Author
|
Topic: Australia : Labelled best country in the world in US Newspaper
|
ufo1300
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10488
|
posted 26 September 2005 01:45 AM
Yesterday, The New York Times labelled Australia as the best country in the world due to its unimaginably beautiful scenery and friendly people along with unusually amazing wildlife and more. Australia, known for the best beaches in the world where the majority of champion surfers come from, also the most stunning scenery and landscape. With its amazing range of ecosystems from rainforests to central desert plains, the most laid back people soaking up the relaxed Aussie environment in the warm sun. Winter climate is a comfortable 17-23 degrees celcius and summer temperatures can get up to 45 degrees celcius in temperate places like NEW SOUTH WALES, the state which holds world famous city of Sydney, whom held the 2000 Olypic Games and was labelled the best Olympics ever by the head of the Olympic Games. In sydney, you'll see the harbour bridge and opera house to the centrepoint tower to The Royal National Park wiht a huge array of amazing beaches. Combined with a government eager to help out other countries in need, fulfill Australian peoples needs and the needs of the pituresque landscape. Be seduced by the Aussie accent which has its own language called strine, which most aussies talk, Strine is slang which is normal daily language for aussies and includes well known aussie things like ''G'day''. Wildlife is all around Australia no matter where you are you'll see everything form kangaroos to frilled neck lizards, from koalas to emus, from platypus'to possums and cockatoos to red belly black snakes, great white sharks to the amazing fish in the Great Barrier Reef. The whitest sand between your toes and amazing surf in front of you surrounded by tanned aussies enjoying the best life, in ""Australia, The Best Country In The World". One of the most multicultural countries in the world due to most tourists deciding to live there after visitng and living the aussie lifestyle. If you havn't been to Australia then you havn't been anywhere.
From: Sydney , Australia | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708
|
posted 26 September 2005 11:36 AM
*edited*I'm not going down this particular path.
[ 26 September 2005: Message edited by: Suzette ]
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 27 September 2005 10:21 PM
quote: Originally posted by The Wizard Of Socialism: Australia is a good brand with good hype, I'll grant you that. But if you scrape the surface you'll find it's nothing but a fresh coat of marketing paint over a rusting frame of racism. I've been to Australia to visit my third-best friend whose going to med school there. ... Fuck those racist pricks. I'll never go back again.
Gee, you are really well educated about Oz to make those judgements aren't you. Apparently we're all recist bastards AND we have third-rate medical training. No wonder my GP recommended I thrash my wife with a bullwhip under a full moon to cure her asthma. Yes, there are many racist pricks in Australia, including our current PM, and in some ways our country was built on a culture of racism, especially towards the indigenous peoples- just like yours. However, there are many many Australians who feel very strongly about past and present injustices, and are working towards reparation and reconciliation. Obviously your third best friend doesn't move in the right circles. Now, I haven't been to Canada, but I've watched lots of TV, so my summation of it is that it's a lot like the USA, everyone talks funny, the French speakers hate the English speakers, everyone skis to work, all the malls are underground cos it's so cold, maple syrup, oh and you club baby seals to death. Is that about right? Think twice before you make blanket statements about a country and its people based on a holiday and the word of a third-best friend. You could be accused of being a fool.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 28 September 2005 12:26 AM
quote: Originally posted by Suzette: Thanks, Walker, you saved me some trouble. Kinda ironic that there's an accusation of racism being hurled in one sweeping generalisation about a nation, don't you think? I'd be more than happy to enter into a discussion on those issues -- or any issues -- in this country here on the board, but childish insults tend to make me think that it's not actually what's being sought. So we're all fucked. That's fine. Have a nice day. Boo hoo.
Woo hoo! I thought I had gone in hard, but I'm glad to see I didn't. Just thought of something else - this guy has THREE friends??
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 28 September 2005 01:56 AM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: And Walker, clubbing those baby seals was SELF-DEFENSE.They all had guns.
NO, they were NAVY SEALS. Still, I can't blame you for putting this one out of its misery.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 28 September 2005 03:30 AM
Contrarian, I got a million of them. Two more?'Flat out like a lizard drinking' '[She's] banging like a dunny door on a windy day' Of course, THIS is real strine: "I woz ony sane lar snite we oughter seeyas." I'll leave those with you.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 28 September 2005 03:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by Hephaestion: Walker--Dunno if you've ever watched Seinfeld... Elaine: (in faux Aussie accent) "That dingo ate my bay-beeee!!!"
Did I? I did. Even countless reruns doesn't spoil it.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708
|
posted 28 September 2005 06:38 AM
I'm not sure what to make of Peter Garrett's choice of party, to be honest. I was surprised when he chose Labor over the Greens, but I seem to recall he said something along the lines that a major party afforded a better opportunity to effect* change. The thought of Labor being a major player any longer is almost amusing... if it weren't so damn depressing. (Thanks for serving the most recent crippling blow, Mark Latham.)From what I can see, members of minor parties and independants are able to affect change, possibly with more freedom due to a lack of a party line to toe. Just look at Brian Harridine. But hey, I'm sure ol' Pete had his reasons. He's a sharp guy with a legal background, so I'm sure he did his research well before making the move. One thing I have noticed is that on the rare occasion I've seen him speak since being elected is that he speaks like a politician rather than the passionate, hard-line, lefty activist he once was. It's a shame, because he is a truly inspirational speaker when in full flight, but I'm trying to reserve judgement for now. I have to say that my hopes for some dazzling parliamentary hoopla courtesy of Mr Garrett have been somewhat dashed. *I'm not sure if I've used the right version of the word here... affect? Effect? I mean "bring about, rather than "imitate". [ 28 September 2005: Message edited by: Suzette ]
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
sub lite
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8918
|
posted 28 September 2005 06:46 AM
quote: Originally posted by Walker: Contrarian, I got a million of them. Two more?'Flat out like a lizard drinking' '[She's] banging like a dunny door on a windy day' Of course, THIS is real strine: "I woz ony sane lar snite we oughter seeyas." I'll leave those with you.
I just hope none of my patients use language like that when I ask them, "So, why are you in hospital today, sir/ma'am?" (What *are* the translations of the above? Or do I need to reference the Macquarie Dictionary I was referred to last time I asked?)
From: Australia via the Canadian Wet Coast | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 28 September 2005 09:23 AM
quote: "I woz ony sane lar snite we oughter seeyas."
"I wazzed in the Seine...?" ...I can't make out the rest. Something about otters? Are there otters in the Seine?
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708
|
posted 28 September 2005 07:01 PM
No, the stigmata you're bravely nursing has its roots in your ignorance and -- ironically -- prejudice. quote: Walker said: Yes, there are many racist pricks in Australia, including our current PM, and in some ways our country was built on a culture of racism, especially towards the indigenous peoples- just like yours.
quote: Then Suzette said: I'd be more than happy to enter into a discussion on those issues -- or any issues -- in this country here on the board, but childish insults tend to make me think that it's not actually what's being sought.
Hardly an attempt to "whitewash". After your resurrection you can start a thread titled: Australians: cruel prejudice against people who read things that aren't there!
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 28 September 2005 07:36 PM
quote: Originally posted by The Wizard Of Socialism: I've been up on the cross for what I said about Australia for awhile now. Fair enough. My ego is not so fragile that it cannot suffer the slings and arrows of intemperance.But I know a thing or two about racism. I live in Saskatchewan. This is arguably the most racist province in Canada. From the shopkeepers who refuse to touch some people's hands when returning change, to the police who harass, beat and sometimes leave some people to freeze to death in minus forty weather, to the employers who refuse to hire those same people. Racist jokes and slurs abound everywhere, even in the marble palace. I see racism every day, and it sickens me. What I saw in Australia was even worse. Racism may be cultural in Canada, but it's institutional in Australia. And all the cute koala bears and funky accents in the world aren't enough to whitewash that...
As I said, you make a quick trip to a place and form such a finely tuned judgement. "Oh look honey, it's just like back home- they're all racist bastards". You may as well start wearing an orange sweatsuit and sew an American flag on your lapel. Listen, I'm not getting all defensive and dewy-eyed about dear old Aus; in fact, I'm often accused of denigrating my own country and people in Aus forums and meesage boards. My point is Australia is such a massive and diverse country, in size, opinion, attitudes, policy and practice, that even Australians have trouble distilling and describing the essence of our peoples. That's the best thing about it. So for you to think you can whizz over and make an off the cuff judgement is the height of arrogance. In short, you're a dickhead. I learned my lesson the hard way, moving to England for 2 years. After a matter of weeks I was an arrogant authority on all things UK, emailing all my family and friends about how crappy and backwards everything was, how the people had such funny accents, how the beer was awful, how everyone was pasty-faced and ignorant about the rest of the world, etc, etc. After 2 years living and travelling, I was so ashamed of all the simplistic, naive and myopic views I had had in the early days. My opinion of and attitude towards England now bears no resemblance to my first thoughts. It's not all good, but it's well rounded and informed by real life experience.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 29 September 2005 06:46 AM
Thanks, but I'd love it if you could clarify the first two for me, does a lizard drink realy fast, or realy lay down lazy, and is banging talking or sex? Realy expected I'd be able to get these, but no, love some help.Secondly the Aussie racial disparity. Aboriginies in Aussie lived a hand to mouth existance for 40 thousand years, where following old establised behaviours, and looking after your own was the only way to survive. take a shortcut, try something new, and your family died out. 40 thousand years.Thats a lot of genetic selection for this sort of behaviour. Note - acquiring wealth, accumulating things was not useful. Attachment to things was dangerous to your survival. In just 200 years, 8 generations, they are expected to want to get rich, get educated. Well known sports people and lotto winers have had extended family arrive en mass. People working for the government in charge of allocating funding or resources have been charged with neopotism. Bush punishments of a speer through the leg, or the modern equivalent of a sharp sideways jerk to the knee, snapping a tendon are still administered for not sharing with family. Aboriginies are very different to many White Australians, they don't fit in to right wing white society. They have NO desire to accumulate wealth. I was working in WA and a Maori guy was with us. I don't know if he knew these guys or not, but an Aboriginie came up and started drinking out of his beer jug(which sits on your table and you use it to full your glass, saves going to the bar so often). The maori got up and smacked him. later when he went outside to use the dunny several of them grabbed him and snapped his knee. He had to drop down wages and cook for the rest of the season.
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819
|
posted 29 September 2005 08:56 AM
Southlander, I don't write em I just repeat em. I think the 'lizard drinking' saying assumes a lizard who lives in the desert would drink really fast. And the 'dunny door' scenario? I had trouble with that myself, never having employed it in conversation. I just love it. I think it's a multiple use analogy - I first thought of talking too much but I googled a couple of examples that referred to sex. As to your 'racial disparity' riff, I'm fairly sure you're intent is true but it's pretty raw and sweeping stuff. Do you carry that ready-made summary around in your back pocket? I might work on refining it a little - no, a lot.
From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Southlander
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10465
|
posted 30 September 2005 04:52 AM
Comming from a genetics background I tend to apply much of it to humans, Sorry. My attempt to explain why Aborigines are seen as different, overlooks that Humans have free will, and we are not only govened by our impulses, genes and environment. yes I did come up with it myself, and it seemed to all fit together so nicely. However I will say again that it only indicates trends, leanings and tendencies. I should have stated this more in the writing. It's main failing, however is that it only attempts to explain why Aborigines are seen as different, and it makes no mention of white Australians, and what may have happened in the development of their country to promote their attitudes and tendencies. Sorry again. It in fact makes no mention of them at all, and they are after all the ones being seen as racist. Part of the reason is that white Australians are probably more honest in voicing their racism in front of people from overseas. (Complement here) Australians are open and honest in their attitude to people no matter who they are, and perhaps the racism is no worse, it's just been heard about by more people writing here. You would have difficulty finding a white NZ'er who will admit to racism. But it does exist. Nothing is of course said in mixed company, and as it's difficult to find unmixed company, except in Southland, visitors would see little of it, unless they go there,and you won't get much out of them either. Donna Awatere Huata supporters are just on TV here claiming her judgement and sentence are harsher because of racist attitudes. New Zealanders opinions on this claim? go here www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3397924a4621,00.html[ 30 September 2005: Message edited by: Southlander ]
From: New Zealand | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|