babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Minimum wage II

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Minimum wage II
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 22 March 2007 12:40 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Star is reporting that the Liberal government is going to promise to raise the minimum wage to $10.25.

They have a $24,000 report that raising minimum wage will cost 100,000s of jobs. In fact bad entrepreneurs will be forced out of business but the customers will move down the street and spend - replacing the jobs. People know this.

An increase at the bottom might inflate 1% but this would be a transfer to the worst paid, who spend -- so there is no net loss of jobs.

These reports are no where near worth $24,000. People know this too.

People are still asleep though. By all reports labour shortages in Calgary have forced Tim Hortons to pay $12 an hour. In this case the market would provide way more social justice and efficiency than government.

The former minimum wage thread ended with a comment that there should be less wage disparity. I read, albiet once only, that the spread between university graduates and highschool graduates in Scandanvia and Japan is much less than it is in America. If you're interested, that might exist.

Meanwhile Canada is a meritocracy. The market for smarter more experienced people keeps wage disparity up.

Michelle closed the minimum wage thread but I could talk about jobs all day, and generally do actually.

[ 22 March 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
The Wizard of Socialism
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2912

posted 22 March 2007 04:08 AM      Profile for The Wizard of Socialism   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So you're saying that people earn more because the market deems them to be worth more, and that the poor should emigrate if they don't like it? Maybe it's me. Maybe I'm a little fucked up this morning, but I just don't get what you're trying to say, beyond the obvious "screw you" to the poor.
From: A Proud Canadian! | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 22 March 2007 09:34 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
The Star is reporting that the Liberal government is going to promise to raise the minimum wage to $10.25.

Ya, on the never-never plan for 2010. And McGuilty will be long gone by then. Meanwhile McGuilty and the Liberals have fast-tracked a $40, 000 pay increase for themselves in the here and now. Liberals understand the pinch of inflation don't they. It's a warm personal gesture from Liberal MPP's to themselves to think they're worth it.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 22 March 2007 03:27 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
All I said, Wiz, is that the market for good skills is strong usually. You can get the market to work for you. This is obvious and just the way it is. I have an opinion about why labour markets don't yo yo but that's another nut.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 22 March 2007 03:45 PM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
All I said, Wiz, is that the market for good skills is strong usually. You can get the market to work for you. This is obvious and just the way it is. I have an opinion about why labour markets don't yo yo but that's another nut.


You're delusional. I have a university degree and I work a just-above-minimum wage job because that's all there is in my town. Same goes for many of my peers.

I've also lived in Calgary and the thing they don't mention in those articles about $12/hour Tim Horton's jobs is that Calgary is the land of service fees. Everything has a fee, not even the public library.

Although, the C-Train is free downtown and that rocks.


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 22 March 2007 03:52 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The point is that next to the U.S. and Mexico, Canada has too many children living below the poverty line. And minimum wages, both real and nominal, are higher in several other rich countries.

Canadian and American Conservatives and Liberals tend to preach free market theology to everybody else but practice socialism for the rich. Nobody has really believed in free market mumbo jumbo since at least 1929.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 22 March 2007 04:28 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Le Téléspectateur:


You're delusional.


I have a degree as well, in Computer Science. However the market has shrunk in that field and I work as a courier. There are still good jobs for people with excellent skills in IT though. That's what I mean.

[ 22 March 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 22 March 2007 04:59 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Nobody has really believed in free market mumbo jumbo since at least 1929.

Thats where we might differ. I think a lot of people have Chosen to believe this yarn again, especially those who happen to benefit the most from it. (at least in the short term, everyone will pay in the end if this lunacy isn't stopped and soon) The next recession will be a nasty one, and their might be fewer options available than the last big one. The Cons and Libs will have to bring down the house first though, all on their own. Only way Joe Suburbia will make the necessary connections.


From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 23 March 2007 12:06 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just hope USian starve the beast conservatives have done their worst already. For Canada, I think just enough voters will be taken in by these conservatives to hand them another phoney majority. They'll give us four, and possibly eight years of anemic economies, privatizations, anything Warshington needs and starvation diets for the provinces before the people wise up and forget everything the Liberals pulled over 13 years.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
chilled
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13767

posted 27 March 2007 04:57 PM      Profile for chilled        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
[QB]All I said, Wiz, is that the market for good skills is strong usually. You can get the market to work for you. ...snippage...QB]

Really? I'm in a trade that has a huge "shortage" of skilled workers yet the best I can do is about 50% of what I made 15yrs ago once inflation and the cost of living is factored in. I can't complain though, I make a lot more than most people and have trouble garnering any sympathy.

But, in my opinon, there is a concerted attack against ALL working people and unfortunately most Canadians really don't know what side of the fence they are on.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 27 March 2007 05:04 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think complexities are the modern labour market situation. There are all these ironies.

When I say there's a strong market for good skills I'm thinking of the statistics that show the top 20% are doing better than ever. Some people are doing rather well.

I tend to agree that people don't watch their own situation and self interest carefully enough. For example there's lots of professional and skilled unemployment but these people don't really relate to it as an issue.


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
chilled
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13767

posted 27 March 2007 05:22 PM      Profile for chilled        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
For example there's lots of professional and skilled unemployment but these people don't really relate to it as an issue.

Bruce, you are absolutely right. Not only is there lots of skilled and professional unemployment, there is even more under employment in these areas.

But, unable to relate to the issue or simply embarrassed to not be in this perceived employees market?


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 27 March 2007 07:14 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find people who are unemployed or underemployed or who have a family member that is so don't necessarilty think it's a social issue of general concern. It's a little backwards.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 28 March 2007 09:33 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Raising the minimum wage would probably help the savings rate a bit, and savings are pretty important, as I note that there has been a slow upward trend in the duration of unemployment. While the graph is for the USA, Canada shares similar characteristics and our unemployment rate was chronically above 7% for over 20 years.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 05 April 2007 02:49 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So I write John Tory about minimum wage and he responds. The government has conducted a study suggesting quite steep job loss at raising minimum wage but I know people think that when a bad entrepreneur goes out of business and jobs are lost the customers go down the street and spend, creating new jobs. The effect of raising minimum wage is a transfer of funds from one group to another -- inflation. John Tory responds with the Liberal's study line -- it costs jobs. He can't follow this economic catecism.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 03:09 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They predicted rising inflation as the price to be paid for the roaring 90's too. It didn't happen. Our Central Bankers have tended to be more conservative than even Volcker or Greenspan. As a result, U rates have been lower in the U.S. than Canada since the late 80's.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 05 April 2007 03:38 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
U rates being what, unemployment. In Canada here we missed the 2001 recession they had in the USA. The economy just chugged ahead.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 04:09 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
U rates being what, unemployment. In Canada here we missed the 2001 recession they had in the USA. The economy just chugged ahead.

That's because they had conservatives running that economy into the ground with spending on war and excessive tax cuts for wealthy friends of the Republican Party.

With money policies tighter here than in the U.S. in the latter part of the 80's and through the 90's, U.S. unemployment rates were better on average than in Canada. BoC has backed off low-low to zero inflation targets since the Mulroney era. The U rate is generally lower in the U.S. than here because the Fed takes a more relaxed approach to inflation than the BoC.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 05 April 2007 05:46 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Le Téléspectateur:

I've also lived in Calgary and the thing they don't mention in those articles about $12/hour Tim Horton's jobs is that Calgary is the land of service fees. Everything has a fee, not even the public library.

The other thing they don't mention is that $12 per hour full time in Calgary is barely enough to rent a place with here. In Calgary $12 IS the effective minimum wage.


From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 07:03 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And the City of Calgary reports thousands of homeless people in the city. Apparently there's not enough of the oil profits being sunk into housing and infrastructure out there to attract suffcient workers from outside Wild Rose County.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 05 April 2007 07:06 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel, mon ami. Comment êtes-vous ? C'est bien si je réponds à votre poste ou je suis toujours un crétin ?
From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 07:19 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Essayer de rester sur le sujet, Heywood. Et vous devez faire un effort pour être aisé dans votre première langue avant de tenter un autre.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 05 April 2007 07:21 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ok. The biggest issue is that there is no incentive to build rental properties, let alone affordable rental properties. Why build overtaxed and non-profitable rental units when you can build condos for the same price and get a far larger profit margin.
From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 07:33 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Affordable housing is a federal issue. Private developers have no interest in non-profit housing. And there's no incentive for people to rent or buy houses they can't afford, so there is unmet demand for which market solutions are not useful in addressing.

[ 05 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 05 April 2007 07:44 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Taxes are both a federal and provincial responsibility. You want to get affordable rental properties built? The fastest way is to make it profitable for the developers or management companies.
From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 08:13 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But provinces now have limits to infrastructure budgets since the start of the Mulroney government. Affordable housing is not the only area where the feds have cut back on transfer payments.

And where has the private sector built affordable housing in the kind of numbers produced in post-war USA, Britain and Canada ?. The private sector needs to be pushed and prodded into allocating so many of the units they build for affordable housing. The tendency is for low income people to move on to other jobs, other cities etc. And once they do that, affordable housing units tend to revert back to market prices and higher rents.

There's not enough actual money circulating in the economy since around the 1980's. The result of our expanded money markets and increased money creation as interest-owing bank debt are bubbles of distorted value in housing and other investment markets. It's not about solving scarcity, it's about creating and maintaining it.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 05 April 2007 09:25 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Affordable housing. The going rate for two bedroom apartments in Toronto is $1000 a month while new construction is at least $2000 a month. That's the cost structure.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 05 April 2007 09:28 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel argues for more inflation. The Central Banks around the world have focused on controlling inflation and in Canada this has produced a 16 year long economic expansion. The normal expansion is 5 -6 years. Can't beat that.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 05 April 2007 09:51 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bunk. Only things expanding in Canada's economy now are foreign ownership, oil prices, real estate bubbles and debt. Oh, and generous pay raises given to upper management From upper management. We all know who'll pay the price for that too, when our main partner in trade drags us down too. The instant conclusion that using the BOc for printing *cheaper* money (or credit) would result in instant run away inflation just demonstrates how little most conservaliberals have thought about economics since reading that chapter in college. Sad thing too is how many Dippers now buy into it, thinking it's "social credit" or some other bogeyman from the past.

[ 05 April 2007: Message edited by: EriKtheHalfaRed ]


From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 April 2007 09:53 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is no link between zero inflation policies and greater economic growth. And especially not in Canada during the 1980s-90's, a disasterous period for unemployment and national debt growth. Our economic growth rates in the 60's-70's were significantly greater then when more than one tool was to fight inflation, and when corporate tax rates were higher.

The U.S. Fed targets inflation at 3 to 4 percent -the BoC 1 to 3 percent with 2 as a midpoint. Where is unemployment lower right now, the U.S. or Canada ?.

[ 05 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 05 April 2007 10:00 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
Affordable housing. The going rate for two bedroom apartments in Toronto is $1000 a month while new construction is at least $2000 a month. That's the cost structure.

What you blithely describe as underlying "cost structures" aren't inevitable expressions of nature, like gravity or basalt. Building costs are a onetime only expense, relative to the demand of the time, compensation for it changes with time as demand does. That is if we don't stop building affordable new spaces, in which case it only drifts up or sits idle. Housing doesn't respond to "supply and demand" quite as well as more optional consumer products.


From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 06 April 2007 07:02 AM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Meanwhile Canada is a meritocracy.

Dammit. I'm off to the store now to buy a new bullshit detector.

Mine just got fried.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 06 April 2007 07:10 AM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by HeywoodFloyd:
Taxes are both a federal and provincial responsibility. You want to get affordable rental properties built? The fastest way is to make it profitable for the developers or management companies.

Mike Harris removed rent controls, cancelled social housing (which landlords complained was "competition") and removed the sales tax on building materials for affordable housing. Net result = close to zero units of affordable rental housing built in 8+ years of Reformatory rule in Ontario.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 09:45 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As far as I can make out there is no constuction of apartments in Toronto and decades hence when the old stock falls apart there'll be a real shortage of apartments. You can see this coming from years off.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 09:50 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel is talking about growing the economy. Be reminded that Canada has job surpluses, is an immigration country and the population has been expanded 8% through immigration in the last decade to mop up the robust growth.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2007 10:15 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
Fidel is talking about growing the economy. Be reminded that Canada has job surpluses, is an immigration country and the population has been expanded 8% through immigration in the last decade to mop up the robust growth.

The 1990's in Canada saw the weakest average job growth rate since the 1930's. How's that for a free trade success story, Bruce ?.

In the 14 years before FTA (1989), Canada's full-time payroll job creation was 2.3 million.

In the 14 years after FTA, Canada created about 1.8 million full-time payroll jobs. That's not expansion so much as contraction in the number of living wage jobs produced as the reward for Mulroney's guarantee of handing over our natural wealth to multinational corporations for a song. Canada is a low wage economy today with about a quarter of adult Canadians earning anywhere below $10 dollars an hour. No, there are no "job surpluses" in Canada because we're still making up for the jobs not created in the 1990's.
And we continue to shed living wage jobs in Canada's largest province. We've lost 120, 000 manufacturing and forestry jobs since 2003. In December, Scotia Bank cut projected growth rates for Ontario in half as said Ontario's manufacturing sector is in recession. This is the reward we reap for allowing over 50 percent foreign ownership in manufacturing. No other rich country allows a third as much foreign ownership of its manufacturing sector. About 33 important sectors of our economy are foreign owned and controlled today.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2007 10:30 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
As far as I can make out there is no constuction of apartments in Toronto and decades hence when the old stock falls apart there'll be a real shortage of apartments. You can see this coming from years off.

The NDP predicted as much when Mike Harris borrowed $35 billion to pay for tax cuts to wealthy friends of the party. The Tories didn't build very damn much over two terms, and now both the Ontario Liberals and federal Tories admit to an infrastructure deficit across Canada after what was the industrialized world's worst aggregate economic performance of the last decade acccording to Pierre Fortin and Industry Canada.

We need new infrastructure and investment in people if Canada wants to break into the top ten most competitive economies in the world, like Sweden, Singapore, Denmark, Finland and Norway have rated over the last two decades. OECD economists are now admitting there are valid alternatives to flexible labour markets. The shine is off neo-Liberal capitalism.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 10:43 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Free Trade reduced tariffs by a few percent points. Tariffs had already been reduced by years of negotiating. It was not that big of deal.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2007 10:48 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
FTA-NAFTA was a HUGE deal that basically undermined Canada's economic sovereignty. Mulroney and Chretien sold us down the river.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 11:00 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada always was a hewer of wood and drawer of water economy. A bush league foreign owned, branch plant trading economy. To expect stellar performance from it is a mistake.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 11:14 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Tommy_Paine:

Dammit. I'm off to the store now to buy a new bullshit detector.

Mine just got fried.


Lots of people doing very well in this country actually. What do you think it's for, generosity from capitalistic owners.

Personally I have no idea what such a post refers to. I have worked in a lot of places and the best managers have some problems while the worst workers can't manage their own life let alone run anything. The situation is the bright get paid better for this reason. Everybody lives with this.

[ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]

[ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: bruce_the_vii ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2007 02:55 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
Canada always was a hewer of wood and drawer of water economy. A bush league foreign owned, branch plant trading economy. To expect stellar performance from it is a mistake.

Canada has been a chronic underperformer, especially so since FTA-NAFTA. NAFTA is the stupidest trade deal ever signed in the history of the world, and the majority of Canadians voted against both deals in the 80s-90's.

political conservatism = uncompetitive nanny state for rich people propped up by natural resource wealth

[ 06 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 06 April 2007 07:16 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada is posting 3% growth or some such thing while Germany, France and Japan are stagnated. That we have this strong growth is the Federal governments proudest post. Canada is firing on all four cyclinders economically. (Unfortunately it's in businesses with less than 50 employees, basically poor paying companies, and these are getting the workers from immigration. Basically this is building an economy with higher dependance ratio, not lower. However the MPs could care a less.)
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2007 10:49 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No need to worry about the environment or sustainability or even an economic crash, they'll create a new investment market for trade in carbon credits. There's a market solution for everything apparently.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 06 April 2007 11:16 PM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
People are still asleep though. By all reports labour shortages in Calgary have forced Tim Hortons to pay $12 an hour. In this case the market would provide way more social justice and efficiency than government.

Actually, no it doesn't. Not even close. First, the capitalist-dominated market, as history shows, adopts the wholly unsustainable and unjust practice of trying to coercively keep workers' wages as low as possible, while forcing them to spend as much as they can creating markets and economic activity.

As soon as the labour supply begins gets any closer to demand, bosses will again push those rates down.

Add to this, the higher wage rates caused by labour shortages don't take into account the skyrocketing cost of living, which has the effect of lowering the standard of living and making those wage-earners overall poorer.

As Le Téléspectateur says:

quote:
I've also lived in Calgary and the thing they don't mention in those articles about $12/hour Tim Horton's jobs is that Calgary is the land of service fees. Everything has a fee, not even the public library.

And, believe it or not Heywood Floyd re-enforces:

quote:
The other thing they don't mention is that $12 per hour full time in Calgary is barely enough to rent a place with here. In Calgary $12 IS the effective minimum wage.

Further supported by Fidel's observation:

quote:
And the City of Calgary reports thousands of homeless people in the city. Apparently there's not enough of the oil profits being sunk into housing and infrastructure out there to attract suffcient workers from outside Wild Rose County

When interest rates rise (as they surely will) and international energy commodity rates fall (as they will in the next couple years), markets will slow as things get even more unaffordable as jobs are lost, and wages are driven down by bosses, without resolving any of the current hardships (like personal debt and homelessness), unless the government legislates a higher minimum wage rate, and invests money in public housing and infrastructure. That would be more effective in terms of social justice.

Of course, a far more effective and historically proven way of promoting social justice and economic freedom and security is for workers to organize into unions of various kinds and get a greater direct democratic say in negotiating wage rates and working conditions, as well as using their collective abilities and invest, as many unions do, in affordable low-end market cooperative housing ventures.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 April 2007 12:32 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like the idea of unions, I really do. The old man finally received decent pay and steady work at the steel mill with union wages after about 1960 or so. The steel mill boomed for a couple of years during the Korean war, and for about six years while my then unmarried father left his job to go overseas in '39. He lost seniority time to the war years, another good reason to stay the hell out of the army he kept telling me when I was a wee lad.

The pulp and paper mill just closed down in my hometown after years of workers accepting wage and pension concessions. It will likely re-open sometime down the road as a non-union shop. A few years before he left the world, Galbraith said the time has come for world-wide unionization to level the labour field. I think he was talking about organizing labour at something along the lines of a WTO organization binding all member countries. There's always a way.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 07 April 2007 02:21 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The point that the $12 minimum wage in Calgary will fall with the next recession is well taken. However most employers are not that quick to adjust wages down. Wages tend to be stickie, do not follow the market quickly. In Toronto here wages at the bottom are mostly above the legislated minimum wage despite rather steep hidden unemployment. Myself, however, I would think that legislating a $12 minimum in places like Calgary to protect and stablize the bottom would be reasonable.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 April 2007 04:47 AM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Lots of people doing very well in this country actually. What do you think it's for, generosity from capitalistic owners.

Personally I have no idea what such a post refers to. I have worked in a lot of places and the best managers have some problems while the worst workers can't manage their own life let alone run anything. The situation is the bright get paid better for this reason. Everybody lives with this.


Well, I see your point of view. But only by employing post hoc reasoning, and enjoying the feed back loop of your tautology.

Canada isn't a meritocracy by a long shot. Never has been. As Brezhnev lived his life in fear of a Communist take over of the Soviet Union, so to our leaders live in constant fear of a meritocracy.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955

posted 07 April 2007 07:45 AM      Profile for Farmpunk     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The problem I have, as an employer, with all this chatter about min wage is that I can't find anyone to work for 12 an hour, and around here the cost of living is quite reasonable. The dicussions I have with other business owners is that there is a serious shortage of willing labourers.

The common denominator in these labour hungry businesses is that the work is physical and dirty. Ever picked cabbage? Asparagus? Strawberries? (Course not, that's why there's close to 30 000 Mexicans, Trinidads and Jamacians in Ontario every year.) Try being a heavy equipment mechanic's assistant for a couple weeks. Or a chicken catcher. Those jobs pay well.


From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 07 April 2007 11:09 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well yes and no. I've thought about these things and if you are refering to farm help you are talking about a seasonal on site work that's dirty you are not going to get that easily. People work in camps in the north but it pays quite well. The family farm is so dear to everyone that they will always allow foreign workers in for that. That's what I can make of this market from my bench here in suburbia.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 07 April 2007 11:13 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"feed back loop in a tautology." i don't even know what that is. probably weenie talk. basically i don't follow that the better people don't get promoted and payed better in our meritocracy/
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 April 2007 11:26 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Farmpunk:

The common denominator in these labour hungry businesses is that the work is physical and dirty. Ever picked cabbage? Asparagus? Strawberries? (Course not, that's why there's close to 30 000 Mexicans, Trinidads and Jamacians in Ontario every year.

I think this is one of the failures of NAFTA for Mexican workers. NAFTA negotiators said at the time that increased trade would create a stay-at-home middle class in Mexico. They said if Americans didn't accept NAFTA, then Mexicans would pile in over the border to take American jobs. Mexico's middle class actually became smaller and "worker desperation" increased. NAFTA critics didn't suggest at the time that it would not increase trade, but that the benefits of increased trade would not flow to workers.

And that's true in Canada as the economic pie has increased since NAFTA, with massive exports of energy and raw materials siphoned off to the U.S. CCPA says 80 percent of Canadian families are receiving a smaller share of the national income than 30 years ago. Child poverty in Canada is too high for a country with so much natural wealth being siphoned off without value added by Canadian workers.

And if we notice, our appointed Central Bank Governor is holding inflation to 1.7 percent(March) with Canadian unemployment unchanged at 6.1 percent.

In the U.S. where inflation is allowed to run a little higher at 2.5 percent with a ceiling of 4 percent, unemployment is even lower in that country, around 4.4 percent

[ 07 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 April 2007 12:28 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
"feed back loop in a tautology." i don't even know what that is.

This much is very clear.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 08 April 2007 02:36 AM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Now you would know about deep things, like alternative economics. It's just that the world is mixed up and backwards.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 April 2007 12:05 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
NDP says Federal Government must take the lead

quote:
TORONTO – Today, a new poll shows that up to three of four Canadians believe that the minimum wage should be at least $10 an hour. According to NDP MP Peggy Nash (Parkdale – High Park), this is just one more indication that the federal government must take the lead when it comes to giving hardworking Canadians a living wage.

Nash currently has a bill before the House of Commons to reinstate a federal minimum wage at $10 an hour.



From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 08 April 2007 06:15 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That maybe so however I read that and wrote to one Peggy Nash only to find out there is no such person in the Legislature.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 April 2007 06:34 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.peggynash.ca/
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 08 April 2007 07:50 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
That maybe so however I read that and wrote to one Peggy Nash only to find out there is no such person in the Legislature.

Try writing to the House of Commons, where she actually works.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 April 2007 03:43 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bruce_the_vii:
Affordable housing. The going rate for two bedroom apartments in Toronto is $1000 a month while new construction is at least $2000 a month. That's the cost structure.

The going rate for a two bedroom apartment in Toronto is $1000 a month?

What alternate universe are you living in?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 10 April 2007 04:21 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's two bedroom market rental apartments out here in Scarberia for less than $1000. In terms of how nice they are, I've been in nicer and been in worse. Personally, I'd give them a pass.

edited to add that just about all of my clients get the $436 maximum shelter allowance under ODSP. (it's a bit more if you have a kid and need a 2 bedroom.)

[ 10 April 2007: Message edited by: oldgoat ]


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 April 2007 04:39 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, actually, I guess I was wrong.

Average 2 bedroom apartment: $1067.

That said, I challenge you to try to find a two bedroom apartment that isn't on the outer edges of Scarberia or the Northwest Territories of Etobicoke (where the commute to work can be measured in hours each way), isn't infested with cockroaches, etc., for a thousand bucks a month. I'm betting you'll have a really hard time finding one. I know, because if I could find one, I'd move into it.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 10 April 2007 06:32 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I lived in Toronto in the 1970s, and the only way back then to live in a rental unit as a student was to pool resources, so we formed a commune, and rented a complete house, instead, on Major Street, not far from the University.

In 1995 I moved to the Lower North Shore of Quebec, and I lived in a three bedroom apartment in a new house for four years at $350/month. Now I have my own place, two bedroom, nice property, waterfront view, large garden, with a CMHC mortgage of $320/month for ten years. I think, considering what rents are in Ottawa and Toronto, I'll stay put here. Plus, we never get extreme summer heat or humidity. A really big downside to living here is that we fairly isolated, meaning very little variety in our daily lives. That's fine, I'm just a few years away from 60, and have had a great life. Now I can tend to gardening all summer in my early retirement, and bitch about the cold winter almost four months of the year.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 10 April 2007 02:49 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

The going rate for a two bedroom apartment in Toronto is $1000 a month?

What alternate universe are you living in?


Actually I get such information from editorials in the Toronto Star.


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 10 April 2007 03:09 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

CMHC The highest average monthly rents for two-bedroom apartments in new and existing structures were in Toronto ($1,067) and Vancouver ($1,045), followed by ...

And in a low vacancy market, average is often difficult to find.

I remember looking high and low for decent place to live in mid-90's Ottawa. I went to look at a bachelor pad next to the Queensway coming available. There were ten people living in a tiny apartment up to then, and the apartment complex wanted $850 for it. I ended up way out of town in a rennovated railway building about 200 feet or so from the tracks. I had to learn to sleep through blaring train horns at all hours of the morning. I think a monkey riding a paintshaker might have slept better.

[ 10 April 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca