Author
|
Topic: They're still killing people every day in Gaza too
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 27 July 2006 08:00 PM
[b]Five killed in Gaza today; 23 yesterday quote: Israeli troops have killed five Palestinians, including a 75-year-old woman, in Gaza, Palestinians say.The reported deaths come a day after at least 23 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military in Gaza.
If the "right to exist" carries with it duties -- like most other rights -- then this butcher of a State of Israel is rapidly losing its right.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Michael Nenonen
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6680
|
posted 29 July 2006 12:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by Stockholm: You're right "they" are still killing people in Gaza every day...Ever since Israel gave the Palestinians what they wanted and unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, fanatics have been sending terrorists over the border into Israel to kill Israelis.There is a consistent pattern. Everytime Israel withdraws (which I agree they should do) - the only result seems to be that the terrorists take advantage of the situation to establish bases of operation that are even closer to Israel. They could just say "thank you very much for withdrawing and nmow we will lay down our weapons and strive to make Gaza the Singapore of the Middle East", but life would be soooo boring without daring terrorist attacks to plan. Who knows some of those terrorists might actually have to work in in a factory or a field or a shop instead of doing "sexy" stuff like planning commando attacks on civilains.
Here's a link to an article that debunk the notion that Israel gave Palestinians "what they wanted": http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/736009.html “Israel left Gaza only partially, and in a distorted manner. The disengagement plan, which was labeled with fancy titles like "partition" and "an end to the occupation," did result in the dismantling of settlements and the Israel Defense Forces' departure from Gaza, but it did almost nothing to change the living conditions for the residents of the Strip. Gaza is still a prison and its inhabitants are still doomed to live in poverty and oppression. Israel closes them off from the sea, the air and land, except for a limited safety valve at the Rafah crossing. They cannot visit their relatives in the West Bank or look for work in Israel, upon which the Gazan economy has been dependent for some 40 years. Sometimes goods can be transported, sometimes not. Gaza has no chance of escaping its poverty under these conditions. Nobody will invest in it, nobody can develop it, nobody can feel free in it. Israel left the cage, threw away the keys and left the residents to their bitter fate. Now, less than a year after the disengagement, it is going back, with violence and force. What could otherwise have been expected? That Israel would unilaterally withdraw, brutally and outrageously ignoring the Palestinians and their needs, and that they would silently bear their bitter fate and would not continue to fight for their liberty, livelihood and dignity? We promised a safe passage to the West Bank and didn't keep the promise. We promised to free prisoners and didn't keep the promise. We supported democratic elections and then boycotted the legally elected leadership, confiscating funds that belong to it, and declaring war on it. We could have withdrawn from Gaza through negotiations and coordination, while strengthening the existing Palestinian leadership, but we refused to do so. And now, we complain about "a lack of leadership?" We did everything we could to undermine their society and leadership, making sure as much as possible that the disengagement would not be a new chapter in our relationship with the neighboring nation, and now we are amazed by the violence and hatred that we sowed with our own hands.” I've posted this chronology on another thread, but it's relevant here, too: http://www.counterpunch.org/lin07252006.html [ 29 July 2006: Message edited by: Michael Nenonen ]
From: Vancouver | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 29 July 2006 04:42 PM
quote: Originally posted by Stockholm: Israel has to be reassured beyond a shadow of a doubt that there will never be another terrorist attack coming out of Gaza again until the end of time.
How about assuring Lebanese and Palestinians that Israeli army will never wake another old man up in the middle of the night with rifle butts and flatten his shack with U.S.-made bulldozers ?. How about some assurance that Palestinian children will never have to observe another Israeli soldier urinating into downspouts on rooftop perches, their apartment building's drinking water supply ?. Do you believe for a moment that the Israeli's, Exxon or U.S. military industrial complex even want peace in the region, Stockholm ?. What would be the incentive for working towards a "peace dividend"?.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 29 July 2006 06:45 PM
quote: Oh so you attribute your racist idea to Arabs. More racism. You can't even take responsibility for what you say.
I fail to see what is racist about saying that Arabs are one ethnicity. I believe that is an anthropological and sociological fact. Otherwise why would we ever even use the term "Arabs" to describe anyone??? Arabs certainly call themselves Arabs. In fact, I read that up until 1948 the very term "Palestinian" was only ever used to describe the JEWISH inhabitants of palestine. What did the Arab inhabitants of Palestine call themselves you might ask? Apparently they called themselves very generically "Arabs living in Palestine". It was only in the late 60s that the term Palestinian ever came into common usage. before that they were simply "Arabs". Its not even clear what the Arab state that was proposed in the 1947 UN partition plan would have been called (non-Saudi Arabia perhaps?). In fact I suspect that any ethnologist would tell you that there is far more homogeneity among Areabs than there is among Jews. Arabs all speak Arabic, all live in the Middle East, are almost all Muslim and almost all eat various incarnantions of eggplant and lamb and chickpeas etc... Jews on the other hand speak vastly different languages, eat different foods and live all over the world. Some would even argue that Jews from countries like Morrocco or and Yemen are really Jewish Arabs. I seem to recall back in 1990 a lot of apologists for Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait said "well you know Arabs are really all one people so why not have Iraq take over Kuwait - there is no real reason for Kuwait to exist in the first place - its just a colonial vestige"
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|