Author
|
Topic: Curios: Progressive Babbler view GOP candidates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938
|
posted 24 January 2008 06:03 AM
Chris Rock on Guliani: quote: Giuliani's kinda like a pitbull. He's great when you have a burglar, but if you don't, he just might eat your kids.
Cultural Kitchen: the oppression olympics Chris Rock is hi-fucking-larious. He says a few problematic things, and if you're a fan of Hillary you probably won't like his piece. Scroll down a bit to the Youtube link. [ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: bigcitygal ]
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938
|
posted 24 January 2008 06:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by The Canadian Centrist:
Look at the other Republicans; anti-gay, racist, religious freaks... Rudy is not... Just like a not so great hockey player will look like a good one on a team where no one else can even skate... get it now!
Canadian Centrist, if I understand you, and you're not trolling, what you're saying is he's the best of a rotten bunch. So, if Romney, McCain and the others (including Bush) are so horrible, they're like the equivalent of getting smashed in the face with a baseball bat 50 times, then Guiliani's like getting smashed in the face with a baseball bat 45 times? I think that's the question babblers should answer!
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362
|
posted 24 January 2008 10:37 AM
quote: Originally posted by martin dufresne:
Interestingly, while Steinem gets flamed for asking women to vote for a woman, Chris Rock taunts them for not having done so in the last 100 years: "What are you bitches waiting for?!(laugh track)"[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]
Chris rock never claimed to be a social justice activist, or to have an encyclopedic understanding of the womens movement. His craft is politicaly-incorrect humor, that makes you go HMMM ..
I don't believe he is taunting women, I see it more like saying women are overdue for uniting together to create change. Same as the other oppressed groups, in this patriarchal system, are overdue and need to unite to affect change.
From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362
|
posted 26 January 2008 01:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by martin dufresne: It's, in so many words, "Who the f*** do they think THEY are for thinking their oppression can even compare and allow them to stand in the way of a possible Black American candidate?" It is that context that makes his words a taunt.[ 24 January 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]
dude .. Black American women are women too are they not? Please lets step out of this mental mastubation. The universe does not revolve around white women. and the so called progressives, need to wrapped their minds around the concept of women of colour, who have the double whammy of race and gender as major factors in their lives. Asking them to deny either, is insulting. Remember there is an overwhelming number of the poor in the western world are racialised and feminine.
From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 26 January 2008 03:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by AfroHealer: dude .. Black American women are women too are they not? Please lets step out of this mental mastubation.
It seems you only want the mental masterbation to be available to you. As you go on to say: quote: The universe does not revolve around white women. and the so called progressives, need to wrapped their minds around the concept of women of colour, who have the double whammy of race and gender as major factors in their lives.
There is no doubt there is additional bigotry factors facing women of colour. I addressed this over here. IMV, you can take your condescending and disparging blanket remarks against progressives elsewhere.But I did not address the bigotry and misogyny women of colour experience at the hands of those within their own rational groups. And not because it is not there, as it is in the form of Chris Rock, but because I feel it is up to the women in their own racial groups to expose and name. quote: Asking them to deny either, is insulting.
You think it quite fine to insult white women, and to deny what they have gone through, and think nothing of belittling our female ancestors who were assasinated, in the millions, for hundreds of years by; burning, drowning, heads lopped off, poisoned, beaten to death and hung, along with being jailed, put in insane asylums, ostracized, and starved to death, for the crime of being a women. And frankly, I do not accept that you have a right to do this here, as you don't. What you are doing is saying that some's oppression is more worthy than others, and that is NOT the case. quote: Remember there is an overwhelming number of the poor in the western world are racialised and feminine.
I am skeptical of this assertation, please provide proof. Of note, I am using the context, of the western world being Europe, Russia, ex-soviet countries, and all points west of those locals, as I took your comment not to just mean NA.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362
|
posted 27 January 2008 08:33 PM
For the record. the people os the ex-soviet block, are a racialised group taht are still disrespected in the rest of the western world.As in evident by the trafficing of women from that part of the world to Europe and the Americas, as a modern day slaves. Even if we choose to ignore that and included the ex-soviet world, anyone who is paying attention knows that the majority of the worlds poor, are in the global south. I fail to understand, why that needs to be proven to anyone here. The link to Chris Rock. was talking about the "oppression olympics". This is not a competition. I have no idea, why some feel minority women, need to put their issues on the back burner. If you don't know anything about that sad aspect of the white feminist movement or are uncomfortable about those facts. Then maybe you have not been paying attention. You can choose to be part of the movement to change the pattern of oppressing racialised groups, or you can continue the fight for white supremacy. I honestly am not interested in continuing this racist debate with you or anyone else. We are supposed to be creating a safe space to discuss issues, without having to fight, about how foolhardy it would be to insist that white peoples perspectives are supreme, and all other peoples perspectives should be put on the back burner. We are dealing with a racist, patriarchal, colonial system. What we need to do is to simultaneously work to reduce all the systems of oppression. Its not about picking one or the other, especially considering the fact that some of the people in the movement are directly negatively affected by race, gender and colonialism. I shall let my sisters in the struggle, share with your their views. I'm sure some have already in the feminism section of babble. And if you really want to know more, you can find countless resources from racialised feminist, as they discuss the challenges they face withing the mostly white feminist movement. Ignorance is bliss to some, but I and my sisters are not blissfully at this movement continues to ignore our voices. *shaking my head * I apologies to all for the thread drift.
From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44
|
posted 27 January 2008 09:27 PM
quote: The presidential candidate who sang "Bomb bomb Iran" is already looking towards the war after the war in Iraq.Sen. John McCain told a crowd of supporters on Sunday, "It's a tough war we're in. It's not going to be over right away. There's going to be other wars." Offering more of his increasingly bleak "straight talk," he repeated the claim: "I'm sorry to tell you, there's going to be other wars. We will never surrender but there will be other wars." McCain did not elaborate who the United States would be fighting. But he did warn the crowd to be ready for the ramifications of current and future battles.
More war with McCain
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Insurrection
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6622
|
posted 28 January 2008 02:12 PM
quote: There is no doubt there is additional bigotry factors facing women of colour. I addressed this over here. IMV, you can take your condescending and disparging blanket remarks against progressives elsewhere.
This is absolutely discussing. I don’t event want to begin to address what is fucked up about a white woman telling a poc on a so called “progressive” board to take their "views" elsewhere especially given the context of this discussion. It’s extremely offensive that the impact of historical white supremasist patriarchy experienced by black women and poc is reduced to “additional bigotry factors”. In case you haven’t figured it out those so called “bigotry factors” you speak of are multi-dimensional and intersectional - that means for racialized people confronting the realities of our lives and our lived experiences in this white supremacist society means living in a world where sexual violence is as much about patriarchy as it is about racism and colonialism and the various other forms of marginalization we experience in our daily lives. Contrary to what the various subcategories on this board would have you believe, we do not have the luxury of compartmentalizing our lives into neat little categories where if people want to talk about the old boys club one can go into the feminist forum and whenever one wants to “explore” race and or indigenous struggles of self-determination, they can go to those “other” forums… and when “we” get tired of doing that cause getting bogged down by identity politics and white hetero-male “guilt” is such a drag “we” can focus on the bigger issues like “class” and “environmental justice” (aptly appropriated title by the way ) “We” all know that white folks (of all genders) have this uncanny ability the free up themselves in the fight for a global sister/brother/personhood of the proletariat or whatever -cause as poc our politics are hopelessly “race based”. It’s shameful for you accuse afrohealer of playing “oppression olympics” then proceed trot out a list of injustices faced by “our” female ancestors -wait don’t you mean YOUR female ancestors who just happen to white surprise surprise. I see the ancestry (re: legacy) of woc is noticeably absent from that piece oh yeah you already addressed woc “issues” in some other thread so it’s okay to go back to the bigger project of defending white womanhood and trust me I know all about the “history” of needing to defend white women from black men like me after all the legacy of lynching and jim crow laws can attest to that (for starters) And really isn’t this what seems to be at the heart of the issue for anyone who actually scrolled past the chris rock skit and READ the piece in the link bcg posted where for black women the choice between race and gender is a choice between “standing by your man” or “standing up for woman kind” whatever that means between “walking away from race” or “turning your back on your sisters”. It’s really insulting to know that the need and the choice for balck women for poc to make “political” decisions through whatever means we choose comes down to a dichotomy that exists primarily in the eurocentric imagination. And thank you for reminding us about the sexism in coc it’s a big issue. Maintaing a need for interconnectivitiy and tangible relationships (that respect our humanity) in our community are necessary for the growth, development, and sustainability of said communities they are also vital for our survival. by the way “we” are continuing to find and develop ways to confront and cope with the devastating impact that sexism and gendered violence has had in our communities - damage that colonialism and white supremacy has had more then a hand in creating/ maintaining. Oh btw it’s very “noble” of you to step down and “allow” woc to speak on this issue (a conversation I look forward to) cause I really don’t think white people need to privy to any type of in depth discussion on this issue anyway.
From: exit in the world | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|