babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Gay Son's Picture Missing From Traditional Values Candidate's Mailers

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Gay Son's Picture Missing From Traditional Values Candidate's Mailers
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 23 August 2006 10:31 PM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
by The Associated Press

August 21, 2006 - 5:00 pm ET

(Tallahassee, Florida) Randall Terry doesn't run away from "family values issues" in his state Senate race.

Among the conservative Christian's pledges are preserving traditional marriage and opposing gay adoptions. He has touted efforts to stop abortions. His campaign mailers sum up the value he puts on family: they show a picture with his wife, a daughter and three grinning young sons taken before a fourth was born this summer.

But Terry's adopted son Jamiel says the picture is missing two people: he and his sister Tila, also adopted. Both have been estranged from Terry since Jamiel came out as a gay man and Tila had a child out of wedlock.

Jamiel Terry said the self-image that his father is crafting and the campaign message about strong families ignores part of his own family history. He said voters have a right to know about that.

"He is very big on image," Jamiel Terry said. "In a large way Tila and I mess up that image."

Jamiel Terry, 26, said in interviews last week and Monday that voters in the northeast Florida district where his father is trying to unseat Sen. Jim King in the Republican primary should know more about the candidate's family.


Read it here.


From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
DownWithAbrahamism
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13056

posted 24 August 2006 07:09 AM      Profile for DownWithAbrahamism     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Unlike Alan Keyes' self-hating hypocritical idiot of a daughter (or for that matter, Mary Cheney), it's nice to see someone who will not support a parent who refuses to even give them the time of day.

[ 24 August 2006: Message edited by: DownWithAbrahamism ]


From: Montreal | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 24 August 2006 07:29 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do you think it is just a coincidence so that so many of the most outspoken social conservatives and homophobes keep on having gay children. The following arch-homophobic rightwing fanatics do:

Cheney
Phyllis Schlafly
Charles Socarides (shrink who thinks being gay is a disease)
Randall Terry
Allan Keyes

and probably many others.

Poetic justice isn't it?


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 24 August 2006 10:26 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
Do you think it is just a coincidence so that so many of the most outspoken social conservatives and homophobes keep on having gay children. The following arch-homophobic rightwing fanatics do:

Cheney
Phyllis Schlafly
Charles Socarides (shrink who thinks being gay is a disease)
Randall Terry
Allan Keyes

and probably many others.

Poetic justice isn't it?


Nope just the luck of the draw. If you believe that sexual orientation is not a learned behaviour then it cannot be related to having assholes for parents otherwise they could cure themselves couldn't they. IMO it is ironic that people who hold the belief that sexual orientation is a life style choice give birth to children whose sexual orientation is not hetro.

From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 24 August 2006 11:17 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think the reason so many outspoken social conservatives have gay kids is that there simply are a hellovalot of outspoken social conservatives down in the states. It's statistically inevitable.I'm sure a lot of social liberals have gay kids, however, that's no cause for a media circus when it does happen and thus we don't hear about it.

kropotkin1951 wrote:

quote:
Nope just the luck of the draw. If you believe that sexual orientation is not a learned behaviour then it cannot be related to having assholes for parents otherwise they could cure themselves couldn't they.

You would really benefit from opening a few psychology textbooks. Simply put, just because a behavior can be encouraged by social influences in childhood does not in any way, shape or form imply that it can necessarily be willed away in adulthood.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
babblerwannabe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5953

posted 24 August 2006 11:29 AM      Profile for babblerwannabe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe the homophobes are closeted homosexuals and they pass down their homosexual genes? heh. I dont even know if gay genes exist, I think homosexuality is the cause of a combination of factors.
From: toronto | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 24 August 2006 12:01 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by 500_Apples:

kropotkin1951 wrote:

You would really benefit from opening a few psychology textbooks. Simply put, just because a behavior can be encouraged by social influences in childhood does not in any way, shape or form imply that it can necessarily be willed away in adulthood.


Please reasd my post you appear to be shadow boxing with something I didn't say. I did not say sexual orientation is a social behaviour because I don't believe it is. In fact the point I was trying to make (obviously unsuccessfully) was that sexual orientation is not a behaviour that is caused by social conditions including growing up in a fundamentalist home. Maybe my tongue was so far in my cheek that it affected my typing.

The snarky comment was unwarrented and unnecesary. You could benefit from rereading your posts to edit for gratuatious insults before hitting send.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 24 August 2006 12:24 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What you wrote is:

quote:
"Nope just the luck of the draw. If you believe that sexual orientation is not a learned behaviour then it cannot be related to having assholes for parents otherwise they could cure themselves couldn't they."

That clearly stipulated that in your world view a behavior learned in childhood can be cured. I believe that's not always true.

quote:
In fact the point I was trying to make (obviously unsuccessfully) was that sexual orientation is not a behaviour that is caused by social conditions including growing up in a fundamentalist home.

You don't really know that, neither does anyone.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 24 August 2006 01:42 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nope that is not what it clearly says. I did not say it was my belief I said if you believe. Sorry you didn't understand the difference.

[ 24 August 2006: Message edited by: kropotkin1951 ]


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 24 August 2006 02:12 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ok, I'll try one last time:

quote:
"Nope just the luck of the draw. If you believe that sexual orientation is not a learned behaviour then it cannot be related to having assholes for parents otherwise they could cure themselves couldn't they."

Translated:

If you believe that sexual orientation is not a learned behaviour ---> then it cannot be related to having assholes for parents ---> otherwise they could cure themselves couldn't they.

I disagree with that line of reasoning.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 24 August 2006 04:22 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually I read pretty much what Kr posted and said he posted. No where did I read him implying that homosexuality is a learned behaviour.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca