babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Talking seriously about race and gender bias

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Talking seriously about race and gender bias
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 07 April 2008 08:42 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
from a women who has paid her dues, Madeleine Kunin, former three-term governor of Vermont.

America, let's talk seriously about race and gender bias, Boston Globe, April 6, 2008

SENATOR BARACK Obama spoke courageously and thoughtfully last month about the history and legacy of race in America. It is a speech that
will be remembered. Now we must start a conversation about gender in America.

Neither blacks nor women were seriously considered to be worthy of the vote when the Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia in 1776. Abigail Adams addressed the role of women when she wrote to her husband John Adams: "Remember the Ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could."

Adams's reply was not helpful: "As to your extraordinary Code of Laws, I cannot but laugh."

It is inaccurate and incendiary to equate women's lack of rights with those of enslaved blacks. Yet, there are some parallels. Married
women were considered the property of their husbands. They had no right to their own money or real estate. Divorce was nearly impossible and seldom sought because mothers would have to give up their children.

Both marginalized groups have experienced centuries of struggle to achieve full citizenship, a struggle that is far from over.
(...)


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 07 April 2008 08:58 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, while it is inaccurate to compare women's lack of rights with that of enslaved Black people, half of those slaves WERE women and girls, subjected to systemic sexual violence.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 07 April 2008 09:11 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Excellent point.
And now things may be about to get a LOT hairier for race/gender pundits:

quote:
Strategist: Rice eyeing VP spot on ticket
April 6, 2008 at 3:59 PM

WASHINGTON, April 6 (UPI) -- U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has exhibited interest in becoming John McCain's vice presidential running mate, a Republican strategist says.

Dan Senor revealed during Sunday's edition of ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" that Rice has been seeking support to be considered for the No. 2 spot on the Republican ticket this fall.

"Condi Rice has been actively, actually in recent weeks, campaigning for this," Senor said.(...)


Rice eying VP spot on ticket

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 07 April 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
Excellent point.
And now things may be about to get a LOT hairier for race/gender pundits:

Rice eying VP spot on ticket


I don't know why she didn't try to be the Republican presidential candidate. (Doubtless she has her reasons. I just wonder what they are or were.) Anyway, this would certainly make things interesting!


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 07 April 2008 11:44 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I don't know why she didn't try to be the Republican presidential candidate.
Could be because - to pick up on Antonia Zerbisias' excellent summation of Clinton's alleged faults - Rice is a woman who knows her place and toes the line set by the boys.

[ 07 April 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 07 April 2008 04:11 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rice is probably the most qualified, or at least one of the three or four most qualified, republicans to be vice president.

There's been a lot of blogosphere discussion on possible republican veeps. There were some comments that the repub governor of alaska is an attractive woman and moderate, or that JC Watts might be interested (He's a high-profile black congressman). Other names mentioned include the republican governors of florida and minnesota, and also Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee.

Now that I think of it, Rice might very well be the best choice for McCain.

[ 07 April 2008: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 07 April 2008 05:56 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Feminism forum 500_apples? I thought you had realized your mistake when editing your post out, and now see you posted another one in the edited out one.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 07 April 2008 06:21 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by remind:
Feminism forum 500_apples? I thought you had realized your mistake when editing your post out, and now see you posted another one in the edited out one.

It would be very appreciated if you stopped stalking me around the forum, with your incessant, interminable rage and hatred for me.

The above post was edited because i was replying to two posts at once, and put one response in the wrong box. This didn't look like a feminism forum thread from the title, nor from the responses, as it was an interdisciplinary topic that didn't fit in a specific category. Likewise, if someone wrote a topic on Roger Federer, and put it in the feminism forum, I wouldn't know.

A lot of people browse the TAT, and not everybody checks the forum in that little writing at the top every single time.

But you're right, oldgoat did ask me to not post in the feminism forum and has not taken back that request, so I'll stop replying in this thread, unless someone responds to my posts.

[ 07 April 2008: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Martha (but not Stewart)
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12335

posted 07 April 2008 10:35 PM      Profile for Martha (but not Stewart)     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:
I don't know why she didn't try to be the Republican presidential candidate.

Perhaps she suspects that even the Republican party would not choose as their presidential candidate anyone so prominent in the country's most reviled administration since Nixon's.

The VP candidate is not chosen by the party, but by the presidential candidate. So she doesn't have to pass muster with the Republican masses. Also, having her on the VP spot on the ticket might draw less attention to her role in the Bush administration.


From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca