Author
|
Topic: Feminism is coming to theaters. Will you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Train
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10748
|
posted 24 October 2005 12:02 AM
quote: Originally posted by kurichina: I just read a review of North Country that labelled it as "Oprah feminism" but was fairly positive nonetheless.
Judging by the trailer, I'm guessing this is accurate. quote: I thought Theron was excellent in Monster.
Me too.
From: Vancouver | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 24 October 2005 10:14 AM
quote: I'm not crazy about Charlize Theron, especially when there's this gimmick on to take her ultra-glamourous face and dirty it up to make it look 'ugly' or 'ordinary'.
I didn't see the movie, but I was amused when one critic asked "are we out of ugly people now??" Good point. Somewhere there's a "plain" actor who probably would have killed for the role, but hey, with a tonne of latex and a few hours in the chair every day, it's possible to take a beautiful person and ugly them, I guess.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474
|
posted 24 October 2005 01:40 PM
Saw "North Country", found it was about the message more than the characters, so for me it's instantly forgettable. No doubt, some good scenes and performances, just not a great whole. Part of its message, at least according to just about every critic I've read is: "The lead actress successfully supressed her beauty. Isn't that amazing?!" Aren't most critics just so boring? Pauline Kael, how I miss you. I think it must be frustrating in the extreme for Theron to constantly receive accolades for successfully supressing her beauty. The beautiful and the ugly share the same curse: their superficial visual aspects are so distracting they're hard to see beyond--beauty especially in N. American culture (is ugly noticed here any more or less than elsewhere?). I think Theron's career is interesting to watch--it's its own little drama. For example, I'm curious why she's in "Aeonflux", a truly moronic movie where she looks like a 14 year-old boy's fantasy a la Catwoman, but maybe it's a contract thing. Other things interesting to me: we do not hear (at least as much) statements like "Jude Law managed to supress his beauty and really made us believe him in this role." And although beautiful and talented actresses (that phrase!) in other countries, like Deneuve, Binoche, and my fave, Irene Jacob (I like French actresses so my sample's skewed), are admired for their looks, I don't think there's the same hoopla about them supressing their beauty when they pull off great performances. Edited to add: the trailer for "Prize Winner" is so nauseatingly treacly! But it's hard to trust trailers. I can't see Julianne Moore in treacle, but who knows. [ 24 October 2005: Message edited by: bittersweet ]
From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 26 October 2005 08:13 AM
quote: Originally posted by audra trower williams: A movie critic friend of mine said that he thought they maybe cast Theron in the role, because if it was more of a "plain" actor, everyone would have been just like "Oh as IF anyone would sexually harass HER."Gah.
I'm betting your movie critic friend is probably right. That is, that the producers of the movie would think that way, and that a lot of people in the audience would as well. By the way, I'm trying to figure out how this is "ugly": [ 26 October 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136
|
posted 26 October 2005 09:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle:
By the way, I'm trying to figure out how this is "ugly": [ 26 October 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]
I'll give it a try: 1.no makeup 2.no big hair - actually no hair at all!!(she looks sovietesque) 3.picture is cut off above the boobs, thus..well, you know.
From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
MasterDebator
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8643
|
posted 15 November 2005 02:35 AM
My husband and I saw North Country this weekend, and we were favourably impressed by an American film that dared to show working class people, even workinc class women, asserting themselves.The circumstances of the characters, humble homes, some frankly shabby, older model cars and trucks, a social life revolving around taverns and hockey rinks looked awfully like a very large stretch of Canada, from Newfoundland to Northern BC. The pincipal character played by Theron faces not only sex discrimination and harassment but an equal oppression based on class, a point highlighted by the fact that the company is represented by a woman lawyer. It's a puzzle to me, maybe someone else has answers, but over the past thirty or so years women have made a lot of progress entering such professions as law, medicine, and dentistry. Yet into such trades as electricity, plumbing, mechanics, and carpentry they have made barely a dent. So for working class women, it's still clerical or service work, or possibly teaching and nursing. Oh, and the police force. Overall I thought it was a good movie, and most of all I enjoyed the gritty realism. [ 15 November 2005: Message edited by: MasterDebator ]
From: Goose Country Road, Prince George, BC | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|