babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Social Democrat wins Guatemalan presidency

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Social Democrat wins Guatemalan presidency
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346

posted 05 November 2007 12:20 AM      Profile for Ken Burch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://tinyurl.com/2s98xq

The real questions are

1) Will he actually TRY to be Social Democratic?

2) If he does, will the Guatemalan military and the Bush regime allow him to live?


From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 05 November 2007 11:30 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think that Washington has counted on the elite and military in those countries to maintain social disorder over the years. The wealthy rancheros in Guatemala are very influential. Colom is a businessman apparently and mentions a need to do something about corruption in justice and policing. I think these are the same things that are said about African national leaders, that they are corrupt and therefore the source of the problems. The World Bank and IMF have been accused of extending round trip loans which tend to miss their intended targets. I don't know how true that is, and I think in order for someone to be corrupted, there have to be corruptors with means to do the corrupting. I think problems begin for certain countries when influential people resist being corrupted. God help them.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
mimeguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10004

posted 05 November 2007 12:16 PM      Profile for mimeguy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://tinyurl.com/yryhut
quote:
The Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA) represents the first attempt at regional integration that is not based primarily on trade liberalization but on a new vision of social welfare and equity. Alternatives are often either theoretical to the point of impracticality, or so micro that scaling up presents huge challenges; ALBA is both large-scale and, to an increasing degree, taking concrete shape. While many aspects of the project are still unrealized or only in the process of realization, and despite some apparent contradictions between theory and practice, ALBA is an important case study.
The fact that ALBA is spearheaded by Presidents Chávez, Castro and, more recently, Morales, of Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia respectively, the hemisphere´s 3 biggest bogeymen for neoliberal imperialism, only makes the tale that much more interesting. When US President George Bush turns up in Latin America to promote the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA), he is routinely cold-shouldered; Chávez on ALBA is greeted like a rock star.

I just started reading on this so other people here are probably more familiar with it. It would seem to be an advantage to join Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia etc. in strengthening the ALBA alliance and creating a small 'fair' trade zone that allows only investment on its own terms from the IMF or World Bank. Are they strong enough to create an alternative to the OAS in terms of mutual military protection?


From: Ontario | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 05 November 2007 06:41 PM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ken Burch:
http://tinyurl.com/2s98xq

The real questions are

1) Will he actually TRY to be Social Democratic?

2) If he does, will the Guatemalan military and the Bush regime allow him to live?


I suspect that Bush et al welcome social democratic governments as opposed to some of the more radical alternatives. At least that's how I read Harper's recent statements in Chile.

quote:
"Too often some in the hemisphere are led to believe that their only choices are — if I can be so bold to say — to return to the syndrome of economic nationalism, political authoritarianism and class warfare, or to become, quote, just like the United States," Harper said, in what appeared to be a reference to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. "This is, of course, utter nonsense."

He cited Canada and Chile as examples.

I am assuming that, after Bush's disastrous Latin American trip, Harper went down there to support his agenda against Chavez, Castro, Morales, etc. and this was the approach agreed on by Harper, Bush, and the interests they represent. When capital feels sufficiently threatened by socialists, it will support social democrats.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca