babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Nepal's push for democracy

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Nepal's push for democracy
kimi
rabble publisher
Babbler # 4299

posted 20 April 2006 12:37 AM      Profile for kimi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A friend in Kathmandu just sent me this great website for updates on the push for democracy in Nepal

It has new photos everyday on the protests all across the country.

As she wrote, "the sheer number of people is staggering. esp when you think that they have been protesting at this rate for 13 days.
many shops, banks etc are closed out of solidarity. most government departments have also joined the call for change.
they are planning the largest rally tomorrow"

Anyone here following the situation?


From: on the move | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged
Wilf Day
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3276

posted 20 April 2006 04:09 PM      Profile for Wilf Day     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
First demo I've ever seen organized by a Bar Association.
From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
rici
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2710

posted 20 April 2006 08:20 PM      Profile for rici     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Wilf Day:
First demo I've ever seen organized by a Bar Association.

Just for you, a new verse to the old ballad:

When the Bar Association finds the courage to defy,
Joins Justice v. Tyrant as amicus curiae,
In the people's litigation, takes up the battle cry:
The union makes us strong


From: Lima, Perú | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 20 April 2006 08:55 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting article on the background to the present upheaval, well worth reading in full, so I reproduce only tantalizing bits of it here:
quote:
February marked the tenth anniversary of the Maoists’ war in Nepal, a conflict that has claimed more than 13,000 lives, shattered a fragile rural infrastructure, halted development, and grown to dominate the consciousness of the country’s 26 million inhabitants who live precariously lodged between an armed and undisciplined militia and a repressive army that rarely pauses to distinguish between rebels and civilians.

On this tenth birthday, the rebels made a remarkable overture for peace, including a request for UN mediation and an offer to participate in multiparty democracy, which was immediately and decisively rejected by the U.S. whose influence in Nepal runs deep.
....
The relatively sparse media coverage that the conflict has received in the West isn’t terribly hard to understand—Nepal doesn’t have many of the attributes that render a country relevant to U.S. and European political, economic, and military interests. Mount Everest was conquered over 50 years ago and Buddhism is no longer trendy. It could be easy to forget about Nepal and its problems, and to a large extent, the world has.

To make sense of the U.S. “paranoia,” let’s head back just four years....

...in 2002, newly crowned King Gyanendra ended Nepal’s 12-year experiment with democracy by declaring a state of emergency, dismissing the cabinet and parliament, and declaring “temporary executive authority,” which continues today. ...

...“What would Thomas Jefferson say…226 years after ousting King George III, the American republic is in the business of propping up monarchies.”...

In February 2005, when the king declared another state of emergency imprisoned political leaders, suspended all parts of the constitution related to civil rights, and began total autocratic rule, the U.S. joined the UK, EU, and India in denouncing the move. Unlike the UK and India, however, the State Department did not suspend military aid....

...the outcome of the Communists coming into power is considered so objectionable that the State Department would prefer to see continued fighting or monarchical rule rather than strive for their professed preferred position, democracy, which might involve the risks of a communist electoral victory. Repression by the king, then, was acceptable, so long as it didn’t tip the political parties and the people into the hands of the Maoists. But it did....



From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 24 April 2006 02:03 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Bar Associations in South Asia have traditionally been very radical. Gandhi and many independence leaders were lawyers.

Another great site is the International Nepal Solidarity Network


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Wilf Day
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3276

posted 26 April 2006 10:20 AM      Profile for Wilf Day     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Seven Party Alliance takes power:
quote:
Girija Prasad Koirala, who was recommended unanimously by the seven party alliance (SPA) for the post of the Prime Minister of the reinstated House of Representatives (HoR) is likely to be appointed new Prime Minister Friday.

Seven political parties have 194 seats between them in the recently reinstated HoR that has a total of 205 members.


Under construction.


From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
island empire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8064

posted 26 April 2006 05:06 PM      Profile for island empire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
nice, and the maoist rebels have called off the blocade for a couple of days to see whether the parties will actually follow through and draft a new constitution. the interim pm said today that they will.

man, imagine a nepal in which the partiez made real changes backed by the guerrilla's military strength, followed by a disarmament by the guerrilla. that would be a nice result to the last 6 or so years of turmoil.

but man, that miliary has to pay - serious atrocities shouldn't be forgiven.


From: montréal, canada | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 28 April 2006 12:14 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Girija is so old and in such ill health, that it'll be interesting how he manages parliament. He didn't even show up to the first mass victory rally.

The first order of business however is the constituent assembly which has become the tool of choice of radical social change. Chavez has really pointed the way here as pointed out by Pratyush Chandra.


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cardy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2437

posted 29 April 2006 08:53 AM      Profile for Cardy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The decision for Nepal to adopt a constituent assembly has nothing to with Chavez; it was first floated in Nepal when the hereditary Prime Ministers, the Ranas, were overthrown with the help of India in the late forties.

That revolution resulted in the King, who'd been restricted to a ceremonial role during much of the previous 100 years, taking full power until the democracy movement of 1990. At that point the monarchy backed down and, relying on a reservoir of respect much deeper than exists today, was able to preserve substantial residual powers in the new constitution.

The Maoist rebels have been calling for a constitutent assembly since their revolt began 10 years ago, and were joined by the parties following King Gyanendra's seizure of power in 2005.

The parties hope to use the assembly to guarantee multi-party democracy, with some happy to preserve a ceremonial monarchy and some not. The Maoists are hoping to use the assembly to be rid of the monarchy and, ideally, introduce a communist republic.

Nepal has been saddled with the twin anachronisms of absolute monarchy and violent Maoism. At least one has been dealt with, hopefully the other soon will be through a peace process that will bring the rebels into the mainstream.


From: Kathmandu, Nepal | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 29 April 2006 02:09 PM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But how the constituent assembly can work in redrafting a modern constitution that includes social justice, has really be revitalized in the last few years, particularly in Latin America, and particularly with the Bolivarian Constitution of 1999. That is what Chandra is on about, despite the vast differences between the two experiences.

While in Nepal's case, there have abortive revolutions in the past -- the first era of limited democracy, leading to the restoration in 1959 (Girija was around then too), and the 1990 democracy movement), this time around if the king doesn't go, then it will be the same.


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Heavy Sharper
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11809

posted 30 April 2006 08:42 PM      Profile for Heavy Sharper        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd love for the Maoists to win just because I'd enjoy seeing the mass execution of the Royal Nepal Army.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Cardy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2437

posted 01 May 2006 03:01 PM      Profile for Cardy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Those drafting the terms of reference for the Constituent Assembly in Nepal are looking to South Africa, not Venezuala, for inspiration. Pratyush Chandra is misguided, to put it mildly.

And that last post - Heavy Sharper, you come on over and help out the Maoists as they blow up schools, health clinics, assasinate and beat democratic Communist Party workers. The do more of that than fighting the RNA. I guess teachers don't shoot back, so they make easier targets.

Nothing like a bit of revolutionary pretension when you're living a nice middle-class life in a developed country, eh?

The Nepali Army is filled with poor kids desperate for any sort of job, just as the Maoist army is filled with conscripted child soldiers from poor families. A peace process is what's needed, not more executions. There's been enough of those.

[ 01 May 2006: Message edited by: Cardy ]


From: Kathmandu, Nepal | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca