babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » UN Peacekeepers Killed By IED in Lebanon

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: UN Peacekeepers Killed By IED in Lebanon
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 24 June 2007 10:38 AM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Four UN Peacekeepers Killed By IED in Lebanon.

BEIRUT, Lebanon -- A bomb apparently targeting U.N. peacekeepers exploded by the side of a road in southern Lebanon on Sunday, killing four Spanish troops and injuring at least four, a senior Lebanese security official said.

[ 24 June 2007: Message edited by: Webgear ]


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 24 June 2007 01:50 PM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OMG,
History repeating again?
Last year, I think Israelis also killed 4 peacekeepers, also in South Lebanon.

with their precision, US-made weapons, can they really plead "accident" again???


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 24 June 2007 02:14 PM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is another reason for the UN to remove their troops. The UN's holy crusade should stop. They are not protecting anyone.
From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 24 June 2007 02:37 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Update: 5 Killed, 3 Wounded

"The mostly likely cause of this attack has been an explosion of a car bomb or device activated by remote control. It has been a premeditated attack,"


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 24 June 2007 02:51 PM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
with their precision, US-made weapons, can they really plead "accident" again???

I apologize for being hasty there.
For some reason I confused the IED with IDF. As in the Israeli Defense Force.

The articles dont mention Israel. anyway, Hizbollah has called the bombing "sucpicious".

Still,we know that Mossad doesnt have to report to the IDF for its activities, which have been rather dirty around the Middle East.
Or, according to the article, its Al-Qaeda that did the attack...

[ 24 June 2007: Message edited by: BetterRed ]


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 24 June 2007 02:54 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by BetterRed:

I apologize for being hasty there.
For some reason I confused the IED with IDF. As in the Israeli Defense Force.

[ 24 June 2007: Message edited by: BetterRed ]


It is ok, I was wondering what you thinking when I saw your reply.

I have made the same mistake before.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 24 June 2007 03:48 PM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by BetterRed:

I apologize for being hasty there.
For some reason I confused the IED with IDF. As in the Israeli Defense Force.

The articles dont mention Israel. anyway, Hizbollah has called the bombing "sucpicious".

Still,we know that Mossad doesnt have to report to the IDF for its activities, which have been rather dirty around the Middle East.
Or, according to the article, its Al-Qaeda that did the attack...

[ 24 June 2007: Message edited by: BetterRed ]



Even when Israel is clearly not at fault, some here have such hate that Israel gets blamed. And you wonder why Jews who support Israel react as they do...ya go figure!!

From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 24 June 2007 03:58 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:
some here have such hate that

Once more, and you're suspended. I've had it with this type of behaviour.

[Edited to be more temperate.]

[ 24 June 2007: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 24 June 2007 04:31 PM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find harping on the acknowledged hastiness after an apology very very low.

Never miss an opportunity to complain Enh?


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 24 June 2007 04:35 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Update: 6 Killed, 2 Wounded

"Hezbollah was quick to denounce the attack in a statement, calling it a "suspicious act that harms the people of the south and of Lebanon." The militant group has had good relations with UNIFIL since the troops were first deployed in Lebanon in 1978."


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 24 June 2007 04:43 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Israel callously bombed the U.N. station last summer, despite documented pleas by the victims to stop the bombing.

Until I see proof to the contrary, I will assume that the same criminals are responsible here.

[sentence deleted after rebuke by moderator]

[ 25 June 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 25 June 2007 03:17 AM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Background on UN mission in Lebanon

Originally, UNIFIL was created by the Security Council in 1978 to confirm Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, restore international peace and security and assist the Lebanese Government in restoring its effective authority in the area. Following the July/August 2006 crisis, the Council enhanced the Force and decided that in addition to the original mandate, it would, among other things, monitor the cessation of hostilities; accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the south of Lebanon; and extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Joel_Goldenberg
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5647

posted 25 June 2007 07:24 AM      Profile for Joel_Goldenberg        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

Sorry, ohara. Real Jews don't support Israel.


That's beyond the pale. What is a real Jew, according to your definition?


From: Montreal | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 June 2007 07:37 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:

That's beyond the pale. What is a real Jew, according to your definition?


A "real" Jew, or a "complete" Jew, is one who consciously and proudly upholds the enlightened, progressive, universalist, and humanitarian traditions which the Jewish people have acquired (though certainly not uniformly) over the centuries of the Diaspora.

This is not intended as a juridical definition - it is purely a personal value judgment on my part. Sort of like saying, "real Canadians don't support merger with the U.S.".

My usage of the term "real Jew" accords roughly with that of Bertell Ollman (although I don't personally agree with his solution of resigning from the Jewish people):

quote:
What, if anything, has such Zionism got to do with traditional Jewish values?

As far as I'm concerned, the comedian, Lenny Bruce, provided the only good answer to this question when he said, "Dig, I'm Jewish. Count Basie's Jewish. Ray Charles is Jewish. Eddie Cantor is goyish... Marine Corps—heavy goyish... If you live in New York or any other big city, you're Jewish. If you live in Butte, Montana, you're going to be goyish even if you're Jewish... Kool-Aid is goyish. Evaporated milk is goyish even if Jews invented it... Pumpernickel is Jewish and, as you know, white bread is very goyish.... Negroes are all Jews... Irishmen who have rejected their religion are Jewish... Baton twirling is very goyish".6

To this I would only add, "Noam Chomsky, Mordechai Vanunu and Edward Said are Jewish. Elie Wiesel is goyish. So, too, all 'Jewish' neo-cons. Socialism and communism are Jewish. Sharon and Zionism are very goyish". And, who knows, if this reading of Judaism were to take hold, I may one day apply for readmission to the Jewish people.


Source.

In conclusion, need I remind you that real Jews have a highly-developed sense of irony and humour, without which their extinction would long since have been assured.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 25 June 2007 07:45 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your invocation of humour does not lesson the pain of your generalization.

For me, and I will only speak for me. I once had my "Jewishness" questioned by a Rabbi who was convinced I was not a real Jew because I did not go to his shul and could not recite all 613 Mitzvote.

Unionist your generalization is neither ironic or funny.

It is hurtful and I ask you to remove your post.


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 June 2007 07:52 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by johnpauljones:
Your invocation of humour does not lesson the pain of your generalization.

For me, and I will only speak for me. I once had my "Jewishness" questioned by a Rabbi who was convinced I was not a real Jew because I did not go to his shul and could not recite all 613 Mitzvote.

Unionist your generalization is neither ironic or funny.

It is hurtful and I ask you to remove your post.


Yeah, well I've had my "Jewishness" questioned constantly for the last 40 years because I oppose Israeli policy and because I oppose the notion that Jews need a "homeland" apart from the countries where they live.

My post was meant ironically and to make a point. My freedom of speech will not be limited because some fanatical rabbi insulted you once. So get over your hurt and debate like a mensch. I refuse to remove my post.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 June 2007 08:08 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm sorry, but he's right, unionist. That was totally unacceptable. It's just as unacceptable as if one of them posted, "Real Jews support Israel". People would be (rightfully) up in arms over a remark like that.

I know these debates get contentious, but such deliberately provocative and offensive posts are over the line. Please don't do it again.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 25 June 2007 08:09 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have emailed a moderator to investigate whether you generalization contravenes babble policy.

unionist I will gladly debate like a mensch when a comment is debatable.

This comment was not that, rather it was insulting, insensative, unnecessary and hurtful.

ETA: Cross post with Moderator.

[ 25 June 2007: Message edited by: johnpauljones ]


From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 June 2007 08:10 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think we cross-posted.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 June 2007 08:11 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
I know these debates get contentious, but such deliberately provocative and offensive posts are over the line. Please don't do it again.

What about my quotes from Lenny Bruce and Bertell Ollman? Are those prohibited also? Serious question.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 June 2007 08:15 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Listen, I'm just saying that you can't tell someone you're debating with here that he's not a "real Jew" because he supports Israel. That's all. You'd be just as offended if one of them said that you're not a "real Jew" because you don't support Israel. And I'd come down on them too for doing that.

Let's not attack each other, okay?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 June 2007 08:41 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Listen, I'm just saying that you can't tell someone you're debating with here that he's not a "real Jew" because he supports Israel.

I didn't. I was responding ironically to this:

quote:
Even when Israel is clearly not at fault, some here have such hate that Israel gets blamed. And you wonder why Jews who support Israel react as they do...ya go figure!!

But I guess irony doesn't work here, when someone decides to claim their feelings have been hurt.

You see, I attacked no one. I commented on my view of what it means to be a real Jew. You have a problem with that because you think it constitutes an attack on some individuals. You're mistaken.

Having said that, you're the moderator, so I'm scrolling up and editing out the offending comment. You still haven't responded about Lenny Bruce (who was arrested for profanity) or Bertell Ollman, so I'll just leave them for now. Hope they don't hurt anyone's feelings.

ETA: Oh yes, important question. Please review this post and advise if it is contrary to babble policy. If it is, I will certainly edit or delete it as well.

[ 25 June 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 25 June 2007 01:26 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Peacekeepers killed by IED

" Six United Nations peacekeepers belonging to the Spanish army who died in Lebanon on Sunday were killed by a car bomb, Spanish Defence Minister Jose Antonio Alonso said Monday.

The bomb containing 50 kilos of explosives was set off by remote control, Alonso explained at a press conference at a Spanish battalion base in Marjeyoun during a visit to southern Lebanon."

"Fatah Al Islam and other forces affiliated with Al Qaeda, who have been battling the Lebanese army since May 20 in the north of the country, have threatened to hit UNIFIL forces in southern Lebanon, accusing them of helping the Lebanese army shell their bases in the Nahr Al Bared Palestinian refugee camp outside Tripoli."

I hope this thread will get back on track.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 June 2007 01:37 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Very confusing report, Webgear:

quote:
The attack may have been an act of vengeance, because the Spanish contingent had looked for those responsible for launching rockets into northern Israel, Spanish intelligence sources were quoted as saying.

That would be Hezbollah, no? Or has Fatah Al Islam been accused of firing rockets at Israel? I'm asking because I don't know.

quote:
Fatah Al Islam and other forces affiliated with Al Qaeda, who have been battling the Lebanese army since May 20 in the north of the country, have threatened to hit UNIFIL forces in southern Lebanon, accusing them of helping the Lebanese army shell their bases in the Nahr Al Bared Palestinian refugee camp outside Tripoli.

But Fatah Al Islam are the mortal enemies of Hezbollah, no?

I may be mixing things up here, but the article seems to be blaming everyone (on opposite sides of the conflict) with the signal exception of the latest people to kill UNIFIL troops in southern Lebanon.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 25 June 2007 01:52 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In my view I think the writer is trying to provide examples of who may have been behind the attack.

It is possible that some of the information was lost in the translation.

I have never study this UN mission or the background behind the issues.

I find this an interesting topic and thought some else may have some knowledge behind the attack.

I believe the attack was likely caused by a splinter group of one side or another.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 26 June 2007 12:40 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
After the Spaniards, who will be next to die in Lebanon?

"Which United Nations contingent in southern Lebanon will be next? It is a ghoulish, terrible question after the car bomb attack that killed six Spanish soldiers of the 13,000-strong international army on Sunday evening, but one which the officers of the UN Interim Force - Unifil - are asking at their intelligence meetings."

Murder of peacekeepers raises stakes in Lebanon

"At last it happened. Every one predicted - not least the United Nations officers on the team - that the international UN peacekeeping army in southern Lebanon would be attacked by a Sunni Muslim group attached to al-Qa'ida, and yesterday afternoon three Spanish and three Colombian soldiers paid with their lives for the fulfilment of this prediction."


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Merowe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4020

posted 26 June 2007 12:49 PM      Profile for Merowe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read a report linking the bombing to the current bloody drive against the Al Queda affiliated group in the camp in the north of Lebanon - too tired to find the name - seems pretty credible to me. Hezbollah wouldn't do it because it would just bring the heat down on them, and the other group according to latest reports has been suppressed by the Lebanese army. Which probably means killed to the last man. So that's my guess on this one. A little bit of payback.
From: Dresden, Germany | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 26 June 2007 01:05 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It appears from the articles that the UN knew an attack was about to happen.

I am wondering why the UN did not prevent the attack?


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
ChicagoLoopDweller
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14097

posted 26 June 2007 01:32 PM      Profile for ChicagoLoopDweller     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My impression from the articles was that the UN believed that an attack on their troops would occur. I saw no indication that they knew of the precise details of the attack or the form that it would take.
From: Chicago | Registered: Apr 2007  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 26 June 2007 01:41 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If the UN had indications and warnings of an attack happening, then the UN most likely have an idea of what organization was behind the attack(s).
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca