babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Justice for Don Milner?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Justice for Don Milner?
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 15 December 2004 01:18 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
CAW Local 444 member was one of three picketers run down by a "security guard" employed by a private strikebreaking company in the brutal 2002 Navistar strike in Windsor. He was also the most seriously injured, suffering " suffered injuries to his lungs, heart and kidneys, a shattered pelvis, broken ribs, ruptured bladder, sheared urethra tube, damaged prostate, nerve and tendon damage in both legs and feet, a badly broken arm and road rash."


That security guard has now been acquitted, but there is potential civil action pending.

If you wish, please feel free to continue the discussion from the other, now-closed thread here.

You might also be interested in this thread, which deals more generally with the subject of private "labour dispute security firms," such as the one involved in this case.

[ 15 December 2004: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Oatmeal Savage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4353

posted 15 December 2004 02:47 PM      Profile for The Oatmeal Savage   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Lewenza and former CAW Local 1973 president Nick Dzudz were charged with assaulting a security guard, though the charges were withdrawn when the alleged victim failed to show up in court. Charges were also dismissed in court against Lewenza for tossing a brick at the bus, though the judge criticized the union members' actions.

Are these guys guilty as hell as well even though the charges were dismissed and withdrawn?

From: top of the food chain | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Phonicidal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7635

posted 15 December 2004 03:04 PM      Profile for Phonicidal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Oatmeal Savage:
Are these guys guilty as hell as well even though the charges were dismissed and withdrawn?
Just curious...How far can posters go in claiming that anybody is guilty of a crime before it becomes libelous and puts babble in legal jeopardy?

From: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
The Oatmeal Savage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4353

posted 15 December 2004 03:12 PM      Profile for The Oatmeal Savage   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good question, some of the remarks about the judge on the other thread on this topic were a little over the top.
From: top of the food chain | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 15 December 2004 03:17 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
How far can posters go in claiming that anybody is guilty of a crime before it becomes libelous and puts babble in legal jeopardy?

I'm no lawyer, but if you want a good rule of thumb, express your opinions as opinions, and you and babble should be OK. eg:

"Me, I believe O.J. did it."

versus:

"O.J. Simpson is a murderer."

You're allowed to believe whatever you wish, but you need to be careful what you state as a fact. I'm sure there are subtleties, but that should be a good start.


From: ĝ¤°`°¤ĝ,¸_¸,ĝ¤°`°¤ĝ,¸_¸,ĝ¤°°¤ĝ,¸_¸,ĝ¤°°¤ĝ, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 December 2004 04:30 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I think we lay some of the blame for this tragedy on the Mike Harris conservatives for repealing anti-scab legislation here in the mid 1990's. If they weren't laying off 10 000 nurses and later scrambling to hire them back, or handing off land development contracts to friends in the mafia, the capital friendly tories were turning back the clock on worker's rights to levels not seen since the 1940's. The tories are remembered for their bad decision making during the prosperous few years at the end of the 1990's besides sticking us with a several billion dollar a year budget deficit. And Norman Bates doesn't seem to be all that much different.

Here's my opinion of Mike Harris, the one who made it more probable that tragedies like this would occur.

The "common sense" revolution is over, and good riddance to the bastards. We'll be cleaning up their mess in Ontario for a long time.

Toronto cops wrestling a female bicycler/homlessness protester to the pavement - true conservatism in action!

[ 15 December 2004: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 15 December 2004 04:35 PM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Well, I think we lay some of the blame for this tragedy on the Mike Harris conservatives for repealing anti-scab legislation here in the mid 1990's.

handing off land development contracts to friends in the mafia,


Fidel why do you have to disparage an Italian Canadian social organization like the Mafia.

Also seriously what proof do you have that the people who won land development contracts are members of the mob?

It is this type of reckless comments that I am against throughout this site.

Edited to add: especially since the mob is well known to have infultrated many unions as well as developers. Let's leave the mob out of this debate. It really is not relevant to the subject of this thread.

Also we could also blaim the social contract of Bob Rae. Since it was the social contract that my right wing nut bar friends use as the excuse for getting rid of all anti-scab legislation. If there is even one shred of truth in that stupid rhetoric then I say Bad Mike, Bad Bob and Bad Norman Bates.

[ 15 December 2004: Message edited by: johnpauljones ]


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 December 2004 04:53 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I think at one time the word "mafia" might have meant that one was centring out a specific ethnic group, but times have changed.

Besides, I think that refusing to acknowldge the existence of organized crime in Canada and their presence in Ontario is just being naive. Nice try though.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 15 December 2004 05:00 PM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel cut the crap.

I am not saying that the mafia does not exist.

I am trying to prove the point that we all throw out non-relevant factoids of information that can take a thread off topic.

Very simply Fidel, what relevance is the connection of land developers to the mob with the events that surrounded the vehicular assault that led to Don Milner's injuries.

Since I believe that the company on strike are not land developers and the thug that drove the vehicle has not been accused of ties to organized crime.


edited to add:
Lagatta with regards to your comments below this post about my social organization crack. That is a line that a former Hamilton journalist on radio and tv once used to describe Hamilton's mob connections.

[ 15 December 2004: Message edited by: johnpauljones ]


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 15 December 2004 05:00 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Indeed there are some unions where underworld inflitration is known or suspected, but the CAW is definitely not one of them.

"Mafia" originally referred to a Sicilian organisation. It was never just a social organisation - it always operated as an underground society, at first in response to encroachment by outsiders (continental Italians) in Sicilians' affairs. I can't go into the whole history of how it became an important organised crime organisation here and now - it got a huge boost from the Allies (mostly the US) in the immediate postwar period.

Nowadays a mafia tends to be used as a more general expression referring to an organised crime syndicate, of whatever nationality. In that sense it is not an ethnic slur. Assuming Sicilians or all southern Italians to be mafia-involved is a slur.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 December 2004 05:16 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's of no direct relevance, I'll admit that. I was simply stating that among many bad policies of the Mike Harris conservatives of the 1990's, the anti-scab legislation was one of them. This is at the root of why we're even discussing this tragedy in the here and now. Had the Harris conservatives left this anti-scab legislation alone, then tragedies like this one would be entirely unnecessary and perhaps even avoided.

Forgive me for criticizing the regressive legislation of our little red school house tory government of the 1990's, but I think that they are at the source of this problem regarding scabs and their legislated right to undermine the efforts of worker's in Ontario to bargain effectiveley for a living wage.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 15 December 2004 05:21 PM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Forgive me for criticizing the regressive legislation of our little red school house tory government of the 1990's, but I think that they are at the source of this problem regarding scabs and their legislated right to undermine the efforts of worker's in Ontario to bargain effectiveley for a living wage.

With that I am in full agreement. Unfortunatley in this case I think the true fault lies with either the crown for not doing a good job (which I have no evidence of ) or the judge making a human error with his decision


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 December 2004 05:41 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And so you might understand the rambling and off topic nature of some of my posts. I disagree with the autocratic policies of political conservatism and so called liberals in general. The legal system is a tool of the artistocracy who claim to be doling out justice when they do not.

In my opinion, the court decision not to prosecute the scab driver for reckless driving, assault, attempted murder or being a menace to pedestrians in general(take your pick) only reenforces the fascism-friendly legislation in Ontario.

"The first principle of non-violence action is that of non-cooperation with everything humiliating." - Cesar Chavez

[ 15 December 2004: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca