babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Dangerous Birth Control Pill

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Dangerous Birth Control Pill
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 14 January 2003 10:18 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/01/13/disclosurediane-35030113
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 14 January 2003 11:16 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I saw that last night. I happen to have a copy of the CPS (Compendium of Pharmaceuticles and Specialties) in front of me. It's what Doctors are supposed to look at before they prescribe.

There it is, clear as day under, Indications. "Diane 35 should not be prescribed solely for it's contraceptive properties" There are also a couple of pages of warnings, precautions, and contra-indications.

Now that is fairly common with most drugs, but in this case, there are a couple of boxes and sections of bolded text calling the readers attention to the points warned about on the show.


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 12:43 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Most doctors don't tell you the risks and side effects of any birth control medications unless you ask specifically. The last time I was on bc pills, I was having horrific mood swings and crying jags -- definitely an altered state for me. My doctor wouldn't believe that it was the pill causing it, was ready to write a 'scrip for Paxil until I insisted he look it up... Seems depression is a side effect. I quit taking them and am back on an even keel.

I have to wonder how many women were put on anti-depressant meds instead of taken off the damned pill...

And this Diane-35 thing is even worse. Choice shouldn't have to mean risking your life.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 14 January 2003 01:02 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does anyone remember the Diane ads a couple of years ago? They showed a traumatised, frightened young woman hiding her face. We got them on bus shelters etc. I thought they were about battered women or some other violence-related issue. These were followed with other ads featuring a beaming Diane and the drug reference.

I don't want to minimise the psychological harm caused by severe acne among teenagers and young adults. Remember even a bit of mild teenage acne and oily skin made me feel dirty. (A tendency to oily skin gets great by your 40s, by the way - no wrinkles). But that is a horrible rate of blood clotting!

I think it shows how far we still are from safe, reliable contraceptives that don't put a damper on sex.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
shelby9
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2193

posted 14 January 2003 01:52 PM      Profile for shelby9     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Me, I was encouraged to see that there will soon be a pill for men for contraception. Of course, it will take another 5 years to get it to market. Just as effective as the women's version so it claims.

I remember seeing the ads for Diane 35 in magazines. And in them it claimed to not only be a birth control, but also "clear up your skin". A friend of mine does take this stuff, for exactly that reason. She has adult acne and was delighted to find a pill that would control that and keep her child-free. She's been on every medication know to humans to clear up her acne, but this one works the best.

Women have a responsibility to ask their doctors what it is they prescribe for them. Just because you ask for and receive birth control, you should still ask what kind of birth control you are getting and how it works. Just like any medication. I knew what Diane 35 was, and I don't take it. I can't imagine there are THAT many who didn't know about it.


From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 14 January 2003 01:59 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never heard of it before today.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 03:00 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think the difference is that it is being marketed as a bc pill that, as a side benenfit, keeps your skin clear, rather than as an acne medication that makes you infertile.

I'd be as wary of a male bc pill, too. He doesn't feel right about me taking a medication with serious side effects, and I wouldn't feel right about asking him to do it, either.

Besides, there's just something wonky about medicating a perfectly healthy body...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 14 January 2003 03:04 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What would you suggest then, Zoot? (Ha, that sounds confrontational, but it's a serious question. )
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 14 January 2003 03:11 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sometimes medicating a healthy body if pregnancy is not an option and people feel strongly about abortion (or may not have easy access to it) remains a lesser evil.

Barrier methods such as condoms and diaphragms are not foolproof. Moreover, they are rather unpleasant to say the least. Alas, many of us have had to fall back on condoms, more from fear of Aids than pregnancy, but it is sort of like talking to someone in the next room ... (Please don't think I'm underestimating the need for safe sex! But it remains a lesser evil...)


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 14 January 2003 03:12 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The pill isn't foolproof either. I oughta know.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 03:29 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What would you suggest then, Zoot?

Put a helmet on that soldier!!!

Seriously, properly used, condoms (not diaphragms, they're harder to use and easier to make mistakes with) are darned effective. I've used them for a long time, and have had only one oops due to user error, not the condom itself. I have friends (a married couple) who have used 'em for over 25 years without a glitch.

It's also pretty easy to screw up taking the pill. Forget one, and that could be enough. At least when the condom doesn't work, you know immediately and can get a morning-after pill. Not optimal, but at least you're not exposing yourself to unnecessary hormones on a constant basis.

Or, if one is sure that kids are never going to be welcome, or you're done having kids, go get the snip! Women can still get a tubal, and the big V is pretty easy and effective for a man.

quote:
...but it is sort of like talking to someone in the next room ...

Apparently, you've never met someone who knows how to compensate properly...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 14 January 2003 03:39 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, I'm just a bit older than you and could remember when real sex wasn't as much of a game of Russian roulette. Find the idea repulsive (though, admittedly, far less than AIDS).
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 04:01 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What the heck does that mean?

What I'm saying is, condoms on, condoms off (yes, I have had sex without a condom... ), it's all good.

And, as I mentioned in my earlier post, there are other options as far as birth control itself is concerned, just to set aside the STD issue for the time being. Tubal ligation is very effective and permanent for women who are resolved that children are not, or no longer are, desired. It is also no longer major surgery. Vasectomies are very effective for men as well.

In my own situation, I am undecided as to whether I will want another child, and we plan to wait until I hit 40 before availing ourselves of one of the two above options. In the meantime, I'd rather deal with the inconvenience of a condom than the hell of screaming uncontrollably at my spouse and children for no apparent reason, then weeping for hours because I feel so out of control.

[ 14 January 2003: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 14 January 2003 04:09 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not nearly as good. Of course, unless you had a VERY high accident rate, of course you must have had unbarriered sex. (When I did get pregnant once, it was due to a burst condom.)

Guess to my mind it is something unpleasant, like "dating" that one must go through nowadays until one is reasonably sure of one's partner. I couldn't imagine it in a serious relationship, but people are different.

Yes, of course if you can't tolerate the pill it is a lesser evil, but I fail to see how an artistic soul like you does not see that it really depoeticises a romantic encounter.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 14 January 2003 04:46 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Reason number 437 why I love the CBC: Good solid investigative reporting.

On a slightly less serious note, there already is a male birth control pill... you put it in your shoe and it makes you limp.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 14 January 2003 04:47 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it's a question of what you're used to. I don't find it much of an interference, but I had condom use drummed into my head from puberty on. If the woman puts it on the man, especially, it isn't that big a loss...

And as for the pill, oh yes, depression city. I have been on the pill, the pill and an antidepressant, and now I am on antidepressants alone and trying to get off them. No fun.

(I love my IUD.)


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 05:03 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Not nearly as good. Of course, unless you had a VERY high accident rate, of course you must have had unbarriered sex. (When I did get pregnant once, it was due to a burst condom.)

Ummmm, yes, one can have absolutely fantastic sex with a condom. Even up to the standards of an artistic soul like me.

Honestly, it's not the condom that "depoeticizes" the encounter, but how one deals with the condom. Creativity! Creativity!

And yeah, having had the second baby quite on purpose, of course we've had unbarriered sex... And pregnancy (two of 'em in my case) means you don't need a barrier for the duration.

An additional point -- if you have a condom break, nowadays one can do something about it, ie: go get the morning-after pill. I believe I mentioned this. As far as I'm concerned, this makes the condom even less risky because oopses are more readily apparent than with other methods.

To my mind, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. The unpleasantness in dealing with side effects are far more problematic than the slight inconvenience using a condom creates.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 14 January 2003 05:35 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mmm. Nonetheless, having seen 'em break, and knowing that the morning after pill can cause some nasty side effects, I like my IUD.
From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 14 January 2003 05:48 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Ummmm, yes, one can have absolutely fantastic sex with a condom. Even up to the standards of an artistic soul like me.
Condoms are not an issue for me for the first time in years and years. Be that as it may, most of my sexual activity with my partner isn't focused on penetration anyway - it's just so much more creative and interesting than that.

Like most people, I enjoy a good fuck. But why choose vanilla when there's rocky road?


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 14 January 2003 06:13 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rocky r-

Uh, how about cherry-berry?


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 14 January 2003 06:14 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
'Zackly. Or to quote Billy Bragg: "Safe sex doesn't mean no sex, it just means use your imagination..."
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 14 January 2003 10:45 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So what is special about this pill? Why is it so much worse than other pills?
From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
shelby9
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2193

posted 15 January 2003 12:36 AM      Profile for shelby9     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wouldn't call it fabulous investigative journalism... especially considering that the print ads have been all over the place for Diane 35 making the pitch that you can have effective birth control as well as clearer skin.
From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
TommyPaineatWork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2956

posted 15 January 2003 01:28 AM      Profile for TommyPaineatWork     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
With your indulgence I will break my exile here for this one post.

One of my daughters is about to start taking this very medication. My ex and her handled it with a dermatologist.

My only concern, initially, was that the dermatologist was of course aware of what possible interactions might occur between this medication and her current medication for epilepsy. I was assured that this checked out okay.

I wasn't told about the thrombosis issue, and I haven't had a chance to ask if this was explained to my daughter.

Be that as it may, while my daughter's acne isn't what I'd call severe, it is in her mind. Saddled already with an adolescence coming to grips with being different due to epilepsy, it's hard to just sit back and tell her not to worry about acne when there's a medication that seems to be very effective.

I did some reading last night on line concerning Dianne 35. I'm not frightened about the thrombosis. Considering that my daughter is in excellent physical shape, doesn't smoke of course, and that she'll be on it for probably less than a year (it seems to take four to six cycles to clear the acne, and three post clearance cycles to "cure") it doesn't seem too dangerous.

Of some concern is the impact of the hormones on her epilepsy. Sometimes her periods effect her epilepsy and this may be tied to hormonal levels. Or not. It could be that her periods effect her sleep, which is a sure trigger for her petite mals which can lead to grand mals sometimes.

Dianne 35 does have some interactions with some epilepsy medications. This isn't a concern at this time as the interactions include medications of a type she does not use, and in any case it's the epilepsy medications that prevent the Dianne 35 from working and not the other way around.

Interestingly, some of the sites I visited on line were of a comercial nature, and yes, some pushed Dianne 35 as a birth control pill more than an acne medication.


Dianne 35 is also used to treat hirsuitness in women.


From: London | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 15 January 2003 01:56 AM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do condoms really break that often? I was trying to do research on condoms online - how stupid of me. I kept coming up with all these websites saying abstinence is the only answer.

The whole idea behind taking the pill bothers me. I suppose birth control is a very personal thing and every woman ( unfortunately it is not so often the man who has to worry that much still ) has to make her own decision for what is best for her.

Wasn't the pill supposed to liberate us? It did to some extent but it didn't make things less scary!!

I guess I KIND of would rather have depression disorders as a side effect from the pill than get pregnant. But then.. is it worth having sex for depression? Cost benefit analysis exists in every faction of life...


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Dawna Matrix
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 156

posted 15 January 2003 03:13 AM      Profile for Dawna Matrix     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, jesus do they break. Two in one pack broke for me this summer - the brand was Kimono, which flaunts that they are thinner. Yeah. Way thinner.

At the time, Toronto was running a study by making the MAP (Morning After Pill) available at pharmacies without prescription. The study has since ended.

I ended up taking the MAP twice in one month.

Symptoms? Aggravation, uncontrollable crying, strange behaviour (moonlight skinny dipping in Lake Ontario by an otherwise almost sane individual), uncontrollable shivering (this was in the summer, which was too damn jungle to believe) and inability to heal properly. Black rings under my eyes, even if I slept 12 hours. Outrageous depression.

The same symptoms that I get from the BCP, except more so. I lasted four days on the pill before I was ready to fall on my own sword.

Never again. I'll stick with good old Lifestyles from now on.
Sherpa and I do not want to spawn.


From: the stage on cloud 9 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 15 January 2003 03:22 AM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes I was reading about the EC (emergency contraception or MAP) and how it is most often used when no birth control was used for sex, or the condom breaks.

My question is, how do you decide that it is absolutely necessary? How do you know for sure that there is a chance that the condom's breaking can lead to pregancy? I suppose you don't. You just have to suffer through the vomiting, stomach pain and God knows what "just in case".


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 15 January 2003 01:29 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you're between day 8 and day 28 of your cycle, there is a chance you can get preggers. However, around between around day 14 and day 21, there's a much greater chance. And every woman is slightly different in how her cycles go. I find these calculations more effective for use in getting pregnant than avoiding it, however...

There are condoms that are good, and others that are not so good. If you're in a secure relationship and not worried about STDs, you can try Natural Lamb, which I've never had a problem with as far as breakage is concerned and they're, um, well, nicer than latex. Ultra thin seem to break more often, from what I've heard from others, although I have no actual hard data on which to back it up.

I look at the potential for using MAP this way -- I have not had any problems with breakage of the condom for many years. If it did happen and I had to suffer through taking MAP, it would be better to deal with it than be nuts on the pill (and taking on health risks, as I'm now over 35) all the time. It's simple risk analysis.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 15 January 2003 01:35 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Zoot, "hard data" ?
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 15 January 2003 01:39 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a friend who uses this basal thermometer computer - it's amazing - apparently it's not rhythm because it actually can tell by your temperature when you're ovulating. You have to do it for a couple of months so its computer "gets used" to your system. I might consider using that if I got married again (aaaaaah, sorry, "m" word) but I wouldn't use it otherwise - too paranoid.

What do you gals think of contraceptive sponges?

Protectaid


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 15 January 2003 01:40 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Lagatta:
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 15 January 2003 01:47 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What do you gals think of contraceptive sponges?

Spermicides tend to give me a rash, but I might give it a try otherwise. Unfortunately, risking a rash in that region is kind of a detriment...

Lagatta -- HA!


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 15 January 2003 01:49 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh really? Does that happen to a lot of women? And here I thought I found the perfect method. Well, except that 90% thing. One in ten chance...eek.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 15 January 2003 01:51 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not necessarily to a lot of women... I get rashes pretty easily due to sensitive skin and allergies.

Plus, the effectiveness thing is a bit high for my comfort.

[ 15 January 2003: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Meow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1247

posted 15 January 2003 03:08 PM      Profile for Meow     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Birth control pills have never worked for me....For a year I experienced the mood swings from hell. I used to cry over the most mundane things (a vending machine refusing to take my money, a stale donut)....

Pretty much every negative symptom that comes from birth control pills, I got it....

Then I decided to try the injections...You can get hormones injected into you once a month if you have problems remembering pills, and sometimes with less/different side effects...This was in retrospect a stupid decision. I had a period for 3 months afterwards. Yes, thats right ladies, 3 months...apparantly this is a rare side effect for some people. Two other women i've met since then have confessed to me that they've experienced the same supposedly rare side effect....so maybe its just a crazy coincidence and we were all drawn together by fate for having shared the feeling of continuous bleeding for 3 months...but I have a feeling we aren't quite as rare as our doctors have told us...


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 15 January 2003 08:54 PM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Geeeeez!! So what other choices do you have??

It dosn't seem to me like there are really all that many still.


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 15 January 2003 09:33 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not really. It's better than 40 years ago, sure, but not that great.

Condoms: break, slip off...depends on the kind, of course. Not intrinsically that bad. The female condom is...well, some people like it, but most don't, and it ain't cheap.
Spermicide: icky, not that effective.
Sponge: ditto. Spermicidal stuff is okay with condoms if you can handle the ick.
Diaphragm/cervical cap: not that easy to get in, spermicidal ick factor, has to be left in to fester for several hours after sex.
Pill: various health risks. For me it was depression. Bad depression. No fun. Can mess with your sex drive, too.
Depo (shot): Basically three months' worth of pills in injection form. If that doesn't send you screaming from the room, well, Idunno. Some people swear by it, others have periods for three months, or gain huge amounts of weight, or other fun stuff.
Rhythm/"fertility awareness": Can be great, can fail miserably; personally I'd rather have something between me and "oh shit, I thought it was a safe day."
IUD: Scares people. Has to be inserted by a doctor in a not-terribly-pleasant manner. Causes bad, bad cramps, especially in the first few months. No one is 100% sure how it works, although it definitely does. Minor risk of infection, which turns into major scary risk if you get an STD. Some doctors won't insert it if you're under 25 or haven't had a baby.

Am I missing anything?

They all suck in different ways. I, personally, have found a suck I can live with (the IUD). Not everyone is so lucky.


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 15 January 2003 09:50 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Gee Smith, you make a great case against intercourse.
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 15 January 2003 09:50 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Regarding Depo, I've talked to three women I know who gained weight that they couldn't lose again after being on it. These weren't women with weight problems either.

There must be something mucho nasty in that stuff.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 15 January 2003 10:21 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Gee Smith, you make a great case against intercourse.

Dude, if I were anti-intercourse, would I have bothered to try so much of this stuff?

Seriously, I love my IUD. And I can't wait until I'm finished having babies so I can make my partner get the snip.

As for Depo...I've heard that progesterone (Depo is artificial progesterone) is fed to cattle to make them gain weight. Make of that what you will.

[ 15 January 2003: Message edited by: Smith ]


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 15 January 2003 10:42 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I didn't say you were anti-intercourse. I just said you made a good case for it.
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Vee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3477

posted 16 January 2003 11:23 AM      Profile for Vee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am glad to see a debate like this about medication because too often I see people blindly taking medications. They do not oftentimes know the name of the medication(prescription or OTC) let alone its reason for use, side effects or proper use.
I chose years ago to not take the birth control pill because I personally was not comfortable with the potential side effects and because it suppresses ovulation(how can that be a good thing over a long period of time?). I am now glad that I chose that option because at age 31, despite otherwise excellent health, I have thrombophlebitis and am at risk for throwing clots.

From: East Coast | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 16 January 2003 06:04 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
As for Depo...I've heard that progesterone (Depo is artificial progesterone) is fed to cattle to make them gain weight. Make of that what you will.

I've been on progesterone-only pills as well as the usual combination pill. They also list depression as a side effect, and I can tell you from experience that it's true. There's no getting around it -- fucking up your hormones does bad things to you. It's creating an imbalance in a healthy body and pretending it is without consequence (no action is) is foolish.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 16 January 2003 10:12 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
See, I have a theory about that, actually. Because the pill is often very, very good for women who have problems brought on by their own hormones - really bad or painful or irregular periods, really bad mood swings connected to the cycles, whatever. The pill tends to even those women out.

But for people like you and me, who were fine to begin with, it often causes fuck-ups.

Obviously, it isn't that simple - a lot of women are fine both before and after starting the pill - but it's worth a thought.


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
shelby9
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2193

posted 17 January 2003 02:11 AM      Profile for shelby9     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I gotta say, I've been on the BCP for some 15+ years and I've never had a problem with them. And I've even screwed up and forgotten to take them on occasion and still nothing. Now, maybe I just can't have kids after I lost one very early on through a riding accident and I've been taking the pills forever since for no reason. But I've never had mood swings, significant weight gain, or any other symptom. When I started using them, the ones the doc gave me made me throw up. He changed it to a low dose pill and I have been fine ever since. I've long since switched to Tri-Cyclen, and no problems since the switch in brands.

Maybe I'm just fussy, but I cannot stand condoms and would prefer to not use them. Of course, being single, this is not the wisest course of action. But I've never had one break - just the plain old Trojans have worked for me for years.

I've tried sponges - hated them. I've tried the foams incredibly messy. A diaphram seemed tricky to me so I passed on trying it. IUD - well I like the idea, but hated the idea of getting it replaced every year. Though there is a new one coming out that is good for 5 years... that I'm interested in. Apparently it also stops your period too. I'm all for that. Deprovera... I know a few women on that, they love it. Though the hassle of getting a shot in the ass or arm every three months kinda sucks.

As for Diane 35... if it works for people, great. Just remember to ask the doc what it is he/she is perscribing to you before you take it. Your health - your responsibility.


From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 17 January 2003 10:27 AM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
IUD - well I like the idea, but hated the idea of getting it replaced every year. Though there is a new one coming out that is good for 5 years... that I'm interested in. Apparently it also stops your period too. I'm all for that.

Actually, the ones you replace every year, the hormone-secreting ones, are relatively new. I have a copper one, which (I think) is the older kind (although refinements have been made since it came out), and those only need replacing every 5-10 years.


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 17 January 2003 10:45 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've tried pretty much every method of birth control and have found all to be unsatisfactory. I've gotten pregnant on the pill twice - the first time because a medication conflict reduced the effectiveness - and now even a low dosage pill makes me nauseated 24 hours a day. I don't remember any mood swings, weight gain, diminished libido or anything else with it, and for many many years it was, with condoms, my method of choice. I can also thanks its failure for the existence of my youngest child, who I love to bits.

I think it would be great if vasectomies were less painful for men and more reversable. Anything that reduces a woman's already huge reproductive responsibility is just fine by me, so long as it's effective and practical.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 17 January 2003 05:11 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"...because a medication conflict reduced the effectiveness..."

I wonder how many women (or men!) are even aware of these? My wife has been on the pill for 13 years or so, and so far no failures, but she also knows that a sleeping pill, many antibiotics, some antihistamines, etc., are all it takes to make us a happy threesome.

"Dad, how come I have such a funny name?"

"Well, Gravol, I'll tell you..."


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 17 January 2003 05:19 PM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I think it would be great if vasectomies were less painful for men and more reversable. Anything that reduces a woman's already huge reproductive responsibility is just fine by me, so long as it's effective and practical.

Speaking from experience, I wouldn't say a vasectomy was particularly painful,(other experiences may vary) and it seems effective. It's important to get a fertility test two months after though! As far as I can see regarding the practical aspect from a womens point of view, instead of lugging around pills and condoms all the time, you have to lug around the same guy all the time.


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 17 January 2003 05:32 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
As far as I can see regarding the practical aspect from a womens point of view, instead of lugging around pills and condoms all the time, you have to lug around the same guy all the time.
Fine by me!

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 17 January 2003 05:35 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yup. That'd be just great for lots of us.

Hehe. "Gravol."


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 17 January 2003 10:23 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just thought it obvious that the reason birthcontrol pills work was by giving one such mood swings that they dump the guy. I don't think I had sex once while on the pill.

Anyways in my teens I met too many young girls who got pregnant while on the pill. And not all of them on antibiotics at the time. They don't seem to work that well if one actually has sex while on them.

They will give prescriptions for this and I can't get Brita on prescription! Glad they are going to fix that problem with the cold water soon. Then maybe I would have sexual desire on a regular basis and not just lay around half dazed hoping I feel better soon. Every time I buy a Brita I am steeling money that should have been spend on my son.


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 17 January 2003 10:27 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
As far as I can see regarding the practical aspect from a womens point of view, instead of lugging around pills and condoms all the time, you have to lug around the same guy all the time.

[rolling-about laughie]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 17 January 2003 10:49 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They do that in Africa and it doesn't work that well. Men get quickies on the way to work and on the way home and then bring home the gift that keeps on giving to their wives.

Depro Provara was a good idea - always prepared - if only one of the side-effects to taking it wasn't suicide!

Why are there not birth control pills for men to mess up their moods? And if there were - would you take them?


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca