Author
|
Topic: Profits up. Productivity up. Wages down.
|
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938
|
posted 28 August 2006 12:54 PM
The USA once again leading the way: quote: The median hourly wage for American workers has declined 2 percent since 2003, after factoring in inflation. The drop has been especially notable, economists say, because productivity — the amount that an average worker produces in an hour and the basic wellspring of a nation’s living standards — has risen steadily over the same period.As a result, wages and salaries now make up the lowest share of the nation’s gross domestic product since the government began recording the data in 1947, while corporate profits have climbed to their highest share since the 1960’s. UBS, the investment bank, recently described the current period as “the golden era of profitability.” . . . . In Europe and Japan, the profit share of economic output is also at or near record levels, noted Larry Hatheway, chief economist for UBS Investment Bank, who said that this highlighted the pressures of globalization on wages. Many Americans, be they apparel workers or software programmers, are facing more comptition from China and India. In another recent report on the boom in profits, economists at Goldman Sachs wrote, “The most important contributor to higher profit margins over the past five years has been a decline in labor’s share of national income.” . . . . “If I had to sum it up,” said Jared Bernstein, a senior economist at the institute, “it comes down to bargaining power and the lack of ability of many in the work force to claim their fair share of growth.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/28wages.html?ref=us
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 01 September 2006 08:44 AM
Rick Salutin's September 1 column refers to the above story and makes some thoughtful observations on how the neo-liberal globalization project has had an intimidating effect on the labour movement: quote: This week, The New York Times reported that the current U.S. expansion is the first in which output and productivity both rose but most people's wages declined. All the new wealth went to corporate profits and the top few earners. Everyone produced the increase, but the rich creamed it off. This is simply unfair, and workers will want not just a cut but basic economic justice. The reason they keep losing out, say economists, is lessened bargaining power due to declines in union strength. And what caused that? Mostly it's trade "liberalization," a.k.a. free trade, globalization etc. Even Ben Bernanke, head of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, says this kind of inequity -- once workers realize it -- could "derail" further trade liberalization, thus acknowledging the real source of the rip-off. That dynamic -- globalization as a device to rob workers -- has been obscured since 9/11 by the obsession with terror. Some unions backed out of anti-globalization protests right afterward. Yet, it continues to eat its way through people's lives. Buzz Hargrove's CAW recently agreed to historic contract concessions out of fear of globalization's impact on its members. One benefit of a sense of self-respect and dignity is that those feelings help lend workers the confidence to resist the forces that stiff or demean them.
[ 08 September 2006: Message edited by: M. Spector ]
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 01 September 2006 09:09 AM
As John Bellamy Foster and others have pointed out, not only are the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer, but, in the US at least, inter-class mobility is declining. There's some substantiation of this claim at the link below. The period of intensive class warfare against working people since the atrocities of the Reagan era is reaping its consequences. Class warfare in the USA quote: Business Week, October 12, 1974: Some people will obviously have to do with less....it will be a bitter pill for many Americans to swallow the idea of doing with less so that big business can have more.
Mass political action, with the labour movement at the heart of it, has ever and shall ever be the means by which the lives of working people improve. And such action is also the path to the broad, sunlit uplands of a much better form of social organization than rapacious, Planet-killing, war-mongering, soul-destroying capitalism at its current stage of "development".
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273
|
posted 07 September 2006 08:47 AM
"What did you do in the Class War, Daddy?"Greg Palast writes: quote: Is America getting poorer? No, just its people, We the Median. In fact, we are producing an astonishing amount of new wealth in the USA. We are a lean, mean production machine. Output per worker in BushAmerica zoomed by 15% over four years through 2004. Problem is, although worker productivity keeps rising, the producers are getting less and less of it.The gap between what we produce and what we get is widening like an alligator's jaw. The more you work, the less you get. It used to be that as the economic pie got bigger, everyone's slice got bigger too. No more. The One Percent have swallowed your share before you can get your fork in.... Of course, there are killjoys who cling to that Calvinist-Marxist belief that a system forever fattening the richest cannot continue without end. Professor Michael Zweig, Director of the State University of New York’s Center for Study of Working Class Life, put it in culinary terms: “Today’s pig is tomorrow’s bacon.”
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 17 September 2006 09:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by N.Beltov:
Fidel! Don't be such an ultra-lefty! Argg.
You're absolutely left. I'm no longer a pinko, I'm ultra-violet now. [ 17 September 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 19 September 2006 01:10 PM
I'm gamma-leftEvery year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines Hanging on in quiet desperation is the english way The time is gone, the song is over, thought Id something more to say [ 19 September 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 19 September 2006 06:30 PM
from M.Spector's link, and interesting proposition for unions: quote: It’s time to turn things around A campaign to win “30 for 40”—30 hours’ work for 40 hours’ pay—could be one of the threads to be woven into a long-overdue offensive. Commit tees advocating 30 for 40 could be organized in unions, workers’ centers, community and progressive groups, and single-issue organizations. A brilliantly planned campaign is required to forge a class-wide, independent strategy. It’s something to think about.
I remember someone telling me about the former Dupont winter home on Varadero Beach, the longest stretch of white coral sand beach in the world. The average Cuban was prohibited from even walking on the Dupont waterfront. Dupont's attack dogs injured more than one Cuban for daring to break the rules during the Batista years. The rules need breaking like never before around the world.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
YardApe
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13223
|
posted 20 September 2006 07:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: We know what happens when workers come close to achieving fair wages and social democracy. At around that point, mongrel capitalist dogs look for another port in a storm to cock their hind legs up. And war. Although unions are the only real opposition to fascism in a market economy, Unions are a pacifier, an opiate of the masses. We need revolutionary change, and this time to preserve the planet for society based on all our present and future needs. There would be no need for unions if we had some decent labour standards in this country,and a way to hold companies to task on abiding them.
"No more replastering - the structure is rotten"
From: NWT | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|