babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Which side are we on?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Which side are we on?
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 18 January 2005 12:17 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it is a key question for babblers:

Which Side Are You On?

by Florence Reese

Come all of you good workers
Good news to you I'll tell
Of how that good old union
Has come in here to dwell


(Chorus)
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?

My daddy was a miner
And I'm a miner's son
And I'll stick with the union
Till every battle's won

They say in Harlan County
There are no neutrals there
You'll either be a union man
Or a thug for J.H. Blair

Oh, workers can you stand it?
Oh, tell me how you can
Will you be a lousy scab
Or will you be a man?

Don't scab for the bosses
Don't listen to their lies
Us poor folks haven't got a chance
Unless we organize
----
It is an old song, but still relevant. Working people have no chance unless we realise that the bosses are feeding us lies - about scabbing, downsizing, makeup, pantyhose, whatever.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 18 January 2005 12:51 AM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My instant reflex is to always support strikers or labour, whatever the circumstances, Sister lagatta.
From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 18 January 2005 03:04 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ludlow Massacre

Woody Guthrie

It was early springtime when the strike was on,
They drove us miners out of doors,
Out from the houses that the Company owned,
We moved into tents up at old Ludlow.
I was worried bad about my children,
Soldiers guarding the railroad bridge,
Every once in a while a bullet would fly,
Kick up gravel under my feet.

We were so afraid you would kill our children,
We dug us a cave that was seven foot deep,
Carried our young ones and pregnant women
Down inside the cave to sleep.

That very night your soldiers waited,
Until all us miners were asleep,
You snuck around our little tent town,
Soaked our tents with your kerosene.

You struck a match and in the blaze that started,
You pulled the triggers of your gatling guns,
I made a run for the children but the fire wall stopped me.
Thirteen children died from your guns.

I carried my blanket to a wire fence corner,
Watched the fire till the blaze died down,
I helped some people drag their belongings,
While your bullets killed us all around.

I never will forget the look on the faces
Of the men and women that awful day,
When we stood around to preach their funerals,
And lay the corpses of the dead away.
We told the Colorado Governor to call the President,
Tell him to call off his National Guard,
But the National Guard belonged to the Governor,
So he didn't try so very hard.

Our women from Trinidad they hauled some potatoes,
Up to Walsenburg in a little cart,
They sold their potatoes and brought some guns back,
And they put a gun in every hand.

The state soldiers jumped us in a wire fence corners,
They did not know we had these guns,
And the Red-neck Miners mowed down these troopers,
You should have seen those poor boys run.

We took some cement and walled that cave up,
Where you killed these thirteen children inside,
I said, "God bless the Mine Workers' Union,"
And then I hung my head and cried


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 18 January 2005 07:27 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Edinburgh chapter of UNISON (the British public service workers' union) has started up a Women's Socialist choir!
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 18 January 2005 03:39 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They imported murderous gangsters from the States like Hal Banks to put down the seafarer's union movement. Fascism has been on their minds for a long time.

'Betrayed' at Sea
A new documentary says Canada sold out its sailors by selling off its merchant marine fleet.

Betrayed At Sea

quote:

"Canada never emerged from the economic doldrums of the 1970s. It simply lurched from mini-crisis to mini-crisis, with economic stagnation and high rates of inflation characterizing the 1980s. Inflation would eventually be brought under control, but only at the expense of an acute slowdown in the manufacturing sector, an intensification of work relations, the creation of the low-wage service economy in which union jobs and entitlements virtually disappeared from a material context governed by minimum wage employment and part-time work. Capital took a rest from production as investment plunged into the freewheeling speculative climate of real estate, the stock market, sport franchises and other endeavours where glib tongues and fast deals open the door to the shadiest of capitalist practices, the overtly criminal tip of an iceberg of sleeze melting into the odd conviction for insider trading."

Taking Up the Need to Act in a New Way



From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 20 January 2005 09:06 AM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, the labor unions in the USA have ties
to organized crime, why don't you mention
that? The Teamsters and Jimmy Hoffa are a
good example of this. Let's not forget the
Democrats in the JFK administration had known
ties to mobsters during that era.

From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 20 January 2005 10:49 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If only our troll, a "student" knew more about the history of the labour movement in the US. Interesting to remember that at one point the Teamsters were a very militant union, involved in a huge strike wave in Minneapolis. (Folks in the Prairies should learn of that, as there are interesting parallels with events in Winnipeg; moreover, in Minnesota there was a "Farmer-Labor Party" not unlike the CCF). How mobsters were able to muscle in is an interesting topic for labour historians - certainly red-baiting played a part there.

I don't think the existence of thuggery in the labour movement is counter to this. In my experience, the thug unions were a form of yellow unionism used against workers who wanted to form REAL unions - in particular, how the Teamsters were used against hotel workers in Montreal.

Fidel also talked about the US thugs brought in to crush the militant seafarers' union.

Sorry, your trolling doesn't work here, for anyone with the slightest knowledge of labour and socialist movement history. Seeing where you are writing from, you should, you know...

[ 20 January 2005: Message edited by: lagatta ]


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 20 January 2005 11:12 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Barcode, if you're just going to drop names, could you at least observe a little consistency? Putting the names Kennedy and Hoffa in close proximity is enough to sink the logic of your last line.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 20 January 2005 11:15 AM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There was a Discovery show on a few days ago that detailed the links between OC and both major US parties via Vegas during the Kennedy election.
From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 20 January 2005 11:18 AM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Barcode thought it important to point out that U.S. labour had ties to the mob, as did the Kennedy family.

I feel compelled to mention that Republican administrations peddled drugs; they themselves were 'organized crime'. And the Bush family had ties to Hitler and the Bin Ladens, so I'd rather associate with the Kennedys, thanks anyway.


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 20 January 2005 11:33 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What the Kennedys mainly had links to were the old regional political machines, which were unquestionably corrupt, and more or less so depending on where they were.

But Bobby Kennedy's pursuit and prosecution of Hoffa were famously fierce and fearsome.

Politics and the mob(s) in the U.S. -- a most complicated network. Need to get your threads carefully untangled every time.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Negad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7863

posted 20 January 2005 11:56 AM      Profile for Negad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:

Sorry, your trolling doesn't work here, for anyone with the slightest knowledge of labour and socialist movement history. Seeing where you are writing from, you should, you know...



Don’t you think that history should be told from all points of views and not just by those who only benefit from it? What about those who were marginalized as a result of actions or lack of actions of "UNIONS". Should we just tell them shut up “UNIONS” did a lot of good for some and they are the people who count. Perhaps you can effort to be romantic about history but others who have to live a life of struggle can not see it through your eyes, simply because their experience from the same situation is different from yours and the result was misery for them and more privilege for “yous”. I suppose you can view the thugs as a minor flaw in the system but those who are affected by it and have to live a life full of oppression can not see it that way. Perhaps you need to stop imposing your views of history on others and hear what others have to say as well. If only "yous" can stop inviting those who are suffering as a result of conducts of thugs, to unite with you to get more privilege for "yous" and mandate them to be happy because we are all "on one side". You can continue being proud of history as you see it and eliminate any parts of it that you want so you can feel good about and feel triumphed, but others can't accept it whether you like it or not. You can continue posting romantic poems which are far from reality of many people's lives but that is not going to change anything. History and present won’t change by romantic poems not for those who have to suffer as a result of craps that are thrown at them.
A point about what was said about Immigrants doing the jobs that other Canadians won't do (this may have been the thread “I made an Indian girl cry,..”. Well actually that is part of the problem, when it is expected that "immigrants" to do that and only that. As soon as “immigrants” are outside that boundary then that is when "UNIONS" start their militant actions against "immigrant" and believe me it is not at all romantic for those who have to live that life every day and they can't see it as a minor flaw either. I suppose just being militant to “protect” the jobs for certain people is viewed as a positive act by the “unions” and we should all unite to cheer them. The moment “immigrants get militants in the same way as the “unions” then they are a threat to the national security and “terrorists” and have to be deported to somewhere to be tortured.
I dare you to be as romantic aobut women's issue, then you will be facing a group of white feminists to strihgten you out very good.

From: Ontario | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 20 January 2005 12:08 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My life of privilege?
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 20 January 2005 12:13 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Negad, you've got several things entangled there, including a discussion from another thread in which you were misreading the situation being discussed. That discussion was not about union members attacking "immigrants," although you thought it was. Go back and read others' replies to you.

The importance of challenging elites and privilege within the women's movement is an important topic for feminists and babblers generally. If you want to introduce it in a way that others can respond to and learn from, then please do.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 20 January 2005 12:32 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
so I'd rather associate with the Kennedys

hello? Joe Kennedy, the patriarch, was a nazi, supporter of Hitler and disliked the British.


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Negad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7863

posted 20 January 2005 12:33 PM      Profile for Negad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
Negad, you've got several things entangled there, including a discussion from another thread in which you were misreading the situation being discussed. That discussion was not about union members attacking "immigrants," although you thought it was. Go back and read others' replies to you.


I was merely suggesting that the beleive about immigrats is a major cause of bullying that they face and it wasn't that I interpreted the other thread as union members attacking "immigrants" I was just quoting that piece to show my point.
Also the issue about feminism and eliticity is not to chage the topic to that issue it was an comparison of issues and how people can only see it through their own eyes and undermine the pain and suffering of others by being romantic about it. I was just stating the fact that if the same approach is adopted about women's issue the resposne would be very different and much more swift. Imagine if a poem is posted totally oblivious to the struggles of women and invite them to unite with men on certain issue of importance then what would be the response however one can be undermining struggles of lower calss, people of colour,.. Perhaps this needs more time and space to be explained. I just can't accept that history is beign told from one point of view and that of the dminate class, race,..

From: Ontario | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 20 January 2005 12:34 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Bacchus:
...and disliked the British.

A New England Irish Catholic who didn't like the British? I'm shocked.


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911

posted 20 January 2005 12:47 PM      Profile for Américain Égalitaire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
If only our troll, a "student" knew more about the history of the labour movement in the US. Interesting to remember that at one point the Teamsters were a very militant union, involved in a huge strike wave in Minneapolis. (Folks in the Prairies should learn of that, as there are interesting parallels with events in Winnipeg; moreover, in Minnesota there was a "Farmer-Labor Party" not unlike the CCF). How mobsters were able to muscle in is an interesting topic for labour historians - certainly red-baiting played a part there.

Lagatta:

He can start with the Hormel strike.

IWW reprint

Minnesota Public Radio


From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 20 January 2005 12:52 PM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
My life of privilege?

Well you know us. I'd call that privileged.


From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 20 January 2005 12:54 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But I think Lagatta may be referring to the Teamsters strike in the Depression. It is the subject of two amazing books by Farrell Dobbs, one of which is called "Teamster Rebellion". It is required reading for anyone interested in the actual history of the labour movement in the USA.

The book documents the way in which Jimmy Hoffa started as a labour goon; he was sent to Minneapolis by President Roosevelt to break the radicals' hold on the union.

Dozens of beatings with truncheons later, the mobsters were in charge of the union, while the police stoood aside.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 20 January 2005 01:23 PM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Joe Kennedy, the patriarch, was a nazi, supporter of Hitler
I had heard of his sympathies for the nazi cause, but a nazi himself? Can you substantiate that claim, or the one that he is a Prescott Bush equivalent, in that he provided any kind of financial support? (Let alone banked for them and established their international supply lines, as Prescott did.)

From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 20 January 2005 01:24 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes jeff, that is indeed what I'm referring to.

Fidel referred to a similar process (involving two different unions, if I recall) in the seafarers' unions.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 20 January 2005 01:32 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hmm I'll have to look it up. He was very pro-hitler and talked about him in admiring ways a lot. I thought I read he had ties like prescott but I'll delve into my archives and check.

He, like lindbergh' switched gears though after Pearl harbor.

And its not so much surprise that he hated the british, but that he was sent as ambassador there as well


Hmm He might just have been a rabid anti-semite


quote:
During May of 1938, Kennedy engaged in extensive discussions with the new German Ambassador to the Court of St. James's, Herbert von Dirksen. In the midst of these conversations (held without approval from the U.S. State Department), Kennedy advised von Dirksen that President Roosevelt was the victim of "Jewish influence" and was poorly informed as to the philosophy, ambitions and ideals of Hitler's regime. (The Nazi ambassador subsequently told his bosses that Kennedy was "Germany's best friend" in London.)


quote:
Brutality was in the eye of the beholder. Writing to Charles Lindbergh shortly after Kristallnacht in November of 1938, Joe Kennedy Sr. seemed more concerned about the political ramifications stemming from high-profile, riotous anti-Semitism than he was about the actual violence done to the Jews. "... Isn't there some way," he asked, "to persuade [the Nazis] it is on a situation like this that the whole program of saving western civilization might hinge?

[ 20 January 2005: Message edited by: Bacchus ]

Ahhh Not so much economic ties as having the Germans help him make a profit.

quote:
The situation was made even worse when it was learned by Harry Hopkins, Roosevelt's most trusted aide, that Joe had sold Czech securities and made $500,000 in profits while U.S. Ambassador. He apparently traded on top secret intelligence information that the Germans were going to invade Czechoslovakia and when they did the Czech stock market collapsed and Joe covered his shorts.


How to get rich lessons

[ 20 January 2005: Message edited by: Bacchus ]


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 20 January 2005 01:44 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
I think it is a key question for babblers:

Which Side Are You On?


I agree!

So...are you with us, or with the ter'rists?

Oh, whoops, wrong leader. My mistake.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 20 January 2005 01:59 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No question, Bacchus, that Joe was a nasty piece of work, although in London in the late thirties, he would have met lots of plummy-toned locals who shared his fascist inclinations. It often seems a wonder to me that England didn't go that way, actually. I sometimes think that Chamberlain deserves more credit than we give him, simply for resisting those pressures at home.

Now, Joe's history in Hollywood is definitely worth investigating. There is the original connection to the gangsters.

I like to think that at least some of his sons overcame that history, though. Robert is a complicated story. Who knows.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 20 January 2005 02:24 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So...are you with us, or with the ter'rists?

While "Which side are you on?" might seem eerily similar to "Are you with us or ag'in us", it must be noted that George Bush's line isn't set to music.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 20 January 2005 02:57 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think Bush knows quite well which side he is on.
From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 20 January 2005 03:01 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is no question but that neo-cons around Bush have spoken quite frankly of "class war", in those words, from the standpoint of their class.

But there is no "class war" between Bush and Bin Laden. Both are right-wing, women-hating born-again religious fanatics and spoit rich boys.

Of course, there are those of us who would rather remain aloof from the whole thing. Wonder if I would, if I had such a luxury?


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911

posted 20 January 2005 03:45 PM      Profile for Américain Égalitaire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
There is no question but that neo-cons around Bush have spoken quite frankly of "class war", in those words, from the standpoint of their class.

But there is no "class war" between Bush and Bin Laden. Both are right-wing, women-hating born-again religious fanatics and spoit rich boys.

Of course, there are those of us who would rather remain aloof from the whole thing. Wonder if I would, if I had such a luxury?


Yes indeed, but note that USians are forbidden from uttering the terms "class warfare" together like that -- it must be spoke of in proxy terms. Its bad form to come out and admit it, since in the fairytale USA we live in everyone has a equal shot and only the "lazy and shiftless" don't taste The American Dream (tm).

As far as the Teamsters reference earlier, I learned a lot about that union when I was a part of it as a college student one summer loading hardware onto trucks in a warehouse. The Minneapolis actions were history to me - the Hormel strike in Austin I remember very well. It was a watershed moment for the US labor movement and not a good one.

The DFL (Democrat Farm Labor) party survives in Minnesota. You can check them out here -- DFL


From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 25 January 2005 07:20 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Procrstination and delay strikes again, but I decided I should really post this story.

I am on a Morris dancing team which also sings. We got a gig at the "Miners Wives Association" picnic a while ago. Given that the miners involved are serious brass the fact that the house had a private golf course for a back yard (well, back large area of land) should not come as quite as much surprise as it did.

Anyways, for one of our songs we did "Union Miner", chorus:

Union miners, stand together
Do not heed the bosses tale
Keep your hand upon your wages
And your eyes upon the scale

The clenched teeth in the audience was a site to behold.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Other Todd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7964

posted 25 January 2005 08:10 PM      Profile for The Other Todd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Egalitarian American:


Yes indeed, but note that USians are forbidden from uttering the terms "class warfare" together like that -- it must be spoke of in proxy terms. Its bad form to come out and admit it, since in the fairytale USA we live in everyone has a equal shot and only the "lazy and shiftless" don't taste The American Dream (tm).


You are a wonderful person, and I want to have your baby.


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
The Other Todd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7964

posted 25 January 2005 08:12 PM      Profile for The Other Todd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Barcode:
So, the labor unions in the USA have ties
to organized crime, why don't you mention
that? The Teamsters and Jimmy Hoffa are a
good example of this. Let's not forget the
Democrats in the JFK administration had known
ties to mobsters during that era.

EVERY labour union in the States, Sonny?

Pretty evident which side this creature's on . . . .


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
The Other Todd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7964

posted 25 January 2005 08:14 PM      Profile for The Other Todd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's a lovely thought, Lagatta, and I wish things were as easy as the song makes them out to be . . . .


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca