babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Oliver Stone and Fidel Castro on the passionate Eye

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Oliver Stone and Fidel Castro on the passionate Eye
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 05 April 2004 01:17 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I watched Oliver Stone's documentary on Fidel Castro. El Commondante is a remarkable man. He has provided free Healthcare and education to every Cuban. He seems to be a brilliant public speaker and an extremely talented politician. One thing troubles me though. The documentary was incredibly one-sided. Because of this, I have decided to come here and ask you to answer some questions about Castro's régime.
What is the human rights situation in Cuba. Castro insists that no man has been executed in his country for 43 years. Is this the case?
Are the elections in Cuba as free as they are in Sweden?
Stone showed happy crowds waiting to meet Castro. How authoritarian is the old man? Is he as tyrannical as Saddam Hussein or the Shah?
Did he in fact give a cigar to Saddam?

From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 05 April 2004 02:58 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The Bush administration rejects normal relations with communist Cuba because of its sorry human rights record and political prisoners. Cuba holds about 350 political prisoners. The U.S.'s new best friend, communist Uzbekistan, an infinitely more brutal, despotic tyranny than Cuba, holds over 7,000.

Other things that might be worth worrying about.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 05 April 2004 01:11 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel's May Day speech from last year.

Fidel on May Day 2003

Of all the things that Castro boasted about in his speech, I particularly like the fact that he brags about the numbers of teachers and the issue of class size. A hack and slash neo-conservative would never brag about such things. They seem to hate all learning.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 05 April 2004 05:45 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, Uzbekistan is a terrible place and the Bush administration is being extremely hypocritical in its dealings with the warlords who govern it.
I'm not saying I trust the American anti Cuba policy. As soon as Fidel dies they will probably assist those upper-middle-class jackals in Miami to destroy everything good that Castro has created. They will also establish a pro American dictatorship.
I find Fidel confusing. I used to think the man was a saint, I still have his picture beside my bed. I said to myself, here is perhaps the only place on earth where communism has worked to the people's benefit. I then started hearing about his human rights abuses. They say he has tortured and jailed authors, thinkers and activists.
So which is it, is El Commondante a kind and gentle man, a benevolent revolutionary who just wants to do the right thing for his people, or is he a corrupt despot who only cares about power? I'm asking this not because I believe that Fidel has more influence on geopolitics then the rulers of Uzbekistan, or because I believe that their arn't other leaders that deserve more scrutiny, I'm asking for my own peace of mind.

[ 05 April 2004: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]

[ 05 April 2004: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 05 April 2004 05:56 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by CMOT Dibbler:
...So which is it, is El Commondante a kind and gentle man, a benevolent revolutionary who just wants to do the right thing for his people, or is he a corrupt despot who only cares about power?
[ 05 April 2004: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]

There's only one way to answer a question like that. Do your own homework and form your own opinion. Here's some help:

Granma

They also have information about Cuban political prisoners in the U.S.
Miami 5


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 05 April 2004 07:34 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I find Fidel confusing. I used to think the man was a saint, I still have his picture beside my bed.

I've stopped thinking as people as saints. I like Fidel. I think he has done well, possibly better than many would have considering the circumstances. How will Cuba evolve post Fidel? Who knows. I wish the Cuban the best.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 05 April 2004 08:36 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It seems to be about as good as you can get, starting from third world conditions with few resources and under trade difficulties, while still being totalitarian.
But it is totalitarian. And there are problems that come from that, both in terms of lack of freedom and in terms of a certain ossification of bureaucracies. Certainly there seems to be a tendency for many things in Cuba to be pretty run down, and it's not clear how much of that is just that Cuba is not a fundamentally rich country and has the US on its neck, and how much comes from procedures trumping useful action.

At the same time, even a democratic state in Cuba's situation would be pretty likely to have some political prisoners (aka people they thought were spies or in the pay of same). Some of the people in jail and called "political prisoners" seem in fact to be people in the pay of the US seeking to destabilize the country. Others seem genuinely to be political prisoners, there for trivial "offenses".

Meanwhile, I think both Castro and the upper Communist Party people are very much afraid that democratization would let the US pry the place open and kill off the very real advances they've made. They could probably get away with more openness than they've got, but the worry is a very real one. I do wonder what Cuba would be like today if there had never been any pressure from the United States in the first place. More room to evolve, I would think, the results less rigid.

I wonder if Castro is hoping to outlast the US. There are a lot of people predicting that the American "imperial moment" doesn't have too many years to run, that they're going to hit an overstretch crisis military, economic or both. After which Cuba might be in a position to loosen up if it had alliances going with countries in a possibly resurgent Latin America. But on the other hand, that's a lot of ifs, and Castro can't have that many years left in him either. Maybe he's just stalling in hopes the horse will learn to talk.

I don't know how to judge Castro. He, and the whole situation, are too complicated and ambiguous for me to reach a conclusion. It's pretty rare for me to see a situation where my hubris doesn't stretch to passing judgment one way or another, but this is one.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 06 April 2004 12:58 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Indeed Rufus. In the lead up to the second Gulf War, I had no problem condemning Saddam Hussein as a vile tyrant, even though he had provided his people with a excellent health-care system and the lowest infant mortality rate in the Middle East. He, like Fidel has a deep hatred of the Americans, but there is definitely something different about Castro's dictatorship. He seems rather easy going for a man who runs a totalitarian régime. He hasn't expressed a deep hatred for ethnic minorities in his country and even his zero-tolerance policy for homosexuality seems to have disappeared. Of course all of this came from Stone's documentary, and he is undoubtedly very pro Fidel.
The Castro régime he sees is benevolent, but this raises the question, can a dictatorship ever be gentle?

[ 06 April 2004: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
DownTheRoad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4523

posted 06 April 2004 01:50 PM      Profile for DownTheRoad     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What is the human rights situation in Cuba. Castro insists that no man has been executed in his country for 43 years. Is this the case? Are the elections in Cuba as free as they are in Sweden?


Hard to know for sure given the tight control the regime maintains over information getting out. Seems Castro's healthcare system ain't all it's cracked up to be, at least for some people:
quote:
Unlike previous years, when Cuban authorities were mostly content to merely harass and threaten independent journalists and their families, in 2003, authorities launched an all-out assault against the opposition and the independent press. Officials jailed 29 journalists—about one-third of the island’s independent press—and sentenced them to lengthy prison terms. Those who continue to work face systematic police harassment and threats.
...
The imprisoned journalists, who are being held in maximum-security facilities and are handcuffed any time they leave their cells, have denounced their unsanitary prison conditions, inadequate medical care, solitary confinement, and lack of access to the press and television. They have also complained of receiving foul-smelling and rotten food.


Not that this kind of thing ever matters to Castro's apologists.

From: land of cotton | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 06 April 2004 04:49 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
DownTheRoad has provided another source for information about Cuba. It's called Committe to Protect Journalists and it is based in the U.S. Funny thing though...the overwhelming bulk of journalistic problems for U.S. journalists seem to take place in some other country!

For another journalistic approach, try the International Federation of Journalists (The IFJ is also critical of the arrest of journalists in Cuba.)

[ 06 April 2004: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3278

posted 06 April 2004 05:49 PM      Profile for Polunatic   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Castro insists that no man has been executed in his country for 43 years. Is this the case?
I'm pretty sure he said that no one had been tortured since the revolution. Cuba acknowledges that they use capital punishment.

One interesting part of the interview was when Fidel said something to the effect of "maybe I am a dictator but what's wrong with that". I thought he was being extremely candid.

In any case, had revolutionary Cuba not done many of the things it did, it would not have survived this long. Take a look at Haiti where the mere election of a moderate like Aristedes raises the American's hackles.


From: middle of nowhere | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 06 April 2004 06:30 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel's recent view on capital punishment in Cuba:

quote:
We fully respect the opinions of those who oppose capital punishment for religious, philosophical and humanitarian reasons. We Cuban revolutionaries also abhor capital punishment, for much more profound reasons than those addressed by the social sciences with regard to crime, currently under study in our country. The day will come when we can accede to the wishes for the abolition of such penalty so nobly expressed here by Reverend Lucius Walker in his brilliant speech. The special concern over this issue is easily understood when you know that the majority of the people executed in the United States are African American and Hispanic, and not infrequently they are innocent, especially in Texas, the champion of death sentences, where President Bush was formerly the governor, and not a single life has ever been pardoned.

