Author
|
Topic: THE ABOLITION OF WORK
|
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104
|
posted 05 July 2005 12:31 PM
I sorta posted this in another fleeting thread, however I'm interested in the reaction it would get here. Robert Black's classic 1985 essay.THE ABOLITION OF WORK No one should ever work. Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil you'd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working. That doesn't mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a *ludic* conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than child's play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isn't passive. Doubtless we all need a lot more time for sheer sloth and slack than we ever enjoy now, regardless of income or occupation, but once recovered from employment-induced exhaustion nearly all of us want to act. Oblomovism and Stakhanovism are two sides of the same debased coin. The ludic life is totally incompatible with existing reality. So much the worse for "reality," the gravity hole that sucks the vitality from the little in life that still distinguishes it from mere survival. Curiously -- or maybe not -- all the old ideologies are conservative because they believe in work. Some of them, like Marxism and most brands of anarchism, believe in work all the more fiercely because they believe in so little else. http://www.spunk.org/library/writers/black/sp000156.txt
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 05 July 2005 04:08 PM
For what it's worth, and while I'd love a world of pure leisure, I think it's hard not to notice that almost every animal has something it has to do in order to promote its own survival. Some hunt, some graze, some migrate. Some build little nets to trap bugs. Some lumber through the oceans and collect plankton. All have something they have to do, whether they really derive joy from doing it or not. The exceptions to this are the parasites.Perhaps someday, as promised by the Jetsons, machines will do all the drudge work. Meanwhile, however, I'm not sure on what grounds I can announce my intentions to never lift a finger in my own interest ever again.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104
|
posted 06 July 2005 01:58 PM
quote: Coyote: But that's just it. Civilization is in constant flux, as new ideas (or old ideas, even) enter the public discourse and form and shape a social consensus. The denial of that, the desire to destroy that, is a denial of what it means to be human.
It is in flux and as that flux goes on it is becoming more and more destructive with each passing age. And it is the case simply for the reason that it is based on war power and domination. This is an antagonism that is irriversable at the end of the day. As for denying humantity, good. Human is a construct to begin with. It was originally made for and by the masters. Using Hegelian terms one was human, then some, then all. This does not change the deep illigtimacy of this very construct. I refuse being and rather seek to constantly become. I do this through my own radical subjectivity. quote: There is nobility in work, in labour, in thought and discussion. They are all, in their way, reinforcements of our inter-connectedness.
Nobility huh, tell that to the Chinese miner who's about to die of cancer. Work within a natural self-sufficiant or autonomous mindset of anykind is one thing, doing it in the name of a totalising system is another. And this idea of interconnectedness is another myth for the simple fact that we have all been forced together by hegemonic means. The reinforcement is anything but consenting or egalitarian. quote: Mr Magoo: For what it's worth, and while I'd love a world of pure leisure, I think it's hard not to notice that almost every animal has something it has to do in order to promote its own survival. Some hunt, some graze, some migrate. Some build little nets to trap bugs. Some lumber through the oceans and collect plankton. All have something they have to do, whether they really derive joy from doing it or not. The exceptions to this are the parasites.
Well if I'm gonna have a boss let it be nature and biology. That's at least non-alienating. When your surviving on your own terms their a fullfuling feeling that comes of that. As for robotics, movies like the terminator get made for a reason you know. quote: ronb: However, there is the break a leg and die of gangrene downside to consider.
I think for this we can take the residual that civilization leaves behind and work these issues out. There are holistic even primitive communal and individual ways that could deal with the gangrene problem.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 06 July 2005 02:08 PM
quote: Well if I'm gonna have a boss let it be nature and biology.
That's who it is, unless you've chosen to work for someone else. Many people choose not to, and you can be one of them. quote: As for robotics, movies like the terminator get made for a reason you know.
Yes, to earn a profit. And what better way than with an "evil machines enslave mankind" story? You'll never go broke flogging those. Funny thing. Teams of very skilled, very dedicated scientists have been trying for decades to create artificial intelligence in a computer. On a very good day they get a computer that's capable of learning a few basic shapes or navigating an unknown room. And yet in the world of science fiction, all you have to do is hook a few databases together and voila! Instant sentience! Instant evil sentience! About half the time, evil sentience with an accent! Easy peasy!
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
ReeferMadness
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2743
|
posted 09 July 2005 04:22 AM
quote: To take only one Roman example, Cicero said that whoever gives his labor for money sells himself and puts himself in the rank of slaves." His candor is now rare, but contemporary primitive societies which we are wont to look down upon have provided spokesmen who have enlightened Western anthropologists.
Gwynne Dyer made a similar point, saying that it is only in modern times that wage labour is considered significantly different than chatel slavery. quote: Only a small and diminishing fraction of work serves any useful purpose independent of the defense and reproduction of the work-system and its political and legal appendages.
Exactly. In the late 1980's and early to mid 90's, a practise called business process re-engineering was all the rage. Essentially, it consisted of taking a set of business processes (say procurement) and identifying the bare essentials in terms of activities that needed to be done to achieve the goal. If we applied the same thinking to capitalism it would disappear and something radically different would take its place. quote: Forty percent of the workforce are white-collar workers, most of whom have some of the most tedious and idiotic jobs ever concocted. Entire industries, insurance and banking and real estate for instance, consist of nothing but useless paper-shuffling. It is no accident that the "tertiary sector," the service sector, is growing while the "secondary sector" (industry) stagnates and the "primary sector" (agriculture) nearly disappears.
I wouldn't put it in exactly those terms but I certainly agree with the sentiment!
From: Way out there | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|