babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Arbitrator orders employer to pay McGuinty health premium

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Arbitrator orders employer to pay McGuinty health premium
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 10 October 2004 01:12 AM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In a ruling that could have wide implications, an arbitrator has ordered an employer to pay the Ontario government's new health care premium on behalf of its employees under provisions of a dormant clause in the collective agreement.

Arbitrator Anne Barrett rejected an argument by the employer, Lapointe Fisher Nursing Home, that the so-called premium "was really a tax and not the long ago discontinued OHIP premium referred to in the collective agreement."

A previous Liberal government eliminated the Ontario Health Insurance Plan premiums 15 years ago, but many unions held on to their contract language compelling employers to pay the premium -- "in case it comes back," Ms. Barrett wrote in her Oct. 6 decision. It came back, in a different form, earlier this year, creating immediate conflict between unions and employers over whether the old contract language could be reapplied.

On July 1, employers started deducting the premium, which could cost Ontario's most highly-paid employees $900 a year. Ms. Barrett's ruling, on behalf of the United Food and Commercial Workers union, was hailed by the union's lawyers as a landmark decision.


Globe&Mail

[ 10 October 2004: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 10 October 2004 09:41 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The article misses one important point. The health premiums (or tax if you will) is a taxable benefit so the employees will still have to pay income tax on that amount. This is not a complete pass through.
From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 10 October 2004 08:05 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ah. My collective agreement is similarly worded. In fact, our language might be clearer.


I will enquire at work as to the status of our grievance.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 10 October 2004 08:28 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ah, the beauty of Liberal word games.

Rather than simply increasing income taxes to cover for the shortfall in revenues (which would have been a far fairer way of sharing the burden), the Liberals decided to call the tax "a premium". Why? So they could say that they had not broken their promise that "I won't raise your taxes". I believe it was Ian Urquhard that predicted this nice little corollary when the premium was first announced.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca