Author
|
Topic: Minimum wage II
|
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710
|
posted 22 March 2007 12:40 AM
The Star is reporting that the Liberal government is going to promise to raise the minimum wage to $10.25.They have a $24,000 report that raising minimum wage will cost 100,000s of jobs. In fact bad entrepreneurs will be forced out of business but the customers will move down the street and spend - replacing the jobs. People know this. An increase at the bottom might inflate 1% but this would be a transfer to the worst paid, who spend -- so there is no net loss of jobs. These reports are no where near worth $24,000. People know this too. People are still asleep though. By all reports labour shortages in Calgary have forced Tim Hortons to pay $12 an hour. In this case the market would provide way more social justice and efficiency than government. The former minimum wage thread ended with a comment that there should be less wage disparity. I read, albiet once only, that the spread between university graduates and highschool graduates in Scandanvia and Japan is much less than it is in America. If you're interested, that might exist. Meanwhile Canada is a meritocracy. The market for smarter more experienced people keeps wage disparity up. Michelle closed the minimum wage thread but I could talk about jobs all day, and generally do actually. [ 22 March 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126
|
posted 22 March 2007 03:45 PM
quote: All I said, Wiz, is that the market for good skills is strong usually. You can get the market to work for you. This is obvious and just the way it is. I have an opinion about why labour markets don't yo yo but that's another nut.
You're delusional. I have a university degree and I work a just-above-minimum wage job because that's all there is in my town. Same goes for many of my peers.
I've also lived in Calgary and the thing they don't mention in those articles about $12/hour Tim Horton's jobs is that Calgary is the land of service fees. Everything has a fee, not even the public library. Although, the C-Train is free downtown and that rocks.
From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710
|
posted 22 March 2007 04:28 PM
quote: Originally posted by Le Téléspectateur:
You're delusional.
I have a degree as well, in Computer Science. However the market has shrunk in that field and I work as a courier. There are still good jobs for people with excellent skills in IT though. That's what I mean. [ 22 March 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
chilled
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13767
|
posted 27 March 2007 04:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by bruce_the_vii: [QB]All I said, Wiz, is that the market for good skills is strong usually. You can get the market to work for you. ...snippage...QB]
Really? I'm in a trade that has a huge "shortage" of skilled workers yet the best I can do is about 50% of what I made 15yrs ago once inflation and the cost of living is factored in. I can't complain though, I make a lot more than most people and have trouble garnering any sympathy. But, in my opinon, there is a concerted attack against ALL working people and unfortunately most Canadians really don't know what side of the fence they are on.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
chilled
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13767
|
posted 27 March 2007 05:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by bruce_the_vii: For example there's lots of professional and skilled unemployment but these people don't really relate to it as an issue.
Bruce, you are absolutely right. Not only is there lots of skilled and professional unemployment, there is even more under employment in these areas. But, unable to relate to the issue or simply embarrassed to not be in this perceived employees market?
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 06 April 2007 10:15 AM
quote: Originally posted by bruce_the_vii: Fidel is talking about growing the economy. Be reminded that Canada has job surpluses, is an immigration country and the population has been expanded 8% through immigration in the last decade to mop up the robust growth.
The 1990's in Canada saw the weakest average job growth rate since the 1930's. How's that for a free trade success story, Bruce ?. In the 14 years before FTA (1989), Canada's full-time payroll job creation was 2.3 million. In the 14 years after FTA, Canada created about 1.8 million full-time payroll jobs. That's not expansion so much as contraction in the number of living wage jobs produced as the reward for Mulroney's guarantee of handing over our natural wealth to multinational corporations for a song. Canada is a low wage economy today with about a quarter of adult Canadians earning anywhere below $10 dollars an hour. No, there are no "job surpluses" in Canada because we're still making up for the jobs not created in the 1990's. And we continue to shed living wage jobs in Canada's largest province. We've lost 120, 000 manufacturing and forestry jobs since 2003. In December, Scotia Bank cut projected growth rates for Ontario in half as said Ontario's manufacturing sector is in recession. This is the reward we reap for allowing over 50 percent foreign ownership in manufacturing. No other rich country allows a third as much foreign ownership of its manufacturing sector. About 33 important sectors of our economy are foreign owned and controlled today.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710
|
posted 06 April 2007 11:14 AM
quote: Originally posted by Tommy_Paine:
Dammit. I'm off to the store now to buy a new bullshit detector. Mine just got fried.
Lots of people doing very well in this country actually. What do you think it's for, generosity from capitalistic owners. Personally I have no idea what such a post refers to. I have worked in a lot of places and the best managers have some problems while the worst workers can't manage their own life let alone run anything. The situation is the bright get paid better for this reason. Everybody lives with this. [ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ] [ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 06 April 2007 02:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by bruce_the_vii: Canada always was a hewer of wood and drawer of water economy. A bush league foreign owned, branch plant trading economy. To expect stellar performance from it is a mistake.
Canada has been a chronic underperformer, especially so since FTA-NAFTA. NAFTA is the stupidest trade deal ever signed in the history of the world, and the majority of Canadians voted against both deals in the 80s-90's. political conservatism = uncompetitive nanny state for rich people propped up by natural resource wealth [ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 06 April 2007 11:16 PM
quote: People are still asleep though. By all reports labour shortages in Calgary have forced Tim Hortons to pay $12 an hour. In this case the market would provide way more social justice and efficiency than government.
Actually, no it doesn't. Not even close. First, the capitalist-dominated market, as history shows, adopts the wholly unsustainable and unjust practice of trying to coercively keep workers' wages as low as possible, while forcing them to spend as much as they can creating markets and economic activity. As soon as the labour supply begins gets any closer to demand, bosses will again push those rates down. Add to this, the higher wage rates caused by labour shortages don't take into account the skyrocketing cost of living, which has the effect of lowering the standard of living and making those wage-earners overall poorer. As Le Téléspectateur says: quote: I've also lived in Calgary and the thing they don't mention in those articles about $12/hour Tim Horton's jobs is that Calgary is the land of service fees. Everything has a fee, not even the public library.
And, believe it or not Heywood Floyd re-enforces: quote: The other thing they don't mention is that $12 per hour full time in Calgary is barely enough to rent a place with here. In Calgary $12 IS the effective minimum wage.
Further supported by Fidel's observation: quote: And the City of Calgary reports thousands of homeless people in the city. Apparently there's not enough of the oil profits being sunk into housing and infrastructure out there to attract suffcient workers from outside Wild Rose County
When interest rates rise (as they surely will) and international energy commodity rates fall (as they will in the next couple years), markets will slow as things get even more unaffordable as jobs are lost, and wages are driven down by bosses, without resolving any of the current hardships (like personal debt and homelessness), unless the government legislates a higher minimum wage rate, and invests money in public housing and infrastructure. That would be more effective in terms of social justice. Of course, a far more effective and historically proven way of promoting social justice and economic freedom and security is for workers to organize into unions of various kinds and get a greater direct democratic say in negotiating wage rates and working conditions, as well as using their collective abilities and invest, as many unions do, in affordable low-end market cooperative housing ventures.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214
|
posted 07 April 2007 04:47 AM
quote: Lots of people doing very well in this country actually. What do you think it's for, generosity from capitalistic owners.Personally I have no idea what such a post refers to. I have worked in a lot of places and the best managers have some problems while the worst workers can't manage their own life let alone run anything. The situation is the bright get paid better for this reason. Everybody lives with this.
Well, I see your point of view. But only by employing post hoc reasoning, and enjoying the feed back loop of your tautology. Canada isn't a meritocracy by a long shot. Never has been. As Brezhnev lived his life in fear of a Communist take over of the Soviet Union, so to our leaders live in constant fear of a meritocracy.
From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 07 April 2007 11:26 AM
quote: Originally posted by Farmpunk:
The common denominator in these labour hungry businesses is that the work is physical and dirty. Ever picked cabbage? Asparagus? Strawberries? (Course not, that's why there's close to 30 000 Mexicans, Trinidads and Jamacians in Ontario every year.
I think this is one of the failures of NAFTA for Mexican workers. NAFTA negotiators said at the time that increased trade would create a stay-at-home middle class in Mexico. They said if Americans didn't accept NAFTA, then Mexicans would pile in over the border to take American jobs. Mexico's middle class actually became smaller and "worker desperation" increased. NAFTA critics didn't suggest at the time that it would not increase trade, but that the benefits of increased trade would not flow to workers. And that's true in Canada as the economic pie has increased since NAFTA, with massive exports of energy and raw materials siphoned off to the U.S. CCPA says 80 percent of Canadian families are receiving a smaller share of the national income than 30 years ago. Child poverty in Canada is too high for a country with so much natural wealth being siphoned off without value added by Canadian workers. And if we notice, our appointed Central Bank Governor is holding inflation to 1.7 percent(March) with Canadian unemployment unchanged at 6.1 percent. In the U.S. where inflation is allowed to run a little higher at 2.5 percent with a ceiling of 4 percent, unemployment is even lower in that country, around 4.4 percent [ 07 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791
|
posted 10 April 2007 06:32 AM
I lived in Toronto in the 1970s, and the only way back then to live in a rental unit as a student was to pool resources, so we formed a commune, and rented a complete house, instead, on Major Street, not far from the University.In 1995 I moved to the Lower North Shore of Quebec, and I lived in a three bedroom apartment in a new house for four years at $350/month. Now I have my own place, two bedroom, nice property, waterfront view, large garden, with a CMHC mortgage of $320/month for ten years. I think, considering what rents are in Ottawa and Toronto, I'll stay put here. Plus, we never get extreme summer heat or humidity. A really big downside to living here is that we fairly isolated, meaning very little variety in our daily lives. That's fine, I'm just a few years away from 60, and have had a great life. Now I can tend to gardening all summer in my early retirement, and bitch about the cold winter almost four months of the year.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710
|
posted 10 April 2007 02:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle:
The going rate for a two bedroom apartment in Toronto is $1000 a month? What alternate universe are you living in?
Actually I get such information from editorials in the Toronto Star.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 10 April 2007 03:09 PM
quote:
CMHC The highest average monthly rents for two-bedroom apartments in new and existing structures were in Toronto ($1,067) and Vancouver ($1,045), followed by ...
And in a low vacancy market, average is often difficult to find. I remember looking high and low for decent place to live in mid-90's Ottawa. I went to look at a bachelor pad next to the Queensway coming available. There were ten people living in a tiny apartment up to then, and the apartment complex wanted $850 for it. I ended up way out of town in a rennovated railway building about 200 feet or so from the tracks. I had to learn to sleep through blaring train horns at all hours of the morning. I think a monkey riding a paintshaker might have slept better. [ 10 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|