babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Why is Tabo denying that HIV causes AIDS

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Why is Tabo denying that HIV causes AIDS
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 06 July 2005 07:26 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mr. Tabo Mbeki has refused to acknowledge HIV causes AIDS. The whole world has dismissed him as backward, ignorant buffoon. But Mbeki is also a politician. He wouldn't say something so stupid if he didn't believe that political capital could be made out of it. Which constituency is the fellow trying to appeal to with his ridiculous statement? What does he hope to gain by lying about HIV?
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Granola Girl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8078

posted 06 July 2005 11:03 PM      Profile for Granola Girl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is my understanding that many traditional Africans in that region are incredibly opposed to birth control (because children = wealth and status) and are very resistant to condoms, which are also seen as violating male privilege to procreate (because they give women the ability to control fertility) and are also seen as interfering with male pleasure.

Also, I don't think its wise to underestimate the hold that traditional medicines and folk beliefs have in rural Africa. Its difficult for Westerners to get into that mindset but, as an example, "witch burning" or ritualized murder of the vulnerable, usually the elderly still breaks out in some parts of Africa with some regularity. When talking about Africa, its best to remember that we are talking about a continent whose inhabitants have, overall, a very low literacy rate.

In any case, to answer your question, Mbeki is probably telling his voters exactly what they want to hear. Dealing with the AIDS crisis would change their patterns of traditional life considerably and also shift power balances in the family.


From: East Van | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Nanuq
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8229

posted 06 July 2005 11:14 PM      Profile for Nanuq   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not to mention that fact that people don't want to accept that AIDS is incurable and can only be treated with expensive antiviral medications that just aren't available to most Africans. AIDS sufferers would prefer to believe anything else, hence the rapes that have been occurring because of the rumour that sex with a virgin will cure AIDS.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
solarpower
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7609

posted 06 July 2005 11:47 PM      Profile for solarpower   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That wasn't so much a rumour as it was a problem with translation.
It was supposed to be 'you can't get aids from a virgin' only it didn't translate properly.
A real life English to African babelfish.
( babelfish... http://babelfish.altavista.com/ )

From: that which the creator created from | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327

posted 07 July 2005 12:18 AM      Profile for Aristotleded24   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by solarpower:
That wasn't so much a rumour as it was a problem with translation.
It was supposed to be 'you can't get aids from a virgin' only it didn't translate properly.
A real life English to African babelfish.
( babelfish... http://babelfish.altavista.com/ )

It is really sad that such a mistranslation would have such deadly implications in this case.

I've heard some speculation that AIDS may not be caused by HIV after all. Given the amount of money devoted to finding treatments, we should investigate this possibility thouroughly and settle the question. It wouldn't be the first time that scientists change long-held beliefs after new facts come in.


From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Nanuq
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8229

posted 07 July 2005 12:26 AM      Profile for Nanuq   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Except that speculation seems to be the only things that the mavericks have been able to develop. You would think that after countless cases, millions of fatalities, and decades of research, the ones who dispute the HIV link would have been able to come up with something to back it up. They certainly haven't developed any new treatments to help. Even if they aren't getting the research funding, they should have at least taken baby steps by now.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 07 July 2005 03:07 AM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm somewhat undecided on the HIV/AIDS thing. To me the real answer may not be clear untill the medical/pharmacutical complex has been destroyed.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 07 July 2005 10:24 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That sounds like a grand idea. Nothing could possibly advance our knowledge of HIV faster than destroying the medical/pharmaceutical complex!

That would make way for the middle managers and recptionists and custodians to finally unlock the mysteries of this dread disease and administer them to a grateful public.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Granola Girl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8078

posted 07 July 2005 04:50 PM      Profile for Granola Girl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hope you were joking about the babelfish thing, solar power, 'cause I think it slightly more complicated than that ...

Besides, which language should I enter in babelfish? South Africa has 11 official languages and scores more unofficial ones. IsiNdebele? IsiXhosa? IsiZulu? Northern Sotho? Sesotho? Setswana? SiSwati? Tshivenda? Xitsonga?


From: East Van | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 07 July 2005 05:00 PM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read it as more of a 'broken telephone game' issue.

'Broken telephone' is a parlour game where everyone whispers a sentence to the person next to them, until it gets around the room and back to the person who chose the original statement. Invariably, it has morphed into something completely different than the original.


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 07 July 2005 05:03 PM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Magoo the fact is it's the biggest industry in the world, with the biggest profits in the world.

Ignore this fact at your own risk.


From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 07 July 2005 05:10 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Ignore this fact at your own risk.

Way to go. Now I'll be awake all night.

Thing is, big or no, profits or no, they're also where we get health care from. I'm not sure I want to destroy modern medicine as we know it and replace it with... what? Anarcho-doctors who travel about like medieval barbers, dispensing remedies they've cooked up themselves?

I guess I just don't take the fact that the health care business is a big business to be a de facto problem. There may be problems, to be sure, but size ain't one of them.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
EFA
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9673

posted 07 July 2005 05:15 PM      Profile for EFA        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Vigilante:
I'm somewhat undecided on the HIV/AIDS thing. To me the real answer may not be clear untill the medical/pharmacutical complex has been destroyed.

I've read a couple of credible papers that suggest otherwise. It doesn't mean the researchers are "lying."

Remember when stomach ulcers turned out to be caused by bacteria? Well, the guy who first proposed that was thrashed for his theory.

Just because the mainstream believes in something isn't reason enough for me to follow along.

Lastly, Big Pharma and medical science are two vastly different arenas. Many of us would like to see Big Pharma step down a bit. That doesn't mean we're bashing medicine.


From: Victoria, BC | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 07 July 2005 05:16 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
That sounds like a grand idea. Nothing could possibly advance our knowledge of HIV faster than destroying the medical/pharmaceutical complex!


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 08 July 2005 06:11 PM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
EFA:
Lastly, Big Pharma and medical science are two vastly different arenas. Many of us would like to see Big Pharma step down a bit. That doesn't mean we're bashing medicine.

Well 1st of all I want Big P shot down. Second I think that both the current medicine and the Pharma are very connected(doctors getting edcation payed for eg). I have an uncle who worked(not sure if he's still there)for an alternative medicine joint. The head of this company apparently did a speach about a promising alternative treatment for diabetes. After the speech a doctor apparently came up to him and said something along the lines of"pssss, do ya want to put us out of busness". There's an ideological line that many in the medical scene are peddeling that is very hostile to anything non-conventional.

Hence, Big P gets its help.


From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
EFA
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9673

posted 08 July 2005 06:37 PM      Profile for EFA        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Vigilante:
Well 1st of all I want Big P shot down. Second I think that both the current medicine and the Pharma are very connected(doctors getting edcation payed for eg). I have an uncle who worked(not sure if he's still there)for an alternative medicine joint. The head of this company apparently did a speach about a promising alternative treatment for diabetes. After the speech a doctor apparently came up to him and said something along the lines of"pssss, do ya want to put us out of busness". There's an ideological line that many in the medical scene are peddeling that is very hostile to anything non-conventional.

Hence, Big P gets its help.


I totally agree with you. I just separated them because another poster was suggesting that to take on Big Pharma would be to shut down modern medicine. That's clearly not the case.


From: Victoria, BC | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646

posted 08 July 2005 06:40 PM      Profile for puzzlic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Evil though Big Pharma may be (and usually is), the great advantage of scientific medicine is that it works whether you believe in it or not.

If you are infected with HIV and you get the right combination of antiretroviral drugs, you will live a lot longer and healthier than an HIV-infected person who relies on herbal teas, astrology, witch-burning, virgin-rape or any other "alternative" therapy. Whether Mbeki is engaging in it or not, HIV-denial is doing no favours for sick people.

P.S. - Granola Girl -- thank you for pointing out the "African" language point! I always feel like saying, "No, I don't speak 'African'. Do you speak European?"

[ 08 July 2005: Message edited by: puzzlic ]


From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 08 July 2005 09:23 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Vigilante:
I'm somewhat undecided on the HIV/AIDS thing. To me the real answer may not be clear untill the medical/pharmacutical complex has been destroyed.


The only guy I know of who disputes the idea that HIV causes AIDS is a fellow called Peter Dueshberg(sp?) and he's got his head so far up the religous right's butt it's not even funny.
Besides, if it's not HIV, what the heck is it?
Sometimes mainstream science is mainstream for a good reason. It isn't always about corporate consperices, you know.

[ 08 July 2005: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831

posted 08 July 2005 10:20 PM      Profile for Boarsbreath   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And, back to the original poser, Mbeki is of course a politician, but not one like the others. Can you conceive a party other than the ANC in power in South Africa anytime in his future...? He has no concern for voters, only for colleagues. (Ditto the opinions of people like us, as his support for Mugabe shows.)

I think it's perfectly likely that in addition to the very sound reasons above (why any African would be so frustrated at the way HIV is only making the bad things about Africa worse), Mbeki just is a little mad. Hardly the first, there or here, when a party has the kind of power the ANC has.


From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 08 July 2005 10:32 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, he's slightly bonkers and the electorate has no influence over him? I find that hard to swallow.
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 12 July 2005 11:09 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If Mbeki is voted out in the next South African elections will his succesor repeat the same untruths?
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 24 July 2005 03:43 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I've read a couple of credible papers that suggest otherwise. It doesn't mean the researchers are "lying."

Who wrote these papers and wher can I find them?


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646

posted 24 July 2005 04:40 PM      Profile for puzzlic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not in peer-reviewed scientific or medical journals, that's for sure.
From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 September 2008 02:16 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
According to these physicians, diagnosing AIDS in Africa is easy. In Africa if you have diarrhea, fever, and weight loss, then you will be diagnosed as having AIDS and will probably die regardless of whether you are HIV positive or not. The human mind is a powerful thing. Some of Australia's indigenous people have been known to end themselves in a matter of minutes by their own will.

African holocaust


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca