Author
|
Topic: "Too feminized" - the latest backlash?
|
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854
|
posted 08 January 2006 10:48 PM
Okay, so this is one of those memes that I keep encountering, and the latest was on the Globe website where the poll of the day is: "In your opinion, has the arts and entertainment scene in Canada become too feminized?" As I don't have a subscription I don't know if this is in reference to something like the Irving Layton funeral, or just general Globishness. Globularity? Globbledom? I've also encountered it several times in the last week or so -- TV surfing, mostly. Oh, and that horrible Macleans article; post-secondary education is also too feminised, it seems. Me, I hadn't noticed. Needless to say, my eyebrows are hovering at the top of my forehead on this one. What sort of subtext do you think is being played out here?
From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582
|
posted 08 January 2006 11:01 PM
I just googled "too feminized". Among the things that are too feminized are: the church, Japanese men, American men, American culture, the humanities, and Star Trek. In all, I got 276 hits. I hadn't heard the phrase before, so I googled. The ever-inventive backlashers strike again.
From: away | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 09 January 2006 08:31 AM
The expression "too feminized," especially in relation to the arts, immediately smells of homophobia to me, but then homophobia also immediately smells of hostility to women or the "feminine," and probably to some men's confusion/paranoia about the suspect "feminine" in themselves.I've been reading some parents for at least a decade worrying about how a "feminized" education system could be short-changing their sons, and I might be semi-prepared to take some of their concerns seriously, depending on the data they can produce and how they present it. But once we shift to employment, claims that any field has become "too feminized" are shorthand for prejudice, IMHO. When we're talking about the arts, we're talking about adult workers, as in any other field. The arts become what people want them to become, both the people who become arts workers and the people who appreciate their work. If any field were ever driven hard by market discipline, boy, it is the arts. Nature red in tooth and claw, as all arts workers know. If anything, that poll you saw, Tehanu, seems nastiest to me in simply putting the question. How many Grope readers would have been thinking about this topic before the Grope planted the silly thought in their minds? The question itself encourages paranoia, and paranoia is one main root of prejudice. Stupid Grope.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582
|
posted 09 January 2006 09:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by skdadl:
How many Grope readers would have been thinking about this topic before the Grope planted the silly thought in their minds? The question itself encourages paranoia, and paranoia is one main root of prejudice. Stupid Grope.
To (sorta) answer skdadl's question -- not this Grope reader. I gotta get out more maybe, or read more stupid journalism, but I hadn't heard/read this phrase before, as I said last night. I googled again this morning and spent several distressing minutes reading crap that contains these two words. It may well be a species of homophobia, but it certainly is misogyny. As a good little 'progressive', I like to believe that there has been some progress. It's crap like this that brings me back to reality.
From: away | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 09 January 2006 04:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by Makwa: As a very angry and harmed man, one should be so lucky to be granted the choice of being even a little bit 'feminized.' Such a release it could be from the anger and harm and danger held inside for so many male humans. From what I have learned from my Elders, it is only from learning from our female energies, do our male energies become free and complete. It is without this understanding comes the anger, loneliness, misery and harm we do to one another.
Makwa, do you really think that works? Discovering the other side within yourself? I'm serious. I have been thinking about this a lot lately, because lately I have often been very angry. When I say angry, I mean smashing my fist into walls angry. Like that. Jumping up and down and swearing, for sure, but approaching blind physical anger too. Like speechifying for hours in an empty kitchen angry - that kind of angry, which prevents you from going to sleep even when you're exhausted. That kind of angry. I don't know how many women get there, but I sure have lately. Is that my yang, my male side? And is it good that I've found it? It suddenly seems all too accessible. Scares the hell out of me, though.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099
|
posted 09 January 2006 07:45 PM
When a patriarchal society tilts too far over to the male side, emphasizing and glorifying the 'masculine' & effectively excluding from power and vilifying all that is female, then force (moral, political, intellectual, boycott, etc. etc.) is applied to level this unbalance, there is initially a shift that draws more women into the fields where they are now accepted. There is also a perception that society is now too feminised. Too bad. oh where oh where is the preview post button? [ 09 January 2006: Message edited by: deBeauxOs ]
From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 09 January 2006 07:54 PM
vmichel, your post really hit home. Thanks for writing it.I have held some of those sentiments at different times. For example - the idea that children aren't allowed to fight back if some other kid picks a fight with them is one I disagree with - if my kid is being bullied and teachers can't stop it, and they so often can't, I don't want him getting in trouble if he finally decides to physically defend himself. That was how I finally ended up stopping people from bullying me when I was in grade school - by learning how to fight and beating the shit out of some kid who felt like he was put on earth to torment me. Worked like a charm. Sometimes schoolyard justice works better than getting parents involved. I remember another time when I told the teacher and my parents about the way I was being bullied by some other kid. (This was before I learned how to fight.) My father talked to the principal, and the kid's parents were called. And then those of us walking home from school that night were treated to the spectacle of this kid's father kicking his ass all the way home. Literally. I think it probably would have been more effective for me to have defended myself against this kid physically by beating him in a good schoolyard fight than to sic his abusive father on him. (Of course, we didn't know his father was abusive at the time, and no one found out since no parents were witness to this shit-kicking.) Soon afterwards, I learned how to fight from a friend of mine, and got explicit permission from my parents to beat the crap out of any kid who picked on me. Do I consider my belief that sometimes kids should fight back to be "masculization" and the current policy of kids never fighting back to be "feminization"? No. I don't know too many feminists who advocate that women who are physically threatened should just sit by and take it, or ask a big strong authority figure (like, say, a man) to protect them. And lots of women might like their kids to have more recess and physical activity time and gym classes, too. I definitely would like to see productive physical activity happening more than once or twice a week as part of the curriculum. Do I consider the opposite to that point of view to be "feminization"? Heck no. I'm a woman!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 10 January 2006 08:53 AM
What still strikes me as odd is the focus of that question strictly on "the arts and entertainment." I mean, if they had asked about the world generally, it would seem more obviously a simple product of thoughtless backlash. But that focus makes me wonder whether something is going on that I've missed (very often the case, btw). Curious. quote: Originally posted by ronb:
Sounds a trifle too expressive to qualify as yang to me. Isn't the entire range of masculine emotion supposed to be feigned indifference punctuated by extremely brief outbursts of pointed violence? Sustained displays of anger not so much.
ronb, this struck me as just true enough to be wryly amusing.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 10 January 2006 09:38 AM
quote: Originally posted by skdadl:
Makwa, do you really think that works? Discovering the other side within yourself? I'm serious. I have been thinking about this a lot lately, because lately I have often been very angry. When I say angry, I mean smashing my fist into walls angry. Like that. Jumping up and down and swearing, for sure, but approaching blind physical anger too. Like speechifying for hours in an empty kitchen angry - that kind of angry, which prevents you from going to sleep even when you're exhausted. That kind of angry. I don't know how many women get there, but I sure have lately. Is that my yang, my male side? And is it good that I've found it? It suddenly seems all too accessible. Scares the hell out of me, though.
I spent much of the first 10 years of my adult life there. It's not yang, per se. Yang is positive energy, movement, so I can see some relationship, but it's not quite the same thing. We westerners relate yang and yin to male and female, but that's an essentialist comparison drawn from our culture, and always bothers me. Women are as yang as men and can still remain feminine. It just has to do with energies -- motion and stillness are a better comparison. Re the anger: If you are able to dissect the anger, you will probably find that it's a secondary emotion. Most of the time, anger is how we cope with fear or hurt without sinking into paralysis. Anger is active, keeps us moving. Sometimes we just need it, but it's not a good permanent state. I found it easier (although not in a crisis period, I needed to be angry and sometimes think anger has saved my life or at least my marbles) to deal with anger appropriately when I could acknowledge what generated it.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 10 January 2006 09:46 AM
Zoot wrote: quote: I found it easier (although not in a crisis period, I needed to be angry and sometimes think anger has saved my life or at least my marbles) to deal with anger appropriately when I could acknowledge what generated it.
Yes, that is a helpful way to put it, and to think. Rage is a real problem though, isn't it. Like some other emotions, it can keep feeding on itself by force of inertia sometimes - as sadness can, eg, in crying jags, or in depression. I've never been a physically violent person, but sometimes, reading crime reports about ordinary guys with a rage problem, I feel I have an inkling of why they do that, why they lash out. The world can make any of us feel so powerless.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
anne cameron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8045
|
posted 10 January 2006 10:02 AM
Where I grew up Everybody scrapped. One of my uncles told me , and for years I believed , the world was made up of two kinds of people, those who got their asses kicked and those who did the kicking. My dad was insanely abusive, the neighbours were as apt as not to get rowdy, especially when drinking...and, man, have I got a temper. I learned how to control it most of the time, but I've had a couple of "blind rage" episodes where I really do think I would have been capable of drinking blood from the throat of someone I saw as an "enemy". The expression "see red" is SO descriptive, everything did disappear into a red haze and those who saw me blow up said my eyes changed colour from green to cat-yellow. Skdadl, I "defuse" almost daily. I argue with the knob on TV who reads what he insists is the news, I argue with the castratii on CBC radio, and I've had a couple of kitchen rants where I let alll the elder gods and goddesses know I was about fed to the teeth with their inactivity. Almost always the anger comes from a feeling of helplessness, the realization that it really doesn't matter what I do or say, or what we all do or say, there is a grossly unfair system with it's huge foot on our scrawny necks and when we struggle, that system either yawns or laughs. And, hen, it ain't gettin' better as I get older!! I used to take that anger energy out to the woodpile and split alder and fir until I was wet with sweat. Now I don't have a woodpile, or a wood burning stove, and I don't have the physical strength to really attack the wood if I had any, so I vent. Irene, the poodlymutt, ignores me. Lace, the boxer, tries to become invisible, and SkinnyMinny sits with her nose raised to the ceiling and lets loose with her hound ooo-ooo-ooo. TESTIFY, my good woman! Give'em shit! And bad cess to the entire lot of'em.
From: tahsis, british columbia | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 10 January 2006 10:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by anne cameron:
TESTIFY, my good woman! Give'em shit! And bad cess to the entire lot of'em.
I feel better already. The animals are funny, aren't they? I just have cats, so I don't get yowls, but whenever I am ... unusual ... they will all gather round and hunker down and watch me. Often, it is noticing that - that the cats are all watching me - that makes me realize I have been holding forth. I think I know what they're thinking, though. "Gee, if this keeps up, is she gonna remember to feed us?"
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 10 January 2006 10:26 AM
You don't get yowls? That means you've never come upon a cat who is at least part Siamese. Hint: they are often black - the Siamese pattern is a variation on the black cat gene(s) - long and slinky with short, sleek fur. Renzo was in full Siamese mode last night, cursing the weather gods (he hates winter as much as I do). Since it wasn't very cold, I gladly opened the door to show him the snow but he wanted no part of it - he doesn't like the new outdoors here - alas no Italian garden with vines and lots of places to take shelter, even in winter. Mrrrrrraaaaaaoooooouuuuuwwwww!
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722
|
posted 10 January 2006 11:20 AM
Hmm I had all of mine on the bed with me last nite, even Circe who had been standoffish that last year or so! All crowding around.But did no one notice the most important part of the 'feminized'? Star trek!!! STAR TREK??? Too feminized? Lets have a mud bath or shower with Archer and his female vulcan sexbot?? Seven of nine slinking around? Commander Riker and hey look at this planet of women wanting sex? Too feminized? Lets remmeber the Prime Directive but still kick the shit out of people? Star Trek?
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
rinne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9117
|
posted 13 January 2006 10:03 PM
I saw part of a Bill Maher comedy special recently and he used the term feminization or something very close to it. I can't say much more than that because I tuned him out when he said, "women's fantasies bore men and men's fantasies disgust women". I do remember thinking it was weird to have him use that term.WTF is "too feminized" anyways? I wonder if this term is not only a direct attack on feminsim but also on the anti-war movement. [ 13 January 2006: Message edited by: a citizen of winnipeg ]
From: prairies | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Glorified Ape
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11758
|
posted 15 January 2006 08:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by Loretta:
I think that this question is really, "In your opinion, are there too many women involved with the arts and entertainment scene in Canada?" "Feminized" means nothing in itself, in my opinion. It's a cover for asking if too many women are involved, something that would be inappropriate to ask outright.
I'm not sure it necessarily suggests too many women being involved as it does an over-pervasiveness of "female" ideas and attitudes. That's a whole other can of worms, as I believe it attributes gender to ideas (possibly fallaciously).
From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|