Author
|
Topic: Chavez offers oil to poor Americans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Briguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1885
|
posted 29 August 2005 12:59 PM
It's not that ridiculous. The domestic supply within the US is largely supplied by platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. Specifically, in and around the Mississippi Delta. Those platforms are designed to withstand bad seas, but not much can withstand a force 5 hurricane. I don't know what the regulations are in the US, but I would hope that news of Katrina's approach (and strength) forced the oil companies to shut in production downhole and move their people off-site, for rigs operating offshore Louisiana and Mississippi. Otherwise, they are asking for both an environmental and a human disaster.Hurricane Katrina has forced the precautionary evacaution of 21 oil and natural-gas platforms and rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, according to the U.S. Minerals and Management Service Friday afternoon. So far, no oil or natural-gas production has been shut in, the MMS said. That last sentence bothers me. If the rigs need to be evacuated, they should be shut-in as well. I hope those rigs are still standing when this blows over. The northern Gulf of Mexico is polluted enough without a bunch of oil fields gushing their contents onto the sea surface. Part of the problem (with prices) is the probable loss of refining capacity along the Louisiana and Mississippi coast. quote: Gasoline prices could see the largest spikes because so many refineries in the region could be shut down by flooding, power outages, or both, energy analysts said. The U.S. has ample crude oil supplies, even if major hurricane destruction trims Gulf oil output and foreign imports, but refining capacity is extraordinarily tight.
From: No one is arguing that we should run the space program based on Physics 101. | Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alan Avans
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7663
|
posted 29 August 2005 01:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by PoostabberII:
So why doesn't Citgo sell their gas for .05 cents, plus taxes, in the US?
I would think it wiser if Chavez were to set up a separate entity to target supplies of petrol to "poor Americans." This is because the location of independent operators selling Citgo products will often not be located conveniently enough to the neighborhoods Chavez wants to help. This kind of assistance also needs to be tied to a broader program of community economic development. Perhaps a customer loyalty program that involves discounts and Venezuela matching its own discount with investment in targeted areas, this investment itself matched by community economic development organizations through local fundraising efforts. Perhaps a cooperative refinery should be built to refine the heavily discounted barrels of Venezuelan oil.
From: Christian Democratic Union of USAmerica | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851
|
posted 29 August 2005 05:33 PM
Here's some details. Looks like Chavez asked Jackson for advice on hooking America up. quote: Caracas, Venezuela, August 28, 2005 —Venezuela’s Chavez said to visiting Rev. Jesse Jackson today that he would like Jackson to help with finding a way to provide discounted heating oil and free eye operations to poor communities in the U.S. Pointing out that Venezuela provides 1.5 million barrels of oil per day to the U.S., Chavez said, “we would like to provide a part of this 1.5 million barrels of oil to poor communities.”Chavez had first mentioned the plan to supply discounted oil to poor communities in the U.S. last week, while in Cuba, but did not provide any details beyond that. Today he specified that it was heating oil that the Venezuelan government was looking into because this seemed the most feasible and most necessary approach. Given the high price of oil this year, heating oil is expected to reach very high levels this winter, which will be unaffordable for many poor families in the U.S. Part of the plan was for the U.S.-based and Venezuelan state-owned oil company Citgo to provide heating oil directly to poor households. Chavez said this would not present a loss to Venezuela because the idea would be to offer the oil at a lower rate because intermediaries would not be involved. Up to 30% to 40% of the cost could be saved said Chavez. Citgo licenses 14,000 gas station franchises and 8 refineries in the U.S.
venezuelanalysis.com
From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 30 August 2005 12:46 AM
Hah. You know, the language of the news article is almost identical to language I've seen for proposed plans to get cheap necessities to poor people living in impoverished countries when they get batted about by aid organizations and governments in industrial nations.Isn't it hideously embarrassing for officials in the USA to realize that the country is being talked about as though it were a Third World nation? I know if I were George W. Bush I would have some serious egg on my face after seeing that little news article. (But then again it has been noted with some mixture of schadenfreude and glee that the USA's income inequality and extremely right-wing (by industrial-nation standards) governments qualify it as a de facto Third World nation with a pile of nuclear bombs.) [ 30 August 2005: Message edited by: DrConway ]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Richard MacKinnon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2150
|
posted 01 September 2005 10:36 AM
quote: That reminds me of Paula Zahn's comment about whether or not Robertson was essentially just a nut, or "on to something".
PAULA ZAHN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening, everyone. Glad to have you with us tonight. Has controversial Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson finally gone too far or is he on to something? ZAHN (voice-over): Preaching assassination. PAT ROBERTSON, THE 700 CLUB: We have the ability to take him out. And I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. ZAHN: Should Pat Robertson take it back? Or should Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez be taken out before he becomes another Castro. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/23/pzn.01.html Heaven forbid he should become another Casto. Cuba, which has the most doctors per capita in the world, has deployed more than 1,000 physicians, dentists and psychiatrists to Angola and other African countries where leftist movements that Cuba once helped are now governments in power. Now Chavez has offered cheap oil to the American poor. What a catastrophe. [ 01 September 2005: Message edited by: Richard MacKinnon ]
From: Home of the Red Hill Concrete Expressway | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 06 September 2005 01:02 AM
Fidel Castro has reiterated his offer to send medical assistance to the Katrina victims in the US: quote: Cuba, a short distance away from Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, was in a position to offer assistance to the American people. At that moment, the billions of dollars the United States could receive from countries all over the world would not have saved a single life in New Orleans and other critical areas where people were in mortal danger. Cuba would be completely powerless to help the crew of a spaceship or a nuclear submarine in distress, but it could offer the victims of hurricane Katrina, facing imminent death, substantial and crucial assistance. And this is what it’s been doing since Tuesday, August 30, at 12:45 pm, when the winds and downpours had barely ceased. We don’t regret it in the least, even if Cuba was not mentioned in the long list of countries that offered their solidarity to the US people. Knowing that I could rely on men and women like you, I took the liberty of reiterating our offer three days later, promising that in less than 12 hours the first 100 doctors, carrying the necessary medical resources in their backpacks, could be in Houston; that an additional 500 could be there 10 hours later and that, within the next 36 hours, 500 more, for a total of 1100, could join them to save at least one of the many lives at risk from such dramatic events. Perhaps those unaware of our people’s sense of honor and spirit of solidarity thought this was some kind of bluff or a ridiculous exaggeration. But our country never toys with matters as serious as this, and it has never dishonored itself with demagogy or deceit. That is why we proudly gather in this hall, at Havana’s Convention Center where only three days ago we observed a minute of silence for the victims of the hurricane which battered the United States, and from where our heartfelt condolences were extended to that brotherly people.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 09 September 2005 09:34 PM
Doctors urge US to accept Cuba's offer of medical assistanceATLANTA, Sept. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- A prominent U.S. medical group voiced "deep concern" over delays in health care and epidemic prevention reaching Katrina victims, and urged U.S. authorities to accept Cuba's offer of 1586 disaster-trained physicians to prevent a "second wave of sickness and death." Latest reports indicate the U.S. State Department is backing away from the offer, implying they are not needed. "Up to this point, there been a clear need for more medical help for Katrina victims," said Peter Bourne, MD, Chairman of MEDICC and former special adviser on health in the Carter White House and former Assistant Secretary General at the United Nations. "The Cuban physicians are accustomed to working in difficult third-world conditions without the resources and supplies most of us are accustomed to. Since they are just an hour away, it is a shame that they have not been allowed to join our committed medical corps already." He is joined by other physicians, medical educators, international health experts and a former U.S. surgeon general associated with MEDICC, Medical Education Cooperation with Cuba. From 1998 through 2004, MEDICC has provided medical electives in Cuba for nearly 1000 students and faculty from 118 U.S. medical, public health and nursing schools. "Cuba has been recognized by the UN, Oxfam and other international organizations as a leader in disaster response, expertise that could be saving lives now," said Doctor William Keck, former long-time director of the Akron, Ohio Department of Public Health. A 2004 Oxfam Report, Weathering the Storm: Lessons in Risk Reduction from Cuba, states that there are real lessons to be learned from Cuba on how to safeguard lives during extreme natural disasters, including getting medical attention to vulnerable populations. The report can be found at http://www.oxfamamerica.org/cuba. On Tuesday, August 30, Cuba first offered U.S. authorities hurricane relief in the form of 1100 disaster-trained bilingual physicians, each equipped with 52-pound pound backpacks of medical supplies, including rehydration therapy, insulin, anti-hypertensives, and medications for systemic and topical infections. On Saturday, September 3, Cuba increased the offer to 1586 doctors, ready for immediate deployment and prepared to stay as long as necessary to help wherever needed. A Cuban spokesperson said that as of today there has been no official response from the U.S. government. Cuban disaster relief experience spans 45 years, mainly in hurricanes faced by the Caribbean island and in coping with disasters confronted by other developing countries. Another nearly 25,000 Cuban health professionals provide longer-term health care services in 68 countries, under government-to-government agreements. Cuba trains 10,500 medical students from 27 countries at its Latin American Medical School -- 65 of them from poor and minority communities in the USA. (See The New England Journal of Medicine, 2004; 351:2680-82.) "What an irony that the first U.S. MD to graduate from the school this August is a young African American from New Orleans," said Diane Appelbaum, RN, NP, MS. "He just passed the U.S. medical boards and is eager to fulfill the commitment he made in exchange for his free education from Cuba to serve the very poverty-stricken areas now devastated."
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 09 September 2005 10:35 PM
quote: In a lame attempt at irony, White House press spokesman Scott McClellan dodged a question about the administration’s response to the Cuban offer by declaring, “We would certainly hope that Castro would offer freedom to his people.” It is hardly likely that many Cubans would like to experience the “freedom” offered to disaster victims of New Orleans, who were left free to die in the streets and who are now being forcibly evicted from their homes and relocated to shelters that have all the characteristics of detention camps. They, like the rest of the world, have watched in horror the images of babies and old people dying from official neglect in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Cuba, an impoverished island nation that has been subjected to a 45-year economic blockade by successive US governments, stands in stark contrast to the US when it comes to disaster prevention and relief. While officials in Washington are continuing the refrain that no one could have foreseen the hurricane and suggesting that those left in New Orleans and other disaster areas are responsible for their own deaths, the Cuban authorities have proven in practice that such tragedies are avoidable. Source
[ 16 May 2006: Message edited by: M. Spector ]
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 01 December 2005 11:35 PM
Venezuela oil offer already generating heat in USA quote: Venezuela's state-owned oil company, which is essentially controlled by President Hugo Chávez, ran full-page advertisements in major U.S. newspapers Thursday saying it will sell 12 million gallons to families at a discount.The ads, one of which ran in USA TODAY, is headlined "How Venezuela is Keeping the Home Fires Burning In Massachusetts" and describes the deal as a "simple act of generosity." Critics say it is an attempt by Chávez to embarrass President Bush and take heat off allegations he supports terrorism. On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal scolded Massachusetts' Rep. Bill Delahunt and former representative Joe Kennedy, both Democrats, for brokering the deal. "Mr. Delahunt's lobbying for the dictator undermines any official U.S. pressure on Mr. Chávez to behave more humanely, which is precisely why Mr. Chávez is returning the favor by plying Mr. Delahunt with cheap oil," the Journal said. "Leave it to the congressman ... and a Kennedy to close the deal."
Note casual way the Wall Street Journal refers to Chávez as a "dictator", thereby rendering the word completely meaningless.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 30 December 2005 05:02 PM
Chicago rejects cheap Venezuelan oil quote: The Chicago Transit Authority is refusing an opportunity to alleviate commuting costs for hundreds of thousands in the Windy City's low-income neighborhoods. Instead of accepting deeply discounted fuel from the Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum Corporation, the city is instead raising fares to solve budget shortfalls.In an October meeting with representatives from the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), the city's Department of Energy and other city officials, Citgo unveiled a plan to provide the Chicago with low-cost diesel fuel. The company's stipulation, at the bidding of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, was that the CTA, in turn, pass those savings on to poor residents in the form free or discounted fare cards. But two months later, despite claims of a looming budget crisis, the CTA president "has no intent or plan to accept the offer," according to CTA spokesperson Ibis Antongiorgi. She gave no explanation.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 28 January 2006 05:09 AM
quote: As spake by Gir Draxon Who Suddenly Got a Huge Case of Conservatitis After That Git Harper Won: Now poorer Americans can enjoy burning copious amounts of oil just like the rich can afford to. Huzzah!
I'm sure heating your house in winter to avoid FREEZING YOUR FUCKING ASS OFF is prodigious and wasteful, right Gir? Lemme guess, with you it's "Let them burn their own furniture", hey? [ 28 January 2006: Message edited by: DrConway ]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 28 January 2006 05:28 AM
That above was the most confusing mishmash of rationalizations of your initial stupid comment that I have ever had the displeasure to read.Wake up and smell the coffee. Not every apartment landlord or manager provides heating with the rent. In particular, in the case of residential homes, the landlord often throws the cost of heating directly onto the tenants instead of burying it in the rent, so that it is the low-income tenant who does directly foot the bill. If you call it prodigious and wasteful to do something necessary to a modicum of basic survival I'd like to see how well you'd do on Ellesmere Island with just your clothes and a parka and no way to get any firewood, and without a propane heater. Prodigious and wasteful, Gir, is when Joe Rich Guy buys himself a million-dollar yacht with a 2000 HP engine just so he can fart around with his fancy new toy. [ 28 January 2006: Message edited by: DrConway ]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600
|
posted 17 May 2006 09:20 AM
But oil may not be what they need: food, shelter and clothing may be higher on the list of priorities on any given day. If they were just given money, they could address their needs as they saw fit.I don't think anyone thinks that this is anything other than a PR stunt to embarass the US, and fair enough. But it's not an effective anti-poverty measure. Indeed, there could even be a Machiavellian aspect to this: he may want poor Americans to be more dependent on oil than they would otherwise choose to be. What would we think if beer companies announced an anti-poverty program of offering beer at discount prices to low-income households?
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 17 May 2006 09:52 AM
If it's a PR stunt that successfully embarasses the USA, causing that country to pay more attention to the needs of poor people, wouldn't that be a good thing? Policies in contrast to the neoliberalism offered by the USA should be welcome by progressives in Canada and elsewhere. Neoliberal policies in Bolivia, for example, made the collection of rain water illegal. Those policies were enforced with the barrel of a gun and cannisters of tear gas. Yet Bolivians have taken a different path with the electoral success of the socialist Morales in that country. Sell the rain [ 17 May 2006: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sanityatlast
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12414
|
posted 17 May 2006 10:46 AM
Venezuela is not a rich country. It is a poor country. Hundreds of billions would be needed to develop an infrastructure to bring the country up to first world standards. Chavez pissing away millions on publicity stunts is that much less for Venezuelan developmnet. Chavez is using Venzuela's treasury like a slush fund to feed his sense of self importance. He's like a father who finds 500 dollars and, instead of buying his children much needed books for school, gets a bigger kick buying beer and pizza for his buddies. Unfortunately many so-called 'progressives' equate anything anti-American as a positive. Chavez's egomania is excused away as some need to 'stick it to the Americans'.
From: Alberta | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 17 May 2006 11:17 AM
quote: S a l:Venezuela is not a rich country. It is a poor country. Hundreds of billions would be needed to develop an infrastructure to bring the country up to first world standards.
So what? Better that transnational corporations appropriate Venezuela's oil wealth and residents of the slums of Caracas wait for what "trickles down" ? I think not. According to a report on the CBC last night, Chavez has the strong support of the poor inhabitants of those slums. I wish there was a government in Canada that was so partisan for poor people as Chavez is. quote: Chavez pissing away millions on publicity stunts is that much less for Venezuelan developmnet.
Yea. Why doesn't he invade Iraq or something? ________________ There's a good chunk of neoliberal/neocon ideology that revolves around the message that "there is no alternative". So much so that it has an acronym (TINA). Chavez, Morales, Lulu to some extent and yes, Castro, offer an alternative vision to "more of the same" offered by neoliberalism. If you don't object to religion to give people hope, why should you object to governments that take a different path?
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
B.L. Zeebub LLD
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6914
|
posted 17 May 2006 12:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by Sanityatlast: Chavez pissing away millions on publicity stunts is that much less for Venezuelan developmnet.
For the uneducated among us, could you please list some of these publicity stunts and their approximate (if not precise) cost? In dollars, if you must, but Euros are okay, too. But, last I checked isn't it just sound business to advertise to develop a niche market and then sell your product to that market? In a sense, Chavez is doing EXACTLY what neo-cons and neo-libs have been suggesting for awhile and that is to use private institutions to supplant the "welfare state" functions of governments specifically as it applies to helping the poor and disadvantaged. Assuming you know the cost of these publicity stunts, how do they compare to the 100 Billion dollar infrastructure improvement program Chavez announced late last year? Something in the range of 20 Billion per annum over 5 years was proposed. Considering the Venezuelan budget is usually in the range of 20-30 Billion, that's a substantial increase in spending on projects designed to stimulate local and international trade - i.e. ports, bridges, railways. The money is to come from petrol profits, including those made selling heating oil to poor Americans, I guess. The job creation in Venezuela could be substantial, let alone the effects of money-multiplying as some of that cash rattles around in the service sectors. Big bad Hugo, how dare he... [ 17 May 2006: Message edited by: B.L. Zeebub LLD ]
From: A Devil of an Advocate | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sanityatlast
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12414
|
posted 17 May 2006 04:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by Dana Larsen:
I see Chavez's offer of cheap gas for poor Americans as a way for him to generate some sympathy and awareness among Americans. He wants to avoid being assassinated or invaded by US troops. Offering to help poor Americans seems a wise PR move.
I'd agree to some extent but he's now enjoying the publicity more than the actual impact to insulate himself from American interference. A couple years ago the Bush administration would have gladly had the fellow bumped off but today they probably pray for his health because if Chavez dropped dead tomorrow, no matter what the cause, the Americans would be blamed. The Americans would have no credibility when their past actions are dug up.
From: Alberta | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|