babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Chocolate Coated Nuclear Power

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Chocolate Coated Nuclear Power
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 May 2006 10:23 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
“I feel a definite vibration in this room…and I think it’s the chocolate!”

These words are the first words my fellow Eye interns and I hear from our host as we sit down to learn about nuclear energy in a room full of women who have just finished eating from a fountain of chocolate. (See Gord Perks article “The power of chocolate,” May 11)

Our host is actually Joanne Thomas Yaccato, the woman behind the Thomas Yaccato marketing group, a group that is responsible to Bruce Power for improving the image of nuclear energy…apparently by luring women to so-called information sessions with chocolate. It seems the reason women are less likely than men to support nuclear power is that we just don’t know enough.

Women know less than men about nuclear power. Women know less than men about nuclear power. Women know less than men about nuclear power. Are you as angry as I am yet?


Eye Weekly

The Power of Chocolate


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 16 May 2006 07:14 PM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's pretty amazing. Why would women know less than men about nuclear power ?
From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 16 May 2006 08:14 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pretty amazing all right - and utterly offensive. I loved this, though:

quote:
At the end of the session, just as we were leaving the room, (of 30 people exactly including all panelists and ourselves…I counted) Joanne Yaccato stopped us and asked in an uncharacteristically tactless tone, “Was it worth crashing?”

Yes, Joanne, I do believe that removing the chocolate-eating grin from your face, if only for a moment, may have made it all worth it.



From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
indiemuse
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12564

posted 16 May 2006 08:52 PM      Profile for indiemuse     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Pride for Red Dolores:
That's pretty amazing. Why would women know less than men about nuclear power ?

They don't. The whole point of campaigning to women in this fashion is because women are, according to them, more skeptical of nuclear power than men. The propaganda is trying to tell women that they are simply less informed.


From: The exception to every rule . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
JaneyCanuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12682

posted 05 June 2006 11:48 AM      Profile for JaneyCanuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Less informed indeed!! Or maybe the nuclear industry knows its opponents. I do know that when I was part of a group protesting the construction of a nuclear plant, we were bluntly informed by someone at AECL that they researched all our letters to the editor in various newspapers (syntax and so forth). In retrospect, that person must've been new since I cannot see any PR person doing that today.

The majority of anti nuke protesters and campaigners have been women. Think of Another Women for Peace - who started the campaign to save baby teeth to test for strontium 90, a program that continues to this day - and in Canada, the venerable Voice of Women to which I admit I was active in at one point. (although all the members were so much older than me but wonderful mentors!!) and Helen Caldicott's work (If You Love this Planet for example) and Rosie Bertrell - I could go on and on......

I still refuse to eat Hershey's because God knows, it could come from the plant near Three Mile Island. That happened in 1979 and I ran into a businessman that day who said to me "Now I see what you mean.". I doubt he did anything about it but he may have challenged his thought process (or I can hope!).

It is even more critical now since according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, the US is producing more nuclear weapons now than at any time in its history (yet demanding other states do not?).

Anyway -- so many of the anti nuke campaigners have been women so this industry has just simply done its homework!

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: JaneyCanuck ]

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: JaneyCanuck ]


From: Halifax, NS | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
morningstar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12378

posted 06 June 2006 09:54 PM      Profile for morningstar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i'm certain that women are being agressively targeted by all groups that know how concerned so many of us are about their nefarious activities. when i was working on banning the cosmetic use of pesticides, almost all the people who helped us were women [with a few idealistic young guys]. how manipulative of that bunch to use another woman[monsanto did the same]. interesting also that they present these sessions as education. most women i know are the ones who read the manual, compare the labeled contents, research the health issues and just make a point of finding out what they need to know from more than the globe and mail.
From: stratford, on | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 07 June 2006 03:39 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is really interesting. I haven't really been involved in groups like the ones mentioned above, so I didn't realize they were so heavily populated by women. Well, if that's the case, then I can see why corporations would try to target women specifically. I'm not sure, though, how they figure they're going to change the minds of strong feminist women who oppose nuclear arms by condescending to them in such a sexist manner. I think of someone like my mother, who doesn't wear "feminist!" on her sleeve, isn't much of a rebel outwardly, but who is very concerned about environmental issues such as this one, going to a stupid forum like the one described in the opening post, and she'd be utterly pissed off. It sure wouldn't convert her.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca