babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » violent protests hit Kabul

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: violent protests hit Kabul
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 29 May 2006 10:49 AM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
US accident, shooting spark protests

quote:
About 1,000 demonstrators rampaged through the Afghan capital on Monday torching the offices of foreign aid agencies and looting businesses in a wave of violence that killed at least 16 people and injured another 142.
ADVERTISEMENT

The unrest was the worst to sweep through Kabul since 2001 and reflects growing resentment about the foreign military presence in the country and the slow pace of reconstruction. The US has 23,000 troops and Nato a force of about 9,000 in Afghanistan.

The protest was triggered by a collision between a US military convoy and a cargo truck that caused a 12-car pile-up, the US military said in a statement.

A crowd quickly swelled around the accident in the northern Shomali district of Kabul and turned hostile, surrounding the US vehicles.

Shots were then fired either by the US military or Afghan police who had arrived on the scene.

“There are indications that at least one coalition military vehicle fired warning shots over the crowd,” Colonel Thomas Collins, US military spokesman, said in a statement.

Five people were killed during the accident and the shooting which followed, a statement from the Afghan presidency said.



From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 29 May 2006 12:14 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The last time Jan Mohammad had a glimpse of Afghanistan was a little less than eighteen years ago during PDPA government rule. He returned to his homeland last September and reports on the dilapidated infrastructure since he left, including a lack of traffic lights in the capital city.


quote:
I wonder what could be more important for the government than providing water and electricity for he people?! I asked people why they don’t complain to the authorities. The response was rather shocking. I was told that the situation with the electric service had improved after the appointment of Ismael Khan as the Minister of Water and Power. The reason I said I was shocked by the response is that Ismael Khan is categorized as a Warlord and he is supposed to be part of the problem not the solution. But, it was rather ironic that a warlord, not a technocrat educated in the West, was delivering on the promise of serving the people.

Other public services are also inadequate. The city is littered with trash. I mean piles of trash. Health clinics exist in all municipal districts, but due to lack of professional care, a significant number of people prefer going to private physicians even though the latter comes with a cost.

Traffic is another major problem in Kabul city. The streets are crowded with pedestrians, carts, vendors, vehicles and even animals in certain parts of the city. Driving is a major headache in Kabul. There are no traffic rules and if there are any, no one follows them. There were a few traffic lights in Kabul in the seventies and eighties, but I didn’t see any right now.



From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 29 May 2006 12:30 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Hundreds of angry protesters marched to the city centre palace of President Hamid Karzai, shouting "Death to Karzai" and "Death to America."

They're not kidding. Dr. Najibullah, the Soviet-backed predecessor to the Taliban, was hanged in public, along with his brother, and put on display. Does Canada really want to be supporting someone whose own countrymen call for his death?

Dr. Najibullah publicly executed by Taliban. (WARNING - Gruesome photos)


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 29 May 2006 01:00 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, and why did the rest of the world turn their backs on the ethnic cleansing, pillage, rape and forced exodus of almost three million Afghani's between 1992 and 1996?.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 29 May 2006 01:17 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
? There's nothing that Canada, or anyone else for that matter, can do to change events in the past. But if our troops are helping to prop up someone who might wind up at the end of a rope courtesy of his own countrymen then we should think long and hard about leaving Afghanistan.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427

posted 29 May 2006 01:33 PM      Profile for S1m0n        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Yes, and why did the rest of the world turn their backs on the ethnic cleansing, pillage, rape and forced exodus of almost three million Afghani's between 1992 and 1996?.

The world didn't turn their backs: they (via the Pakistan secret service) supported the Taliban, who brought the first period of stability to Afghanistan since the halcyon days of the late sixties and early seventies, and ended the Warlord's reign of terror.

Now we're back: this time backing the warlords against the Taliban, and taking Afghanistan back into civil war and lawlessness. Yeay us!


From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 29 May 2006 03:13 PM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I dread that Canadian soldiers will experience a Khyber Pass moment.


First Afghan War 1842: Dr. William Brydon, an assistant surgeon in the Bengal Army arriving at the gates of Jellabad on his exhausted and dying horse. He was thought to be the sole survivor of some 16,000 strong army and followers from Kabul.

[ 29 May 2006: Message edited by: ceti ]


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 29 May 2006 03:26 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by S1m0n:

The world didn't turn their backs: they (via the Pakistan secret service) supported the Taliban, who brought the first period of stability to Afghanistan since the halcyon days of the late sixties and early seventies, and ended the Warlord's reign of terror.


You must mean in the years after 1979 to 1992 in which the CIA, Brits and Saudi's were funding the same ruthless, most vicious warlords, foreign-based mercenaries and drug barons who would later recruit Taliban students into Pakistani seminaries funded by the west?. The same Islamo-fascist Taliban who staged public executions of women in a football stadium?. And then there were reports of women being buried alive for wearing nail polish in the post PDPA years. My god how we've helped them.

Taliban's halcyon days

Is this Santiago de Chile football stadium in the 1970's? No, it's a scene in Kabul's soccer stadium late 1990's.

[ 29 May 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427

posted 29 May 2006 03:52 PM      Profile for S1m0n        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:

You must mean in the years after 1979 to 1992 in which the CIA, Brits and Saudi's were funding the same ruthless, most vicious warlords, foreign-based mercenaries and drug barons who would later recruit Taliban students into Pakistani seminaries funded by the west?. The same Islamo-fascist Taliban who staged public executions of women in a football stadium?. And then there were reports of women being buried alive for wearing nail polish in the post PDPA years. My god how we've helped them.

No, I meant what I wrote: the Taliban were Afghanistan's best chance for peace and the eventual resumption of normality. The Western invasion is a step back, not forward, for Afghanistan.

Stability and peace--the rule of law, however composed--is the necessary precondition for the development of civil society.

In some places, perhaps, that can come under foreign occupation, but Afrghanistan has made it perfectly clear over the centuries that it will not be such a place.

In that case, the afghans are going to have to do it themselves. Unfortunately, there is NO palatable faction in afghanistan that's strong enough, even with western help, to accomplish this. Our choices are between perpetual chaos and varying flavours of distasteful.

One such was the Taliban. Once we've been driven out and a new gang of thugs climbs to the top of the heap, they'll be just as brutal as the Taliban were.

And Afghanistan will have lost another generation. As I wrote, Yeay us!

And it'll take a decade before they start to civilize, and a generation of kids grows up in peace and with their mothers unraped.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 29 May 2006 04:04 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
U.S. Policy Has Betrayed Afghan Women for 20 Years May 2000

quote:
Afghanistan's ruling Taliban, after years of unconscionably cruel treatment of women, persecution of Hindu "infidels" and Christian foreign aid workers, destruction of ancient Buddhist temples, and barbaric measures towards accused criminals, is finally in the world's spotlight. Afghanistan was one of the key battlegrounds of the Cold War but, sadly, what was once unthinkable has now become quite clear: the U.S. was backing the wrong side all along.
---
The PDPA regime promoted education for girls, gave women the right to divorce and own property, and reduced the bride price to a nominal fee. It also distributed land to the impoverished peasants and restrained the power of the mullahs, the Muslim clergy.
--
When Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev pulled Soviet troops out in early 1989, it was widely predicted in the Western press that the Afghan regime would collapse within months. It didn't happen. At key battles like the bloody siege of Jalalabad, Afghan Army men as well as women in volunteer militias fought side by side and defeated the Mujahedin. The PDPA government held out until 1992, when rebel groups finally seized the capital, Kabul. Many of these rebel soldiers, along with Afghan refugees from Pakistan, later came to form the Taliban, who took over most of the country in 1996. What has followed has been a nightmare worse than anything the PDPA ever could have brought to Afghanistan.
--

One picture taken shortly after the Taliban takeover says it all: a trembling woman covered in a head to toe veil, her face completely obscured, sobs as she speaks with a Western reporter. Who is she? An impoverished peasant? A homeless woman? No, she's the recently removed chief surgeon at the country's largest hospital!

Afghani women soldiers of the PDPA, Afghanistan 1989


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 29 May 2006 04:05 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Of the 16,000 souls lost in the Khyber Pass massacre, only about 4000 were soldiers, the remaining 12000 were camper followers (women, children and servants) of the British army.

Note: I have read a number of military histories each with a different number men and women and children lost. Some reports state 17,000 persons lost with some 300 survivors, other reports a lower number of only 10,000 persons lost and a great number of survivors.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 29 May 2006 08:10 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The people of Kabul have spoken.

Tonight we saw them on television and heard their voice.

Let us respect their democratic wishes, as expressed in the streets, at risk of their lives.

Let us condemn the illegal bloodthirsty U.S.-led invasion and occupation, and the puppet warlord regime which they installed in Kabul by force of arms.

Let us withdraw our own soldiers from that country at once. All "support for our troops" must stop, before such "support" claims more innocent lives.

The question facing all Canadians is not as complex as it is made out. It is an age-old question: Which side are you on? Let us take the side of the Afghani people in their heroic struggle to expel the latest sorry bunch of invaders and make their own future without our "help".


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
TK 421
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12140

posted 29 May 2006 08:17 PM      Profile for TK 421     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Driving in Kabul is an experience. The drivers are skilled, but the roads are ruthless. Its like Montreal with more livestock and guns. My wife doesn't much like my driving now (not that she ever did, she's just more scared now). Its a very congested city, and I think that the streets were designed for right-hand drive, as are most of the cars. There are some traffic lights, but they were not working. I doubt that anyone would heed them anyway.

I witnessed several scrums after car accidents. I don't think that anyone has insurance, so losing one's car must be a major trauma, not to mention personal injuries.

With regards to the future of the country as a whole, I spent some time working with the Afghan National Army (ANA). I spoke to all ranks, and even the recruits were motivated and dedicated to a stable and secure Afghanistan. Take it for what is worth, but they also appreciated the support, both moral and physical, that Western troops and countries give.

Cheers,

TK 421

p.s. Don't forget that Flashman also survived the first Afghan War and was decorated to boot!


From: Near and far | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Bubbles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3787

posted 29 May 2006 08:29 PM      Profile for Bubbles        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
One picture taken shortly after the Taliban takeover says it all: a trembling woman covered in a head to toe veil, her face completely obscured, sobs as she speaks with a Western reporter. Who is she? An impoverished peasant? A homeless woman? No, she's the recently removed chief surgeon at the country's largest hospital!

Maybe it shows our own racism. Canada ofcourse never removed surgeons from their post or put innocent people in jail. Women are never discriminated against here in Canada. Oh no, never here.

Maybe we should invade every country that is not like us.


From: somewhere | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 29 May 2006 08:47 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
“The people of Kabul have spoken.”

1000 people out of 3.5 million is not a majority of the people speaking?

I do not think the people have spoken as you wish they have.

From the original article posted by rasmus raven

“However, diplomats and eyewitnesses said the demonstrations had been used by criminals as an opportunity for looting and theft.

“They were thieves. They were waiting for a small opportunity to steal and loot from the houses,” said Jan Ali, a 50-year-old shopkeeper in downtown Kabul.”

Or

“Opinion remains divided over whether the disturbance was orchestrated by Islamic militants or was a spontaneous eruption.

“The riots were organized,” said a western security source working with Afghan police. “They have been waiting for a catalyst from the coalition forces and biding their time.”

He added that he had seen demonstrators carrying maps with a route drawn out. “They are after martyrdom. They are calling the people who got killed in the accident martyrs,” he said.”

I would think this was a staged event, to be used to damage public opinion back in Canada and the western world. A riot created to produce a result(s) that would be used by anti-war groups in western countries to weak our governments resolve and thus allowing them (Taliban, warlords, criminal groups) to gain an advancement on their goals (the removal of non Afghan force) and to show the population of Kabul that the western armies can not protect their shops and property.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427

posted 29 May 2006 08:55 PM      Profile for S1m0n        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess we'll find out in time, won't we? But I know which side history and the odds favour.
From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 29 May 2006 09:16 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:
1000 people out of 3.5 million is not a majority of the people speaking?

I do not think the people have spoken as you wish they have.


Oh yes they have. This is the beginning of the end for the invaders. By the way, the BBC says it was 2,000 people, and that the authorities (U.S. and/or Afghan police) fired on the demonstrators and at least seven were killed. There are no reports of demonstrators armed with anything but stones.

Naturally, people who take to the streets in their thousands calling for death to the U.S. and its puppets must be crazed delirious martyrdom-seeking Muslims carrying maps, no less. Do you even begin to realize how foolish and racist are these reports that you quote as reliable sources, Webgear?

The puppet warlord authorities have imposed a curfew. I imagine they are shaking in their boots right now. Too bad.

Here is the BBC report.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 29 May 2006 10:00 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Curfew imposed as rioters loot Kabul

"Gunfire, at times intense, rang out across Kabul as hundreds of young men smashed shop fronts, carted off goods and set fire to police cars and station houses"

Kabul erupts into violence over an accident

"A fatal traffic accident involving US troops sparked Kabul's worst riots since the fall of the Taliban yesterday, with thousands of protesters looting shops and chanting "Death to America".


Almost all of the articles I have seen, have mentioned that looting of local Afghan shops occurred, if all these protestors were mad at Western Forces why did they loot their own countrymen. It would seem to me the most of these rioters were involved for criminal reasons rather than political motives.

The BBC article mentions that 7 people were killed perhaps these seven people were the shopkeepers trying to defend their property, or actual killed in the traffic accident itself however I doubt that came to your mind.

And were did I say that original article posted by rasmus raven was a reliable sources? I used that article because it was the first article in the thread and the basis of the thread. Can at this time you provide any evidence that this article is not based on facts or is untruthful?


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 30 May 2006 04:31 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:

The BBC article mentions that 7 people were killed perhaps these seven people were the shopkeepers trying to defend their property, or actual killed in the traffic accident itself however I doubt that came to your mind.

You're right, Webgear. I jumped to conclusions. Maybe there's a simpler explanation for what happened than my hasty conclusion that the people of Kabul hate Karzai and his U.S. protectors. It was probably just thousands of criminals looking to do some free shopping. Or looking for a free trip to martyr heaven. Or perhaps for some free snacks before going to heaven. Yeah, that was it. Whew!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 30 May 2006 07:34 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Almost all of the articles I have seen, have mentioned that looting of local Afghan shops occurred, if all these protestors were mad at Western Forces why did they loot their own countrymen. It would seem to me the most of these rioters were involved for criminal reasons rather than political motives.

Yeah, because poor, hungry people almost never loot when the opportunity arises and then it is always for criminal motives rather they be poor brown people in Kabul or poor black people in New Orleans.

The rich white guys with guns never loot, do they? Oh, except the oil wealth of entire nations. But that's not looting that's regime change and nation building.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12238

posted 30 May 2006 07:59 AM      Profile for Polunatic2   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why don't these Afghanis just get jobs instead of getting in the way of convoys and bullets that aren't meant for them? Anyone who falls for the old "Death to Karzai, Death to Bush" line doesn't understand Afghanistan. It's just their way of saying thanks.

As for Stephen Harper, the deeper we're dug into Afghanistan, the more excited he gets. He must be having multiple orgasms these days.


From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 30 May 2006 09:08 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Polunatic2: Why don't these Afghanis just get jobs ...

According to the CBC Quick Facts, the unemployment rate is at 78%. It's like trying to get a job on an Indian Reserve in Canada.

No wait. The unemployment rate is worse on many Reserves.But no one's bombing them.

Quick Facts are on the right column.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 30 May 2006 11:58 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, and our immigrant success gap in Canada has widened over the years. Unemployment among highly skilled and professional immigrants is four times the rate of unskilled immigrants.

With intervention on that side of the globe, the western world has managed to roll back the Afghani's revolution by several decades. Afghani's needed a status quo foisting on them again, not basic human rights apparently.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12238

posted 30 May 2006 12:23 PM      Profile for Polunatic2   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada's immigration policy has been another setback for Afghanistan. We helped drain them of doctors and other professionals and then put them to work as cabbies (not that they didn't want to leave Afghanistan).
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 30 May 2006 02:19 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Brake failure caused crash that sparked Kabul riot

"A road crash that sparked a deadly riot in the Afghan capital occurred because a military truck lost its brakes as it was coming down a hill and ploughed into a line of cars, the US military said today."


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 30 May 2006 02:45 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Western influences and unending poverty sour many Afghans on foreigners

quote:
To many Afghans, foreigners are a privileged elite, earning hefty salaries and given to drinking alcohol while this shattered Islamic country remains mired in violence and poverty...

"We don't want these foreigners, they should go home. They're damaging our society, the economy is terrible and we're so poor. And they're looting Afghanistan. Why aren't they building factories?" asked Faisal Agha, 45, a policeman who was injured in the riots that left at least 11 dead and scores wounded.

"Now there's prostitution, alcohol. There's more vice," he said from his hospital bed, his eyes puffy and his face bruised after falling during Monday's chaos...

Despite suspicions that anti-government elements could be fomenting the unrest, the main protagonists seemed to be angry young men.

Still, the signs on the street are that the irritation with foreigners has not hardened into widespread xenophobia.

"We want the good foreigners to stay in Afghanistan, to help us. Not these people who kill us, they must go," said Ahmed Mirwais Kabuli, 17, a wedding photographer.



From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 30 May 2006 02:55 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It now appears that the soldiers shot into the crowds, causing numerous deaths of innocent people.

The New York Times reports today:

quote:
It became clear the American military and the Afghan police and army had used their weapons to try to disperse the crowds. Scores of people were treated in hospitals for gunshot wounds.

A 7-year-old boy was among the dead, and two more schoolchildren were badly wounded, said Dr. Amin, the duty doctor at Khair Khana Hospital in the northern part of Kabul, who like many Afghans uses only one name. Four people died at the hospital, he said, and 60 wounded people were given first aid before being transferred to other hospitals.


Afghans have reasons for their anger, for example:

quote:
Ali Seraj, a businessman and a descendant of the Afghan royal family, contended that the American military showed a careless attitude toward human life that was becoming a growing problem, whether it was the bombing of villages in counterinsurgency activities in southern Afghanistan or car accidents in the capital.

"This type of attitude has created a great deal of mistrust and hatred," he said.

Just last week, President Karzai ordered an investigation of an American airstrike on a village near Kandahar in the south that killed at least 35 civilians.

In another episode, the United States military said last month that it would investigate the killings of seven members of a family in an airstrike in Kunar Province in the east during an operation against insurgents.


The presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan CREATES Taleban supporters. The longer Canadian soldiers are there, the more opposition we will face.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca