babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Joe Wilson: "There are no tinfoil hats anymore."

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Joe Wilson: "There are no tinfoil hats anymore."
blogbart
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12021

posted 04 November 2006 11:46 AM      Profile for blogbart   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Constitutional crisis"? Can you help me parse what Ambassador Joe Wilson means by that?

quote:
I asked a serious question about how he thinks the Bush administration will respond if the Dems DO retake both houses of Congress, considering that a) Bush can now LEGALLY arrest, lock up and torture any U.S. citizen he wants to; b) Bush can now declare martial law anywhere and anytime he wants to; and c) Rumor has it that FEMA has contracted with Halliburton to build dozens of detention centers here in the U.S..

His response was, let's just say, not encouraging

...

In short, Wilson anticipates that starting November 8th (or more likely in January, when the new Congress takes office), the United States will very likely have not one, but several Constitutional crisis' occur.

...

I prefaced my question by admitting that I might be going into tinfoil hat territory. Unfortunately, Wilson stated that at this point, under this administration "there are no tinfoil hats anymore."

...

It wasn't Wilson's response itself that made me think this was worthy of re-posting; it was the fact that he was the one who made it. This wasn't some paranoid guy at the bowling alley; this was Ambassador Joseph friggin' Wilson, and he was deadly serious.


Source: Daily Kos - Brainwrap diary


From: Vancouver | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Abdul_Maria
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11105

posted 04 November 2006 05:29 PM      Profile for Abdul_Maria     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
in 1990 i worked at a place for 4 months where there was a lot of pressure on the workers.

Larry T., one of my co-workers was laid off. he had a wife and kids.

after 3 months he came back in with a gun and some dynamite. he killed the VP of manufacturing, for whom there was very little sympathy.

i knew Larry as the nice & helpful guy who helped me set up for an EMI test. i started out as a mechanical engineer so i was always winging it when i did electronics testing. it was techs. like Larry T. that helped me do my job.

after he was laid off, his anxiety built to an unbearable level, and the logical thing to do was grab a gun and some dynamite.

the economy in the US is in bad shape for the workers.

i'd say the US government is anticipating a massive increase in the number of Larry T's.

it's related to the effect of Energy Transition on the economy.

also, because there is so little slack in the energy production and delivery system, one person with a gun can hugely impact the situation by taking 500K barrels per day off line. (the system is, almost by design, much more vulnerable to what the US government calls terrorism).

the situation is such that the US government can say, "it's those damn terrorists", and be partially accurate.

if the majority of Americans used firewood and walked to work, the loss of oil flow would be less impactful.

what the US government has done is embark on a "might makes right, we make the rules" foreign policy.

the sooner the rest of the world catches on, the better.


From: San Fran | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
blogbart
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12021

posted 05 November 2006 12:55 PM      Profile for blogbart   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
i'd say the US government is anticipating a massive increase in the number of Larry T's.

it's related to the effect of Energy Transition on the economy.

also, because there is so little slack in the energy production and delivery system, one person with a gun can hugely impact the situation by taking 500K barrels per day off line. (the system is, almost by design, much more vulnerable to what the US government calls terrorism).

the situation is such that the US government can say, "it's those damn terrorists", and be partially accurate.


Pithy!

So you surmise that those purported 800 detention camps are for the Larry T's?

I don't disagree.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca