babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Recent Violent Eviction in Guatemala by Canadian mining company

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Recent Violent Eviction in Guatemala by Canadian mining company
Ahni
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13327

posted 26 January 2007 11:05 AM      Profile for Ahni   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On January 8th and 9th 2007, hundreds of police and soldiers in Guatemala forcibly evicted the inhabitants of several communities who were living on lands that a Guatemalan military government had granted to Canadian mining company INCO in 1965.

Local indigenous populations claim the land to be theirs, and resent the exploitation of an outside corporation.

Canada’s Skye Resources now lays claim to the land, and paid workers a nominal sum to destroy people’s homes.

With the force of the army and police, company workers took chainsaws and torches to people’s homes, while women and children stood by.

Skye Resources claims that they maintained “a peaceful atmosphere during this action.”


Watch:
on youtube, or
on google, or doanload as a MOV file

Originally from: www.rightsaction.org


From: near another river | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged
quelar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2739

posted 26 January 2007 11:13 AM      Profile for quelar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Unfortunately, this is pretty much the norm for Canadian Mining companies operating outside of Canada.

And then you wonder why the people like Hugo Chavez when he tells Multinationals to behave.


From: In Dig Nation | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 26 January 2007 12:22 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, who owns Skye Resources? Shouldn't this be made more known here in Canada?
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 26 January 2007 05:03 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Although some things have undoubtedly changed since the signing of the Peace Accords in 1996, a climate of fear and uncertainty has been maintained by the CNG-Skye Resources since land reoccupations began in September. Locals I met with in December told of biweekly helicopter flyovers, fruitless meetings with company representatives who will not allow community members to bring legal representation or translators, and of a horrifying night of military and police evictions that took place in November, when hundreds of police and army personnel arrived to remove people from the lands.

The first eviction took place on November 12, and was carried out without an order signed by a judge, required by Guatemalan law. In statements reminiscent of the days of EXMIBAL, eyewitness testimonies on the night of the evictions explained that groups of police and troops deployed from within the boundaries of company property -- some using company vehicles -- to evict people from their homes.

Revolución was faced with a second eviction order on December 27th, 2006. The Christmastime eviction order appeared to be an attempt on behalf of the CGN-Skye Resources to “go legal” -- to follow procedures for eviction from private land as dictated by Guatemalan law. On the morning of the 27th, the people in Revolución were organized and expecting the worst, and it was only through listening to a local radio station that residents learned that the eviction would not take place.

The sense of relief was fleeting, however. Another eviction notice was filed for January 8th, 2007. Arriving in El Estor on the evening of the 7th, it was evident that something was amiss. Dozens of police vehicles clogged the thoroughfares of the nearby town of Rio Dulce, and police were everywhere. The following morning, it was clear that evictions were imminent.


Read more at miningwatch.ca

[ 28 January 2007: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ahni
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13327

posted 27 January 2007 10:01 AM      Profile for Ahni   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
well - I guess it's still too early for me. I meant to reply here with some more info, and ended up making this new post. Sorry folks.

Anyways...

Quetar, unfortunately it's a norm within Canada too - with land developers, logging and hydro businesses; it's not quite as overt and extreme as it is on the outside, but the policies and means are really no different. Even Canada itself is akin to doing business as Skye is...

Jeff, it is definitely a little surprising that this doesn't have any news coverage; particularly considering the article by Victoria Henderson (see above link)


From: near another river | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 27 January 2007 12:57 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I didn't understand the Canada Pension Plan reference in Victoria Henderson's article. Are CPP funds invested in INCO?
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ahni
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13327

posted 02 February 2007 09:17 AM      Profile for Ahni   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey M. Spector. As I understand it at the moment, yes CPP funds are being invested in INCO and other such Canadian mining companies.

I'm going to email Victoria Henderson shortly and try to get more info.

Ahni


From: near another river | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 02 February 2007 09:42 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do we have some "nice" Canadian multinational corporations we can invest CPP funds in?
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 02 February 2007 09:43 AM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I see one of the directors is on the Advisory Board of the Richard Ivey School of Business at Western University in London, Ont.

http://www.skyeresources.com/corporate/board_of_directors/

If the Business School gives these people pretige, then it should become the focus of a criticism of their activities.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Ahni
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13327

posted 04 February 2007 08:21 AM      Profile for Ahni   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
M, It seems CPP monies are being invested in over 2000 companies, including:

15 of the world's top 20 weapons-makers, tobacco giants such as Rothmans and Imperial Tobacco, and nine of the top 10 air polluters in the U.S.

see: {URL=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=fd182e92-b450-49e3-a2b1-2f92c2a1ea3c]The Dark Side of the Canadian Pension Plan[/URL]

and this article from ACTivist Magazine


From: near another river | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 04 February 2007 08:33 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It brings up the whole "ethical investing" idea, which really should be the topic of a separate thread.

Can the investment decisions of pension fund managers in Canada make any difference to the people of Guatemala, for example, or the manufacturers of weaponry and electronic components for the imperialist war machine, or the victims of tobacco addiction, or employers of child labour abroad? Or will a change of ownership of their shares have any salutary effect at all on the behaviour of corporations?


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 10 February 2007 09:49 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The paper economy has a fragmentary effect on the real economy. It continually amazes me that people think purchasing and selling shares in a company will actually affect that company's behavior, when the share purchases put nothing into and take nothing out of the company's coffers.

Oh, but stockholder meetings, you say.

Please. Most institutional funds don't even bother voting for or against any resolutions, and from what I understand about the way such meetings work, is that no-shows and abstentions are counted as having voted the same way as the majority, which usually favors the status quo of not rocking the boat.

What the company MAKES, what the company SELLS is what needs to be attacked. The real economy has to be used to get companies to pay attention to what it is they're doing.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 10 February 2007 09:51 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Right on, Doc!
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 10 February 2007 03:27 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ahni:
M, It seems CPP monies are being invested in over 2000 companies, including:[/URL]

Sure, and there are complaints about a lack of investment in Canada. Meanwhile, Canada's big banks and pension fund managers are shovelling money out of the country at a frenzied pace. And just look at all the crappy jobs Canadians are enjoying because we're paying foreigners to take our valuable raw materials off our collective hands. It's beautiful. The two old line parties shouldn't be trusted to run a lemonade stand.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 10 February 2007 06:36 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jeff house:
So, who owns Skye Resources? Shouldn't this be made more known here in Canada?

Inco owns 3,619,251 shares or 12.3%


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca