babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » 25 years since the Ad Hoc Committee won the Equal Rights Amendment

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: 25 years since the Ad Hoc Committee won the Equal Rights Amendment
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 17 November 2005 12:08 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From Penney Kome:

In 1981, Canadian women fought for and won an Equal Rights Amendment in the brand new Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [Section 28 provides that, Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons.]

Although there were discussions among women's groups for a year beforehand, and lobbying and presentations, the campaign really kicked off on February 14, 1981, when about 1300 women gathered in the West Block of the House of Commons for a volunteer-run conference on Women and the Constitution.

To celebrate this achievement, and to link up with women in other countries (Rwanda, Afghanistan, South Africa) who are exploring how to implement equality guarantees in their own new-ish constitutions, a coalition of women's groups is organizing another conference, to be held February 14 and 15, on Parliament Hill.

This group is seeking women who participated in that original conference, as well as reaching out to those who might want to be involved with the next one. We are requesting help with reviewing a document from 1983, with an eye to updating it for the conference.

The document is online at:
http://adhoc25.org/updateintro.html

For more information, please visit http://adhoc25.org.

Or send an email to [email protected] .

Or read more about the original conference at:
coolwomen.ca

[ 17 November 2005: Message edited by: writer ]


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 17 November 2005 12:40 PM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In 1981, Canadian women fought for and won an Equal Rights Amendment in the brand new Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [Section 28 provides that, Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons.]


Wasn't Section 28 part of the Constitution from the beginning? If so, I don't think it's really proper to call it an "amendment".

Just a minor quibble.


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 17 November 2005 12:46 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nope, it wasn't, which is the point. From the coolwomen article:

quote:
Women's groups forced the government to adopt that section with a year-long lobby that kicked off with a huge, almost spontaneous, conference on February 14, 1981.

The Women's Constitution Conference was the first public conference ever held in Parliament buildings. Originally, the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women ("CACSW", then a federal arm's-length agency, since abolished by the federal government) organized the event and issued invitations to women across Canada.

The CACSW had researched the issues involved in the proposed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Prime Minister Trudeau's new constitution (released in September 1980) ...



From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 17 November 2005 01:06 PM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Nope, it wasn't, which is the point. From the coolwomen article:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Women's groups forced the government to adopt that section with a year-long lobby that kicked off with a huge, almost spontaneous, conference on February 14, 1981.
The Women's Constitution Conference was the first public conference ever held in Parliament buildings. Originally, the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women ("CACSW", then a federal arm's-length agency, since abolished by the federal government) organized the event and issued invitations to women across Canada.

The CACSW had researched the issues involved in the proposed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Prime Minister Trudeau's new constitution (released in September 1980) ...


But when the constitution BECAME LAW in 1982, Section 28 was part of it. Basically, the minute we had the constitution, we had Section 28. So, Section 28 can't properly be comsidered an amendment.


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 17 November 2005 01:37 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pedant alert
From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 17 November 2005 01:57 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
On March 18, 1981, four members of the Ad Hoc legal team went into a meeting with two Justice Department officials. Out of that meeting came a new clause spelling out equality between "male and female persons" - not part of Clause One, as the conference insisted, but a new Clause 28. Placed towards the end of the Charter, with clauses intended to guide the courts in interpreting Charter rights, it was the first "Notwithstanding" clause in the new constitution. This meant that it was to apply to every clause of the Charter, in spite of what the clause might say or appear to say.

On April 23, the three parties in Parliament adopted some amendments to the constitution, including Clause 28, and declared the package complete.



From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 17 November 2005 11:59 PM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
On April 23, the three parties in Parliament adopted some amendments to the constitution, including Clause 28, and declared the package complete.


Sorry about the delay in responding. I've spent the last little while wiping egg off my face.


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca