Their idea is to have as many immigrants flooding in as possible. Why ?

1) In order to provide DIRT cheap labor for corporations & business.

2) Also, since extreme immigration levels cause lack of cohesive integration, you have good fodder for the prison industry. Check out the percentage of US inmates that are Latino, for example.

3) Extreme immigration levels can also cause social unrest. Look at the well documented BC Sikh militant gatherings in BC before the airliner was brought down, CBC showed the footage of the violent attack mob. Look at the Mexican protesters in the US. Again, too many immigrants, inadequate immigration control, and woefully inadequate integration.

4) This facilitates the ultimate police state agenda because it causes social chaos, and a request from the citizens for more control, surveillance, security, persecutions, and incarcerations.

5) It also provides alot of willing soldiers for the American (and now Canadian) war machine : many Latinos and other immigrants saw and see military duty as a way to avoid poverty, isolation and deportation.

Now you can defend the Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative immigration policies if you like. They were brought to you by the Democrats, the Republicans, the Liberals and the Conservatives ENTIRELY.

Instead of flooding our Neo-Liberal/Neo-Conservative countries, Canada and the US, with cheap labor pawns, prison fodder, military pawns and social unrest sparkplugs, we should change the immigration policy to be based on maximum cohesive integration.

Reduce the immigration rate by 10% to 30% so that...

1) Every immigrant is guaranteed a well paying job.

2) Every immigrant is well integrated linguistically and socially.

3) Every immigrant understands the principles of tolerance, secularism and peace.

My view is 100% PRO-Immigrant. Just because I promote a QUANTITATIVE reduction, doesn't mean I promote a QUALITATIVE reduction.

1) In order to provide DIRT cheap labor for corporations & business.

2) Also, since extreme immigration levels cause lack of cohesive integration, you have good fodder for the prison industry. Check out the percentage of US inmates that are Latino, for example.

3) Extreme immigration levels can also cause social unrest. Look at the well documented BC Sikh militant gatherings in BC before the airliner was brought down, CBC showed the footage of the violent attack mob. Look at the Mexican protesters in the US. Again, too many immigrants, inadequate immigration control, and woefully inadequate integration.

4) This facilitates the ultimate police state agenda because it causes social chaos, and a request from the citizens for more control, surveillance, security, persecutions, and incarcerations.

5) It also provides alot of willing soldiers for the American (and now Canadian) war machine : many Latinos and other immigrants saw and see military duty as a way to avoid poverty, isolation and deportation.

Now you can defend the Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative immigration policies if you like. They were brought to you by the Democrats, the Republicans, the Liberals and the Conservatives ENTIRELY.

Instead of flooding our Neo-Liberal/Neo-Conservative countries, Canada and the US, with cheap labor pawns, prison fodder, military pawns and social unrest sparkplugs, we should change the immigration policy to be based on maximum cohesive integration.

Reduce the immigration rate by 10% to 30% so that...

1) Every immigrant is guaranteed a well paying job.

2) Every immigrant is well integrated linguistically and socially.

3) Every immigrant understands the principles of tolerance, secularism and peace.

My view is 100% PRO-Immigrant. Just because I promote a QUANTITATIVE reduction, doesn't mean I promote a QUALITATIVE reduction.

[ 09 June 2007: Message edited by: EriKtheHalfaRed ]

1) In order to provide DIRT cheap labor for corporations & business.

2) Also, since extreme immigration levels cause lack of cohesive integration, you have good fodder for the prison industry. Check out the percentage of US inmates that are Latino, for example.

3) Extreme immigration levels can also cause social unrest. Look at the well documented BC Sikh militant gatherings in BC before the airliner was brought down, CBC showed the footage of the violent attack mob. Look at the Mexican protesters in the US. Again, too many immigrants, inadequate immigration control, and woefully inadequate integration.

4) This facilitates the ultimate police state agenda because it causes social chaos, and a request from the citizens for more control, surveillance, security, persecutions, and incarcerations.

5) It also provides alot of willing soldiers for the American (and now Canadian) war machine : many Latinos and other immigrants saw and see military duty as a way to avoid poverty, isolation and deportation.

Now you can defend the Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative immigration policies if you like. They were brought to you by the Democrats, the Republicans, the Liberals and the Conservatives ENTIRELY.

Instead of flooding our Neo-Liberal/Neo-Conservative countries, Canada and the US, with cheap labor pawns, prison fodder, military pawns and social unrest sparkplugs, we should change the immigration policy to be based on maximum cohesive integration.

Reduce the immigration rate by 10% to 30% so that...

1) Every immigrant is guaranteed a well paying job.

2) Every immigrant is well integrated linguistically and socially.

3) Every immigrant understands the principles of tolerance, secularism and peace.

My view is 100% PRO-Immigrant. Just because I promote a QUANTITATIVE reduction, doesn't mean I promote a QUALITATIVE reduction.