The Cuban Revolution was placed in the dilemma of either protecting the lives of millions of Cubans by using the legally established death penalty to punish the three main hijackers of a passenger ferry or sitting back and doing nothing. The U.S. government, which incites common criminals to assault boats or airplanes with passengers on board, encourages these people gravely endangering the lives of innocents and creating the ideal conditions for an attack on Cuba. A wave of hijackings had been unleashed and was already in full development; it had to be stopped.

We cannot ever hesitate when it is a question of protecting the lives of the sons and daughters of a people determined to fight until the end, arresting the mercenaries who serve the aggressors and applying the most severe sanctions against terrorists who hijack passenger boats or planes or commit similarly serious acts, who will be punished by the courts in accordance with the laws in force.

Not even Jesus Christ, who drove the traders out of the temple with a whip, would fail to opt for the defense of the people.


Not bad. I have yet to see another leader who carries out capital punishment but expresses the view that he would rather not.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2004 06:41 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I dunno. Seems to me as though it's yet another example of this phenomenon.
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 06 April 2004 06:50 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My point is that most of the supporters of capital punishment in Canada, for example, defend it by making statements like, "Well, they won't be able to do that again." And so on. Or they defend it as retribution.

The fact that a head of state, on a national holiday, makes it his business to defend such executions while acknowledging that he would rather not carry them out seems to deserve our consideration. Even the most consistent opponent of capital punishment could imagine circumstances where they could not avoid it: civil war, invasion, and so on.

Sidebar: Fidel did not mention the 20 or so times that the U.S. has allegedly tried to assassinate him. Personally, I'd be rather annoyed.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2004 07:59 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not convinced. In the case of civil war or invasion, you're killing people who are armed and would kill you if given the chance. Capital punishment involves taking people who are in the custody of the state, who pose no immediate physical threat to anybody, and killing them anyway.
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 06 April 2004 08:22 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It should be noted that the other power that occupies part of Cuba operates a facility there to try people in military courts and also execute death sentences in Cuba.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2004 08:52 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, but at least they're not hypocrites: they don't make any effort to pretend that they're really against capital punishment.

That said, hypocrisy is a lesser crime. But still nothing to be proud about.


From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 06 April 2004 09:21 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Excuse me? Indefinite detention and trials of people "who are in the custody of the state, who pose no immediate physical threat to anybody," in secret military criminal courts in the name of truth, freedom and democracy is not hypocritical?
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2004 09:34 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes it is, especially if you're sworn to uphold a constitution that forbids such things.

I was referring to capital punishment - on that subject at least, the US cannot be accused of hypocrisy. They do it, and they don't pretend that they'd rather not do it.

Doesn't mean that they can't be hypocrites in other areas.


From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 06 April 2004 11:48 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What is the human rights situation in Cuba. Castro insists that no man has been executed in his country for 43 years. Is this the case?

Fidel wasn't referring to capital punishment, he was referring to torture.

The Cuban government has indeed executed prisoners (something I personally oppose) but I think that international human rights organizations would agree that Cuba has not engaged in the torture of prisoners...political and otherwise.

There have been reports of poor prison conditions and neglect, but certainly not torture.

quote:
Are the elections in Cuba as free as they are in Sweden?

The Cuban parliament (its called the Assembly of People's Power) is an elected body, but its not elected in a way that those in western countries would be familiar with.

As I understand, candidates are nominated by workplace committees, neighbourhood committees and various social organizations. On the ballot, people vote on whether or not they approve the candidates or not. The Cubans would argue that its at this "grass roots" level where democracy takes place.

Apparently there is a "recall" provision in the Cuban constitution but how often it is in fact used is a question I can't honestly answer. It would be interesting to find out.

quote:
Stone showed happy crowds waiting to meet Castro. How authoritarian is the old man? Is he as tyrannical as Saddam Hussein or the Shah?

One of the "crowd" scenes took place at the Latin American School of Medicine in Havana. Students at the school are drawn from throughout Latin America and receive their medical education for free courtesy of the Cuban government. The school also accepts students from depressed communities in the U.S. who could otherwise not afford a medical education.

Needless to say, those students all feel very grateful towards Fidel and that's why you saw him being treated like a rock star.

Oliver Stone did the documentary prior to the arrests of the so-called "independent journalists" and apparently plans to go back to Cuba to do another film dealing with this issue. All of these "independent journalists" were in some way shape or form receiving payments from the U.S. Interests Section in Havana through a programme initiated by the Bush-appointed head of the section James Casson. So its debatable in my view as to how "independent" they were.

quote:
He hasn't expressed a deep hatred for ethnic minorities in his country and even his zero-tolerance policy for homosexuality seems to have disappeared.

Actually I thought Castro was quite honest about this issue in the film where he talked about the history of machismo throughout Cuban history and how they've evolved out of it.

Actually, some months ago the "Telelatino" cable channel carried a Cuban film which dealt with this very issue, however within a Cuban context.

This would have been a film that was shown in Cuban cinemas and on Cuban television...sorry can't remember the name of it. It was in Spanish with subtitles and my Spanish isn't very good.

Basically the film deals with a young male art student who's also a candidate member for the Cuban Young Communist League. The student strikes up a friendship with a gay man.

The film was straight-up honest about the homophobia in Cuban society, how the student was hassled because of his friendship with the gay man. Towards the end of the film the gay man gives a "speach" questioning why gay people can't be considered communists and revolutionaries.

I've seen other Cuban films on the weekend on Telelatino from time to time. Interesting what you can catch "flicking the remote".

The black population in Cuba were treated as subhumans in pre-revolutionary Cuba. One thing that the revolution did accomplish was the elimination of racism. In the film, Castro states that blacks in Cuba are in fact the most revolutionary and therefore the most pro-government. I can only say that from my own travels to Cuba over the years that I would tend to agree.

Threads on Cuba come up quite frequently on babble. With very limited resources its made tremendous achievements in health and education despite 40 years of harassment and sabotage by the U.S.

Most of us would like to see Cuba become more open and democratic, but its between the perverbial rock and a hard place.

[ 06 April 2004: Message edited by: radiorahim ]


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 07 April 2004 01:23 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Threads on Cuba come up quite frequently on babble. With very limited resources its made tremendous achievements in health and education despite 40 years of harassment and sabotage by the U.S.

Well my thread hasn't been closed down yet. I guess that means it's unique! Which I find rather odd. I can't imagine that I'm the only babbler who's wondered about Castro's character.


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 07 April 2004 01:47 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Castro's character? He has tons of character. Is he a nice guy. Dunno. Is he an effective politiican who has done good things for his country. Yes.

I can't think of a Canadian politician who has come close to the kind of staying power, intelligence and ability as Castro. He makes people like Paul Martin look like they are in kindergarden.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 07 April 2004 03:09 PM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If Castro really wanted to get back in Uncle Sam's good graces, it would be fairly simple to do so. All he'd have to do is abolish the health care and other social programs, set up maquiladora zones and allow US and other foreign corporations to set up sweatshops and exploit cheap Cuban labour.

If he did that, suddenly he'd become a "good Commie" in Washington's eyes, like China. And criticisms of his human rights record would quietly wither away.


From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 07 April 2004 09:16 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually Cuba has had export processing zones since 1997..."maquiladoras" if you will.
From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 08 April 2004 01:02 AM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting. I didn't know that.

A bit of quick Googling indicates that these EPZ's haven't exactly taken off, though. It seems that foreign companies are forbidden from hiring & firing labourers directly, instead having to hire them through an "employment agency" which is part of the Cuban government. Plus, the companies are forced to pay such things as social security benefits, paid vacations & holidays, and free lunches for their workers.

What kind of "free trade zone" is that?

Obviously those Cubans haven't quite grasped what the "maquiladora" philosophy is all about. It's a good start, though: maybe, given time, they'll learn, and Cuba will join the "race to the bottom" like everybody else.

[ 08 April 2004: Message edited by: beluga2 ]


From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca