babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » "Too feminized" - the latest backlash?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: "Too feminized" - the latest backlash?
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 08 January 2006 10:48 PM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Okay, so this is one of those memes that I keep encountering, and the latest was on the Globe website where the poll of the day is: "In your opinion, has the arts and entertainment scene in Canada become too feminized?"

As I don't have a subscription I don't know if this is in reference to something like the Irving Layton funeral, or just general Globishness. Globularity? Globbledom?

I've also encountered it several times in the last week or so -- TV surfing, mostly. Oh, and that horrible Macleans article; post-secondary education is also too feminised, it seems. Me, I hadn't noticed.

Needless to say, my eyebrows are hovering at the top of my forehead on this one.

What sort of subtext do you think is being played out here?


From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 08 January 2006 10:55 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sic, tooooo feminized? it would seem, at least to me, that we are being "subtexted" for reprisals against us uppity women for wanting, no demanding equal time and real equality. Hate that smell of neocon fundamentalism in the evening, but welcome to our world if they get a firmer toehold in Canada.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 08 January 2006 11:01 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just googled "too feminized". Among the things that are too feminized are: the church, Japanese men, American men, American culture, the humanities, and Star Trek. In all, I got 276 hits.

I hadn't heard the phrase before, so I googled.

The ever-inventive backlashers strike again.


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
fast_twitch_neurons
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10443

posted 08 January 2006 11:10 PM      Profile for fast_twitch_neurons     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Realistically, I think it's simply that a lot of people feel competition is healthy, as well as what have been considered historically masculine traits: confidence, agression, linear focus - or basically any positive personality traits not associated with women. It hasn't got much to do with neocon fundamentalism from what I've seen. The most frequent context in which I've seen the expression "too feminized" used with respect to the education system, where competition is being stamped out to prevent kids' feelings from being hurt. The impression many might have is that boys need competition to stay motivated.

I certainly would not have made it if it this far academically wasn't for a deep inner need to crush the average, and to excel. My academic experience is that most men also feel the need for competition to motivate.

As for TV, I never watch it, so I don't know.


From: Montreal | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099

posted 08 January 2006 11:10 PM      Profile for deBeauxOs     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is clearly some line that is being defined either by cultural pundits, academics, the media or the general public.

Is Queer eye for the straight guy too feminised?

Has the medical profession become too feminised?


From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 09 January 2006 08:31 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The expression "too feminized," especially in relation to the arts, immediately smells of homophobia to me, but then homophobia also immediately smells of hostility to women or the "feminine," and probably to some men's confusion/paranoia about the suspect "feminine" in themselves.

I've been reading some parents for at least a decade worrying about how a "feminized" education system could be short-changing their sons, and I might be semi-prepared to take some of their concerns seriously, depending on the data they can produce and how they present it.

But once we shift to employment, claims that any field has become "too feminized" are shorthand for prejudice, IMHO. When we're talking about the arts, we're talking about adult workers, as in any other field. The arts become what people want them to become, both the people who become arts workers and the people who appreciate their work. If any field were ever driven hard by market discipline, boy, it is the arts. Nature red in tooth and claw, as all arts workers know.

If anything, that poll you saw, Tehanu, seems nastiest to me in simply putting the question. How many Grope readers would have been thinking about this topic before the Grope planted the silly thought in their minds? The question itself encourages paranoia, and paranoia is one main root of prejudice. Stupid Grope.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 January 2006 08:40 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I couldn't imagine it getting public play if it referred to an ethnic or national group, the kind of gripes one hears about too many ... (Jews, Blacks, francophones or whatever) supposedly taking over a field.

A feminist historian here (must retrieve my books from my largest bookcase - still in boxes) wrote extensively on the feminisation of professions with their resulting loss in status (from secretaries to medical staff).

And, of course, there is the old suspicion of arts and culture as "sissy", whether it is a code-word for gay or simply not red-meat-masculine enough, the way the Freedom Fries types talk about effete Europeans...


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 09 January 2006 09:11 AM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A blogger responds to the poll:
quote:
My vote was "No," but only because there wasn't an option for "What the f$#@ is this poll talking about?"

Just thought you might find that interesting.

[ 09 January 2006: Message edited by: pogge ]


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 09 January 2006 09:27 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Indeed we do, pogge.

Thanks.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 09 January 2006 09:36 AM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:

How many Grope readers would have been thinking about this topic before the Grope planted the silly thought in their minds? The question itself encourages paranoia, and paranoia is one main root of prejudice. Stupid Grope.

To (sorta) answer skdadl's question -- not this Grope reader. I gotta get out more maybe, or read more stupid journalism, but I hadn't heard/read this phrase before, as I said last night. I googled again this morning and spent several distressing minutes reading crap that contains these two words.

It may well be a species of homophobia, but it certainly is misogyny.

As a good little 'progressive', I like to believe that there has been some progress. It's crap like this that brings me back to reality.


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 09 January 2006 10:07 AM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I'm certainly feeling more paranoid, but perhaps not in the way the Glob intended
From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cartman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7440

posted 09 January 2006 10:15 AM      Profile for Cartman        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A feminist historian here (must retrieve my books from my largest bookcase - still in boxes) wrote extensively on the feminisation of professions with their resulting loss in status (from secretaries to medical staff).
I would really like to get this reference from you pretty please.

From: Bring back Audra!!!!! | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
The Wizard of Socialism
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2912

posted 09 January 2006 11:55 AM      Profile for The Wizard of Socialism   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Too Feminized" This is an unpleasant concept I'm all too familiar with. I had a buddy who went to twelve different banks and credit unions to get a mortgage before he found a loans officer that wasn't a woman. His rationale was that if he got turned down by a man it would be one thing. But to be turned down from a mere woman would be like being turned down by a dog or a cat. And he couldn't take that. Needless to say, he's not my buddy anymore. Funny sidebar. He started his own mortgage brokerage company in town, just so other men wouldn't have to "go through what he did." If you live in Regina and have access communications cable tv, you've seen his ugly mug on the tv listings/advertising channel. He's the one with the stupid grin...
From: A Proud Canadian! | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 09 January 2006 03:11 PM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Globe usually doesn't post polls that make me ask myself "what the hell does that even mean?" This is a poll which causes me to ask myself "what the hell does that even mean?"
From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 09 January 2006 03:54 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As a very angry and harmed man, one should be so lucky to be granted the choice of being even a little bit 'feminized.' Such a release it could be from the anger and harm and danger held inside for so many male humans. From what I have learned from my Elders, it is only from learning from our female energies, do our male energies become free and complete. It is without this understanding comes the anger, loneliness, misery and harm we do to one another.
From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 09 January 2006 04:02 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
As a very angry and harmed man, one should be so lucky to be granted the choice of being even a little bit 'feminized.' Such a release it could be from the anger and harm and danger held inside for so many male humans. From what I have learned from my Elders, it is only from learning from our female energies, do our male energies become free and complete. It is without this understanding comes the anger, loneliness, misery and harm we do to one another.

Makwa, do you really think that works? Discovering the other side within yourself?

I'm serious. I have been thinking about this a lot lately, because lately I have often been very angry. When I say angry, I mean smashing my fist into walls angry. Like that. Jumping up and down and swearing, for sure, but approaching blind physical anger too.

Like speechifying for hours in an empty kitchen angry - that kind of angry, which prevents you from going to sleep even when you're exhausted. That kind of angry.

I don't know how many women get there, but I sure have lately. Is that my yang, my male side? And is it good that I've found it? It suddenly seems all too accessible. Scares the hell out of me, though.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Blink
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11402

posted 09 January 2006 04:45 PM      Profile for Blink     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Skdadl, it took me thousands of dollars and many, many counselling sessions to realize how angry I was. I am so much happier knowing the truth.
From: British Columbia | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 January 2006 04:52 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But we are right to be angry. The challenge is how to channel that anger into something positive instead of self-destruction or blind rage.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 09 January 2006 05:33 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Is that my yang, my male side?

Sounds a trifle too expressive to qualify as yang to me. Isn't the entire range of masculine emotion supposed to be feigned indifference punctuated by extremely brief outbursts of pointed violence? Sustained displays of anger not so much.


From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
v michel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7879

posted 09 January 2006 07:11 PM      Profile for v michel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hear the "too feminized" complaint often in the contexts of parents complaining about their boys' education, and of people complaining about the arts. It's one of those buzzwords where I wish people would just say what they meant, rather then using "woman-like" as a general negative smear.

With education, it's often parents who think that their kids spend too much time in quiet activities like reading and not enough in active play, running around at recess, etc. Also unhappy with school discipline, like rules that all fighting is wrong regardless of who started it and so on. Which are valid objections -- I might disagree, but I'll respect someone who says he wishes teachers would split the school day differently or handle discipline differently. Such changes might benefit a lot of girls too. Why does that complaint have to be called over-feminization? It comes across like parents long for a world where men were men and women knew their place, and they are unhappy that boys aren't getting that socialization anymore. And I don't think that's what they really mean.


From: a protected valley in the middle of nothing | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 09 January 2006 07:38 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, that's pretty wacked. Do they mean effeminatized, or feminismized? Funny how inventing words makes things clearer.

Personally, I've been too feminized, but after laying some boundries concerning whale bone stays with "Mistress Helga", I no longer feel that way.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099

posted 09 January 2006 07:45 PM      Profile for deBeauxOs     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

When a patriarchal society tilts too far over to the male side, emphasizing and glorifying the 'masculine' & effectively excluding from power and vilifying all that is female, then force (moral, political, intellectual, boycott, etc. etc.) is applied to level this unbalance, there is initially a shift that draws more women into the fields where they are now accepted. There is also a perception that society is now too feminised.

Too bad.

oh where oh where is the preview post button?

[ 09 January 2006: Message edited by: deBeauxOs ]


From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 January 2006 07:54 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
vmichel, your post really hit home. Thanks for writing it.

I have held some of those sentiments at different times. For example - the idea that children aren't allowed to fight back if some other kid picks a fight with them is one I disagree with - if my kid is being bullied and teachers can't stop it, and they so often can't, I don't want him getting in trouble if he finally decides to physically defend himself. That was how I finally ended up stopping people from bullying me when I was in grade school - by learning how to fight and beating the shit out of some kid who felt like he was put on earth to torment me. Worked like a charm. Sometimes schoolyard justice works better than getting parents involved. I remember another time when I told the teacher and my parents about the way I was being bullied by some other kid. (This was before I learned how to fight.) My father talked to the principal, and the kid's parents were called. And then those of us walking home from school that night were treated to the spectacle of this kid's father kicking his ass all the way home. Literally. I think it probably would have been more effective for me to have defended myself against this kid physically by beating him in a good schoolyard fight than to sic his abusive father on him. (Of course, we didn't know his father was abusive at the time, and no one found out since no parents were witness to this shit-kicking.) Soon afterwards, I learned how to fight from a friend of mine, and got explicit permission from my parents to beat the crap out of any kid who picked on me.

Do I consider my belief that sometimes kids should fight back to be "masculization" and the current policy of kids never fighting back to be "feminization"? No. I don't know too many feminists who advocate that women who are physically threatened should just sit by and take it, or ask a big strong authority figure (like, say, a man) to protect them. And lots of women might like their kids to have more recess and physical activity time and gym classes, too. I definitely would like to see productive physical activity happening more than once or twice a week as part of the curriculum. Do I consider the opposite to that point of view to be "feminization"? Heck no. I'm a woman!


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 09 January 2006 08:14 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To me the poll would have made more sense if it asked is the world still too masculanized. But I guess since it is so obvious that it still is there is no point. Or perhaps some consider it acceptable, even though it isn't.

Tommy, love the Mistress Helga!


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 10 January 2006 08:53 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What still strikes me as odd is the focus of that question strictly on "the arts and entertainment." I mean, if they had asked about the world generally, it would seem more obviously a simple product of thoughtless backlash. But that focus makes me wonder whether something is going on that I've missed (very often the case, btw). Curious.

quote:
Originally posted by ronb:

Sounds a trifle too expressive to qualify as yang to me. Isn't the entire range of masculine emotion supposed to be feigned indifference punctuated by extremely brief outbursts of pointed violence? Sustained displays of anger not so much.


ronb, this struck me as just true enough to be wryly amusing.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 10 January 2006 09:38 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:

Makwa, do you really think that works? Discovering the other side within yourself?

I'm serious. I have been thinking about this a lot lately, because lately I have often been very angry. When I say angry, I mean smashing my fist into walls angry. Like that. Jumping up and down and swearing, for sure, but approaching blind physical anger too.

Like speechifying for hours in an empty kitchen angry - that kind of angry, which prevents you from going to sleep even when you're exhausted. That kind of angry.

I don't know how many women get there, but I sure have lately. Is that my yang, my male side? And is it good that I've found it? It suddenly seems all too accessible. Scares the hell out of me, though.


I spent much of the first 10 years of my adult life there.

It's not yang, per se. Yang is positive energy, movement, so I can see some relationship, but it's not quite the same thing. We westerners relate yang and yin to male and female, but that's an essentialist comparison drawn from our culture, and always bothers me. Women are as yang as men and can still remain feminine. It just has to do with energies -- motion and stillness are a better comparison.

Re the anger: If you are able to dissect the anger, you will probably find that it's a secondary emotion. Most of the time, anger is how we cope with fear or hurt without sinking into paralysis. Anger is active, keeps us moving. Sometimes we just need it, but it's not a good permanent state. I found it easier (although not in a crisis period, I needed to be angry and sometimes think anger has saved my life or at least my marbles) to deal with anger appropriately when I could acknowledge what generated it.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 10 January 2006 09:46 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Zoot wrote:

quote:
I found it easier (although not in a crisis period, I needed to be angry and sometimes think anger has saved my life or at least my marbles) to deal with anger appropriately when I could acknowledge what generated it.

Yes, that is a helpful way to put it, and to think.

Rage is a real problem though, isn't it. Like some other emotions, it can keep feeding on itself by force of inertia sometimes - as sadness can, eg, in crying jags, or in depression.

I've never been a physically violent person, but sometimes, reading crime reports about ordinary guys with a rage problem, I feel I have an inkling of why they do that, why they lash out. The world can make any of us feel so powerless.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
anne cameron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8045

posted 10 January 2006 10:02 AM      Profile for anne cameron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Where I grew up Everybody scrapped. One of my uncles told me , and for years I believed , the world was made up of two kinds of people, those who got their asses kicked and those who did the kicking. My dad was insanely abusive, the neighbours were as apt as not to get rowdy, especially when drinking...

and, man, have I got a temper. I learned how to control it most of the time, but I've had a couple of "blind rage" episodes where I really do think I would have been capable of drinking blood from the throat of someone I saw as an "enemy". The expression "see red" is SO descriptive, everything did disappear into a red haze and those who saw me blow up said my eyes changed colour from green to cat-yellow.

Skdadl, I "defuse" almost daily. I argue with the knob on TV who reads what he insists is the news, I argue with the castratii on CBC radio, and I've had a couple of kitchen rants where I let alll the elder gods and goddesses know I was about fed to the teeth with their inactivity.

Almost always the anger comes from a feeling of helplessness, the realization that it really doesn't matter what I do or say, or what we all do or say, there is a grossly unfair system with it's huge foot on our scrawny necks and when we struggle, that system either yawns or laughs.

And, hen, it ain't gettin' better as I get older!! I used to take that anger energy out to the woodpile and split alder and fir until I was wet with sweat. Now I don't have a woodpile, or a wood burning stove, and I don't have the physical strength to really attack the wood if I had any, so I vent.

Irene, the poodlymutt, ignores me. Lace, the boxer, tries to become invisible, and SkinnyMinny sits with her nose raised to the ceiling and lets loose with her hound ooo-ooo-ooo.

TESTIFY, my good woman! Give'em shit! And bad cess to the entire lot of'em.


From: tahsis, british columbia | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 10 January 2006 10:10 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by anne cameron:

TESTIFY, my good woman! Give'em shit! And bad cess to the entire lot of'em.


I feel better already.

The animals are funny, aren't they? I just have cats, so I don't get yowls, but whenever I am ... unusual ... they will all gather round and hunker down and watch me. Often, it is noticing that - that the cats are all watching me - that makes me realize I have been holding forth.

I think I know what they're thinking, though. "Gee, if this keeps up, is she gonna remember to feed us?"


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 10 January 2006 10:13 AM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
I think I know what they're thinking, though. "Gee, if this keeps up, is she gonna remember to feed us?"

More likely they're wondering 'is she gonna eat us?'


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 10 January 2006 10:20 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ha! You have not met my cats. That kind of doubt has never entered their self-esteeming little minds.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 10 January 2006 10:26 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You don't get yowls? That means you've never come upon a cat who is at least part Siamese.

Hint: they are often black - the Siamese pattern is a variation on the black cat gene(s) - long and slinky with short, sleek fur.

Renzo was in full Siamese mode last night, cursing the weather gods (he hates winter as much as I do). Since it wasn't very cold, I gladly opened the door to show him the snow but he wanted no part of it - he doesn't like the new outdoors here - alas no Italian garden with vines and lots of places to take shelter, even in winter.

Mrrrrrraaaaaaoooooouuuuuwwwww!


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 10 January 2006 10:32 AM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
See that? Responses from three womens and a gay guy and already the thread derails to cat talk... too feminized indeed.
From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
anne cameron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8045

posted 10 January 2006 10:43 AM      Profile for anne cameron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
oh, piffle.

I have two cats. Ruby's mom was a crippled Manx but I'm told she HAS to have siamese in her background because she will not shut up..and she doesn't "meow" or "mew" she WHINES....and each whine sounds like every other whine so there's no telling what it is she thinks she wants this time...lately I've just put her outside as soon as she starts whining...

otherwise, feminized or not, I might lose my temper and turn her into a slipper!


From: tahsis, british columbia | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 10 January 2006 10:46 AM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Tape_342:
See that? Responses from three womens and a gay guy and already the thread derails to cat talk... too feminized indeed.

Stereotyping of the worst kind!! Cats are NOT a feminist issue.


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 10 January 2006 10:58 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do you know, of all my cats it is Philibert - who is a huge hunky bruiser - who has the very highest wee voice? If you didn't know him and heard him from another room, you'd swear he was a kitten.

The Throat is Mathilda, the black and white. Her favourite time to yowl is when she first wakes up. I think she never knows where she is when she wakes, but instead of getting up and coming to find me, she just lies there and cries pitifully, up and down the scale, very deep to very high, until I call back to her. If you didn't know her, you'd think she was in trouble.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 10 January 2006 11:20 AM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hmm I had all of mine on the bed with me last nite, even Circe who had been standoffish that last year or so! All crowding around.

But did no one notice the most important part of the 'feminized'?

Star trek!!! STAR TREK??? Too feminized? Lets have a mud bath or shower with Archer and his female vulcan sexbot?? Seven of nine slinking around? Commander Riker and hey look at this planet of women wanting sex?

Too feminized? Lets remmeber the Prime Directive but still kick the shit out of people?

Star Trek?


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 10 January 2006 11:23 AM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I suspect the Star Trek reference is because shudder, horrors they had Captain Janeway. A woman. In charge of a ship. When will it end, when will it end?!!
From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 10 January 2006 11:36 AM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well yabbut they kind of made Janeway a guy. At least they made her as masculine as they could!
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099

posted 11 January 2006 12:12 AM      Profile for deBeauxOs     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
posted by fern hill: Stereotyping of the worst kind!! Cats are NOT a feminist issue.
Sounds like an invitation to spin off this topic to another thread ......

"Too felinized" - the latest catscratch?


From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
grrril
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4050

posted 13 January 2006 08:43 PM      Profile for grrril     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
skdadl, zoot, anne cameron, and others-thanks for your responses. I find anger rears its ugly head when it seems as though there isn't a solution nearby. It pops up infrequently, but people who know me, know that once I hit the point of "no return.." they better listen or suffer my "wrath".
From: pinkoville | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
rinne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9117

posted 13 January 2006 10:03 PM      Profile for rinne     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I saw part of a Bill Maher comedy special recently and he used the term feminization or something very close to it. I can't say much more than that because I tuned him out when he said, "women's fantasies bore men and men's fantasies disgust women". I do remember thinking it was weird to have him use that term.

WTF is "too feminized" anyways?

I wonder if this term is not only a direct attack on feminsim but also on the anti-war movement.

[ 13 January 2006: Message edited by: a citizen of winnipeg ]


From: prairies | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 13 January 2006 10:20 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have encountered few things in life and society that couldn't have stood a little more feminization. Whatever the hell that means.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Glorified Ape
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11758

posted 15 January 2006 07:24 PM      Profile for Glorified Ape        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does anyone else find it strange that the concept of "too feminized" is offhandedly dismissed so easily while the concept of "too masculinized" is an assumed condition in almost any realm of society?

To borrow from another, seems to me a "species" of misandry.


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Loretta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 222

posted 15 January 2006 07:47 PM      Profile for Loretta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"In your opinion, has the arts and entertainment scene in Canada become too feminized?"

I think that this question is really, "In your opinion, are there too many women involved with the arts and entertainment scene in Canada?"

"Feminized" means nothing in itself, in my opinion. It's a cover for asking if too many women are involved, something that would be inappropriate to ask outright.


From: The West Kootenays of BC | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Glorified Ape
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11758

posted 15 January 2006 08:06 PM      Profile for Glorified Ape        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Loretta:

I think that this question is really, "In your opinion, are there too many women involved with the arts and entertainment scene in Canada?"

"Feminized" means nothing in itself, in my opinion. It's a cover for asking if too many women are involved, something that would be inappropriate to ask outright.


I'm not sure it necessarily suggests too many women being involved as it does an over-pervasiveness of "female" ideas and attitudes. That's a whole other can of worms, as I believe it attributes gender to ideas (possibly fallaciously).


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
mersh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10238

posted 15 January 2006 09:56 PM      Profile for mersh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Glorified Ape:
Does anyone else find it strange that the concept of "too feminized" is offhandedly dismissed so easily while the concept of "too masculinized" is an assumed condition in almost any realm of society?

To borrow from another, seems to me a "species" of misandry.


I think you're assuming without substantiating. And are you actually claiming a "species" of misandry is being expressed here?


From: toronto | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca