babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » US Denies Aristide Kidnapped

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: US Denies Aristide Kidnapped
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 01 March 2004 05:33 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
WASHINGTON - The White House and Pentagon (news - web sites) on Monday dismissed allegations that Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide was kidnapped by U.S. forces eager for him to resign and flee into exile

!!!!!!


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
terra1st
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4605

posted 01 March 2004 05:45 PM      Profile for terra1st     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
this is also on CBC.ca
From: saskatoon | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 01 March 2004 11:03 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, the problem here is that while it's perfectly possible he wasn't in fact kidnapped, none of the people denying it have the tiniest hint of credibility. Couldn't they get someone who hasn't already been caught out in repeated lies?
From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 01 March 2004 11:48 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heard someone being interviewed on CBC Radio's "As it Happens" tonight and they said it would probably be two or three years till an investigative journalist finds out what really happened.

I think he's probably right.

Regardless, the U.S. has pretty much orchestrated the whole mess in Haiti right back to the Clinton administration.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 02 March 2004 02:12 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here's an interesting bit of background:

Don't fall for Washington's spin on Haiti

[ 02 March 2004: Message edited by: Doug ]


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
drgoodword
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3214

posted 02 March 2004 02:52 AM      Profile for drgoodword   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Great Chossudovsky article on Haitil linked from rabble's home page.
From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 02 March 2004 02:54 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Financial Times????

Well that's a left-wing commie pinko propaganda rag if I ever saw one.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
scribblet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4706

posted 02 March 2004 10:25 AM      Profile for scribblet        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't believe you guys would fall for this, really. I can believe they talked him into resigning, but kidnapping...lets get real, the spotlight is too glaring right now for them (U.S.) to be so stupid.

By the way, Haiti received over 2 billion dollars in aid from Clinton, what happened to that money - who got it..Aristide?

quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:
[QBHaitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide was kidnapped by U.S. forces eager for him to resign and flee into exile[/URL]

!!!!!![/QB]



From: Canada | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 02 March 2004 10:27 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Confirmed by the AP

Aristide: 'U.S. Forced Me to Leave Haiti'

quote:
I can't believe you guys would fall for this, really.

I can't believe you would automatically assume people believe things because they post them, really. It should not be posted?

Even funnier is that you assumed my political position based on article, which is mostly, US adminstration people denying that a kidnapping took place. Bizarre!

Or perhaps you are suggesting that reporters should not report testimony of people involved, because (you say) there is an accounting problem? Amazing!

Really it brings the reliability (and bias) of your analysis into question. Your other assumption is that it is not true, of course. Perhaps they 'kidnapped' him because they think he stole all their money? What relevance is that to whether they kidnapped him or not?

[ 02 March 2004: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 02 March 2004 01:17 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
. I can believe they talked him into resigning, but kidnapping...lets get real, the spotlight is too glaring right now for them (U.S.) to be so stupid.

I don't know what happened. But I do know that the Venezuelan military kidnapped THEIR President last year, and before he could be interviewed, the US accepted the lie that he had resigned. They recognized the new government immediately.

Then it turned out that the military coup plotters had met with US foreign policy bigwigs three days before the coup.

So, it is quite possible that Aristide was kidnapped, as he says.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 02 March 2004 02:09 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by radiorahim:
The Financial Times????

Well that's a left-wing commie pinko propaganda rag if I ever saw one.


It's pinko, anyway.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
RookieActivist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4089

posted 02 March 2004 02:36 PM      Profile for RookieActivist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jeff house:

But I do know that the Venezuelan military kidnapped THEIR President last year, and before he could be interviewed, the US accepted the lie that he had resigned. They recognized the new government immediately.


A small quibble, the coup in Venezuela was in 2001, not last year.


From: me to you | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 02 March 2004 03:47 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you are going to Quibble. Make sure you use the Quibble HTML tags:

[Quibble] in point of fact [/Quibble]

like that.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 02 March 2004 06:08 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess time flies.
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 02 March 2004 08:43 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[Quibble]Cueball, your post was itself a quibble. So you yourself are egregiously guilty of ignoring your own admonishment, by failing to put the tags around the first line![/Quibble]
From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 02 March 2004 09:08 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
True but:

[Quibble] For clarities sake, I used a traditional format. For the unintiated. [/Quibble]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tolok
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4934

posted 02 March 2004 09:11 PM      Profile for Tolok        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Quibble/ Tag, you're it. /Quibble
From: Out of Ontario | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 02 March 2004 11:08 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[quibble]You botched the format, Tolok.[/quibble]
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tolok
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4934

posted 02 March 2004 11:11 PM      Profile for Tolok        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: Out of Ontario | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 03 March 2004 12:04 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No.

[quibble] [/quibble]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 03 March 2004 12:22 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[Quibble] The coup was in 2002, not 2001. [/Quibble]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3278

posted 03 March 2004 12:46 AM      Profile for Polunatic   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you want to see some really professional quibbling about Haiti,[quibble] read Scott MacLellan's Monday White House briefing.[/quibble]
quote:
Q - Okay, I have another question, somewhat linked. Many persons are saying that the United States government promotes democracy all around the world, but when it came to Haiti, we just walked away.
MR. McCLELLAN: No, actually, we came to a democratic and constitutional resolution of the situation in Haiti. And now we are working to move forward to help the Haitian people realize a better future and a more free future. It was the actions of Mr. Aristide, in large part, that led to the current political crisis in Haiti. I just talked about some of the actions by Mr. Aristide. He failed to adhere to the democratic principles and his obligations called for under the CARICOM plan.....
Sometimes people lose faith in their leaders. Sometimes people lose faith in the ability of their leaders to govern effectively. This is not the first time that this has happened. It certainly happened in our own country.

Then read PRESIDENT URGES HAITI'S WOULD-BE BOAT PEOPLE TO BEWARE THE TERRIFYING VOODOO CURSE THAT LAYS WASTE ALL WHO DARE TRESPASS NEAR PIVOTAL FLORIDA COUNTIES

[ 03 March 2004: Message edited by: Non-partisan partisan ]


From: middle of nowhere | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 03 March 2004 08:44 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This has affected me more than any of the cynicism I've seen over the last couple of years--more than Iraq in many ways.

The massive, blatant lies that both the administration and the mainstream press have been pumping out about Haiti as they apologize for their craven, blatant, bloodthirsty hijacking of a democratic country enrage me. Aristide was no doubt not a perfect saint--but he was a better leader than anyone we've had in Canada for a fair number of years, or than they've had in the US, was elected with a massive majority, and was doing better things for Haiti than anyone had in the last century, despite major constraints and downright sabotage led by the US. And they have the gall to say it's somehow democratic that he was forced out of the country by a bunch of CIA-supplied murderers!
The US administration are vicious, evil, Orwellian jackbooted thugs. They shouldn't just be sacked--they should be jailed, in one of their own private prisons, for multiple consecutive life terms. Bastards!!!


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 03 March 2004 09:18 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is a surprising admission:

quote:
Sometimes people lose faith in their leaders. Sometimes people lose faith in the ability of their leaders to govern effectively. This is not the first time that this has happened. It certainly happened in our own country.

From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 03 March 2004 09:38 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good point Scott. So do you think he is saying that a coup would be legitimate in the US? OR a rebel invasion?
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3278

posted 03 March 2004 09:45 PM      Profile for Polunatic   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought they were referring to Nixon.
From: middle of nowhere | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 03 March 2004 11:31 PM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought he meant Clinton.
From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 03 March 2004 11:37 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm going to say that he meant Dubya
From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 04 March 2004 12:46 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well it has the stink of a CIA operation.

It'll take some time but sooner or later the truth will come out.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 04 March 2004 04:46 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
radiorahim, I don't think it's just "the stink of". While it may be some time before it becomes widely known through the mainstream media, the evidence seems clear and well documented.

http://www.counterpunch.org/williams03012004.html

quote:
Also forgotten is the fact that members of the armed groups burning their way through Haiti's cities today include groups that, (according to myriad sources including sworn testimony before Congress by U.S. officials, reporters, and reports of Haitian recipients of covert aid,) were funneling drugs to the U.S. while in the pay of U.S. intelligence agents.

quote:
According to Tom Reeves, the admittedly poorly-attended elections were not the stuff of grand vote larceny. "All sides," he wrote in a very fine article last fall in Dollars and Sense, "concede that Aristide won the presidential ballot with 92 percent of the voteThe sole disagreement is over run-off elections for seven senators from Aristide's part who obtained pluralities but not majorities in the first round. The seven senators eventually resigned, making way for new elections." Nonetheless, these electoral "abuses" were grounds for the Bush administration and pliant international partners in Europe to suspend hundreds of millions of dollars in credit lines and aid to Haiti.

quote:
the fifteen-party anti-Aristide coalition known as "Convergence" includes "every faction of the Haitian dominant class, factions who are generally at war with one another." Despite anemic support from the voting public (never approaching even 20 percent in opinion polls conducted even by the U.S.) what apparently they were able to converge on was three million dollars a year in funding in from the International Republican Institute, a Republican-party backed arm of the National Endowment for Democracy.

Anyone heard of the NED before in any other connection? Backing coupsters in Venezuela, for instance? It's a known funnel for funds to destabilize governments the US doesn't like.

Add in that major officials in the Bush administration with responsibility for the region have been afte Aristide's ass, fairly publicly, for years.

Add in that the "rebels" crossed from the Dominican republic armed with many, many M-16s, rifle grenades, and anti-tank weapons coincidentally shortly after an American delivery of such weapons to the armed forces of the Dominican Republic.

There's more than "stink" here. The gun is smoking pretty hard--it just isn't being reported much.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
terra1st
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4605

posted 04 March 2004 05:05 PM      Profile for terra1st     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Countries push for inquiry into Aristide's claim
Last Updated Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:43:47
KINGSTON, JAMAICA - South Africa joined 14 Caribbean nations Wednesday in calling for an independent international inquiry into Jean-Bertrand Aristide's claim that the United States forced him out of office.


Exiled Haitian leader Jean-Bertrand Aristide. (AP file photo)

"The suggestion that President Aristide may have been forced out of office, if true, will have serious consequences and ramifications for the respect of the rule of law and democracy the world over," said Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, South African foreign minister, in a statement.

Dlamini-Zuma called for a United Nations' investigation to "clarify" the circumstances leading to the departure of Aristide.

"The international community must not be seen to be wavering in its commitment to democracy and the respect for the rule of law, particularly in the face of anti-democratic forces," she said.


More at CBC.ca


From: saskatoon | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 04 March 2004 05:17 PM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It would be nice to think that this might not just disappear. After all, the global community has a hate-on for the Bush administration like no other before, so it's natural that they will engender more scrutiny than usual and that people will much more easily believe bad things of them.

This would also place Martin in the hot seat as he struggles to explain how he had no knowledge that he was supporting a military coup.


From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 05 March 2004 03:19 AM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's hope so. Let the fucker squirm.

Does anyone else find it utterly humiliating that tiny little countries like Jamaica and Barbados are courageous enough to raise a stink over US actions, while Canada meekly tags along at Dubya's heels? Sickening.

BTW, Aristide still plans to return to Haiti:

quote:
In a phone conversation with a French writer Mr Aristide said he had not officially resigned and still planned to return home. ...

In the telephone conversation with Haiti specialist Claude Ribbe, Mr Aristide said that he had signed a document to "avoid a bloodbath" but that there was no formal resignation.

The ousted president was speaking from the Central African Republic, from where it has been rumoured he will travel on to South Africa.

But he said any new destination would only be a step on a journey back to Haiti.

"I'm not the kind of person to stay in exile... If I have to make a stopover in South Africa, I will - before going back home."


BBC

From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 05 March 2004 03:23 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Anyone heard of the NED before in any other connection? Backing coupsters in Venezuela, for instance? It's a known funnel for funds to destabilize governments the US doesn't like.

Yes the so-called "National Endowment for Democracy" has a very long and sordid history of subverting governments that the U.S. doesn't like.

As soon as you know "NED" is involved, you know its a CIA operation! NED played a role in subverting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua in the 1980's amongst other things.

By the way this story on union-busting by the new thugs in charge in Haiti just came out:

Labour Start- Haiti: Immediate action needed to support new union under attack

The company is apparently a contractor for Levi Strauss and Bush's thugs recently beat the crap out of union members at the factory.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
BugBear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3379

posted 06 March 2004 11:48 AM      Profile for BugBear   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Reports emerged that the private U.S. security firm guarding President Aristide was prevented by the White House from sending reinforcements to Haiti last week to bolster his security. We speak with the CEO of the firm Kenneth Kurtz.

AMY GOODMAN: Yesterday we managed to reach the CEO of the Steele Foundation, Ken Kurtz, on the telephone at his corporate headquarters in San Francisco.
KENNETH KURTZ: The Republic of Haiti contracted with the Steele Foundation to provide protective services and training to the office of the president in the Republic of Haiti in 1998, and we have successfully carried out that contract since then.
AMY GOODMAN: President Aristide is saying that he was kidnapped. Can you comment on that?
KENNETH KURTZ: I haven't heard President Aristide say that he was kidnapped. I can tell you that the mission of our company is to protect the head of state from assassination, kidnapping, and embarrassment, and that's what we did.
AMY GOODMAN: He says he told a Congressmember - and he was just on CNN - and he said he was kidnapped.
KENNETH KURTZ: Again, I haven't heard President Aristide say that, so I cannot comment.
AMY GOODMAN: Have some Steele Foundation security gone with him to the Central African Republic?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on that.
AMY GOODMAN: And were Steele Foundation personnel there on Saturday night?
KENNETH KURTZ: We were with the president when he left the country.
AMY GOODMAN: Did you ask the US Government in Haiti whether you could count on more protection if rebels attacked the president?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on that.
AMY GOODMAN: Were you concerned in these last days that you didn't have enough personnel there, given the environment?
KENNETH KURTZ: Oh, I think for weeks the government was deeply concerned about protecting themselves against a rebel force that was very well armed. I think that over the last few weeks, you saw that President Aristide asked for international assistance to be able to protect his government, a democratically elected government against an invading rebel force essentially.
AMY GOODMAN: How well armed is that rebel force?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot go into specifics. They were well armed.
AMY GOODMAN: Is the Steele Foundation still in Haiti protecting other personnel of the government of Haiti?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot confirm that.
AMY GOODMAN: Does the Steele Foundation work hand-in-hand with the US military in a case like this, with US soldiers coming in?
KENNETH KURTZ: No, not at all. In this case we work for the government of Haiti. We took direction directly - and only from - the president.
AMY GOODMAN: Was the president concerned that the military - or that his security forces - would be leaving? Did the Steele Foundation ever tell the president that you would be leaving him, if he did not leave?
KENNETH KURTZ: No, no, of course not. We’ve been in Haiti since 1998, and we’ve been through one attempted coup d’etat - in December 17th a couple of years ago. We’ve been through some very, very serious situations. The people that worked in Haiti, protecting the president, were 100% dedicated to President Aristide and insuring that we fulfilled our mission and our focus, which was to insure his safety as well as the safety of his family.
AMY GOODMAN: Are many of the forces that you work with, or the personnel that the Steele Foundation works with, are they veterans of US Special Forces?
KENNETH KURTZ: Our personnel are all trained in their respective skills. The Steele Foundation is a multinational corporation. Our team in Haiti, I can confirm, is an international team.
AMY GOODMAN: The attempted coup was carried out by whom? In December 17th.
KENNETH KURTZ: I think there were a number of people. Guy Philippe was certainly involved in that. I think, that historically, if you look at the individuals that are involved in this "rebel force," they are all historical individuals in Haiti, who had a very active role in some extreme violence in the country.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you think President Aristide had reason to be concerned?
KENNETH KURTZ: I can’t speak on behalf of President Aristide.
AMY GOODMAN: Were your men concerned?
KENNETH KURTZ: We were concerned about the overall security situation in the country. As protecting the president, we consistently made sure that we had proper resources in place.
AMY GOODMAN: Did the US Government ever tell the Steele Foundation to leave?
KENNETH KURTZ: No.
AMY GOODMAN: What did they tell you?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on that.
AMY GOODMAN: Did they ever say they wouldn't help you in these last days, when it got more and more precarious, more and more dangerous?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on that.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you feel that you had the support of the US Government there in protecting President Aristide?
KENNETH KURTZ: It was our job to protect President Aristide, not the job of the United States Government.
AMY GOODMAN: I’m looking at a piece in the Miami Herald, that says, "The Bush Administration blocked a last minute attempt by President Aristide to bolster his bodyguards - mostly former US Special Forces members - fearing he wanted them to organize and lead a counterattack against the rebels... US Officials also forced a small group of extra bodyguards from the Steele Foundation to delay their flight from the United States to Haiti from Sunday to a later day - too late to help Aristide, said the sources, who are close to Aristide." Is that true?
KENNETH KURTZ: No. No. It's not.
AMY GOODMAN: Did those reinforcements come?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you feel President Aristide's life was in danger when he left?
KENNETH KURTZ: I think that the security situation in the country was very serious, and I think that if international assistance would have arrived, it would have certainly stabilized the situation.
AMY GOODMAN: Did you call for it as well?
KENNETH KURTZ: It wasn't our place to call for that. Our only mission was to provide protection to the office of the president.
AMY GOODMAN: And you felt that if forces had come in, it would have shored him up? It would have protected him?
KENNETH KURTZ: I think it would have stabilized the security situation in the country.
AMY GOODMAN: Did any of your men get delayed in coming down and adding to the contingent around the president?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on that.
AMY GOODMAN: Steele Foundation was the company that was there to protect the president. In the end, the president clearly felt he had gotten the message, he said, from US Forces, that he would no longer be protected. Why do you think he felt that way?
KENNETH KURTZ: I cannot comment on why President Aristide, or what President Aristide said. I guess anybody watching the news can see that the security situation in the country was dire.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you think that the US Military could have made a difference at the end?
KENNETH KURTZ: Well, I would probably turn that question around you to, and ask, "Looking at the US military, coming in the day after he left, and that, in itself, insuring some stability, do you think that, if they would have come in a day before, it would have created stability?"
AMY GOODMAN: And that is Kenneth Kurtz, CEO of the Steele Foundation. You can hear the whole interview on our website at democracynow.org. Steele Foundation works in security around the world, including in Iraq. I asked Mr. Kurtz if the Steele Foundation is providing security for Paul Bremer. He said he would not comment. That does it for today's program. Again, our website has comprehensive coverage of the situation in Haiti - democracynow.org.


From: 2nd London Tractor Factory | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 06 March 2004 03:49 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Aristide is to the alternative as Castro was to Batista: Better, but still not that great at all.
From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 06 March 2004 04:24 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a knee jerk reaction. When I see rich people demonstrating for or against someone, i tend to oppose them. When I see thousands of the poor demonstarting I tend to side with them. I see thousands of people from the slums demonstrating for Aristides return. That says a lot to me.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 06 March 2004 04:51 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They know that the thugs currently in power in Washington have no problem returning to the Duvalier era if they feel it's in the best interests of American big business.
From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 06 March 2004 05:22 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is possible. But I am not going to try and discern what motivates them. I am sure they have many reasons, and are even split along political lines, but they do prefer him, as you say.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 06 March 2004 08:50 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, I think they just did return to the Duvalier era. That's been the whole point of this exercise.
Meanwhile, people, try to remember that corruption isn't something you turn on and off like a switch. You come into power after the Duvaliers and there's corruption in your regime and the cops are poor quality . . . no duh. What was Aristide supposed to have done, waved a magic wand? I know, gone and personally arrested every corrupt police officer--I'm sure that would have worked.
It's easy to slag Aristide from here, but he seems to have done better than anyone before him, despite having very little to work with, aid and credit embargos, food dumping breaking the farmers, and concerted resistance from the upper classes. Despite that he seems to have managed to improve health care and education.

Who knows how well he might have done if the US had left him the fuck alone instead of crippling his regime?


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 06 March 2004 09:52 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes classic U.S. bully strategy.

Sabotage the economy of your opponent and then claim your opponent is incompetent, undemocratic, corrupt, has ties to drug smugglers etc.

Just look at Panama, which was invaded by Bush I.
There are more drugs moving through Panama now than there ever were under "drug running dictator Manuel Noriega".


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 07 March 2004 02:39 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Aristide muzzled -- Jamaica Observer

quote:
"All agents of the private press and the foreign press must go to the foreign ministry over any matter related to the stay of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, for better coordination and orientation," said a broadcast government statement.

From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 07 March 2004 03:34 PM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Re: the Central African Republic:

quote:
Observers have said that Bangui came under pressure from foreign powers to take in Aristide, probably in exchange for aid and international recognition of a post-coup government.

The state coffers have been emptied by years of high-level corruption and political instability, and the current government came to power after the coup on March 15 last year in which elected leader Ange-Felix Patasse was ousted.


So lemme get this straight: the US & France engineer the overthrow of an elected government by armed thugs, then arrange to have him exiled to... ANOTHER country in which an elected government was recently overthrown by armed thugs.

Oh. How nice.

Hallelujah! Democracy marches on!!!

[ 07 March 2004: Message edited by: beluga2 ]


From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 07 March 2004 03:50 PM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey, I think I'm beginning to see a pattern....

Naaahh, that's just tin-foil hat talk.

The US is a champion of democracy and human rights across the globe.
The US is a champion of democracy and human rights across the globe.
The US is a champion of democracy and human rights across the globe.

That's better.


From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
anthony
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4873

posted 10 March 2004 01:42 PM      Profile for anthony     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
According to the Montreal Gazette [March 8] and Kevin Pina [in Haiti, whom I spoke to], as many as one million people took to the streets Sunday to oppose the illegal occupation of their country by Canada, France, and the US.

Contrast these numbers with the "thousands" who are reported by the AP and Reuters to have demonstrated against Aristide that same day. In corp-news the real numbers do not find their way onto the pages. This has been consistent for years.

Scott McClellan is lying when he says Aristide did not fulfill the CARICOM proposal. Check out what the CARICOM has to say about this. They are calling for an investigation into Aristide's overthrow and will not recognize the illegitimate government that is being formed.

In 2002, CARICOM pleaded with Colin Powell to release the desperately needed funds that were being withheld. He rejected these pleas given his and the DOS agenda.
http://www.caricom.org/pressreleases/pres28_02.htm

Also worth noting is that in 1994 "From September 17 to 19, a team consisting of [then-retired] Gen. Colin Powell, Sen. Sam Nunn, and Jimmy Carter persuaded the junta to leave Haiti voluntarily and let the Multinational Forceland unopposed." From Chetan Kumar's "Building Peace in Haiti", p. 26, 1998.

This was not so much about Aristide in any case as it was about trashing Haiti's right to self-determination.

Note: Emergency Debate on Haiti in House of Commons Wednesday. Contact Svend Robinson, who will be leading the questions for the NDP, possibly the only genuinely critical voice to be heard. Canadians have a right to a full inquiry into our involvement, violation of international laws, etc.

[ 10 March 2004: Message edited by: anthony ]


From: Vancouver/Edmonton | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
anthony
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4873

posted 10 March 2004 01:45 PM      Profile for anthony     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

[ 10 March 2004: Message edited by: anthony ]


From: Vancouver/Edmonton | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 12 March 2004 01:23 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
One of the things I really like about how this is being handled by the western press is the constant reference to the 'council of sages,' or 'wise men.' Its a really interesting piece of semantic newsqueak, which conotes all the colonialist prejudices about 'uncivilized' Haiti. When of course in this country no one would dare have described the minsters meetings around Meach Lake as a council of the 'wise,' or 'sages.'

This description immedialty belittles, even our Haitian allies, by using terminology associated with our prejudices about 'primitive' black society. Why not a council of elder statesmen?

[ 12 March 2004: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 12 March 2004 01:24 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
PS: Anthony, do y ou have a link to the Gazeete article? Anyone seen any photographs?
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Richard MacKinnon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2150

posted 16 March 2004 08:35 AM      Profile for Richard MacKinnon   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Haiti and the US are suspending relations with Jamaica because it's allowed Aristide to visit. Is Canada next to do this? Martin and Pratt were awful quick to follow the Americans in support of this coup. I wish Martin would stop putting big target signs on our train stations.
From: Home of the Red Hill Concrete Expressway | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 16 March 2004 01:08 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The only thing I saw is that Haiti suspended diplomatic relations with Jamaica. Nothing about the U.S.
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
thebabblerformerlyknownas'larry'
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5043

posted 16 March 2004 05:25 PM      Profile for thebabblerformerlyknownas'larry'     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
^^Jamaica and Caricom.

It seems the U.S. translation of Aristide's 'resignation' letter dosesn't quite match the AP's
the U.S. and AP version both say

quote:
The Constitution cannot be drowned in the blood of the Haitian people.


but in the next line the AP version has the word 'if'
quote:
For that reason, if tonight it is my resignation that will avoid a bloodbath, I accept to leave with the hope that there will be life and not death.


as opposed to the U.S. version:
quote:
For that reason, tonight I am resigning in order to avoid a bloodbath.


Edited to move the -Haiti police round up Aristide associates article to the Haiti Aftermath thread

[ 17 March 2004: Message edited by: thebabblerformerlyknownas'larry' ]


From: Kitchener, Ontario | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 17 March 2004 01:10 AM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The US hasn't cut off relations with Jamaica, though they have grunted some pretty thinly-veiled threats.

They've also said that Aristide shouldn't be allowed to return to the Western Hemisphere:

quote:
Meanwhile, senior officials of the Bush administration have expressed their opposition to Aristide being in the Western Hemisphere. James Foley, the US Ambassador to Haiti, said Jamaica was taking on a “risk and a responsibility” in welcoming Aristide. He said "His coming within 150 miles from Haiti is promoting violence.”

National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press "We think it's a bad idea. We believe that President Aristide, in a sense, forfeited his ability to lead his people, because he did not govern democratically."

On Sunday, before Aristide began his return back to the Caribbean, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on CNN "The hope is that he will not come back into the hemisphere and complicate [the] situation."


Who the fuck do these people think they are?


From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 17 March 2004 02:53 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada joins in the criticism:


"Canada has expressed concern over the presence of ousted Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide in Jamaica, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said Wednesday.

"I've spoken to the foreign minister of Jamaica; obviously we are concerned," Graham said when asked about Aristide's visit to Jamaica. Aristide stepped down as president of Haiti less than three weeks ago as a violent uprising swept across the Caribbean country.

Flown to exile in Central African Republic on a U.S. plane, Aristide later claimed that he was abducted and forced from office. His supporters have called for his return.

His current stay in nearby Jamaica, supposedly to reunite with his daughters, has prompted worries in Port-au-Prince, Washington and Ottawa that his presence in the Caribbean could provoke more violence among his supporters.

"Our belief is we need stability and change in Haiti," Graham said.

"We need a new climate of political co-operation, and therefore we certainly would urge the government of Jamaica . . . we certainly would urge Mr. Aristide - who did resign - to remain outside the Haitian political situation so we can get a new stability and a fresh start.""

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2004/03/17/385672-cp.html

I can understand why Bush wanted Aristide out, if for no other reason than he didn't want Haitian refugees flooding Florida, but why are Canada and France so dead-set against him, and the democratic process?


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 18 March 2004 11:02 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Questions focus on the role of the Dominican Republic, a Republican version of the old Cominterm, and an Assistant Secretary of State:


"Sen. Christopher Dodd says he wants to know whether U.S. taxpayers paid to train Haitians who plotted to overthrow President Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

Dodd (D-Conn.) also wants to know if the United States supplied arms used by anti-Aristide rebels.

Dodd's focus is on the Dominican Republic, where over the past two years a group called the International Republican Institute trained hundreds of Aristide opponents, giving them classes in political organizing and similar skills."

"The question is: Was the Dominican Republic being used as a staging ground for weapons transfers and coup plotting?" said an aide to Dodd.

At a hearing last week of a Senate subcommittee on Western Hemisphere affairs, Dodd asked Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega about the M-16s, citing several Defense Department letters written in 2002 and last year. Noriega said that, as far as he knew, the guns had not been delivered to the Dominican Republic, though Dodd's aide said the letters appear to show a completed transfer.

From the moment Aristide went into exile two weeks ago - prodded by U.S. diplomats - Bush administration critics have cast a suspicious eye at Noriega, saying he had been trying for years to get Aristide out of power. Noriega has been part of a group of archconservative policymakers that considered Aristide too left-leaning."

http://tinyurl.com/23lj9


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
anthony
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4873

posted 18 March 2004 03:11 PM      Profile for anthony     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's some excellent new analysis, if you all haven't seen it yet, and a fairly extensive archive at: http://www.zmag.org/lam/haitiwatch.htm.

Cueball, I have the URL to the Gazette story somewhere, just haven't had time to dig it up yet. The falsification of the number of demonstrators by corp and Haitian -elite-owned - media has been consistent for years, probably decades if not longer, depending of course on the context. In any case, when I find it I'll forward it.

I should also be able to provide some photos in the next couple of weeks. I'll keep you posted here, or just check out Zmag or The Dominion weblog.


From: Vancouver/Edmonton | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 18 March 2004 11:16 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by josh:
Questions focus on the role of the Dominican Republic, a Republican version of the old Cominterm, and an Assistant Secretary of State:


"Sen. Christopher Dodd says he wants to know whether U.S. taxpayers paid to train Haitians who plotted to overthrow President Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

Dodd (D-Conn.) also wants to know if the United States supplied arms used by anti-Aristide rebels.

Dodd's focus is on the Dominican Republic, where over the past two years a group called the International Republican Institute trained hundreds of Aristide opponents, giving them classes in political organizing and similar skills."

"The question is: Was the Dominican Republic being used as a staging ground for weapons transfers and coup plotting?" said an aide to Dodd.

At a hearing last week of a Senate subcommittee on Western Hemisphere affairs, Dodd asked Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega about the M-16s, citing several Defense Department letters written in 2002 and last year. Noriega said that, as far as he knew, the guns had not been delivered to the Dominican Republic, though Dodd's aide said the letters appear to show a completed transfer.

From the moment Aristide went into exile two weeks ago - prodded by U.S. diplomats - Bush administration critics have cast a suspicious eye at Noriega, saying he had been trying for years to get Aristide out of power. Noriega has been part of a group of archconservative policymakers that considered Aristide too left-leaning."

http://tinyurl.com/23lj9


Meanwhile, Hoe Lieber"man" (sic) is on his knees, asking the GOP which way he should be bending over next.


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 19 March 2004 04:25 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Bush junta is pissed at Jamaica:


"Jamaica's decision to welcome former Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide has infuriated Bush administration officials, who say U.S. relations with English-speaking Caribbean countries have reached a new low.

Senior U.S. officials refuse to speculate whether Washington will retaliate against Jamaica, which currently presides over the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) regional bloc.

But other U.S. officials say that if Aristide's return from Africa to the Caribbean triggers new bloodshed in Haiti and U.S. troops get in harm's way, there would be congressional calls for a strong U.S. reaction against Jamaica.

Asked whether the United States will take any concrete measures against Jamaica, U.S. officials say the Bush Administration will not cut aid to fight AIDS in the region or reduce other kinds of humanitarian assistance. But they hint that other nonhumanitarian bilateral programs could be slowed down."

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/nation/8222803.htm


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014

posted 19 March 2004 05:05 PM      Profile for Hinterland        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, this should be good. Jamaicans respond really well to threats....Or, in this case the Bush-regime patented "non-threat". We're familiar with it here. On marijuana decrimilisation: "...we are concerned, but it's not like we're considering trade sanctions, or anything...".
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca