babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Our beginnings...

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Our beginnings...
Lima Bean
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3000

posted 16 October 2002 03:53 PM      Profile for Lima Bean   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey Feminists, in the interest of starting a thread that (hopefully) won't dwindle into sarcasm and misinformation, and doesn't have anything to do with the Queen's visit or the impending war on Iraq, here's a question that might be fun to answer:

Do you remember some formative moment in your feminist development? A book you read? A challenge you encountered? A declaration you made?

When and how did you first start calling yourselves feminists?

For me, arguing with my Dad was a big influence, Inga Muscio and others straightened out a bunch of stuff for me, and of course, my undergrad degree in English deserves some credit, as do the fabulous women in my life, all of whom deserve as much respect and power as any stinky boy...

and you?

[ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: Lima Bean ]


From: s | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 16 October 2002 06:35 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I read Letty Cottin (sp?) Pogrebin's Growing Up Free when I was nine. My dad's "den" was in the (finished) attic, and my parents kept most of their books up there, and it was on a low shelf in a hard-to-reach corner. I used to skim everything on that shelf that had a title suggesting childhood or fairy tales or, well, sex.

I didn't attach the sentiments of Growing Up Free to the word "feminist" until I was about twelve and growing interested in abortion rights. At ten and eleven I'd had nightmares about finding myself pregnant with sickly, demonic babies (I know, weird), and I was horrified at the thought that anyone would want to force me to stay pregnant and have a child.

[ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: Smith ]


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Heather
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 576

posted 16 October 2002 09:22 PM      Profile for Heather   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Growing up in the arctic, I've always viewed situations in moral or ethical ways.

Like when my mom used to work at the airport as a contract janitor and had to walk three miles (three miles one way so six total) because it was against Transport Canada's regulations for her to get a ride with the regular workers in the Transport Canada vehicle.

In the summer it wasn't so bad but in the winter between blizzards and minus 40 degree weather it made it a little hard. She eventually made enough money to buy an all terrain vehicle and snowmobile but they break down or run out of gas...during those days she had to walk. Some workers were nice enough to sneak her a ride but they were few and far between.

The first time I ever heard the word 'feminist' was when I was about 18 and living in Winnipeg. The person I was working with, opened the door for a woman but she wouldn't go through so he mumbled something about 'feminists'.

My natural instincts were reinforced after I read Maude Barlow's book, "The Fight of My Life- Confessions of an Unrepentant Canadian". I was just blown away by her. I had the chance to see her talk recently and she signed the book- now it's in circulation with some of my friends

[ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: Anuri ]


From: Planet Earth | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 16 October 2002 10:05 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OT: Anuri, why wasn't your mother allowed to ride with the other workers?

Edited to say: Oh, because she was contract? Wow, that's dumb.

[ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: Smith ]


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Heather
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 576

posted 16 October 2002 10:46 PM      Profile for Heather   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Oh, because she was contract? Wow, that's dumb.

Exactly. It wasn't as though there were a lot of janitors to give a lift to- she was the only one.

My heart just breaks when I think of her walking as that dumb transport truck drove by with empty seats in it. Would they make eye contact? Stop and say, 'hi'? The days I walked with her the truck went by too fast that we couldn't make eye contact...

And then when she made it there, people would go about their business as if there was nothing wrong. I know this because I walked with her some days (not many grant you but enough to notice what was happening but not able to put it into words because I was about 10 years old at the time).

Something just didn't seem right- my thoughts told me that we were inferior for some reason and it hurt.

It still hurts when I think of it but I have matured since then (with a lot of help from my husband) and I understand that people are just people and it is the systems we implement, beginning with education (real education not just skill teaching) that we as a society need to improve on.

When I say 'real education' I mean about being aware of our similarities rather than our differences as a people and being aware of how we live as a society- the kinds of rules we impose on ourselves and others.


From: Planet Earth | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 16 October 2002 10:53 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wow. That's just...really, really dumb.

One of the key lessons we need to learn and teach is that people take priority over systems.


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Shenanigans
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2993

posted 17 October 2002 06:41 AM      Profile for Shenanigans   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A little more than a year ago, I would have balked at the ideal of becoming a feminist. When I learned I had to take Introduction to Feminism, my head went through every possible pre-connotation there was! But I had an excellent professor who would let us think on our own, but occaisionally couldn't resist throwing in her own two cents on male movements "that's bullshit!"

Then working within my class of women and working with feminists in the larger community, I started to realise the strength women have and the reason why we have this strength (apart from spiritual) is because we have to, we are oppressed, and it sickens me to know that so many women are suffering because they are women. I also saw that feminists came in every shape colour and size. While, there is still a large number of white middle class women, just being able to see powerful women of colour stand up and say that they were a feminist was very validating for me. At that point I decided to bear the label feminist and all the beauty and stife that comes with it.

Shenanigans


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
swirrlygrrl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2170

posted 17 October 2002 12:21 PM      Profile for swirrlygrrl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was really lucky to have a mom who always taught me to be true to myself and not take sh*t because I was a girl (or for any other reasons). SO when I was about 12 or 13 and discovered Gloria Steinem, it just all clicked into place for me - oh yeah, I'm a feminist, just like my mom.

Gloria had a huge impact on me personally, especially "Revolution from Within" (it was just the right point in my life), and led to a lot of other white, mostly middle/upper class, mostly American feminists until late high school/early university, where I started exploring other voices in the feminist movements, which really challenged me (oh, I was sooo defensive for a while against ideas that challenged my very priviledged, white, able bodied, heterosexual idea of feminism...thankfully I'm growing and have managed to leave a good portion of that behind, and am working on the rest), and ultimately changed me.

But like most everything else that is good in my life, it all started with my mom.


From: the bushes outside your house | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 17 October 2002 12:33 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The first time I heard the word "feminism" was on an episode of The Partridge Family. Feminism got a pretty bad rap - it was portrayed as extreme, rigid, dogmatic and excluding. Not unlike most mainstream portraits of the Women's Movement in the 70s.

I don't like labels - they're too easily made negative epithets that dehumanize and villify, that are made exclusionary, even elitist. I think this elitism is something bell hooks addressed in her "womanism" essay, and in reading it I was immediately attracted to how she prefers the inclusivity of that term to the perceived educated white middle class exclusivity of the term "feminism". Truly, how we receive information is as important as how it is intended at its source.

I do not want to be seen as a preconceived notion of feminism, but rather as a human being who struggles to understand what and who we all are, and to discover the best way for us to proceed with addressing those things that hinder our mutual growth toward and understanding of equity and fairness. That's a core value in the creed of feminism that I subscribe to, a value that all to often gets lost in the politics of gender and identity.

When I was growing up, I understood quite well that girls were considered inferior to boys - this was the case in our household - and that speaking out about it would earn you a reputation as a troublemaker. That Partridge Family episode confirmed that nice girls didn't want to be feminists, nice girls just wanted to sleep with Keith Partridge.

When I got older, and read all kinds of feminist theory and literature, and was introduced to the language that defined the experience of sexism and exclusion, I began to understand that the viciousness of a backlash was a barometer for the success of any movement for change, that people were at their worst when their privilege was under actual threat of being removed. In this way I understand that often when things are at their worst, most angry and divisive, they are perversely at their very best, as opportunities for dialogue and change.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 17 October 2002 04:32 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In my late teens and very early twenties, I wouldn't have described myself as a feminist... Odd, really, because I've nearly always behaved like one.

The first time somebody referred to me as a feminist, I was very surprised. I was raised in a very patriarchal family, one in which the women were as staunchly patriarchal as the men. I was treated differently from the other female children in the family, though. Eldest child, no brothers, and bright enough academically that I was a shoe-in to go to university, the first one in the family to do so.

So from the time I was very small, I was pushed to succeed academically by my father and grandfather, and was taught to take no crap from anyone on the basis of my gender or class. I was encouraged to behave and interact more like the men in the family, but it was difficult because there were also the expectations of the women in the family that I felt I had to meet.

It wasn't until my first marriage was on the rocks that I realized I didn't fit the patriarchal female mold. I'd tried to for about 5 years, and it just wasn't working for me, it wasn't working for my spouse (who spent a great deal of time and energy pushing me into the mold and castigating me when I rebelled) and it wasn't who I was.

So in the end, I left and did some reinventing of myself, including accepting that I was feminist instead of just an anomaly/exception to the "rules".

I find it tremendously amusing that a pair of patriarchal men raised a feminist...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 18 October 2002 06:54 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My feminist identity comes from way back. I was always jealous of the boys because they got to do more interesting stuff, they weren't punished or castigated for getting dirty (something I've always and still love to do!)

I read a book when I was about thirteen called "The Oval Amulet" by Lucy Cullyford Babbit. I recently found and purchased the book off of the internet (sadly it's OOP) and rereading it I realized how greatly it affected me.

It's a teen pagan/fantasy novel about a young women in a strict religously patriarchical world. She decides to dress up as a boy and goes exploring with a pair of brothers from her community. They stumble upon a community of all women and learn that Paragrin (the young woman) is the natural ruler. Of coarse by this point we've had lots of romance and adventure. Paragrin then goes on to wage a war against the male leadership represented by a sqare amulet. Her man however, is a pacifist and stays at home to cook and clean.

I didn't forget that book for sixteen years. It really made clear for me the ridiculousness and unfairness of gender roles in our society. My feminism stems from that attitude.


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
rosebuds
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2399

posted 18 October 2002 08:50 PM      Profile for rosebuds     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Skadie - can't believe you didn't mention this one, cuz I've heard you mention it before...

In our grade nine class, one of the curriculum books we had to read was "The Diary of Ann Frank". However, only the girls had to read it and the boys read something else (can you remember what it was, skadie?). "Old Shep" or some other equally young boy coming of age story.

Even then I realized that the division was not one of education - it was one of ignorance. The idea of expecting a boy to read a story about a girl was simply unheard of. This was probably the first (and virtually only) book we read in school that was from a female perspective. And the boys were excused.

Other than that, I think the most educational learning experience I've had about feminism has been on this thread. Reading and watching the dynamics is terrific. And although I don't agree with everyone, I appreciate hearing so many different views. I don't think I've ever discussed so much feminism with so many people before.


From: Meanwhile, on the other side of the world... | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 19 October 2002 12:53 AM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In our grade nine class, one of the curriculum books we had to read was "The Diary of Ann Frank". However, only the girls had to read it and the boys read something else (can you remember what it was, skadie?). "Old Shep" or some other equally young boy coming of age story.


The boys read "Shane." Grrrrrr. Heaven forbid they should read about MENSTRUATION.

How can one NOT be a feminist in this world?


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Pat
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2064

posted 19 October 2002 03:09 AM      Profile for Pat   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I was raised in a very patriarchal family, one in which the women were as staunchly patriarchal as the men. I was treated differently from the other female children in the family, though. Eldest child, no brothers, and bright enough academically that I was a shoe-in to go to university, the first one in the family to do so.

So from the time I was very small, I was pushed to succeed academically by my father and grandfather, and was taught to take no crap from anyone on the basis of my gender or class. I was encouraged to behave and interact more like the men in the family, but it was difficult because there were also the expectations of the women in the family that I felt I had to meet.


I've noticed Zoot that many of the "strong" women I know come from families that have no boy children. The rules and expectations for boys and grils in my family were quite different. The boys were expected to be the "successful" ones, and take leadership roles while the grils were expected to become good homemakers or nuns.It seems as though the expectation for success gets transferred to the eldest daughter in the absence of brothers.


From: lalaland | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3192

posted 19 October 2002 01:36 PM      Profile for Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think being the oldest helps. My mum has four brothers, but because she's the oldest (and the brightest, IMHO), she always shone. She's still the only one with a graduate degree.

The oldest gets to everything first, has to beat down all the doors and pave the way for the younger ones, and I think that's pretty influential. When you yourself have to fight for stuff, you tend not to forget it.


From: Muddy York | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 19 October 2002 09:17 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The boys read "Shane." Grrrrrr.
I asked to read "Shane" because I'd already read the other selection. I don't remember the reading material being gender-based, but my Jr. High School English teachers (both very good ones, I might add) were women. I always felt encouraged to read, write and excel in those classes. There were a few classes where girls got short shrift - though I wasn't allowed to take shop class, even though I refused to attend home ec, but for the most part my teachers were strong, smart women. I suppose that's why I rarely felt excluded or diminished because I was female. That happened at home, and if not for my father's encouragement I might never have gone to university. My mother's praise and encouragement was reserved for the boys in our family.

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 20 October 2002 11:03 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
First, there was the clothing issue. (This would be late 60', early 70's; Calvin Klein wasn't around yet). How come the pants made for me didn't have any pockets? I need pockets! Why did my shoes have to be uncomfortable? And especially the underwear: bra-straps with nasty metal buckles on... those horrid panties with the skinny elastic, welts inside and scratchy bit of nylon lace around the legs. How come they could make flat seams and non-cutting edges on men's underwear?
So, i started buying boys' jeans and hiking boots, jockey shorts and undershirts. They were cheaper, as well as more wearable.

Then, i created a job for myself, which was promptly given to the only male tech in the laboratory - who started a year later than i did, and was about half as good. He also got the promotion and pay raise. Guess who was sent to the annual convention.
Not fair.

On the other hand, my brother got hit a lot more than i did, even though he was younger. Plus, he was stuck with more dirty and unpleasant chores and had to work with the father we both tried to avoid.
In those days, if a job was dangerous, cold, wet, difficult and ugly, a man was expected to do it. Mostly, he still is. That's not fair, either.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 20 October 2002 07:19 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I've noticed Zoot that many of the "strong" women I know come from families that have no boy children.

I've sometimes wondered how my life would have been different if I'd had brothers. I don't know.

Part of the encouragement I got from the men in my family had more to do with ability than gender. I had a male cousin, but he just didn't have the personality or the intellect for academics, and my grandfather put his hopes on me to go to university. (Post-secondary education for at least one of us was a long-cherished goal of his. He was a working-class charity child with a grade 3 education -- Having me go to school meant he'd truly arrived at middle class.)

My dad and I once had a conversation when he was dying... He said he never regretted not having a son, that I was as much like him (at least in personality) as any son could have been. Gender didn't matter much in the end.

Where I find it really matters is how people react to my physical self and to my personality. Some never quite get used to the dichotomy.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca