Author
|
Topic: Social Democrat wins Guatemalan presidency
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 05 November 2007 12:20 AM
http://tinyurl.com/2s98xqThe real questions are 1) Will he actually TRY to be Social Democratic? 2) If he does, will the Guatemalan military and the Bush regime allow him to live?
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
mimeguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10004
|
posted 05 November 2007 12:16 PM
http://tinyurl.com/yryhut quote: The Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA) represents the first attempt at regional integration that is not based primarily on trade liberalization but on a new vision of social welfare and equity. Alternatives are often either theoretical to the point of impracticality, or so micro that scaling up presents huge challenges; ALBA is both large-scale and, to an increasing degree, taking concrete shape. While many aspects of the project are still unrealized or only in the process of realization, and despite some apparent contradictions between theory and practice, ALBA is an important case study. The fact that ALBA is spearheaded by Presidents Chávez, Castro and, more recently, Morales, of Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia respectively, the hemisphere´s 3 biggest bogeymen for neoliberal imperialism, only makes the tale that much more interesting. When US President George Bush turns up in Latin America to promote the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA), he is routinely cold-shouldered; Chávez on ALBA is greeted like a rock star.
I just started reading on this so other people here are probably more familiar with it. It would seem to be an advantage to join Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia etc. in strengthening the ALBA alliance and creating a small 'fair' trade zone that allows only investment on its own terms from the IMF or World Bank. Are they strong enough to create an alternative to the OAS in terms of mutual military protection?
From: Ontario | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921
|
posted 05 November 2007 06:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: http://tinyurl.com/2s98xqThe real questions are 1) Will he actually TRY to be Social Democratic? 2) If he does, will the Guatemalan military and the Bush regime allow him to live?
I suspect that Bush et al welcome social democratic governments as opposed to some of the more radical alternatives. At least that's how I read Harper's recent statements in Chile. quote: "Too often some in the hemisphere are led to believe that their only choices are — if I can be so bold to say — to return to the syndrome of economic nationalism, political authoritarianism and class warfare, or to become, quote, just like the United States," Harper said, in what appeared to be a reference to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. "This is, of course, utter nonsense."
He cited Canada and Chile as examples. I am assuming that, after Bush's disastrous Latin American trip, Harper went down there to support his agenda against Chavez, Castro, Morales, etc. and this was the approach agreed on by Harper, Bush, and the interests they represent. When capital feels sufficiently threatened by socialists, it will support social democrats.
From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|