babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Curios: Progressive Babbler view GOP candidates

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Curios: Progressive Babbler view GOP candidates
The Canadian Centrist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14873

posted 23 January 2008 05:22 PM      Profile for The Canadian Centrist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just curious, who do progressive, left-of-center Canadians like (much) of the Babblers on here are tolerate the most as possible Republican president candidate? I would find Guiliani acceptable as he represents what values I have as well: progressive social policies, fiscal responsible. Only problem is his refusal to remove himself from the havoc of Bush's wars. For this reason, I purely support Obama. But Rudy does not make me throw up like a few others of the Republicans,
From: The NDP: Parliament's Whitest Party | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
Slumberjack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10108

posted 23 January 2008 05:49 PM      Profile for Slumberjack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here's a great recipe for Newfoundland Style Pea Soup.

Newfoundland Pea Soup


From: An Intensive De-Indoctrination, But I'm Fine Now | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 23 January 2008 05:52 PM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Slumberjack:
Here's a great recipe for Newfoundland Style Pea Soup.

Newfoundland Pea Soup


It's vegetarian too. I have printed it. Thanks


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 23 January 2008 07:16 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Canadian Centrist:
But Rudy does not make me throw up

Then you haven't been paying attention.


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
The Canadian Centrist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14873

posted 23 January 2008 07:31 PM      Profile for The Canadian Centrist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by pogge:

Then you haven't been paying attention.


in this sense, American politics - all of it - makes me want to throw up. I love Obama but so annoyed by all of his sayings and fake talking of Jesus... Bush landing on aircraft carriers, Rudy starting fights with Iran... These are symptoms of a nation gone insane through too easily prescribed anti-depressant medicine, tens of millions without healthcare, war-like minds, and angry/racist voters.


From: The NDP: Parliament's Whitest Party | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 23 January 2008 07:41 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Canadian Centrist:I love Obama but so annoyed by all of his sayings and fake talking of Jesus...

As opposed to Guiliani's incessant 911 911 911 911 911


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Briguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1885

posted 24 January 2008 05:14 AM      Profile for Briguy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How can we ever take you seriously when you actually admit to finding Captain 9-11 acceptable? Honestly. Look into police abuses during his Mayorship of NYC for a preview of what the future American Police State holds, if Captain 9-11 actually wins.
From: No one is arguing that we should run the space program based on Physics 101. | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Canadian Centrist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14873

posted 24 January 2008 05:17 AM      Profile for The Canadian Centrist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by remind:

As opposed to Guiliani's incessant 911 911 911 911 911


Um didnt I say i hate that too? Yes, i think it is dumb , fake, and lying. All I'm saying here is Rudy is socially progressive, of course if i were a American i would not vote for him... All Im saying is he is a conservative more in the Canadian red-tory sense of being socially progressive and fiscally centre-right. Not great, but not terrifying like another Bush or Cheney would be...


From: The NDP: Parliament's Whitest Party | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
The Canadian Centrist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14873

posted 24 January 2008 05:19 AM      Profile for The Canadian Centrist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Briguy:
How can we ever take you seriously when you actually admit to finding Captain 9-11 acceptable?

Look at the other Republicans; anti-gay, racist, religious freaks... Rudy is not... Just like a not so great hockey player will look like a good one on a team where no one else can even skate... get it now!


From: The NDP: Parliament's Whitest Party | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 24 January 2008 06:03 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Chris Rock on Guliani:

quote:
Giuliani's kinda like a pitbull. He's great when you have a burglar, but if you don't, he just might eat your kids.

Cultural Kitchen: the oppression olympics

Chris Rock is hi-fucking-larious. He says a few problematic things, and if you're a fan of Hillary you probably won't like his piece.

Scroll down a bit to the Youtube link.

[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: bigcitygal ]


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 24 January 2008 06:27 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
All I'm saying here is Rudy is socially progressive

Giuliani is not what would pass for "socially progressive" in Canada. He is just like Mitt Romney. When Giuliani was running for mayor of New York and Romney was running for Governor of Massachusetts - they both knew that being anti-gay and anti-abortion etc...would be the kiss of death - so they each pretended to be "moderate". Now that both are running for the GOP nomination, they have each backtrached 100%. Giuliani has promised social conservatives that if he is president he will only appoint judges who are anti-abortion and who promise to repeal Roe v. Wade and his onetime support for gay rights has also vanished into thin air. Some religious right leaders like pat Robertson have even endorsed Giuliani.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 24 January 2008 06:36 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Canadian Centrist:

Look at the other Republicans; anti-gay, racist, religious freaks... Rudy is not... Just like a not so great hockey player will look like a good one on a team where no one else can even skate... get it now!


Canadian Centrist, if I understand you, and you're not trolling, what you're saying is he's the best of a rotten bunch.

So, if Romney, McCain and the others (including Bush) are so horrible, they're like the equivalent of getting smashed in the face with a baseball bat 50 times, then Guiliani's like getting smashed in the face with a baseball bat 45 times?

I think that's the question babblers should answer!


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 24 January 2008 06:50 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Chris Rock's schpiel is a little more than problematic for anyone who cares at all about justice. An excerpt of his advertorial in opposition to women's issues:
quote:
White women burn their bras, Black men were burned alive!... No white women have ever been assassinated!"
In fact, of course, no women ever burned their bras: it's a media factoid, used to dismiss and ridicule women's issues. And *many* more white women than Black men were burned alive, among other male ways of putting them to death.
But hey, if it gets hoots from SNL and Youtube audiences...
Interestingly, while Steinem gets flamed for asking women to vote for a woman, Chris Rock taunts them for not having done so in the last 100 years: "What are you bitches waiting for?!(laugh track)"

[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
West Coast Greeny
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6874

posted 24 January 2008 10:12 AM      Profile for West Coast Greeny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You have to understand that, among the members of this board, there are quite a few that can't even tolerate the three major Democratic frontrunners.

My opinion of the Republican frontrunners:
Guiliani: Exploits the 9/11 tragedy for his own political advantage
McCain: Biggest warhawk of the bunch.
Romney: With all his duplicity and flip-flopping, I'm not sure he even has politicial positions.
Huckabee: Way off to the social right, with no credability on any other issues.

I'll take the dude who exploits 9/11. Actually, what I'm actually hoping for is that the Republicans choose someone so unelectable that he couldn't possibly win: Huckabee or Romney.


From: Ewe of eh. | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
Pogo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2999

posted 24 January 2008 10:34 AM      Profile for Pogo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I kind of like Huckabee. First and foremost choosing him would be disasterous for the Republican party leading to a move away from the religous right. Secondly, his populist message raises expectations and counters the traditional GOP trickle down talk. I don't believe he is at all looking out for the average joe/jane but he reminds them that they should have expect government to be looking out for them.

If there was any chance he could win or even be close to winning I take it all back.


From: Richmond BC | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 24 January 2008 10:37 AM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:

Interestingly, while Steinem gets flamed for asking women to vote for a woman, Chris Rock taunts them for not having done so in the last 100 years: "What are you bitches waiting for?!(laugh track)"

[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]



Chris rock never claimed to be a social justice activist, or to have an encyclopedic understanding of the womens movement. His craft is politicaly-incorrect humor, that makes you go HMMM ..

I don't believe he is taunting women, I see it more like saying women are overdue for uniting together to create change.

Same as the other oppressed groups, in this patriarchal system, are overdue and need to unite to affect change.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 24 January 2008 10:56 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
...I don't believe he is taunting women, I see it more like saying women are overdue for uniting together to create change.
AfroHealer, I can't believe you would suggest this after having listened to that skit. Have you?
I don't see Chris Rock - or more to the point the writers of SNL - as social activists either, and I don't expect that of them. I just want us to be clear about what is the overall message here: it is NOT any suggestion that women unite and create change. It's, in so many words, "Who the f*** do they think THEY are for thinking their oppression can even compare and allow them to stand in the way of a possible Black American candidate?"
It is that context that makes his words a taunt.

[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 24 January 2008 11:37 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
McCain's the best of a bad lot. Guliani would be the worst! Aside from the fact that, other than abortion, he has moved to the right as fast as he can, the man is a total meglomaniac who tried to bend the rules to stay in office as mayor after his term had expired. He cited NYC's inability to get along without his presence for a few additional months after 9/11.

McCain is the candidate the far right doesn't want. He has strayed from the right-wing orthodoxy on a number of issues from taxes to the environment to money in politics to torture. He's by no means a day in the park, but he's far better or, more accurately, less bad, than the other clowns.


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
melovesproles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8868

posted 24 January 2008 01:07 PM      Profile for melovesproles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm with Greeny, McCain would mean we'd have to listen to an all-militarist Republican campaign, I find the theocratic bullshit less nauseating than the war drum. For this reason Giuliani and McCain would be the worst of the bunch. A lot of the Conservative base hates Huckabee too and I think he'd lose against whoever the Democrats fielded, so I'd say the best case scenario would be an Edwards-Huckabee race.

I think Romney could be a strong candidate for the Rethugs precisely because he is so obviously full of shit. He isn't as threatening to independent voters as some of the others because he such an obvious phony. He could also be a compromise between the religous wing and the economic conservative wing. I think the Republicans would have the best chance with him or McCain.


From: BC | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
St. Paul's Progressive
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12621

posted 26 January 2008 12:23 PM      Profile for St. Paul's Progressive     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The only GOP candidate I have any respect for whatsoever is McCain - he did break from GOP orthodoxy from time to time and he is a legitimate war hero (unlike Bush).

But they're all way to far to the right for my taste. Giuliani and Romney seem pretty weak and Huckabee's base is limited to evangelicals. The sad thing about the religious right is that it is basically a working class vote.


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 26 January 2008 01:26 PM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
It's, in so many words, "Who the f*** do they think THEY are for thinking their oppression can even compare and allow them to stand in the way of a possible Black American candidate?"
It is that context that makes his words a taunt.

[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


dude .. Black American women are women too are they not? Please lets step out of this mental mastubation.

The universe does not revolve around white women. and the so called progressives, need to wrapped their minds around the concept of women of colour, who have the double whammy of race and gender as major factors in their lives.

Asking them to deny either, is insulting.

Remember there is an overwhelming number of the poor in the western world are racialised and feminine.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 26 January 2008 03:13 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by AfroHealer:
dude .. Black American women are women too are they not? Please lets step out of this mental mastubation.
It seems you only want the mental masterbation to be available to you. As you go on to say:

quote:
The universe does not revolve around white women. and the so called progressives, need to wrapped their minds around the concept of women of colour, who have the double whammy of race and gender as major factors in their lives.
There is no doubt there is additional bigotry factors facing women of colour. I addressed this over
here. IMV, you can take your condescending and disparging blanket remarks against progressives elsewhere.

But I did not address the bigotry and misogyny women of colour experience at the hands of those within their own rational groups. And not because it is not there, as it is in the form of Chris Rock, but because I feel it is up to the women in their own racial groups to expose and name.

quote:
Asking them to deny either, is insulting.
You think it quite fine to insult white women, and to deny what they have gone through, and think nothing of belittling our female ancestors who were assasinated, in the millions, for hundreds of years by; burning, drowning, heads lopped off, poisoned, beaten to death and hung, along with being jailed, put in insane asylums, ostracized, and starved to death, for the crime of being a women. And frankly, I do not accept that you have a right to do this here, as you don't. What you are doing is saying that some's oppression is more worthy than others, and that is NOT the case.

quote:
Remember there is an overwhelming number of the poor in the western world are racialised and feminine.
I am skeptical of this assertation, please provide proof. Of note, I am using the context, of the western world being Europe, Russia, ex-soviet countries, and all points west of those locals, as I took your comment not to just mean NA.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 27 January 2008 08:33 PM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For the record. the people os the ex-soviet block, are a racialised group taht are still disrespected in the rest of the western world.

As in evident by the trafficing of women from that part of the world to Europe and the Americas, as a modern day slaves.

Even if we choose to ignore that and included the ex-soviet world, anyone who is paying attention knows that the majority of the worlds poor, are in the global south. I fail to understand, why that needs to be proven to anyone here.

The link to Chris Rock. was talking about the "oppression olympics".

This is not a competition. I have no idea, why some feel minority women, need to put their issues on the back burner. If you don't know anything about that sad aspect of the white feminist movement or are uncomfortable about those facts. Then maybe you have not been paying attention.

You can choose to be part of the movement to change the pattern of oppressing racialised groups, or you can continue the fight for white supremacy.

I honestly am not interested in continuing this racist debate with you or anyone else.

We are supposed to be creating a safe space to discuss issues, without having to fight, about how foolhardy it would be to insist that white peoples perspectives are supreme, and all other peoples perspectives should be put on the back burner.

We are dealing with a racist, patriarchal, colonial system. What we need to do is to simultaneously work to reduce all the systems of oppression. Its not about picking one or the other, especially considering the fact that some of the people in the movement are directly negatively affected by race, gender and colonialism.

I shall let my sisters in the struggle, share with your their views. I'm sure some have already in the feminism section of babble.

And if you really want to know more, you can find countless resources from racialised feminist, as they discuss the challenges they face withing the mostly white feminist movement. Ignorance is bliss to some, but I and my sisters are not blissfully at this movement continues to ignore our voices. *shaking my head *

I apologies to all for the thread drift.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 27 January 2008 09:27 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The presidential candidate who sang "Bomb bomb Iran" is already looking towards the war after the war in Iraq.

Sen. John McCain told a crowd of supporters on Sunday, "It's a tough war we're in. It's not going to be over right away. There's going to be other wars." Offering more of his increasingly bleak "straight talk," he repeated the claim: "I'm sorry to tell you, there's going to be other wars. We will never surrender but there will be other wars."

McCain did not elaborate who the United States would be fighting. But he did warn the crowd to be ready for the ramifications of current and future battles.


More war with McCain


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Insurrection
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6622

posted 28 January 2008 02:12 PM      Profile for Insurrection     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
There is no doubt there is additional bigotry factors facing women of colour. I addressed this over
here. IMV, you can take your condescending and disparging blanket remarks against progressives elsewhere.

This is absolutely discussing. I don’t event want to begin to address what is fucked up about a white woman telling a poc on a so called “progressive” board to take their "views" elsewhere especially given the context of this discussion.

It’s extremely offensive that the impact of historical white supremasist patriarchy experienced by black women and poc is reduced to “additional bigotry factors”. In case you haven’t figured it out those so called “bigotry factors” you speak of are multi-dimensional and intersectional - that means for racialized people confronting the realities of our lives and our lived experiences in this white supremacist society means living in a world where sexual violence is as much about patriarchy as it is about racism and colonialism and the various other forms of marginalization we experience in our daily lives. Contrary to what the various subcategories on this board would have you believe, we do not have the luxury of compartmentalizing our lives into neat little categories where if people want to talk about the old boys club one can go into the feminist forum and whenever one wants to “explore” race and or indigenous struggles of self-determination, they can go to those “other” forums… and when “we” get tired of doing that cause getting bogged down by identity politics and white hetero-male “guilt” is such a drag “we” can focus on the bigger issues like “class” and “environmental justice” (aptly appropriated title by the way )

“We” all know that white folks (of all genders) have this uncanny ability the free up themselves in the fight for a global sister/brother/personhood of the proletariat or whatever -cause as poc our politics are hopelessly “race based”. It’s shameful for you accuse afrohealer of playing “oppression olympics” then proceed trot out a list of injustices faced by “our” female ancestors -wait don’t you mean YOUR female ancestors who just happen to white surprise surprise. I see the ancestry (re: legacy) of woc is noticeably absent from that piece oh yeah you already addressed woc “issues” in some other thread so it’s okay to go back to the bigger project of defending white womanhood and trust me I know all about the “history” of needing to defend white women from black men like me after all the legacy of lynching and jim crow laws can attest to that (for starters)

And really isn’t this what seems to be at the heart of the issue for anyone who actually scrolled past the chris rock skit and READ the piece in the link bcg posted where for black women the choice between race and gender is a choice between “standing by your man” or “standing up for woman kind” whatever that means between “walking away from race” or “turning your back on your sisters”. It’s really insulting to know that the need and the choice for balck women for poc to make “political” decisions through whatever means we choose comes down to a dichotomy that exists primarily in the eurocentric imagination.


And thank you for reminding us about the sexism in coc it’s a big issue. Maintaing a need for interconnectivitiy and tangible relationships (that respect our humanity) in our community are necessary for the growth, development, and sustainability of said communities they are also vital for our survival. by the way “we” are continuing to find and develop ways to confront and cope with the devastating impact that sexism and gendered violence has had in our communities - damage that colonialism and white supremacy has had more then a hand in creating/ maintaining. Oh btw it’s very “noble” of you to step down and “allow” woc to speak on this issue (a conversation I look forward to) cause I really don’t think white people need to privy to any type of in depth discussion on this issue anyway.


From: exit in the world | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 28 January 2008 02:36 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Disagree with your response comments and with afrohealers, and I spoke nothing about protecting white women from black men, indeed I know quite well white women need(ed) protecting from white men, as do WoC, so I would thank you to stop inferring any such thing.

Moreover, I am not going to feel guilt because of white man's patriarchy, I am too busy struggling against it myself to have any guilt. Nor am I going to take men, of any colour's, denigrating words about how us white women need to stop feeling oppressed, or about how insignificant my ancestor's plights were in compare.

[ 28 January 2008: Message edited by: remind ]


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 28 January 2008 03:09 PM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Probably no coincidence that :

1) I think McCain the likely Rebub nominee;
2) I would find him the most palatable of them
3) I really hope he isn't the nominee, as he is the only repub contenter that stands any chance of beating Clinton, Obama, or Edwards.


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca