babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » The rape of Darfur

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The rape of Darfur
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 18 January 2006 09:45 AM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Suggestions by a British MEP (Glenys Kinnock) about what to do to help the women and children of Darfur.

I don't like the emphasis on 'we', but at least it's...something.

quote:
The United Nations has repeatedly refused to send peacekeepers to Darfur. However, there are other steps we can take to protect the women there.

We could send groups of policewomen from African nations to accompany the firewood-gathering trips.

Civilian police would not represent the same challenge to the national sovereignty of Sudan that soldiers would.

By training, supporting and enabling female police officers from African countries we could build the capacity of their forces, thus achieving two worthwhile aims at once.

We could help provide fuel-efficient stoves so less firewood is needed.

We could vastly increase the currently tiny number of African Union monitors in Darfur, giving them enough personnel to deter the militia from attacking women.

We could provide rape counselling and a chance to break the taboo of silence.

We could increase medical treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, as recommended by Médecins Sans Frontièrs.


Fromthe Guardian


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 18 January 2006 10:51 AM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If the UN sends in troops you will end up with a similar situation that Canada has been criticized for in Afghanistan.

The UN will have to pick a side in the civil war to form the next government. The UN will not be sending in peace keepers. The will have to send in peace makers. I don't know of any other situations where this has worked.


From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 18 January 2006 11:04 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There are important structural differences between what is happening in Darfur and anything happening in the ME or Central Asia.

The Western powers, especially the U.S., have only an indirect interest in what happens in Sudan. They are more or less willing to let the African Union cope on their own, and the AU is not coping well, for political reasons the West only distantly cares about.

Peacemaking in Sudan really could be peacemaking. That cannot be the case in Afghanistan.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 18 January 2006 09:05 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Skdadl

I am not sure what you meant by this statement “Peacemaking in Sudan really could be peacemaking.”

Can you please clarify what you meant?


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 19 January 2006 07:39 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Africa Union Problems in the Sudan

"African leaders have barely disguised their impatience and disappointment at Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir’s bad faith and intransigence in dealing with the insurrection in his country’s western region of Darfur."

"The government’s best offer is for the appointment of a special adviser on Darfur to al-Bashir.

Khalil Ibrahim Mohamed, president of the rebel group, Justice and Equality Movement, is concerned that allowing Sudan to host the AU summit and handing al-Bashir the presidency will affect the impartiality of the 7 700 AU peacekeepers in Darfur.

In October, the AU forces suffered their first casualties with the death of three Nigerian soldiers. Four Sene-galese troops were wounded in November.

Last Friday, a Senegalese peacekeeper was killed in an ambush. The AU has condemned these attacks and the Khartoum government is blaming Chad, whom it accuses of backing the rebels."


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca