are right to have their opinion. Each should be allowed to have their opinion. While I may disagree with some of what Ohara writes. Who gave me the power to say that his opinion is 100% false? Who is right? I don't know. But my daddy used to say that in a divorce their are 3 sides to the story -- his, hers and the truth and the truth usually has bits of his and bits of hers combined. well in this case i am sure their is misinformation be spread by all sides. In fact I know that their has to be. Now is Ohara evil. No he can be annoying. But no more annoying than some who have posted here in this thread and are so quick to condemn.
From: vaughan | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
miles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7209
|
posted 22 January 2008 05:40 PM
quote: Originally posted by Frustrated Mess: This isn't about ohara. It is about an indefensible assault on humans by a combination of imprisonment, an overwhelming mechanical militaristic force, and slow strangulation.If you, or ohara, or petsy, or anyone wants to defend that, go ahead.
FM in reading this thread it is more about ohara than about what you posted just now. I wish this thread was only a discussion of the issues you wanted to talk about. But you are mistaken it is not. It has become an indictment upon one poster and one poster only.
From: vaughan | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
just one of the concerned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14896
|
posted 22 January 2008 10:06 PM
quote: Britain condemns Israeli blockade of Gaza LONDON: Britain has condemned the escalation of suffering, as Israel blockades Gaza in response to a series of rocket attacks.A call for an end to the aggression came in a joint statement by Foreign Secretary, David Miliband and Secretary of State for International Development Douglas Alexander.
quote: Reports: Thousands Cross Gaza Wall By IBRAHIM BARZAK – 48 minutes ago GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) — Thousands of Palestinians poured out of the Gaza Strip and into Egypt early Wednesday after masked gunmen blew dozens of holes in the border wall, witnesses and Hamas security officials said. Egyptian guards took no action as the Gazans rushed to buy food, fuel and other supplies that have become scarce in Gaza because of an Israeli blockade, the witnesses and officials said. Police from Hamas, which rules Gaza, also stood by.
From: in the cold outside of the cjc | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961
|
posted 23 January 2008 03:56 AM
I love this. Bad enough you always link petsy and I but now anyone honestly anyone, who even remotely tries to shed some light on the tactics used against me because i happen to support Israel is also attacked. Poor miles, never really an ohara fan, not by any definition, just points out some obvious truths and BAM he is pilloried. Talk about ostrich-like. And for the record, I deplore the occupation. It has dehumanized both Israelis and Palestinians. I want it to end but unlike many here I want it to end with credible negtotiations between Isarelis and Palestinians not between B.L. Zeebub LLD and Frustrated Mess. I wish there was never a blockade as strongly as I wish that Hamas would not lob hundreds of rockets into Sdeorth on a regular basis.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554
|
posted 23 January 2008 04:24 AM
The issue of Gaza has taken a turn this morning with news that the border with Egypt or at least a portion of the border is now wide open. Egypt is now it the position to help. What will Egypt do with the thousands who are running across the border to flee Gaza. The issue of Egypt's assistance is an important discussion to have. It does not negate the discussion of Israel and Gaza. But rather it brings another player into an already messy issue. quote: Tens of thousands of Palestinians have surged into Egypt from the Gaza Strip after masked militants destroyed parts of the border wall. Gazans rushed to buy food, fuel and other supplies that have become scarce because of an Israeli blockade - aimed at stopping rocket attacks from Gaza. Egyptian police have so far taken no action to stop people crossing.
bbc [ 23 January 2008: Message edited by: johnpauljones ]
From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 23 January 2008 04:52 AM
quote: I wish there was never a blockade as strongly as I wish that Hamas would not lob hundreds of rockets into Sdeorth on a regular basis.
Really ohara? Well, I for one, do not believe you. Remember, you were the one so powerfully against the ACJC. Your comment above speaks volumes about you. If they lob rockets then all is fine and dandy? You do realize Israel has the backing of the almighty US, and now Canada, and far far more money and military might right? You realize that in NO WAY is this an even handed conflict? You realize starving people, keeping them boarded up and locked away from the basic necessities is an abhorrent position right ohara? Of course you do, but I suspect that doesn't matter to you. As long as Hama is "lobbing rockets" then everything Israel does is justified. Dug yourself even deeper.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Indiana Jones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14792
|
posted 23 January 2008 05:46 AM
Was just checking the Star's website and things appear to have jsut gotten crazier: http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/296628 "RAFAH, Gaza Strip–Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured from the Gaza Strip into Egypt today after masked gunmen with explosives destroyed most of the seven-mile wall dividing the border town of Rafah. The Gazans crossed on foot, in cars or riding donkey carts to buy supplies made scarce by an Israeli blockade of their impoverished territory. Police from the militant group Hamas, which controls Gaza, directed the traffic. Egyptian border guards took no action."
From: Toronto / Brooklyn / Jerusalem | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553
|
posted 23 January 2008 07:31 AM
Israel made the difficult decision of imposing a blockade on Gaza knowing it would produce hardship for the Palestinians. However clearly,the blockade was in response to a relentless and intense barrage of bombs on Sderot and the Western Negev. Its easy for Stargazer and others to just poo poo this but I wonder how they would feel if their town was faced with daily rocket attacks? So the blockade was an attempt to avoid more violent measures and diminish the need for armed intervention, which would bring about a great loss of life to both sides. As a result of the blockade, rocket fire was significantly decreased. And here is the catch following the easing of restrictions yesaterday guess what, . the rocket barrage has re-intensified. What should Israel do? Sit back and let it happen? Yes I know its the occupation stupid but in the immediacy whats to be done?
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 23 January 2008 09:09 AM
Okay, Petsy. You're asking a fair question. You're probably not going to like my answer, but here it is.First, as FM notes above, the shellings are not the main reason for this blockade. There have been shellings before, especially in Sderot. They have halted before through diplomatic and other measures. This blockade, then, is not a direct result of the shellings. The blockade continues Israel's strategy of isolating Gaza so long as it remains under Hamas rule. That is the real issue here. Gaza, the world's largest open air prison, is being punished to drive out Hamas. It is interesting to note that in the lead up to this brutal tactic, Olmert put aside (for now) a full scale invasion of Gaza, saying that it was not necessary in order to fulfill Israel's strategic objectives. Now, I'm not arguing for a full scale invasion - I think you know that - but I do find it interesting that what is used instead is a "safe" tactic which only a power with complete domination over the other can afford itself. Even if one accepts, and I do not, that Israel has the right act in the manner it has done, it is hard to avoid the underlying conclusions one must draw. As follows: Israel is crushing the Gazan economy, and starving Palestinian people. Hamas is an entity which, amongst other things, attempts to thwart Israeli objectives. Were they able to stop them, they would. Therefore, were Hamas in any position to end this enforced blockade, they would. Therefore, Israel is in complete control of the situation. Therefore, Israel's decimation of Gaza is cruel, and the people it is crushing have no means to defend themselves. There is also a context to the shelling of Sderot, which, fyi, should stop, both because it is wrong in and of itself to bomb a civilian community, and because it is strategic nonsense which gives Israel cover for its actions. Israel has dominated life in Gaza for 60 years, and the Withdrawl has not led to a lessing of Israel's stranglehold over the Strip. What should Israel do to stop the shelling? Open the borders. Help Gaza re-open its airport and sea ports. Allow the PA to open a corridor between Gaza and the West Bank. Show some kind of good faith, negotiated with Palestinian representatives. This is not a fair fight. There is no equivalence. What should Israel do? Recognize that the shelling of Sderot, while wrong, does not warrant the crushing of a people; it is also in part a reaction to exactly the kind of thing that Israel is doing now. They should recognize that they are laying the seeds for the next round of shelling. [ 23 January 2008: Message edited by: Coyote ]
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
just one of the concerned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14896
|
posted 23 January 2008 09:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by Petsy: Israel made the difficult decision of imposing a blockade on Gaza knowing it would produce hardship for the Palestinians. However clearly,the blockade was in response to a relentless and intense barrage of bombs on Sderot and the Western Negev. Its easy for Stargazer and others to just poo poo this but I wonder how they would feel if their town was faced with daily rocket attacks? So the blockade was an attempt to avoid more violent measures and diminish the need for armed intervention, which would bring about a great loss of life to both sides. As a result of the blockade, rocket fire was significantly decreased. And here is the catch following the easing of restrictions yesaterday guess what, . the rocket barrage has re-intensified. What should Israel do? Sit back and let it happen? Yes I know its the occupation stupid but in the immediacy whats to be done?
The blockade is collective punishment of Gaza's civilians. That means it is terrorism. Full stop.
What should Israel do? Start fixing the refugee crisis. Start fixing the broken economy which it suffocated. Start asserting the rights of Palestinians as equal human beings in every part of public life. Stop controlling and micromanaging the Palestinians' destiny. Stop stealing land, water and labour from the Palestinians by law and by force. Stop propping up corrupt puppet regimes in Palestine. But first: Stop making excuses.
From: in the cold outside of the cjc | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 25 January 2008 03:09 PM
quote: A SENIOR Hamas official warned yesterday that the next breakout from the Gaza Strip could be into Israel, with 500,000 Palestinians attempting to march towards the towns and villages from which they or their parents fled or were expelled 60 years ago. "This is not an imaginary scenario and many Palestinians would be prepared to sacrifice their lives," said Ahmed Youssef, political adviser to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya. Israeli minister Ze'ev Boim said the threat must be taken seriously in light of the successful Hamas breakout into Egyptian territory on Wednesday, adding: "We must learn from what has just happened there."
The beginning of a Palestinian civil rights movement?
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961
|
posted 26 January 2008 04:23 AM
Not really a great fan of the Sun newspaper i must say I did find their latest editorial interesting enough to post here since it is on point and asks some interesting questions.Toronto Sun However more to my liking and certainly more provocative is the actual Ha'aretz piece quoted in part in the Sun editorial. It speaks much more to my way of thinking and I believe to some here who at any other time would be loathe to agree with me on the fact that the sun rises every day. Ha'aretz [ 26 January 2008: Message edited by: ohara ]
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803
|
posted 26 January 2008 04:53 AM
I read both articles. No, certainly Israel has nothing to be blamed for, nothing.By the way, I thought that Palestine was a land without people that was made available to a people without a land to occupy. So where the heck did this Qassam come from?
From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 26 January 2008 06:13 AM
From ohara's link: quote: Collective punishment is abhorrent. It is morally reprehensible. It is functionally self-defeating. It destroys the moral fiber of those who order it, practice it, countenance it, turn a blind eye to it. And those who are subjected to it.
Imagine that. Equating the firing of poorly aimed, ineffective rockets into mostly empty desert and with casualties in the tens, to a barbaric siege 1.5 million people complete with starvation, deaths in the thousands, constant brutality, and terror. The Zionists used to have a term for that. Moral equivalence, I think it was.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174
|
posted 26 January 2008 06:35 AM
But FM, the editorial does conclude that line of thought with:
quote: Collective punishment is abhorrent. It is morally reprehensible. It is functionally self-defeating. It destroys the moral fiber of those who order it, practice it, countenance it, turn a blind eye to it. And those who are subjected to it. This may explain why the victims of collective punishment may find themselves resorting to its use. We are guilty of it.
In other word's Israel's use of collective punishment is both morally wrong and achieves nothing strategically. There is even a dotted line back to this: quote: The world is unsympathetic. The world does not think highly enough of Hamas to hold it accountable for the actions of the gunners who use the launchers produced by Hamas and the rockets produced by Hamas.
IE, no wonder the world doesn't care.
From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961
|
posted 26 January 2008 09:46 AM
quote: Originally posted by Frustrated Mess: From ohara's link: Imagine that. Equating the firing of poorly aimed, ineffective rockets into mostly empty desert and with casualties in the tens, to a barbaric siege 1.5 million people complete with starvation, deaths in the thousands, constant brutality, and terror. The Zionists used to have a term for that. Moral equivalence, I think it was.
Its a huge tragedy for the Palestinian people. Hamas leaves few options as noted. Where even one innocent Palestinian or Israeli death in my eyes is a tragedy exagerrating numbers does no one any good. Please help me find a reliable source for your claim that as a result of the siege "deats in the thousands" have occured.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 26 January 2008 12:54 PM
Rick Salutin: quote: Gaza remains a prison: surrounded, strangled, guards on the walls, selectively cutting food and power. We've seen this movie: Dog Day Afternoon. The Kill Pit. The guys inside use hostages, but here, the guys inside are the hostages: 350,000 streamed through the breach, said the UN. When they get out, what do they want to do: Make holy war? No: go shopping! For bombs? No, cement, so they can build a house and marry. Antacid!Don't worry, the border will soon close again, due to U.S. and Israeli pressure. Will people out here have learned anything from the brief gusher of ordinary life — talk about reality TV? Probably not. It all gets muddled again, so easily. But it's a reminder not to rely on the normal versions, from official sources, relayed through the media. Take last week's spat over a Canadian government training course that named Israel and the U.S. as potential torturers. The minister ordered the names omitted.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174
|
posted 26 January 2008 05:10 PM
I don't know for sure about the nature of the wall either. But like other repressive states, Egypt has plenty of its own reasons to want the wall kept solid.For one thing it's Palestinians on both sides, and there is a dotted line to the many Palestinians in Cairo. Mix in Islamic Brotherhood, as well as the close tabs the gegime keeps on secular critics: they want the wall. And I don't doubt that assurances they will maintain security gets some kind of quid pro quo from Israel. Israel wouldn't rely on the Egyptians. But a leaky wall is better than no wall, and it means the Israelis can focus on intelligence ferreting out armaments traffic through the border.
From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174
|
posted 26 January 2008 05:17 PM
quote: If the wall was built on the Gaza side, would it matter what the Egyptians thought?
You can bet the Israelis built the wall with some degree of coordination with Egypt. It doesn't matter whose side the wall is on. What matters is who controls the choke point, 'gaps' in the wall. That is Egypt. And if they are salvaging the sections of the wall- you can bet they won't be worrying about which sides the pieces fell on, or asking for permisssion to retreive. [But it would mostly be falling towards Egypt anyway.]
From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 28 January 2008 07:01 AM
quote: Saying they were waging "economic warfare" against the Gaza Strip's Hamas leaders, Israeli officials told the Supreme Court on Sunday that the military intends to start cutting electricity to the Palestinian territory and continue restricting fuel.
Everyone in Gaza is a Hamas leader. quote: Hamas leaves few options as noted
Applying your logic, every Israeli citizen is responsible for every atrocity carried out by their government. Is that what you believe? quote: Please help me find a reliable source for your claim that as a result of the siege "deats in the thousands" have occured.
I am certain there is no source reliable enough for you ... but ... quote: Between September 2000 and November 2007, about 1,804 Palestinian civilians in Gaza were killed by the Israeli army and 11,300 were wounded; 2,931 homes were completely destroyed, and 2,848 homes were partially destroyed. Because 71% of the population is refugees, the probability is high that those made homeless by Israel's periodic rampages were losing their homes for the second or third time. Gazan households typically consist of 6-7 people, and so the number of people affected by a single death, an injury, or a house demolition is huge.(7)
That is killed and wounded directly and does not include those killed indirectly from lack of medical care, preventable disease, and other illnesses and effects of the barbaric Israeli policy. For example, quote: The impact of the siege on health care is disastrous. The World Health Organization has reported that chronic malnutrition and dietary-related diseases are slowly increasing: low birth weights, anemia in 68% of children age 1 year and younger, and stunted growth in 13.2% of children under age 5. Other health problems include preventable diseases caused by unclean water and inadequate sewage processing, and lack of chemotherapy for cancer patients and medicines used to control chronic cardiac and other conditions. Permission to leave the area for medical treatment is typically denied.
I am sure you agree that is another "tragedy" brought on by the Palestinians themselves.The entire article is worth a read. For example, the rocket fire, the supposed justification for Israel's crimes are, "the crude home-made missiles fired by Palestinian militants on the Israeli town Sderot, which have killed 12 Israelis in 6 years."
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 28 January 2008 01:02 PM
Jaku, even if numbers are wildly too high, under the current conditions they will soon be correct and soon after that, too low. And if 100 deaths is acceptable, why not 1,000? Why not 10,000?It is like the argument over deaths in Iraq. "One million Iraqis have died as a result of the invasion." "I'm sorry, but it was only 250,000." "Oh, so we have 750,000 to go before we have an atrocity worthy of being appalled."
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 28 January 2008 02:52 PM
sigh quote: London - Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger has been quoted as calling for Gazans to be transferred to the Sinai Peninsula, to a Palestinian state which he said could be constructed for them in the desert. In an interview in English with the British weekly The Jewish News, the chief rabbi also said that while peaceable Muslims should be allowed to pray in Jerusalem mosques, they should recognize that Jerusalem belongs to the Jews. Muslims have Mecca and Medina, he was quoted as saying, adding that "you don't need a third place." Metzger called for Britain, the European Union and the United States to assist in the construction of a Palestinian state in Egypt's Sinai Desert. According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city. This will be a solution for the poor people - they will have a nice county, and we shall have our country and we shall live in peace."
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803
|
posted 20 February 2008 03:28 PM
quote: According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city.
Sound like a good deal. However, some detail has to be ironed out. Since, according to Ariel Sharon "(we) the Jewish people control America".. http://tinyurl.com/yvlptq ..would they order the USA to provide "aid" for Palestinians to enable them to make a wonderful city out of a piece of desert ? quote: U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact Summary Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)Foreign Aid Grants and Loans $74,157,600,000 Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid) $9,047,227,200 Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments $1,650,000,000 Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Total Benefits per Israeli $14,630 Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S. Aid to Israel Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Interest Costs Borne by U.S. $49,936,680,000 Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers $134,791,507,200 Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli $23,240 http://tinyurl.com/4v6oh
From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790
|
posted 20 February 2008 03:46 PM
quote: Originally posted by adam stratton: Since, according to Ariel Sharon "(we) the Jewish people control America"..
I have seen this quoted before. It is basicly hearsay. Not saying he did not say it, nor saying he did. Just saying that it is a suspect quote. Note, if you look at your source, no one is identified as actually hearing him say it: "IAP News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael..." IAP said that Radio Israel said... No one is identified as hearing him say it, and it is already now 3 steps down the broken telephone chain. If you can find a good source, let me know.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803
|
posted 20 February 2008 05:13 PM
Following Cueball's objection to hearsay sources, I revised my comment. Thank you Cueball, you are inspiring with your fair-mindedness, I must say. Not that your requirement did not annoy me a bit.. quote: According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city.
Sounds like a good deal. Except that the Palestinians do not have US taxpyers funding transformation of deserts into wonderful cities. quote:
U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact Summary Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997) Foreign Aid Grants and Loans $74,157,600,000 Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid) $9,047,227,200 Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments $1,650,000,000 Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Total Benefits per Israeli $14,630 Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S. Aid to Israel Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Interest Costs Borne by U.S. $49,936,680,000 Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers $134,791,507,200 Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli $23,240 http://tinyurl.com/4v6oh
[ 20 February 2008: Message edited by: adam stratton ]
From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|