babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Life inside the Gaza Ghetto

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Life inside the Gaza Ghetto
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 January 2008 01:48 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.littleredbutton.com/gaza/index2.html
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 January 2008 01:50 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The Israeli Defence Ministry has ordered all of the border crossings with Gaza to be closed, preventing the delivery of a UN aid shipment.

Only humanitarian cases which receive Defence Minister Ehud Barak's personal approval would be allowed through, it said.

"If milk is low in Gaza, the minister will be asked to approve a milk shipment, and it will enter," a spokesman said.



Kiling them slowly

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 January 2008 01:52 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is considering resigning from his post if Israel continues its military operations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, a top PA official said Thursday.

Will the puppet really tug on his own strings?

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 18 January 2008 02:22 PM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ah yes we went too long here without Godwin's law coming into effect.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 18 January 2008 02:26 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You are despicable ohara. Nothing to say about this subject at all? You don't find this a terrible way to treat people? Only you would jump into a subject on the suffering and abuse of people with bullshit like that post.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 18 January 2008 02:39 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:
Ah yes we went too long here without Godwin's law coming into effect.
Gee I didn't see any references that would fall under Godwin's law. You must have really had to dig into the stories. Could you quote the part you mean.

From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 18 January 2008 02:42 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Also, where was the Godwin? Am I missing something?

And ohara, real people (known as Palestinians, who are actually people) are losing their lives daily because of what Israel is doing. You might spare a moment to think about about that.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
B.L. Zeebub LLD
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6914

posted 18 January 2008 03:57 PM      Profile for B.L. Zeebub LLD     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I suspect the shill will claim the word "ghetto" is "Nazi imagery" or some other variant on the usual antisemitism smear. In applying this bizarre and obscure definition the shill will, ironically, be the only one in this thread guilty of the reductio ad Hitlerum argument.

[ 18 January 2008: Message edited by: B.L. Zeebub LLD ]


From: A Devil of an Advocate | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 18 January 2008 04:20 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:
Ah yes we went too long here without Godwin's law coming into effect.

While you would be quite right to point out that the original meaning of the word "ghetto" was the part of a city to which Jews were restricted, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary that usage dates back to the early 17th century which is certainly well before Hitler was born. In fact by 1892, when Hitler was only 3 years old, the usage of ghetto had already been extended to mean the parts of the city in which other minorities lived.

Now shall I look up the etymology of the word "asshole" or would you like to take care of that yourself?


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 18 January 2008 05:26 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hear effin' hear.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 18 January 2008 05:29 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've missed you, pogge.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 19 January 2008 02:42 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A 47-year-old woman died when an Israeli warplane fired into a building that used to house a Hamas "interior ministry" in Gaza City, destroying the structure, they said.

The building was abandoned, but the powerful blast damaged 15 adjacent houses, killing the woman and wounding 46 others, including several children.

Many of the injured were on their way to a wedding in the neighbourhood, witnesses said.



Everyone's a terrist.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 19 January 2008 02:45 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Israel's targeting of a Hamas government office which caused serious casualties at a nearby wedding party was a "war crime" and those responsible should be punished, a UN official said yesterday.

Is that a call for the International Criminal Court? Sorry, that number has been disconnected.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 21 January 2008 01:26 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Daily life, and death, a lot of death, in Palestine.

[ 21 January 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 22 January 2008 03:54 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The strategy worked. On Thursday, 40 rockets were lobbed at Israel from Gaza. By Monday, only one rocket was fired. But the improved security comes at a price. Not only the EU but officials from the United Nations and other organizations have condemned the blockade. They accused Israel of risking the safety of Gazans as a result of mounting fuel and food shortages and power outages at hospitals. They demanded that fuel be flown to the one power plant in the Gaza Strip. In fact, the power Israel provides to Gaza through the electrical grid was never cut; the interruption was to the flow of fuel used to power that plant. As Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni aptly put it, "Israel is the only country in the world that supplies electricity to terror groups which in turn fire rockets at it."

Globe and Mail; Jan 22, 2008


Globe and Mail

The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry. Israel wisely chose not to use the IDF to stop the rocket barrage against Sderot. It has the right to defend itself against terrorism. As sad and deplorable as are these events let's hope that the terrorist Hamas leadership ends the bombing.


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 January 2008 04:27 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Gaza Strip residents Monday moved from worrying about the electricity cuts of the previous 40 hours to worrying about a water shortage. The municipality needs electricity to bring water to homes and the houses need it to pump water to the roof tanks. Hence 40 percent of Gaza Strip homes - 600,000 people - had no running water Monday, the Palestinian water authority said.

Oxfam International said Monday that unless diesel and fuel supplies were resumed immediately, all the Strip's water pumps could stop working Tuesday. The non-governmental organization also warned of the sewage system's collapse in the absence of diesel.

"Without electric power we can manage somehow, without bread too," says a resident of the Nasser neighborhood in northern Gaza. "It's cold enough to prevent the food from going bad and we try to open the refrigerator as little as possible. The kids grumble but they can learn to live without the computer. But without water?"



They are all guilty and the sentence is slow death.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 07:16 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You would think some people would know better than to defend collective punishment and the gross abuse of human rights on babble. Sadly, ohara has not learned that in his time here. A shame.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 22 January 2008 07:26 AM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is a shame, and one has to wonder why such a person is posting on a progressive board when said person has shown absolutely no ability for empathy beyond the CJC and what moves them.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 January 2008 07:34 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stargazer:
It is a shame, and one has to wonder why such a person is posting on a progressive board when said person has shown absolutely no ability for empathy beyond the CJC and what moves them.

Well for me, his posts illuminate the evil ugliness and mal-intent that is driving him and those like him.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 January 2008 07:49 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is another thread on the forum regarding progressive views on anti-semitism here. I wonder if Ohara realizes his (and others) complete lack of compassion really contributes to the topic April Rosenblum tries to tackle.
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 07:55 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think it's "evil", at least not in intent. I think it must be hard to identify so strongly with an entity that is seen to some as the expression of collective aspiration, and then see that entity act so definitively against the most basic elements of progressive thought.

I suppose what depresses me is that someone can spend so much time around the people who make up this board, the compassion and insight brought to bear by so many, and be unmoved. It is not as if the effects of the Occupation on an occupied people have not been well documented on babble. And yes, I think the ill effects of the Occupation on Israel and Israelis has been well documented as well, including the horrific shelling of Sderot.

The Occupation hurts us all. It has to end. I hope that this self-evident truth becomes consensus, the kind of consensus one can read in the Globe and Mail.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 22 January 2008 08:15 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by remind:

Well for me, his posts illuminate the evil ugliness and mal-intent that is driving him and those like him.


I know some here lump me and ohara together but I do not always agree with him. However this post breaks all Babble rules. We don't refer to Babblers (no matter what your beef) as "evil" with "mal-intent". It's just plain wrong.

From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 22 January 2008 08:38 AM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Too bad for ohara Petsy. He is a despicable person. Sorry but he has proven himself to be completely lacking any progressive values and compassion. That was his own doing. If we happen to abhor that, then good for us. The issue is, how much of his crap is he allowed to spew on this progressive board simply because 1) he rarely answers direct questions and 2) he continues, constantly, to post only to slyly attack those who do not like the CJC's mandate, and those who speak of progressive Jewish groups. Of course, he does both 1 and 2 without stepping too far over any lines.

Read Coyote's post a couple above and you'll get what I mean.

I feel no pity for ohara. I think remind was correct about him.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 January 2008 08:39 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Petsy:
I know some here lump me and ohara together but I do not always agree with him. However this post breaks all Babble rules. We don't refer to Babblers (no matter what your beef) as "evil" with "mal-intent". It's just plain wrong.

I think it suits his words just fine. Please note the first and last description of evil below.

quote:
Main Entry: 1evil
Pronunciation: \ˈē-vəl, British often & US also ˈē-(ˌ vil\
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): evil·er or evil·ler; evil·est or evil·lest
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English yfel; akin to Old High German ubil evil
Date: before 12th century
1 a: morally reprehensible : sinful wicked b: arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct
2 aarchaic : inferior b: causing discomfort or repulsion : offensive c: disagreeable
3 a: causing harm : pernicious

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evil

[ 22 January 2008: Message edited by: remind ]


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 January 2008 08:41 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

[ 22 January 2008: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 22 January 2008 09:02 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stargazer:
Too bad for ohara Petsy. He is a despicable person. Sorry but he has proven himself to be completely lacking any progressive values and compassion. That was his own doing. If we happen to abhor that, then good for us. The issue is, how much of his crap is he allowed to spew on this progressive board simply because 1) he rarely answers direct questions and 2) he continues, constantly, to post only to slyly attack those who do not like the CJC's mandate, and those who speak of progressive Jewish groups. Of course, he does both 1 and 2 without stepping too far over any lines.

Read Coyote's post a couple above and you'll get what I mean.

I feel no pity for ohara. I think remind was correct about him.


I don't agree. Someone I believe either here or another thread did point out that ohara is on the record that he is against the occupation. It may not meet your test but at least he has posted his position.

Secondly so there is no misunderstanding, I do know ohara and while he is sometimes excessive on both israel and cjc, I also know him to be more than progressive on social policy issues from AIDS to child poverty.

All this to say that judging anyone by one issue is wrong. And its more wrong to use such ugly and dismmisive language here on Babble short of going after a neo-Nazi or white supremacist.


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 09:55 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree that judging anyone by one issue is problematic. And if ohara concentrated himself on the issues where he actually has a progressive perspective, and only occasionally interjected to defend Israel's attacks on the basic human rights of Palestinians, I could have a higher opinion of his contribution here.

It could be that ohara is a wonderful person IRL. I'm prepared to believe that. I'm prepared to believe we could share a small carafe of wine (I don't drink much, but I do like wine) and be quite content with each other's company. But that's not the contention here.

We have a thread, here, that deals with the absolute horror of what is happening, daily, to the people of Gaza. Ohara's interjections have been designed to derail the discussion from the start. He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier. And this is the vast majority of his contribution to babble.

So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 22 January 2008 10:09 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Coyote:
I agree that judging anyone by one issue is problematic. And if ohara concentrated himself on the issues where he actually has a progressive perspective, and only occasionally interjected to defend Israel's attacks on the basic human rights of Palestinians, I could have a higher opinion of his contribution here.

It could be that ohara is a wonderful person IRL. I'm prepared to believe that. I'm prepared to believe we could share a small carafe of wine (I don't drink much, but I do like wine) and be quite content with each other's company. But that's not the contention here.

We have a thread, here, that deals with the absolute horror of what is happening, daily, to the people of Gaza. Ohara's interjections have been designed to derail the discussion from the start. He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier. And this is the vast majority of his contribution to babble.

So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.


Coyote, anger is one thing calling someone "evil" quite another.

And your contention that "He has not even had the grace, obviously, to read or comment on what Hell is being visited on the occupied by the occupier",is simply false. See ohara's comment from this thread below


quote:
The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry. Israel wisely chose not to use the IDF to stop the rocket barrage against Sderot. It has the right to defend itself against terrorism. As sad and deplorable as are these events let's hope that the terrorist Hamas leadership ends the bombing.


So all I am saying is we ought not let anger blind us so totally.Ohara certainly has his shtik but some of the allegations are wrong and the label "evil" is evil itself.

From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 January 2008 10:23 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Coyote:
So, sorry if there is some harshness here. And I don't agree with calling anyone "evil". But the anger directed his way is justified. Completely.

Coyote, are you instilling a religious viewpoint onto the word "evil"? As I gave a clear definition of what I meant by the word above which is morally reprehensible as that is how I view said actions in this regard.

However, I am unwilling to go further with this line of meta discussion, as I see it as the usual deflection away from the topic started by the same people in all the Palestinian threads.

In any of the threads about Palestine and the CJC, dialogue supporting Palestinians, illuminating their plight, and opposing the CJC's stance, is occuring.

Then All of a sudden ohara jumps in, making over the top comments, amongst other things, and of course, someone then states disagreement with his less than empathetic stances on the plight of Palestinians, or they contend his remark supporting the CJC's. All of a sudden petsy jumps in, to call it an attack against ohara's person. And by doing so, frames the future discussion towards; how, why, where, when, it was an attack upon the person, and thus the topic at hand, either the plight of Palestinians, or the CJC, or Israel's actions are deflected away from.

This happens time after time, after time in ALL of the Palestinian and CJC threads. So much so, that one has to realize that it is done with intent. If it happened just a few times, or sporadically, then one could shrug it off as just meta debate circumstance, or a natural thread drift into other areas. But it isn't just a few times, or sporadic, it is EVERY thread, just look, and think back, over them. And that is what I call mal-intent.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 22 January 2008 11:00 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This thread is really ironic. Ohara can be an ass. When I read some of his posts i want to throw the monitor across the room.

But guess what that can be said about a lot of people here.

He is a defender of the state of Israel. You know what many here are.

That does not make him a good or bad person and does not make him evil.

One can agree with him, disagree or stay neutral or ignore him

But let us focus on the real racists and bigots out there. Ohara is not one of them.


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 January 2008 11:09 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But let us focus on the real racists and bigots out there. Ohara is not one of them.

Not a biggot, just employs the same tactics... To surprising success considering the majority here seem to have identified the tactics. What was this thread about?


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 22 January 2008 11:29 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by remind:

All of a sudden petsy jumps in, to call it an attack against ohara's person. And by doing so, frames the future discussion towards; how, why, where, when, it was an attack upon the person, and thus the topic at hand, either the plight of Palestinians, or the CJC, or Israel's actions are deflected away from.

This happens time after time, after time in ALL of the Palestinian and CJC threads. So much so, that one has to realize that it is done with intent. If it happened just a few times, or sporadically, then one could shrug it off as just meta debate circumstance, or a natural thread drift into other areas. But it isn't just a few times, or sporadic, it is EVERY thread, just look, and think back, over them. And that is what I call mal-intent.



Sorry remind but let me remind you that it was stargazer who began this thread drift when he posted:

quote:
You are despicable ohara.
That was quickly followed by pogge claimng:

quote:
Now shall I look up the etymology of the word "asshole" or would you like to take care of that yourself?
ohara then posted the Globe editorial with an admission that this was a passionate issue that makes one cry:

quote:
The mess in the Middle East is enough to make you cry.
That was followed by another attack on ohara by stargazer:

quote:
It is a shame, and one has to wonder why such a person is posting on a progressive board when said person has shown absolutely no ability for empathy beyond the CJC and what moves them.
And that remind led to you attacking ohara as evil:
quote:
Well for me, his posts illuminate the evil ugliness and mal-intent that is driving him and those like him.
So then I would look in the mirror before I cast stones at who started what thread drift.

From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 11:48 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Petsy, you are being obtuse. Hand-wring about the "mess" that is the Middle East is not the same thing as recognizing that the Occupation is marked by the acts of the occupier, not the occupied. Commending Israel for "wisely" not obliterating Gaza en toto does not equate to a progressive perspective. In fact, any defense of Israel's brutal, and illegal, decimation of Gaza and its inhabitants cannot be considered progressive; let alone describing the tactics of the occupier's brutal methods as "wise". . You should recognize that. And your defense of such, your characterization of it as anything near defensible, speaks volumes.

And remind, I think we fundamentally agree. I just think using a term like "evil" is loaded with all kinds of connotations that are not necessarily helpful in this discussion. But Petsy would do better to pay attention to the substance of what has been said, rather than playing word games.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 January 2008 11:53 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heh, you'll notice Petsy simply repeats the tactic Coyote
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 11:55 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's what happens when you come to pamphlet a board rather than to engage and/or learn.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 22 January 2008 11:59 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Then what is believing in collective punishment if not bigotry or racism. Even his last post justifies collective punishment. Your neighbour fires a rocket we will kill you because you are part of your neighbours collective. That is an evil thought to want to inflict harm on innocent people in the hope they might stop the heavily armed murderers in their presence.

By that logic Osama Bin Laden was right to blow up the trade centre to try and convince Americans to stop attacking Muslims. It was wrong for Bin Laden and it is wrong for Israel.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 22 January 2008 12:00 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Petsy:
That was quickly followed by pogge ...

If you're going to bring me into this, how about you also bring in the comment from ohara I was responding to. Clearly his intent was to stifle this discussion by any means he could find. And clearly his comment was unwarranted, as I demonstrated. So why do you mention me, again?


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 January 2008 12:01 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 January 2008 12:03 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
-The United Nations Security Council will not approve a resolution condemning Israel over the closure of the Gaza Strip, due to pressure applied by the United States.

That American commitmet to freedom and justice at work, yet again.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 January 2008 12:06 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Outraged at the above clip? Do something about it: Here is the information for Friday, January 25th, 5 p.m. in Toronto.

Incidentally, the mistype in the linked thread ("the Gaza Strip power plant ran out of fuel and shit down") seems much more appropriate


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 January 2008 12:07 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Mansour Rahal lay unconscious in the intensive care unit of Gaza City's Shifa hospital, linked to an electrically powered ventilator, the coloured monitor above his head showing his heart, respiration and oxygen saturation rate.

On Thursday last week, the teenager was driving his donkey cart through Beit Lahiya when it was destroyed by a missile which targeted militants in a nearby car. The rocket killed his mother and older brother, and Mansour contracted meningitis after suffering severe head wounds.

His hopes of survival yesterday depended on there being enough diesel to keep in operation the four generators which were Shifa's only source of power. His doctor, Kamal al-Geathny, said: "If we lose power, he and six other patients in this unit will die."



Barak and all Israelis must be pleased that this Gazan is not living comfortably.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 January 2008 12:10 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Coyote:
And remind, I think we fundamentally agree. I just think using a term like "evil" is loaded with all kinds of connotations that are not necessarily helpful in this discussion.
I will concede to that observation.

quote:
But Petsy would do better to pay attention to the substance of what has been said, rather than playing word games.
As I stated above, I believe that it is a created diversion by both players.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 22 January 2008 03:41 PM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Created diversion by both people? I was in Huntsville all day today without internet access. Hard to be part of a conspiracy as a result.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 22 January 2008 03:52 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:
Created diversion by both people? I was in Huntsville all day today without internet access. Hard to be part of a conspiracy as a result.

Disingenuous as always.

From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
miles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7209

posted 22 January 2008 05:26 PM      Profile for miles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is easy to gang up on Ohara. It is easy to attack Petsy.

But you know what. If you walk outside of the babble bubble and talk to real people you may find out the following. Some are in favour of a 1 state Israel, some are in favour of 1 secular joint state and some are in favour of 2 states.

Each are right to have their opinion. Each should be allowed to have their opinion.

While I may disagree with some of what Ohara writes. Who gave me the power to say that his opinion is 100% false?

Who is right? I don't know. But my daddy used to say that in a divorce their are 3 sides to the story -- his, hers and the truth and the truth usually has bits of his and bits of hers combined.

well in this case i am sure their is misinformation be spread by all sides. In fact I know that their has to be.

Now is Ohara evil. No he can be annoying. But no more annoying than some who have posted here in this thread and are so quick to condemn.


From: vaughan | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 January 2008 05:35 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This isn't about ohara. It is about an indefensible assault on humans by a combination of imprisonment, an overwhelming mechanical militaristic force, and slow strangulation.

If you, or ohara, or petsy, or anyone wants to defend that, go ahead.

I post this here not to debate the politics of the middle east or to annoy ohara but to do my little bit to document the crimes against humanity being carried out with the virtual approval of the entire Western world because, well, the Palestinians are simply a disposable people committing "terrorism" by trying to defend their own land and their own lives from forces intent on grinding them into the desert sand.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
miles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7209

posted 22 January 2008 05:40 PM      Profile for miles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
This isn't about ohara. It is about an indefensible assault on humans by a combination of imprisonment, an overwhelming mechanical militaristic force, and slow strangulation.

If you, or ohara, or petsy, or anyone wants to defend that, go ahead.


FM in reading this thread it is more about ohara than about what you posted just now.

I wish this thread was only a discussion of the issues you wanted to talk about. But you are mistaken it is not. It has become an indictment upon one poster and one poster only.


From: vaughan | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 22 January 2008 05:48 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is not a divorce. This is an Occupation. And yes, there are many sides to any story. But to accept without question - and it is without question for ohara, as it is substantially for Petsy and yourself (are we now supposed to believe that ohara has somehow stepped out of the consensus you three bring to each and every discussion? Please.) - the right of the occupier to occupy, and to punish the occupied, is not even close to being a reasonably progressive position.

Israel is killing innocent Gazans. It is the occupying power. There are no justifications for what it is doing. Quit trying to make them.

[ 22 January 2008: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
ChicagoLoopDweller
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14097

posted 22 January 2008 05:49 PM      Profile for ChicagoLoopDweller     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This type of diversion happens in ALL sorts of threads. Talk about Cuba and what do you get. Talk about Isreal and what do you get. The internet is not conducive to real discussions but lends itself much more to over the top rhetoric for which one never has to truly answer.
From: Chicago | Registered: Apr 2007  |  IP: Logged
just one of the concerned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14896

posted 22 January 2008 10:06 PM      Profile for just one of the concerned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Britain condemns Israeli blockade of Gaza LONDON: Britain has condemned the escalation of suffering, as Israel blockades Gaza in response to a series of rocket attacks.

A call for an end to the aggression came in a joint statement by Foreign Secretary, David Miliband and Secretary of State for International Development Douglas Alexander.



quote:
Reports: Thousands Cross Gaza Wall

By IBRAHIM BARZAK – 48 minutes ago

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) — Thousands of Palestinians poured out of the Gaza Strip and into Egypt early Wednesday after masked gunmen blew dozens of holes in the border wall, witnesses and Hamas security officials said.

Egyptian guards took no action as the Gazans rushed to buy food, fuel and other supplies that have become scarce in Gaza because of an Israeli blockade, the witnesses and officials said. Police from Hamas, which rules Gaza, also stood by.



From: in the cold outside of the cjc | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
B.L. Zeebub LLD
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6914

posted 23 January 2008 02:07 AM      Profile for B.L. Zeebub LLD     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What a surprise; miles is here to defend ohara and petsy with nothing but the finest platitudes.
From: A Devil of an Advocate | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 23 January 2008 03:56 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I love this. Bad enough you always link petsy and I but now anyone honestly anyone, who even remotely tries to shed some light on the tactics used against me because i happen to support Israel is also attacked.

Poor miles, never really an ohara fan, not by any definition, just points out some obvious truths and BAM he is pilloried. Talk about ostrich-like.

And for the record, I deplore the occupation. It has dehumanized both Israelis and Palestinians. I want it to end but unlike many here I want it to end with credible negtotiations between Isarelis and Palestinians not between B.L. Zeebub LLD and Frustrated Mess. I wish there was never a blockade as strongly as I wish that Hamas would not lob hundreds of rockets into Sdeorth on a regular basis.


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 23 January 2008 04:24 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The issue of Gaza has taken a turn this morning with news that the border with Egypt or at least a portion of the border is now wide open. Egypt is now it the position to help.

What will Egypt do with the thousands who are running across the border to flee Gaza.

The issue of Egypt's assistance is an important discussion to have. It does not negate the discussion of Israel and Gaza. But rather it brings another player into an already messy issue.

quote:
Tens of thousands of Palestinians have surged into Egypt from the Gaza Strip after masked militants destroyed parts of the border wall.
Gazans rushed to buy food, fuel and other supplies that have become scarce because of an Israeli blockade - aimed at stopping rocket attacks from Gaza.

Egyptian police have so far taken no action to stop people crossing.


bbc

[ 23 January 2008: Message edited by: johnpauljones ]


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 23 January 2008 04:52 AM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I wish there was never a blockade as strongly as I wish that Hamas would not lob hundreds of rockets into Sdeorth on a regular basis.

Really ohara? Well, I for one, do not believe you. Remember, you were the one so powerfully against the ACJC. Your comment above speaks volumes about you. If they lob rockets then all is fine and dandy? You do realize Israel has the backing of the almighty US, and now Canada, and far far more money and military might right? You realize that in NO WAY is this an even handed conflict? You realize starving people, keeping them boarded up and locked away from the basic necessities is an abhorrent position right ohara?

Of course you do, but I suspect that doesn't matter to you. As long as Hama is "lobbing rockets" then everything Israel does is justified.

Dug yourself even deeper.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 23 January 2008 05:19 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Deplore anything you will, ohara. You're boring. People are dying because the occupier, whom you find "wise", continues to occupy. That should be fun.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 23 January 2008 05:42 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think everyone's made their points, and everyone's named the behaviour now, and I agree with the majority.

So, now that we've named it for what it is, how about not letting them derail further, and just continue the discussion about the thread topic? Right now, they're winning. You don't have to let them.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Indiana Jones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14792

posted 23 January 2008 05:46 AM      Profile for Indiana Jones        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Was just checking the Star's website and things appear to have jsut gotten crazier:

http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/296628

"RAFAH, Gaza Strip–Tens of thousands of Palestinians poured from the Gaza Strip into Egypt today after masked gunmen with explosives destroyed most of the seven-mile wall dividing the border town of Rafah.

The Gazans crossed on foot, in cars or riding donkey carts to buy supplies made scarce by an Israeli blockade of their impoverished territory. Police from the militant group Hamas, which controls Gaza, directed the traffic. Egyptian border guards took no action."


From: Toronto / Brooklyn / Jerusalem | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 January 2008 05:49 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The rockets, Mashaal said, were not the reason for the blockade.


"We stopped the missiles before, as well as all types of resistance in a tactical manner, but this did not bring the siege to an end. Therefore, the missiles are not the reason, and the siege did not begin with the fuel and electricity crisis."



It's the demographics, stupid.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 23 January 2008 07:27 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Indiana Jones:
Was just checking the Star's website and things appear to have jsut gotten crazier:

"


I agree Indiana that is why I posted it above. I still wonder why Egypt will do -- Not today but really tomorrow.


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 23 January 2008 07:31 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Israel made the difficult decision of imposing a blockade on Gaza knowing it would produce hardship for the Palestinians. However clearly,the blockade was in response to a relentless and intense barrage of bombs on Sderot and the Western Negev. Its easy for Stargazer and others to just poo poo this but I wonder how they would feel if their town was faced with daily rocket attacks?

So the blockade was an attempt to avoid more violent measures and diminish the need for armed intervention, which would bring about a great loss of life to both sides. As a result of the blockade, rocket fire was significantly decreased. And here is the catch following the easing of restrictions yesaterday guess what, .
the rocket barrage has re-intensified.

What should Israel do? Sit back and let it happen? Yes I know its the occupation stupid but in the immediacy whats to be done?


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 23 January 2008 09:09 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Okay, Petsy. You're asking a fair question. You're probably not going to like my answer, but here it is.

First, as FM notes above, the shellings are not the main reason for this blockade. There have been shellings before, especially in Sderot. They have halted before through diplomatic and other measures. This blockade, then, is not a direct result of the shellings.

The blockade continues Israel's strategy of isolating Gaza so long as it remains under Hamas rule. That is the real issue here. Gaza, the world's largest open air prison, is being punished to drive out Hamas.

It is interesting to note that in the lead up to this brutal tactic, Olmert put aside (for now) a full scale invasion of Gaza, saying that it was not necessary in order to fulfill Israel's strategic objectives. Now, I'm not arguing for a full scale invasion - I think you know that - but I do find it interesting that what is used instead is a "safe" tactic which only a power with complete domination over the other can afford itself.

Even if one accepts, and I do not, that Israel has the right act in the manner it has done, it is hard to avoid the underlying conclusions one must draw. As follows:

Israel is crushing the Gazan economy, and starving Palestinian people.

Hamas is an entity which, amongst other things, attempts to thwart Israeli objectives. Were they able to stop them, they would.

Therefore, were Hamas in any position to end this enforced blockade, they would.

Therefore, Israel is in complete control of the situation.

Therefore, Israel's decimation of Gaza is cruel, and the people it is crushing have no means to defend themselves.

There is also a context to the shelling of Sderot, which, fyi, should stop, both because it is wrong in and of itself to bomb a civilian community, and because it is strategic nonsense which gives Israel cover for its actions. Israel has dominated life in Gaza for 60 years, and the Withdrawl has not led to a lessing of Israel's stranglehold over the Strip.

What should Israel do to stop the shelling? Open the borders. Help Gaza re-open its airport and sea ports. Allow the PA to open a corridor between Gaza and the West Bank. Show some kind of good faith, negotiated with Palestinian representatives.

This is not a fair fight. There is no equivalence. What should Israel do? Recognize that the shelling of Sderot, while wrong, does not warrant the crushing of a people; it is also in part a reaction to exactly the kind of thing that Israel is doing now. They should recognize that they are laying the seeds for the next round of shelling.

[ 23 January 2008: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 January 2008 09:32 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The siege was imposed on Gaza with the election of Hamas. It is not for rockets that Gazans are being relentlessly and mercilessly punished, it is for exercising franchise and not electing the puppets put forward by Israel and the US.

The rocket fire is barely an annoyance to Israel and if it stopped tomorrow, Israel would invent another excuse to continue their barbaric, genocidal policies.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
just one of the concerned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14896

posted 23 January 2008 09:33 AM      Profile for just one of the concerned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Petsy:
Israel made the difficult decision of imposing a blockade on Gaza knowing it would produce hardship for the Palestinians. However clearly,the blockade was in response to a relentless and intense barrage of bombs on Sderot and the Western Negev. Its easy for Stargazer and others to just poo poo this but I wonder how they would feel if their town was faced with daily rocket attacks?

So the blockade was an attempt to avoid more violent measures and diminish the need for armed intervention, which would bring about a great loss of life to both sides. As a result of the blockade, rocket fire was significantly decreased. And here is the catch following the easing of restrictions yesaterday guess what, .
the rocket barrage has re-intensified.

What should Israel do? Sit back and let it happen? Yes I know its the occupation stupid but in the immediacy whats to be done?



The blockade is collective punishment of Gaza's civilians. That means it is terrorism. Full stop.

What should Israel do? Start fixing the refugee crisis. Start fixing the broken economy which it suffocated. Start asserting the rights of Palestinians as equal human beings in every part of public life. Stop controlling and micromanaging the Palestinians' destiny. Stop stealing land, water and labour from the Palestinians by law and by force. Stop propping up corrupt puppet regimes in Palestine.

But first: Stop making excuses.


From: in the cold outside of the cjc | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 January 2008 11:31 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 23 January 2008 04:20 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
The siege was imposed on Gaza with the election of Hamas. It is not for rockets that Gazans are being relentlessly and mercilessly punished, it is for exercising franchise and not electing the puppets put forward by Israel and the US.

The rocket fire is barely an annoyance to Israel and if it stopped tomorrow, Israel would invent another excuse to continue their barbaric, genocidal policies.



Excellent catch and response FM.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 24 January 2008 11:49 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"We wouldn't want to see the people suffer. All these stories about collective punishment is nonsense. For us children are children whether they are Palestinians or others. We would like to see them living in peace," Peres told reporters at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

He's such a sweet guy, isn't he?


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 24 January 2008 11:52 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Israel said Wednesday it expects Egypt to "solve the problem" after at least 50,000 people crossed the downed Gaza-Egyptian border to buy supplies.

'Cause everyone knows Palestinains not humilated and in deep despair among sewage and crumbling buildings is a problem.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 24 January 2008 07:18 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Vilnai said Israel's effort to disengage from Gaza "continues in that we want to stop supplying electricity to them, stop supplying them with water and medicine, so that it would come from another place."

"We are responsible for it as long as there is no alternative," Vilnai said. Israel says it has tightened its cordon around the Gaza Strip to prevent cross-border rocket attacks that have sown panic in southern Israel ... The Jewish state still controls Gaza's northern and eastern borders as well as its airspace and coastal waters.


Oddly, Israel doesn't want to disengage from Gaza's coastal waters where there is natural gas Israel believes it has a right to. It appears Israel wants Arab soil and resources. Just not Arabs.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 25 January 2008 03:09 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A SENIOR Hamas official warned yesterday that the next breakout from the Gaza Strip could be into Israel, with 500,000 Palestinians attempting to march towards the towns and villages from which they or their parents fled or were expelled 60 years ago.

"This is not an imaginary scenario and many Palestinians would be prepared to sacrifice their lives," said Ahmed Youssef, political adviser to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya.

Israeli minister Ze'ev Boim said the threat must be taken seriously in light of the successful Hamas breakout into Egyptian territory on Wednesday, adding: "We must learn from what has just happened there."


The beginning of a Palestinian civil rights movement?


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 26 January 2008 04:23 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not really a great fan of the Sun newspaper i must say I did find their latest editorial interesting enough to post here since it is on point and asks some interesting questions.

Toronto Sun

However more to my liking and certainly more provocative is the actual Ha'aretz piece quoted in part in the Sun editorial. It speaks much more to my way of thinking and I believe to some here who at any other time would be loathe to agree with me on the fact that the sun rises every day.

Ha'aretz

[ 26 January 2008: Message edited by: ohara ]


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 26 January 2008 04:53 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read both articles. No, certainly Israel has nothing to be blamed for, nothing.

By the way, I thought that Palestine was a land without people that was made available to a people without a land to occupy.

So where the heck did this Qassam come from?


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 26 January 2008 06:13 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From ohara's link:

quote:
Collective punishment is abhorrent. It is morally reprehensible. It is functionally self-defeating. It destroys the moral fiber of those who order it, practice it, countenance it, turn a blind eye to it. And those who are subjected to it.

Imagine that. Equating the firing of poorly aimed, ineffective rockets into mostly empty desert and with casualties in the tens, to a barbaric siege 1.5 million people complete with starvation, deaths in the thousands, constant brutality, and terror.

The Zionists used to have a term for that. Moral equivalence, I think it was.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 26 January 2008 06:35 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But FM, the editorial does conclude that line of thought with:


quote:
Collective punishment is abhorrent. It is morally reprehensible. It is functionally self-defeating. It destroys the moral fiber of those who order it, practice it, countenance it, turn a blind eye to it. And those who are subjected to it.

This may explain why the victims of collective punishment may find themselves resorting to its use. We are guilty of it.


In other word's Israel's use of collective punishment is both morally wrong and achieves nothing strategically.

There is even a dotted line back to this:

quote:
The world is unsympathetic. The world does not think highly enough of Hamas to hold it accountable for the actions of the gunners who use the launchers produced by Hamas and the rockets produced by Hamas.

IE, no wonder the world doesn't care.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 26 January 2008 07:44 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
ohara likes links?

These should keep you busy for a while. While you watch them, you could perhaps meditate on the meaning of the word "wisdom".


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 26 January 2008 09:46 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
From ohara's link:

Imagine that. Equating the firing of poorly aimed, ineffective rockets into mostly empty desert and with casualties in the tens, to a barbaric siege 1.5 million people complete with starvation, deaths in the thousands, constant brutality, and terror.

The Zionists used to have a term for that. Moral equivalence, I think it was.


Its a huge tragedy for the Palestinian people. Hamas leaves few options as noted. Where even one innocent Palestinian or Israeli death in my eyes is a tragedy exagerrating numbers does no one any good. Please help me find a reliable source for your claim that as a result of the siege "deats in the thousands" have occured.

From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 26 January 2008 12:54 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rick Salutin:

quote:
Gaza remains a prison: surrounded, strangled, guards on the walls, selectively cutting food and power. We've seen this movie: Dog Day Afternoon. The Kill Pit. The guys inside use hostages, but here, the guys inside are the hostages: 350,000 streamed through the breach, said the UN. When they get out, what do they want to do: Make holy war? No: go shopping! For bombs? No, cement, so they can build a house and marry. Antacid!

Don't worry, the border will soon close again, due to U.S. and Israeli pressure. Will people out here have learned anything from the brief gusher of ordinary life — talk about reality TV? Probably not. It all gets muddled again, so easily.

But it's a reminder not to rely on the normal versions, from official sources, relayed through the media. Take last week's spat over a Canadian government training course that named Israel and the U.S. as potential torturers. The minister ordered the names omitted.



From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 26 January 2008 01:32 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why does Egypt have a wall between them and Gaza, couldn't they use the business? Cash for goods seems like good reason to have border crossing. What are the reasons Egypt keeps a wall up and doesn't allow free movement of poeple and goods back and forth.

The border crossings between Can/USA/Mexico - seem to work pretty well despite a few problems.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 26 January 2008 02:43 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Why does Egypt have a wall between them and Gaza, couldn't they use the business?

There may be an incorrect assumption in your question.

quote:
Residents of Rafah, a divided town straddling the Egypt-Gaza border, said militants set off explosions that demolished a 200-metre (200-yard) length of the rusting, six-meter-high (20-foot-high) metal border wall put up by Israel in 2004, a year before it pulled troops and settlers from the territory.

Emphasis added.

From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 26 January 2008 03:07 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
thanks
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 26 January 2008 03:10 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So obviously Israel and Egypt have an agreement on this wall being there.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 26 January 2008 04:15 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Don't know but I don't know that it's obvious, either. If the wall was built on the Gaza side, would it matter what the Egyptians thought?

[ 26 January 2008: Message edited by: pogge ]


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 26 January 2008 05:10 PM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't know for sure about the nature of the wall either. But like other repressive states, Egypt has plenty of its own reasons to want the wall kept solid.

For one thing it's Palestinians on both sides, and there is a dotted line to the many Palestinians in Cairo.

Mix in Islamic Brotherhood, as well as the close tabs the gegime keeps on secular critics: they want the wall.

And I don't doubt that assurances they will maintain security gets some kind of quid pro quo from Israel. Israel wouldn't rely on the Egyptians. But a leaky wall is better than no wall, and it means the Israelis can focus on intelligence ferreting out armaments traffic through the border.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 26 January 2008 05:17 PM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
If the wall was built on the Gaza side, would it matter what the Egyptians thought?

You can bet the Israelis built the wall with some degree of coordination with Egypt.

It doesn't matter whose side the wall is on. What matters is who controls the choke point, 'gaps' in the wall. That is Egypt.

And if they are salvaging the sections of the wall- you can bet they won't be worrying about which sides the pieces fell on, or asking for permisssion to retreive. [But it would mostly be falling towards Egypt anyway.]


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 28 January 2008 07:01 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Saying they were waging "economic warfare" against the Gaza Strip's Hamas leaders, Israeli officials told the Supreme Court on Sunday that the military intends to start cutting electricity to the Palestinian territory and continue restricting fuel.

Everyone in Gaza is a Hamas leader.

quote:
Hamas leaves few options as noted

Applying your logic, every Israeli citizen is responsible for every atrocity carried out by their government. Is that what you believe?

quote:
Please help me find a reliable source for your claim that as a result of the siege "deats in the thousands" have occured.

I am certain there is no source reliable enough for you ... but ...

quote:
Between September 2000 and November 2007, about 1,804 Palestinian civilians in Gaza were killed by the Israeli army and 11,300 were wounded; 2,931 homes were completely destroyed, and 2,848 homes were partially destroyed. Because 71% of the population is refugees, the probability is high that those made homeless by Israel's periodic rampages were losing their homes for the second or third time. Gazan households typically consist of 6-7 people, and so the number of people affected by a single death, an injury, or a house demolition is huge.(7)

That is killed and wounded directly and does not include those killed indirectly from lack of medical care, preventable disease, and other illnesses and effects of the barbaric Israeli policy. For example,

quote:
The impact of the siege on health care is disastrous. The World Health Organization has reported that chronic malnutrition and dietary-related diseases are slowly increasing: low birth weights, anemia in 68% of children age 1 year and younger, and stunted growth in 13.2% of children under age 5. Other health problems include preventable diseases caused by unclean water and inadequate sewage processing, and lack of chemotherapy for cancer patients and medicines used to control chronic cardiac and other conditions. Permission to leave the area for medical treatment is typically denied.

I am sure you agree that is another "tragedy" brought on by the Palestinians themselves.

The entire article is worth a read. For example, the rocket fire, the supposed justification for Israel's crimes are, "the crude home-made missiles fired by Palestinian militants on the Israeli town Sderot, which have killed 12 Israelis in 6 years."


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jaku
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14801

posted 28 January 2008 10:18 AM      Profile for Jaku     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
nice response frustrated mess. though these tragic circumstances have occured over an 8 year period. i thought you had suggested that the thousands of deaths were as a result of Israel's siege. also i hate to think of how hard this has been on the palestian people but if we do not want to get caught by people like ohara we should not exagerrate the numbers.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 28 January 2008 12:05 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do you know what the total death toll in Gaza as a result of the siege? That would include all deaths resulting from deprivation? I don't either. But I bet it curves upwards.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jaku
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14801

posted 28 January 2008 12:36 PM      Profile for Jaku     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i do not know. what i do know is that we have to be careful not to claim numbers taht are not correct.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 28 January 2008 01:02 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Jaku, even if numbers are wildly too high, under the current conditions they will soon be correct and soon after that, too low. And if 100 deaths is acceptable, why not 1,000? Why not 10,000?

It is like the argument over deaths in Iraq.

"One million Iraqis have died as a result of the invasion."

"I'm sorry, but it was only 250,000."

"Oh, so we have 750,000 to go before we have an atrocity worthy of being appalled."


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 28 January 2008 02:52 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
sigh

quote:
London - Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger has been quoted as calling for Gazans to be transferred to the Sinai Peninsula, to a Palestinian state which he said could be constructed for them in the desert.

In an interview in English with the British weekly The Jewish News, the chief rabbi also said that while peaceable Muslims should be allowed to pray in Jerusalem mosques, they should recognize that Jerusalem belongs to the Jews. Muslims have Mecca and Medina, he was quoted as saying, adding that "you don't need a third place."

Metzger called for Britain, the European Union and the United States to assist in the construction of a Palestinian state in Egypt's Sinai Desert.

According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city. This will be a solution for the poor people - they will have a nice county, and we shall have our country and we shall live in peace."



From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 20 February 2008 02:02 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The child was identified as Sa’id Al Ayidy, 2, from Rafah in the southern part of the Gaza Strip. He suffered from a kidney infection. His death raised the number of Palestinian patient who died due to the siege to 98, including 17 children.

Its his own fault for being born Palestinian.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
just one of the concerned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14896

posted 20 February 2008 02:13 PM      Profile for just one of the concerned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Anyone can expect that the longstanding suffocation of Gaza is going to disproportionately target the very young and the very old. How can that not count as terrorism? Thanks for this, frustrated mess.
From: in the cold outside of the cjc | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 20 February 2008 03:28 PM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city.

Sound like a good deal. However, some detail has to be ironed out. Since, according to Ariel Sharon "(we) the Jewish people control America"..
http://tinyurl.com/yvlptq
..would they order the USA to provide "aid" for Palestinians to enable them to make a wonderful city out of a piece of desert ?

quote:
U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact

Summary
Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)

Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

http://tinyurl.com/4v6oh



From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 20 February 2008 03:46 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:
Since, according to Ariel Sharon "(we) the Jewish people control America"..

I have seen this quoted before. It is basicly hearsay. Not saying he did not say it, nor saying he did. Just saying that it is a suspect quote.

Note, if you look at your source, no one is identified as actually hearing him say it: "IAP News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael..."

IAP said that Radio Israel said... No one is identified as hearing him say it, and it is already now 3 steps down the broken telephone chain.

If you can find a good source, let me know.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 20 February 2008 05:13 PM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Following Cueball's objection to hearsay sources, I revised my comment. Thank you Cueball, you are inspiring with your fair-mindedness, I must say. Not that your requirement did not annoy me a bit..

quote:
According to Metzger, the plan would be to "take all the poor people from Gaza to move them to a wonderful new modern country with trains buses cars, like in Arizona - we are now in a generation where you can take a desert and build a city.

Sounds like a good deal. Except that the Palestinians do not have US taxpyers funding transformation of deserts into wonderful cities.

quote:

U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact

Summary
Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)
Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

http://tinyurl.com/4v6oh


[ 20 February 2008: Message edited by: adam stratton ]


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca