babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Tide caused allergic reaction

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Tide caused allergic reaction
Candace
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3380

posted 26 April 2005 10:08 AM      Profile for Candace     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Proctor and Gamble, Inc.
ATTN: Chief Executive Officer
4711 Yonge St.
North York, Ontario
Canada
M2N 6K8

April 26, 2005

Re: Tide Cold Wash Liquid Laundry Detergent

Dear Proctor and Gamble, Inc.:

Tide Cold Wash Liquid Detergent made me sick. Literally, your product made me physically ill. I used a sample of your product that was sent to me in the mail, and I broke out into hives. The clothes that I wore which I had washed in your detergent made me break out into itchy sores—I was uncomfortable for days.

Finally, I sought medical assistance. I had never had any allergies before in my entire life (I had also never used Tide). I was informed that detergents are a common cause for topical allergic reactions. I wondered why there was no warning on the package or in your TV advertisements?

I brought up my case with fellow employees at the public radio station at which I work. ALL of them claimed to have experienced an allergic reaction to Tide detergent in the past.

Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should STOP producing and marketing a harmful product such as Tide Cold Wash Liquid Detergent. Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should consider a RECALL of all of its Tide Cold Wash Liquid Detergent products wherever they have already been sold, or distributed as samples for free. Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should also, at the very least, issue CLEAR warnings on your product packages and TV advertisements that a potential allergic reaction may occur, that Tide may be HARMFUL TO YOUR HEALTH. I am lucky that my allergic reaction was not so severe—I imagine that the results for an elderly individual, child or infant could be disastrous.

What do you offer as a potential solution to this problem?

I firmly believe that Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should be accountable not just to consumers, or its shareholders, but to communities as a whole. If Proctor and Gamble, Inc. does not act in the best interests of the communities of which it is a part, then Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should cease to exist in society.

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Candace Mooers
23 Veterans Drive
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3A 4C4 Canada


From: Fredericton | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 26 April 2005 10:11 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've used 'Arctic Power' exclusively since moving here in 1995, no problems. However, someone on another list tells me 'Arctic Power' contains an enzyme or some other ingredient that is harmful to the environment. Can someone here shed light on this? Should I switch to something more benign? Which brand? I want to continue doing laundry in cold water.

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Candace
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3380

posted 26 April 2005 10:12 AM      Profile for Candace     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does anyone know a good laundry detergent recipe? Baking soda and water? Vinegar?

I am also looking for a good insect repellent recipe...? I am told that lemongrass oil mixed with some other oils do the trick...?


From: Fredericton | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 26 April 2005 10:16 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Boom Boom: Probably still contains too much organophosphates?

[ 26 April 2005: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 26 April 2005 10:20 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Boom boom phosphate free detergent is what you are looking for.

Candace, there are these little round disks with metal balls around the edges that you can get to put in your washer. They are supposed to break down the water molecules surface tension, which is what detergent does, and you do not need soap. My mother in law uses them and has not used detergent in years.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 26 April 2005 10:23 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by remind:
Boom boom phosphate free detergent is what you are looking for.

Thanks. If someone can think of a cold water brand that is phosphate-free could you PM me - thanks!


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438

posted 26 April 2005 10:25 AM      Profile for Hailey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just have laundry softener....

2 Cups White Vinegar
4 Cups Water
2 cups baking soda

Combine over sink. Pour into plastic bottle, cover, and shake.

I use homemade detergent now with the babies because I'm nervous about their skin but I'll have to ask my mother-in-law for it because I get it from her.

I have used tide for my own clothing for a long time and I've never had a reaction. Thats terrible.


From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Igor the Miserable
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8445

posted 26 April 2005 10:25 AM      Profile for Igor the Miserable   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.greenpeace.ca/e/resource/green/laundry.php

Too lazy to make my own, I've been using Nature Clean liquid detergent in cold water for all my wash, and it works just fine. Lable has symbols to indicate product is enviro choice and not tested on animals.


From: STRIKE | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 26 April 2005 10:27 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Great! The stores here don't carry that brand, but I can ask for it.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 26 April 2005 10:39 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I firmly believe that Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should be accountable not just to consumers, or its shareholders, but to communities as a whole. If Proctor and Gamble, Inc. does not act in the best interests of the communities of which it is a part, then Proctor and Gamble, Inc. should cease to exist in society.

I once got a rash from a wool sweater. As a result, I demand that grandmothers everywhere be accountable to their itchy grandsons or cease to exist in society!

While I can appreciate wanting to inform a company of the allergic reaction you had to one of their products, does the fact that it's used by millions not suggest to you that you're kind of the exception to the rule on this one, and that it's not really a matter of Tide, or P&G, having been negligent?

If every product to which anyone has ever been allergic had to have a warning label on it, then we'd have a warning label on everything but water.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438

posted 26 April 2005 10:46 AM      Profile for Hailey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mr Magoo!

Her doctor left her with the impression that it was noteworthy because he/she presented it as fairly common.

It's actually not that uncommon from my understanding. Babies are particularly suspectible. I do think that most mainline detergents should say something on it about people with sensitive skin shouldn't use.


From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 26 April 2005 11:29 AM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
If every product to which anyone has ever been allergic had to have a warning label on it, then we'd have a warning label on everything but water.

I know someone who has some very strong opinions on that particular subject.


From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 26 April 2005 12:57 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Her doctor left her with the impression that it was noteworthy because he/she presented it as fairly common.

Fair enough. My eye was just drawn by the immediate jump from "my skin reacted to this laundry detergent" to "... and therefore, if Proctor and Gamble don't make this priority #1 then they must cease to exist in society!"

I mean, sorry if you itched for a day or so, but that doesn't, de facto, make P&G bad corporate citizens.

quote:
I know someone who has some very strong opinions on that particular subject.

Reminds me of the bestest ever spoof line by tWWotW: "Aaaaah! I'm melting! Who could have imagined a drop of water would ever be splashed on meeeeeee?"


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca