Author
|
Topic: Bigotry at Work
|
|
GT Snowracer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12474
|
posted 02 May 2006 01:54 PM
Tough situation to be in no doubt.I guess its a matter of "Who" these people are in your work place. Admins, Sales, VP's. You would also need to find out how long they have been there. If your office is as toxic as you say chances are that it because of inaction on the part of senior management. Nothing is fair in the office and personal ties can weight heavily on re-org decisions. Toxic workplaces can turn into hell depending on how management handles the corp culture. "Is there a suggestion box?" "Maybe writting an anonymous letter" "Requesting a no-politics policy has worked at some places I have worked." I would do everything you can to make the inappropriate behavior known, while equally protecting your job security. GT
From: In the echo chamber | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
StockwellDay
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10342
|
posted 02 May 2006 02:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by GT Snowracer: I guess its a matter of "Who" these people are in your work place. Admins, Sales, VP's. You would also need to find out how long they have been there.
One's been there for a year, and the other for a few months. One's smart enough to say "Well, I'm my father's daughter," and the other one just insists that I'm playing politics. I think management would prefer that I simply stopped minding the remarks. They're very defensive/protective of these two women. One manager has mentioned, after noticing I have as little to do with them as possible, that they remind her of how she was when she was their age. (I think she means flighty, unprofessional, moody and lazy, as opposed to bigoted).
From: the right coast | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
StockwellDay
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10342
|
posted 02 May 2006 02:37 PM
I'm not sure where the confusion is. How is the fact that my workplace is divided by the sexes NOT a feminist issue?And what gave you the impression that I'd think these two bigots are feminists? They ain't. They're not power hungry either, or managers. Just sexist bigots. I'm just looking for a couple pieces of advice: 1. How best to approach the issue with management. 2. How to turn my workplace into a progressive place. I see the feminism forum as a safe place for to receive advice on this issue, as in the past, I learned the most from the people who frequented this forum.
From: the right coast | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
StockwellDay
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10342
|
posted 02 May 2006 02:47 PM
Well, perhaps I'll just wait and see if there are any people interested in discussing this with me. quote: Originally posted by jas:
LOL...why did it take you three posts to get to that point?
Have a nice day.
From: the right coast | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
StockwellDay
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10342
|
posted 02 May 2006 03:36 PM
Oh. Thanks GT. The labour forum works fine for me.What were we talking about? O yeah. No, there's no 'suggestion box'. I've always hated those things. But I thought the comment about 'no politics at work' was an interesting suggestion. The co-workers I have problems with see everything I say has having a political side to it (which I'd agree with). So any 'no politics at work' policy would make it difficult to discuss anything at all. They would attack me as being 'politically correct', or a 'feminist', or 'partisan'.
From: the right coast | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389
|
posted 02 May 2006 05:28 PM
In the post that opened this thread the writer says that he/she wanted to get workers fired, not have them change their attitudes or work toward that end.Hearing one side, I would beware knee jerk support of draconian solutions that leave workers unemployed. An excellent title. One might also ask what part bigotry may play on this message board. Given response to this thread and nil response to a question of bigotry yesterday, one might well believe that it was not so much the message but who posted what. Eastern chauvinism, perhaps? A reminder: It was in The rest of the World and referred to an exciting engineering project that may link Africa and Europe but that may be scuttled by bigotry - much, perhaps, under the guise of concerns about immigration. (How many dreams are killed by bigotry?) It clearly is not a hot-button issue for all, but I would have thought that more than an individual would have been excited by the scope and promise of the project.
From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polunatic2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12238
|
posted 03 May 2006 01:42 PM
quote: I would never listen silently to shit - ever - because it makes them think people agree with them.
Which only encourages them even more. It's pretty hard to change people's attitudes. However, it's a lot easier to change their inappropriate behaviour. Telling them that you don't appreciate their comments might help. Sounds like you're past that stage. Once management is aware, it becomes their resonsibility to deal with it if disciminatory behaviour or harassment is taking place. Sounds like you're dealing with a "poisoned work environment". Maybe you could propose that management sponsor a 3 hour anti-harassment training seminar for starters so that people are aware of what's "OK" and what's not. You could try to pitch it as a "win - win" proposal. I think that getting people fired should be a last resort - saved for the worst offenders and meant as a strong message to others. Even with a union, these can be tricky waters to traverse. You might want to begin documenting everything (privately) in order to cover your own butt. Try to sound "reasonable" but make it clear that the behaviour crosses the line and is unacceptable in this day and age. [ 03 May 2006: Message edited by: Polunatic2 ]
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062
|
posted 03 May 2006 02:03 PM
Most provinces have legislation covering discrimination and prejudice, within both the workplace and the community itself that might well address this very issue. Local citizen advocacy groups should be able to point you in the right direction. The best thing you can do is document in writing - with the names of both participants and reliable witnesses - as many instances of this behaviour that you can. The more the better. It would require a few weeks or perhaps months of such documentation to accurately identify such behaviour as chronic and ongoing. Then a case can be made to your local citizen's advocacy group or your local government that can be directed at either the participants or even the business regarding such petty, mean-spiritedness. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people whose lives are circumscribed by their workplace and the sitcoms they watch at home. Consequently they are prone to both consciously and unconsciously repeating - and even emulating - towards those they work with, whatever tripe they encounter on the tv and in various other forms of media. Smartass remarks, petty put-downs, infantile insults, ongoing disrespectful behavour and all round immaturity seems to be the norm for the vast majority of sitcoms that dominate what has deemed to be entertainment over the years. All of which carry over into both the family and the workplace.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389
|
posted 03 May 2006 03:00 PM
otter quote: Most provinces have legislation covering discrimination and prejudice,...
Just as is handled by our LRB, otter. (Labor Relations Board) I just wish your post had been the second in the thread. The workplace may also have that person with the permanent chip on the shoulder, eager to pounce, nursing the wrath etc.
From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732
|
posted 03 May 2006 05:12 PM
quote: Originally posted by otter: Most provinces have legislation covering discrimination and prejudice, within both the workplace and the community itself that might well address this very issue. Local citizen advocacy groups should be able to point you in the right direction. The best thing you can do is document in writing - with the names of both participants and reliable witnesses - as many instances of this behaviour that you can. The more the better. It would require a few weeks or perhaps months of such documentation to accurately identify such behaviour as chronic and ongoing. Then a case can be made to your local citizen's advocacy group or your local government that can be directed at either the participants or even the business regarding such petty, mean-spiritedness.
Good advice. Document and then if you live in a province with a Human Rights Commision not just an adjuicative tribunal you will be able to talk to a Human Rights Officer who will be well versed in the options available in your province. BC only has a tribunal but under the old system you could have spoken to a Human Rights Officer whose job it was to deal with exactly this kind of scenario. It is my personal believe that all of us have a duty to speak out against hate speech. And I mean duty. It is like refusing to do unsafe work or allowing a newbie at the workplace to put thmeselves in danger by doing unsafe work. A poisoned workplace hurts everyone and often times the people most affected do not have the emotional strength to take on the advocacy role themselves. Don't argue with them but EVERY time they make a sexist or racist statement tell them that you consider it to be sexist or racist and that you want them to refrain from making the statements. You probably can't change their views (it would be nice if it happened) but you can change the atmosphere by a making them stop the venom.
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sineed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11260
|
posted 03 May 2006 10:16 PM
quote: Sorry, but putting food before my family members sometimes takes precedance over my dignity or peace of mind.
Good point; it's all too easy to be an armchair critic and say one must always take a principled stand no matter what the consequences. However, I would say that sometimes people don't say anything, using fear for their job as an excuse, when they're just chicken. Those of us who work in government would be standing on pretty solid ground when we would speak out against racist comments. WDHP may be toothless, but managers are supposed to at least pay lip service to respecting policy.And there are tactful ways of letting someone know they're out of line. I've used the example before of the woman who pointed to a poster commemorating Black History Month and whispered, "What about white history month?" I said, people of colour might say every month is white history month, and knowledge of black history has been suppressed so Black History Month helps to even things out. Not exactly a fire and brimstone reply, I know, but I think to say nothing would imply a tacit agreement. But regardless of tactics, I agree that there's nothing that applies in all circumstances. If people are spewing hatred in a truly venomous way, how do you deal with that?
From: # 668 - neighbour of the beast | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Polunatic2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12238
|
posted 04 May 2006 11:31 AM
quote: It is my personal believe that all of us have a duty to speak out against hate speech.
I don't think this is an unreasonable position but of course it depends on the workplace. What needs to be explicit is that it's not just people from affected groups that have to make noise. The bile is vile whether or not members of the targetted group are present at the time or even "represented" in the workplace. The workplace is poisoned as long as people feel they can say "those f***ing this" or "these f***cking that". The impact may be different and experienced in different ways by different people but the poison is still there. There was nothing in Kropotkin's analysis that said that someone needs to isolate themselves to the point of losing their job. I think his point is that someone's got to take a stand. Makwa, I think you'd benefit from having someone like Kropotkin in your workplace.
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|