babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Woman Becomes Quadruple Amputee After Giving Birth

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Woman Becomes Quadruple Amputee After Giving Birth
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 20 January 2006 02:25 PM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A Sanford mother says she will never be able to hold her newborn because an Orlando hospital performed a life-altering surgery and, she claims, the hospital refuses to explain why they left her as a multiple amputee.

The woman filed a complaint against Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, she said, because they won't tell her exactly what happened. The hospital maintains the woman wants to know information that would violate other patients' rights.

Claudia Mejia gave birth eight and a half months ago at Orlando Regional South Seminole. She was transported to Orlando Regional Medical Center in Orlando where her arms and legs were amputated. She was told she had streptococcus, a flesh eating bacteria, and toxic shock syndrome, but no further explanation was given.

The hospital, in a letter, wrote that if she wanted to find out exactly what happened, she would have to sue them.


What the hell?


From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
swirrlygrrl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2170

posted 20 January 2006 02:32 PM      Profile for swirrlygrrl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yee. What a difficult situation for her - I'm glad she's not dropping the issue, she deserves answers at the very least, and most likely, some major compensation. I'm guessing the hospital is trying to cover its ass.
From: the bushes outside your house | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 20 January 2006 02:32 PM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Should not they have asked?
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Diane Demorney
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6183

posted 20 January 2006 02:34 PM      Profile for Diane Demorney   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm curious how the hospital justifies doing the surgery without a consent form from the patient or guardian.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 20 January 2006 02:50 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How utterly ghastly - don't they have to ask the person whether they'd rather live under such circumstances?
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 21 January 2006 05:57 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, let me get this straight--the hospital's position is that I go into hospital to have a baby and I come out minus my arms and legs, and I'm not supposed to ask why???
From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
v michel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7879

posted 21 January 2006 07:47 PM      Profile for v michel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't that bacteria one that's typically gotten in hostpitals -- through contamination during surgery and the like? Might be wrong since I'm reaching a bit in memory, but I think it is.

Sounds like maybe the hospital might have done something wrong and be afraid to give any details that might be used against them in a lawsuit.


From: a protected valley in the middle of nothing | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 21 January 2006 08:16 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
any details that might be used against them in a lawsuit

Sound worse than that. They'll definitely be sued but it sounds like someone internal put out a gag order without talking to their lawyers. I can't imagine competent counsel telling anyone that they'd have to sue to get the facts. I can see them insisting on filtering every communication and I can see them refusing to allow any telephone conversations. But I can't see a gag order like this one.

As noted by another poster, it may also be that the surgery in question should not have been performed without consent, at least in the circumstances in question.

In short, the hospital fucked up big time and are completely mishandling the current situation.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 21 January 2006 08:50 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Canadian Socialist:
I'm curious how the hospital justifies doing the surgery without a consent form from the patient or guardian.

You can't get admitted to hospital without signing a consent form. The trouble is that it is pretty blanket, meaning that they can do anything to you.

Welcome to the American medical system.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 21 January 2006 08:51 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Welcome to the American medical system.

Welcome to any medical system. Not just American.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 22 January 2006 12:13 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What do you mean?
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sifo-Dyas
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11116

posted 22 January 2006 12:44 AM      Profile for Sifo-Dyas     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Deleted

[ 22 May 2006: Message edited by: Sifo-Dyas ]


From: --- | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 22 January 2006 03:18 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mind you, while the hospital was probably at fault, it may not have been the surgery that was the error. That flesh-eating disease kills, and kills very fast. By the time they noticed it, if there wasn't anyone on hand right at that very moment to give consent immediately, they might reasonably have figured they had to do it right then or she woul die.
The real question is more, what are the cleaning standards like at that hospital? How is it that she got the disease in the first place? Was there non-sterile equipment involved, pressent through negligence?
Here in BC, the bloody Liberals (provincial Liberals, roughly the same as federal Reformatories) privatized the hospital cleaning and hacked the cleaners' wages; the private companies don't train workers much. I fear what's going on now.

From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 22 January 2006 03:20 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What do you mean?

Simply that you have to sign a release whenever you enter a hospital anywhere. That includes Canada. The last time I had to sign one in Toronto it was incredibly broad. Basically allowed the doctor and hospital to do what they thought was appropriate in the circumstances without coming back to me. While we knew who the surgeon was the form allowed him to have assistance from anyone of his choice and/or delegate any or all of the operation to anyone that he felt appropriate. [If you think about it, this is absolutely necessary - if for some reason the doctor is incapacitated in the middle of surgery and no-one else is allowed to touch the patient, what do you do?] Since I don't live in Canada the hospital made me sign a second form that said that the relationship between the hospital and myself was governed by Canadian law and any legal action I might bring would be subject to Canadian law and forum.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca