Author
|
Topic: balancing act
|
|
|
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996
|
posted 02 April 2004 11:16 AM
Well, I started the thread because I'm currently going through a major whole-life overhaul. I'm leaving Toronto, leaving my boyfriend, leaving admin/receptionist work (oh, how I hope it's for good!!!), and heading to Calgary where I'll be a single fine arts student.I'm having a hard time with all the adjustments, and with trying to imagine where I'm headed, and what my life will be like. Seems to me that all the things I'm aspiring to these days won't really allow for a romantic, long term relationship, and probably not home-ownership, most likely not motherhood...So I was hoping that babblers out there can prove me wrong, and show me how many hats one woman can wear at a time...At this point I don't feel like my head is big enough to balance more than even one or two! (not to suggest that multitalented women out there are big-headed!!) [ 02 April 2004: Message edited by: Lizard Breath ]
From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 02 April 2004 11:58 AM
Liz, it is a very intriguing topic. I've been mulling it over. Especially since I don't think you have children, or are a caregiver to an ill or elderly family member. Those are the main things I'd associate more with women's role in terms of a balancing act, not that men might not be doing them as well, but because they are burdens that typically fall more heavily on women's shoulders. The main "female" aspect to any balancing act I might have to play (between my precarious paid work, being a militant, being an artist...) is the fact that women tend to earn less and be consigned more to casual work, even if we are educated, and the fact that "soft" knowledge, such as arts and letters, are valued less in our culture than technology and applied science or especially business. Since I don't have children (and never wanted any) the usual meaning of "balancing act" doesn't really apply in my case. I fail to see why being an art student - and hopefully working in an arts-related field - precludes a serious, romantic relationship. You assure me that a milieu of "alternative", interesting people does indeed exist in Calgary. I confess my familiarity with that town is limited to flying in to interpret at conferences. I saw nothing but sprawl, but I can't claim to have had the time to look for anything more positive. If such people do exist where you are moving you have as much chance of meeting one there as anywhere else. As for children, the main problem is financial. You probably face a lifetime of precarious work, unless you want to become an arts administrator or arts faculty (and even then, those are the fields where cutbacks are usually made first). People do have children under that and worse circumstances, but I can't advise you about such a personal decision.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 02 April 2004 12:36 PM
Yes, dee, but liz put this topic in "feminism" so I assume she is talking about the aspects of a "balancing act" relating more to the double working day and what is still seen as women's traditional roles up against new expectations. The things you mention don't necessarily weigh heavier on women - in some respects they might weigh heavier on men as they are traditionally expected to be "breadwinners". Unless of course you mean the fact that it is probably harder (and it is) for women to find a serious companion once we've passed our "best before" date. Edited to add: Liz, in general I'd be the last person to put a positive spin on getting older. It sucks. But one positive aspect is that I don't think a serious relationship - in my eyes or the eyes of anyone it might be with - depend on round-the-clock availability or fawning admiration. As for the passive, comfortable thing, that can be caused by many things in life, not just love. Not having anyone and feeling empty as a result is not exactly a great creative stimulus either. Guess we must just apply kicks to our own (figurative) rear ends, eh? [ 02 April 2004: Message edited by: lagatta ]
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 02 April 2004 12:37 PM
When I was a photography student I had two classmates who were a long-term couple. They both had their own particular styles and interests, but they'd travel all about, camera gear in tow, together. Dunno how interested you might be in an arrangement like that, but at least it's not impossible.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996
|
posted 02 April 2004 12:58 PM
quote: but liz put this topic in "feminism" so I assume she is talking about the aspects of a "balancing act" relating more to the double working day and what is still seen as women's traditional roles up against new expectations.
That is the sort of thing I was thinking about, but also the more abstract, intricate balances struck by women who want to at once be strong and competent in their chosen field of work and also be able to be more traditionally feminine in their personal lives. I was also thinking of how ambition influences women differently, how we as women might have to temper our lofty goals with the reality that is child-rearing or caregiving, or just being a committed, romantic partner, as I mentioned above. So, not exclusively the double-workday, but the whole dual (or more) personality thing... I guess this may not be an issue that only women face, and I'm sure that men struggle with balancing their inner lives with their more worldly selves, but I was just interested in seeing how other women deal with these challenges, not so much in how it effects men (just because I'm not a man). And Magoo, I guess that is encouraging to hear. Thanks.
From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 06 April 2004 08:18 PM
Interesting question, LB.I wear a lot of hats: Mother, spouse, entrepreneur, artist, arts and community activist, co-op(artist run centre) board member and have now added to my list volunteering with a non-profit working with refugees and immigrants, and by association, self-styled ESL tutor. Oh, yeah, and homeowner. At the moment, it's a bit too much. My volunteer stuff is out of balance because my role at the co-op has been much more demanding than is usual lately. The secret to being able to do way too much is having a partner who is on the same page and carries an equal share of the load. I'm very fortunate that the blond guy and I work together, and also do a lot of our volunteer stuff together. For example, I'm on the board at our film co-op, but he's a member; he's on the steering committee for a group fighting to preserve inner city libraries and I'm a member of the group. I don't think of it as me balancing roles, but the two of us balancing all our roles, and helping each other in the process. And the travel thing: Don't let anybody tell you it's not possible to have kids and do work that requires travel. It might be a little more difficult, but it's still possible. I have done research in four countries for one of the docs we made with a baby in tow. It can be done, you just have to be very, very organized and have a parental partner who understands what you do and why you do it.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|