quote:
Zain warned the committee that money Canada has sent to rebuild Aceh following the tsunami — which killed 128,000 in that province alone and left half-a-million people homeless — will be wasted unless Canada also invests in democratizing and opening up civil society in the region. “Denounce the human rights violations,” she urged the backbenchers and opposition politicians on the committee. “To ensure that funds are not lost to the corruption in the recovery and the reconstruction process in Aceh — to promote meaningful civil society participation in peace negotiations and the planning, monitoring and control of the reconstruction in Aceh.”
In 2004 Indonesia was tied with six other countries for a ranking of 133rd on Transparency International’s annual index of corruption. Only seven other countries in the world ranked lower. A large part of Indonesia’s bribe-taking and influence peddling is associated with the military.
“Indonesia is on a very long curve toward democratization,” Dan McTeague, the Pickering-Scarborough East Liberal MP, told The Catholic Register after Zain’s presentation.
Zain’s request struck at the heart of Parliament’s current review of Canada’s foreign policy. Should Canada use its influence and its meagre overseas development aid budget to promote democracy, civil institutions, rule of law, peace making and peacekeeping around the world? Or should it concentrate on protecting Canada’s national security and economic interests? It’s what McTeague and others call the “romanticism versus reality” debate.