babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Fired for Breast-feeding

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Fired for Breast-feeding
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 13 April 2002 09:40 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess they figured she was talking too many milk breaks. In all honesty I've heard people warned about going to the bathroom when it wasn't their 15 minute lunch break (actually people just used that break for lunch), but no one fired for it. I did read an old article lately about some place in Mexico where they fired someone for complaining that the bathroom didn't have toilet paper.

How much time does breatfeeding take up during a work day? Is it possible to engage in work related activities while breastfeeding? Newborn babies do not sleep all that much, despite the rumours to the contrary, how did she keep the baby entertained and work at the same time?


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 14 April 2002 01:54 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Newborn babies do not sleep all that much, despite the rumours to the contrary
It's no rumour. They sleep most of the time for the first few months, but their patterns vary between short catnaps throughout the day to long stretches of unbroken sleep.

I have an infant, I breastfeed. When she was a newborn, I fed her every two to three hours and it took about half an hour each time. I was on maternity leave then. Now she's 7 mos old, I'm back at work full time and still breastfeeding three times a day on workdays, four or five times on my days off. Times vary from ten minutes to twenty minutes to properly feed her.

It doesn't say whether this woman took leave or not, whether her workplace agreed to let her bring her infant into work, whether she made up the time she took to feed her baby or not.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 14 April 2002 03:04 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There are adults who sleep more than my John or Kevin did when they were first born. John had the first pattern and did not sleep through the night until he was 3½ while Kevin slept through the night in the first few months.

And cribs are useless peices of junk. It is very difficult for a short person to lift a baby into one without waking the baby up and then it is back to snuggling with them on the chesterfield all over again! It is so adorable how they turn over in their sleep without waking up as you carry them to their bed. Most people wake up a few times a night to turn over and then go back to sleep. To do so without waking up for a few seconds is strange!


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 14 April 2002 04:19 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I suspect there was something else going on here; that this was an excuse - that they wanted to get rid of her anyway. I doubt anyone would fire Peter Mansbridge for taking time out every couple of hours.
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 14 April 2002 04:47 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The trick with the crib is to leave the drop side down after taking the baby out of the crib, that way when you go to put the baby back in again when it's sleeping, you don't have to try and drop the panel without jostling the little one and waking it up.

Or, you could try to get them used to going to bed when they're almost asleep, from a very early age (like, a couple of weeks old), so that they get used to being put down awake. But not all babies have the temperament for that (luckily mine did), and even if they do, they will always go through stages where they will want to be rocked to sleep for comfort and security.

Well, isn't this just total thread drift.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 14 April 2002 05:04 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It still didn't go down low enough! Glad I got a bassenet instead for Kevin. That and the fact that I could move it from room to room.

They can fire you for anything these days. You know that it is fiction when Buffy leaves in the middle of a shift because Riley wants her to fight demons and she still has a job to come back to.


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 15 April 2002 05:55 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Breastfeeding while working... That's something I've learned a little about! I'm self-employed and have been since my first daughter was 6 mos old.

quote:
How much time does breatfeeding take up during a work day?

With a newborn, I once calculated that I was spending about 6 hours a day (the full 24 hrs) nursing. Of course, only part of that time would be spent in a work day.

quote:
Is it possible to engage in work related activities while breastfeeding?

Absolutely. I had a day job when I was pregnant with my first daughter, so I had mat leave, but with the second I was already self-employed. I was at my desk a few days after she was born, and putting in 3/4 days by the time she was a few weeks old. I can do a lot of things with a baby at the breast -- I can keyboard, I can write, I can read, surf the 'net, make budgets, do accounting, make lists, have phone meetings, have face-to-face meetings.... Heck, with the use of a sling, I don't even have to be seated to nurse.

Even with an older baby (Ms T is coming up on 15 months and still nurses occasionally during the day), you can nurse and do other things at the same time.

Small babies are remarkably portable, provided people are willing to accept the fact that you are a nursing mother and this is just part of the deal. Which, in my opinion, is as it should be.

quote:
Newborn babies do not sleep all that much, despite the rumours to the contrary, how did she keep the baby entertained and work at the same time?

Newborns actually sleep a lot, as Rebecca said, but not necessarily for large blocks of time. I found the easiest way for me to keep my small one happy while I was working was to carry her in the sling. She would either watch me, or sleep. Part of the time was spent rolling on the floor, as long as it pleased her.

Anyway, the article says nothing about whether she had a nanny who brought the baby to her for feeding (when I was in school, there was a film prof whose hubby stayed home with baby, and brought him in for feedings as she returned to work one week post-partum, seemed to work well for them) or if she was having the baby at work without assistance. I'd be surprised if that was the case.

I think a case like this one is really important. Our society often makes it hard to be a mother, and it's so unnecessary.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 16 April 2002 12:40 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't have the room for a full-sized crib, so I've got a portable infant bed with a bassinet attachment (easier on the back, for sure).

Begin rant:

My workplace actually made it difficult for me to return to work at all, and I've been on a waiting list for affordable daycare for over a year. The federal government seems to think that offering a year's maternity leave is really progressive. Yeah, well, after the 17 weeks of top-up from your employer (if you're lucky) you get a whopping 55% of your salary for the rest of the year. How many families can afford to lose 45% of their income, especially when expenses increase with a new baby? Progressive, my ass.

If the feds were serious about addressing our declining population (hoping for simple compassion for parents from them is delusional, at best) they'd support and encourage people who wish to have children. And whatever happened to their "commitment to end child poverty"?

The empty pretense of giving a shit for our children is all we'll ever get from them.

End rant.

[ April 16, 2002: Message edited by: Rebecca West ]


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 16 April 2002 02:01 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And yet, to listen to some of my former co-workers (the childless ones), you would think that people who take parental leave are just milking the system and bleeding them dry.

The fact is, we as a society have a bad attitude towards involved parenting, to children in general. There doesn't seem to be much political will to make the system any better, and it is still seriously flawed.

I like the Scandinavian approach to parental leave -- you get 18 mos at your full wage, and that's for both parents. You can either take it together, or consecutively. It doesn't seem to be making much impact on the birth rate, but I'm sure that there's a lot less stress on both parents and kids.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 16 April 2002 02:06 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I like the Scandinavian approach to parental leave

Do all three Scandinavian countries have the same policies? How are these policies changing now that public sentiment in the Scandinavian nations seems to be shifting to the "right"?


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 16 April 2002 02:45 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They don't all have the same policies, (I think it was Sweden with the 18 month thing, but I can't remember off the top of my head), but all 3 have much more family-friendly policies than we do. Long mat leaves, better monetary benefits, etc.

I also don't know that they are changing currently. I have talked about the policies with a few people from Denmark and Sweden, they feel that it's better to spend the money on giving children a strong family foundation in the formative years than to spend it on delinquency later. Made sense to me.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 16 April 2002 03:53 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The federal government seems to think that offering a year's maternity leave is really progressive.

I know. When I had my baby, it was still 6 months at 55% of your income (up to a top rate of something like $420 a week). When the new changes came about, some people thought it was so great. But you know what I would prefer? I would prefer it if you had the choice - get either 55% of your income for a year, or 95% (or heck, even 100%) of your income for 6 months. If given the choice I would take almost full income for 6 months rather than 55% for a year.

As for people who don't like the idea of paid maternity leave at all, well, they are usually the types of people who don't like any kind of government spending. I don't really give a damn what they think. In that case, I don't feel like I should have to pay for all those prisons and boot camps that the law-and-order types (who usually are the same ones who whine about maternity leave) think people should be locked into with the key thrown away for everything from a misdemeanor to murder. I don't take those people very seriously. They're all for government spending when it suits THEIR agenda.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 16 April 2002 04:51 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Right on Michelle.

(Nice rant, BTW :)


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 16 April 2002 06:02 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Excellent rant! I'm with ya!

It's funny, I quit the highest paying job I've ever had when I had my daughter. I was lucky that they had one year of mat leave written into the employment contract, so I had 6 months to see if I could do something else instead, with the safety of being able to go back to work within a week's notice if I wanted to. In the end, I found dealing with the stress of contract work/self-employment more conducive to parenting than the stress of the job.

I might have considered going back if there had been job-sharing or telecommuting options available, and those are some flexibilities that parents should be pushing for.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 16 April 2002 08:06 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is why I would like it if we could choose our rate and amount of time off - I know people who would much prefer a year at 55% rather than 6 months at full rate. I can completely understand that. In my case, I was supporting a spouse through school and could have used the full amount. But some people have spouses who make enough money that they can make do with half their own income for a year. More power to them.

And others like Zoot may want to use the latter 6 months for experimentation with a new career. That's cool too. (How did that go down with EI rules, Zoot? I guess you just had to claim any income you made working, right? They take it off dollar for dollar when you're on maternity leave and you earn any money. But did they also take those weeks you were working and tack them on the end of your eligibility period? I don't remember how that part works since I didn't work during my maternity leave.)


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 17 April 2002 02:26 AM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This isn't quite on topic but...my wife was nursing our baby on a French beach one afternoon and kept receiving dirty looks from everyone, including the women who were going around topless for no reason.

That's it.


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 17 April 2002 02:29 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wow. Is it not cool to nurse in public in France? You'd think they'd be more open about that kind of thing there, considering how they seem to be more open about sexual content on television and nudity on the beach, etc. I wouldn't think they would be squeamish about stuff to do with the body.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 17 April 2002 04:44 AM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
You'd think they'd be more open about that kind of thing there, considering how they seem to be more open about sexual content on television and nudity on the beach, etc.

That would have been my guess, too. Maybe open sexuality is fine...and motherhood is taboo?


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 17 April 2002 06:56 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
...my wife was nursing our baby on a French beach one afternoon and kept receiving dirty looks from everyone, including the women who were going around topless for no reason.

Weird -- When I was in France, nobody even blinked, wherever I happened to nurse.

quote:
How did that go down with EI rules, Zoot? I guess you just had to claim any income you made working, right? They take it off dollar for dollar when you're on maternity leave and you earn any money. But did they also take those weeks you were working and tack them on the end of your eligibility period? I don't remember how that part works since I didn't work during my maternity leave.

I didn't have to deal with EI rules. Basically, at the time EI went for the first 6 mos and then stopped. My union agreement allowed for a full year of leave without pay. I took the full year, received EI for the first 6 mos and started working freelance for the second 6 mos. By the time I was getting to the end of the year's leave, I was comfortable with the idea of self-employment and decided to make it permanent.

It's made it harder with the second babe, since I was having to complete contracts around the time she was born, but it seems to be working out. I'm also doing what I've always wanted to do (sort of, anyway) so it makes up for any rough spots. Nothing's perfect.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 17 April 2002 11:41 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Did you try nursing at a beach?
From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 18 April 2002 01:12 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find that when I nurse in public, most people don't even notice, and those who do politely look away. I generally prefer a quiet, private spot though, because when my daughter gets distracted, she's liable to turn her head suddenly. Ouch.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 18 April 2002 02:20 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
LOL, yeh, they do that, don't they.... And the older they get, the more acrobatic they become.

Arch, I nursed a lot of places... We were in Cannes, but it wasn't high season, not warm enough to go topless on the beach, but I did nurse there, and nobody seemed to take notice. Then again, we weren't surrounded by "the beautiful people", so that may have had something to do with it. I didn't get looks in restaurants or sidewalk cafes, either, though. According to my SIL, who toured with both her sons (she's a musician), Europeans tend to be more comfortable with public nursing than North Americans.

I think Toronto was the only place I've ever been where I was asked to nurse in the ladies' room...

Best place for acceptance of nursing had to be Beijing -- However, the crowd of people watching, smiling and generally applauding the nursing of curly-headed blond baby got a little disconcerting after the first few minutes....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 18 April 2002 02:53 PM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Did they take pictures? Totally unrelated, my parents were moving across the country, and we had to ship the St. Bernard and the rotti/shepard on Air Canada. The St. Bernard's flight was delayed, so I walked her around. I was swamped with about 20 Japanese tourists on a visit, and my dog, and me -I assume- are now permanently in their souvenire books. "BIG-DOG BIG-DOG!!" "Beethoven!" "CUJO!" What fun.

I plan on breastfeeding, I hope I can. That sling thing sounds really good. I can't believe you were told to use the bathroom in Toronto! What they heck do you say when people are like that?


From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 18 April 2002 02:58 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Generally, I say "No thanks, I'm fine right here." I repeat it, politely but firmly, if necessary.

No, they didn't take pictures, but they were very... supportive.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 18 April 2002 03:01 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wasn't there an incident at the AGO in Toronto (or was it the ROM?) where a woman was asked to breast-feed in the bathroom? I don't remember whether or not she complied, but I certainly remember there being a big to-do about it afterwards. Sure, I'll breastfeed in the bathroom, right after you sit on the toilet and eat your lunch off the used-tampon recepticle in the stall.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 18 April 2002 03:14 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There've been several to-dos in numerous places, so I've lost track.

I know there's always the temptation to be aggressive about it when someone makes that kind of wrong-headed demand, but I've found being cheerful and polite makes them really embarrassed, especially if you speak in a clear enough voice so that people around you can't help but hear the conversation. They back off a lot quicker because you're just not playing along -- if they can make you defensive, it's more like you're doing something wrong.

And they really hate it when you smile at them while you're refusing to cooperate!


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 18 April 2002 03:26 PM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why do some people have a problem with this? Is it squeamishness over breasts? I don't get it.
From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 18 April 2002 03:38 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I really think it's a combination of factors.

First of all, breasts are fetishized in our society as objects of arousal -- sexual by nature to the exclusion of all else. So the sight of a breast is seen as a sexual image only, which is something that is not acceptable to publicly display.

Not that I think breastfeeding displays anything. I can breastfeed without anybody seeing much of anything, and so can most of the other nursing moms I have known.

Secondly, breastfeeding is not the norm in our society. Many people are not familiar with it, and it feels "unnatural", because in their frame of reference, it is. We are taught that babies take bottles from an early age, part of our socialization. The fact that it's backwards doesn't fizz on some people, they haven't given it any thought, nor do they know why breastfeeding is beneficial. They just feel it's wrong.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
from the mouths of babes
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2577

posted 29 April 2002 10:14 PM      Profile for from the mouths of babes     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
They don't all have the same policies, (I think it was Sweden with the 18 month thing, but I can't remember off the top of my head), but all 3 have much more family-friendly policies than we do. Long mat leaves, better monetary benefits, etc.

I would agree with you in it being Sweden- they've got some of the largest social programs in the world. (highest taxes, though- 73%! Ouch!) I guess all of the social programs balance themselves out in the taxes you pay.

From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
KevinMichaelMurphy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2487

posted 30 April 2002 10:48 AM      Profile for KevinMichaelMurphy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My personal fave regarding this happened while I was living in Ottawa about ten years ago.

A lady was feeding her child on an OC Transpo bus when the driver asked if she could not do that on the bus. She politely refused.

At the next stop the driver asked again, she again refused and the driver asked her to leave the bus.

After much arguing the lady left the bus (I wouldn't have budged). She filed a complaint with OC Transpo and went straight to the media as well.

When contacted about the incident, OC Transpo stated that food or drink was not allowed to be consumed on their buses, that's why the lady was asked to leave.

After getting over my anger, I laughed for days whenever I thought about that.

Most of the ladies that have responded here seem to be in very fortunate positions where they work near their babies, so breastfeeding while at work isn't an issue.

In talking with friends who are about to give birth, I'd say a good 70% say a big NO WAY to breastfeeding. "It's too much hassle", "Isn't the formula these days just as good as my milk?"

I think the sexualization (is that a real word?) of breasts has a lot to do with the discomfort some people seem to feel over breastfeeding. But, I think the "hassle" factor is a big one as well. My female friends seem to think that they'll be tied down by breastfeeding.

That's kind of sad I think. After all, although this society tends to forget this, that is what breasts are for

Kevin


From: Saint John, NB Canada | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 30 April 2002 10:52 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
An oft-forgotten good reason to breastfeed is that studies have shown that babies who are breastfed are generally healthier, overall. While this is not as critical in industrialized countries, in semi-industrialized or nonindustrialized countries it can mean the difference between surviving a childhood disease or not.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 30 April 2002 11:30 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In talking with friends who are about to give birth, I'd say a good 70% say a big NO WAY to breastfeeding. "It's too much hassle", "Isn't the formula these days just as good as my milk?"
Your friends who think breastfeeding is a hassle obviously have never washed and sterilized 6 bottles a day, nor have they mixed formula or tried to warm formula under a tap in a public washroom while out with the baby. I had to do all that when I couldn't nurse my firstborn, and it was a helluva lot of work. Yeah, breastfeeding can be, at first, quite difficult. But they have lactation consultants up the wahzoo at hospitals these days (and you can use them even if you have a homebirth) and they're enormously useful. Alot of midwives and doulas are also knowledgable about breastfeeding techniques. In addition, no formula can give a baby the kind of nutrition and immunity from disease that individually made-to-order breast milk can.

Apart from practicalities, breastfeeding can be a very pleasant and relaxing part of the day. At the end of a long work day, I can't wait to get home to nurse the baby. All the stress leaves my body and I go into this warm and fuzzy zone where all seems well and good. It rocks.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 30 April 2002 01:55 PM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your mention of breastfeeding at the ROM, and generally being stared at reminds me of a semi-relevant anicdote. When my daughter was born, she had an underdeveloped suck reflex. She ended up in the hospital seriously dehydrated shortly after birth, and even the Le Leche lady said we'd have to go back to the bottle, which we did for several months.

A Dr. at Scarborough Grace Hosp. worked with us on a protocol she was developing for a sort of reverse weaning. The one doing the feeding had a baggie of expressed milk around the neck with a thin feeding tube running down the arm, and taped to the end of the forefinger. This went in my daughters mouth, and we were instructed on how to massage her palate in such a way that was supposed to stimulate the suck reflex. I think it was about a month or two of this, and she was able to return to breast feeding with no further problems.

The neat thing was that I got to do it too. Even her brother, (4 years old at the time) got to try it. But talk about being stared at! I remember doing this in the rotunda at the ROM and almost drawing a crowd. I,ve bottle fed babies lots, but that felt so much more intimate. Kind of wierd in a nice way. It was a fair bit of work, and we had to rent a really high quality breast pump, but it was certainly worth it!


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 30 April 2002 02:42 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, the intimacy is immensely satisfying. I have a feeling my youngest will be more successfully weaned than I will. Speaking of pumping, I went away for last weekend without the baby for the first time since she was born last fall and took along one of those plastic hand pumps. What a hassle! I'm so glad I don't have to use one any more than very occasionally.

[ April 30, 2002: Message edited by: Rebecca West ]


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 30 April 2002 04:52 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
My female friends seem to think that they'll be tied down by breastfeeding.

And they would be right. I felt an immense relief when I abandoned breast feeding and went to bottle feeding. Granted, I only tried breast feeding for a couple of weeks, but I found that I was breast-feeding all day long in 4-6 hour sessions. I have never felt so overwhelmed or depressed. The only problem with bottle feeding was my idiot of a husband's nasty response to my decision. Easy for him. He didn't have to be a milk machine for 12 hours a day.

quote:
Your friends who think breastfeeding is a hassle obviously have never washed and sterilized 6 bottles a day, nor have they mixed formula or tried to warm formula under a tap in a public washroom while out with the baby.

I found it took much less time to make a day's batch of formula than it did to try and feed it to him for hours per day from my breasts. And I've never had to warm formula in a public washroom - I usually fed the baby right before going out, took another bottle with me, and by the time he needed feeding again while we were out, the milk would be room temperature.

quote:
Yeah, breastfeeding can be, at first, quite difficult. But they have lactation consultants up the wahzoo at hospitals these days (and you can use them even if you have a homebirth) and they're enormously useful.

I found the nurses pretty useless at the hospitals when it came to trying to teach a woman with large breasts how to breastfeed. They just started supplementing him right away because he was a big baby and they thought he needed it because of the blood sugar tests. And when they saw I needed help, they referred me to the lactation consultant, whose office hours were extremely limited. And even though they could see that I was very upset about not being able to breastfeed properly, they never told me there were actually people in the community who could help me. I had no idea. So personally, I found the hospital to be pretty darn useless as a resource. And this was supposed to be such a great hospital for maternity, Mount Sinai in Toronto - brand new maternity and labour areas, etc. I was so overwhelmed and depressed that it didn't occur to me that there might actually be people who will come to your home and help you cope with breastfeeding. And I found that several of the nurses who were on shift (with one amazing, shining exception) were pretty useless when it came to specialized knowledge about breast-feeding, labour, and neonatal care.

As for nothing being as good as breast milk, well, my son was reared on formula, I was reared on formula, and so were millions of other babies who turned out just fine.

quote:
That's kind of sad I think. After all, although this society tends to forget this, that is what breasts are for.

That's what my breasts are for if I choose to use them that way. I think a lot of breast-feeding advocates seem to forget that the freedom to breast-feed also includes the freedom NOT to breast-feed. I lost count of all the nipple-nazis (not you, Kevin ) who nagged me and tried to make me feel guilty for not breast-feeding my son. It may come as a shock to realize that not all women who choose not to breast-feed do it out of ignorance or selfishness.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 30 April 2002 06:07 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
n talking with friends who are about to give birth, I'd say a good 70% say a big NO WAY to breastfeeding. "It's too much hassle", "Isn't the formula these days just as good as my milk?"

AAAAAAAAAAAAGH!!!!!!

No, it is definitely not a hassle. It's tough for the first 4-6 weeks, but after that, it's nowhere near the hassle of dealing with bottles. I'm telling you this from the experience of a mother who has traveled extensively while my first baby was still nursing -- I had 20 hour transits in some cases, and long days in some hot places. It was a relief not to have to worry about having equipment and facilities for sterilizing bottles or spoilage.

And your friends should check out the medical opinions on breastmilk vs formula -- they're not the same, and breastmilk wins hands down. Even the formula companies acknowledge this.

quote:
My female friends seem to think that they'll be tied down by breastfeeding.

I would cousel those who worry about being "tied down" not to have children just yet. Breastfeeding doesn't tie you down, parenthood does. I still managed to get out, often as much or more than my bottle-feeding contemporaries. And I tended to lug my little ones along with me -- small babies are very portable, and the larger ones can take expressed milk in a bottle or cup once in a while. And as I noted above, I travelled a LOT with a baby. So I would say this is largely a myth.

quote:
Granted, I only tried breast feeding for a couple of weeks, but I found that I was breast-feeding all day long in 4-6 hour sessions. I have never felt so overwhelmed or depressed.

Michelle, it's really hard to judge what established breastfeeding is going to be like from the first couple of weeks. Certainly, 4 hours plus on the boob at a time is pretty unusual, and I think if you'd had the kind of support and encouragement you needed that it might not have been so hard. I can't believe the hospital didn't refer you to La Leche League, there would have been somebody there for you.

And I also found that most moms are sleep-deprived, overwhelmed and slightly depressed in those first few weeks. It's the hormones, not just the breastfeeding. Although I'm certain your trouble with it added to the usual blues.

quote:
As for nothing being as good as breast milk, well, my son was reared on formula, I was reared on formula, and so were millions of other babies who turned out just fine.

Yeah, and so was I. But breastmilk has a number of advantages over formula, and according to nutritionists, pediatricians and the like, breastmilk is better. Not that formula is bad for babies -- just not as up to the mark as human milk. What Rebecca mentioned -- breastmilk being custom-made -- is true. Your body alters the composition of the breastmilk according to what the baby needs at the time, something that formula can't do. And there are some immune system benefits to it as well.

quote:
I think a lot of breast-feeding advocates seem to forget that the freedom to breast-feed also includes the freedom NOT to breast-feed. I lost count of all the nipple-nazis... It may come as a shock to realize that not all women who choose not to breast-feed do it out of ignorance or selfishness.

Okay, I probably fall under the heading of "nipple-nazi", although that's not the term I would choose to describe myself...

I'm not suggesting that all women who choose not to breastfeed are ignorant or selfish. We all live our own experiences. But I do think that we still lack the understanding and support for women like yourself who were willing to give it a shot and had difficulty (because breastfeeding is definitely a learned skill) and didn't get what you needed at the time. I think that's a real indictment of the system, not you as a parent.

Heck, I consider myself lucky to have managed to breastfeed with as little difficulty as I did, since I was the only living woman in my family to do so. It was a foreign concept to me at first, but decided to go for it after researching the medical benefits. I started for the health reasons, but stayed with it for the convenience.

What I find disturbing, though, are women who immediately dismiss the idea of breastfeeding, and those to whom breastfeeding is considered disgusting, unseemly and meant to be hidden like a dirty habit.

Sorry for the long post....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 30 April 2002 11:02 PM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I post this with full awareness that as a male, I'm doing the Hokey Pokey in a minefield, but here goes.

I guess I've established above that we're fans of breast feeding in my family. The support that my wife recieved was great, and the openess about breast feeding was hard won, as there was a time not too long ago when there was absolutely no support at all. It was seen as a lower class choice, and women who made that decision were often isolated. We've come a long way and that's good.

I'm reminded by Michelles post that when we were going through this business with our daughter, we recieved huge support from her family, and various para-professional breast feeding support types. My sister in law on my side of the family, who had bottle fed for reasons she has not shared and I've not asked, ended up feeling hurt by some of the thing that were said by a few of the more vocal enthusiasts. Parents of newborns, I feel often encounter those who are incredibly evangelical about their point of view. The Le Leche people for instance are almost a cult. It's easy to miss that when you're basically agreeing with them in the first place.

Personally, I try not to give unsolicited advice even when I'm personally enthusiastic about something. When I am asked, I try to go over to where the person is at, and start from there. For instance, when sombody says it's a hassle, then godammit it's a hassle!

BTW, hey Michelle: Without detracting from the clear feeling behind your post, I have to say I was tickled by the phrase "Nipple Nazi". I kept trying to visualize their uniforms.

[ April 30, 2002: Message edited by: oldgoat ]


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 01 May 2002 12:51 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Le Leche people for instance are almost a cult.

I really don't think that's an entirely fair assessment, Oldgoat. You're making a generalization based on a few nutbars, which you'll find in any organization that promotes just about anything.

I've actually found the majority of La Leche Leaguers to be friendly, supportive and non-judgemental. I don't breastfeed as long as many of them (my older daughter quit at a year, and some breastfeed as long as three), but nobody's ever been down on me for it.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca