babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Taking Ownership: Reclaiming the word "liberal" for 2006

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Taking Ownership: Reclaiming the word "liberal" for 2006
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 31 December 2005 07:33 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I mean "liberal" as in the epithet that USians often use. I borrowed this from progressivethought.net

The reactionary right-wingers call me a liberal

I refuse to pretend that racism and sexism no longer exist, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe cutting the military from being able to blow up the world 10 times over down to only 8 times over is a bad thing, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that money magically trickles down from the rich, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe giving a mother food stamps to feed her kids is a waste of money, while buying the air force a billion dollar bomber it doesn't want isn't, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe cutting the taxes of the rich helps the poor, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe Rush Limbaugh has talent on loan from God, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that "market forces" are some magical panacea, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that the profit motive creates virtue in people, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that might makes right, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe the government should control women's reproductive choices, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that single mothers are necessarily bad parents, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe only northern Europeans have culture, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe a union worker making $17/hr is overpaid while a CEO making $1 million/year is not, so they call me a liberal.

I refuse to ignore the long history of oppression, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe teaching children about cultural diversity is wrong, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe the only good jobs are ones where someone else is skimming off a profit, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe homosexuals are evil, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe family means a man ruling over a wife and kids, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe non-Christians are evil, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe liberals are subhuman monsters, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe that things are black-and-white, so they call me a liberal.

I don't believe their lies, so the reactionaries call me a liberal The more they talk, the more being called a liberal sounds like a compliment.

- Douglas Giles

[ 31 December 2005: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 31 December 2005 07:37 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Funny, though I'll stick to socialist or progressive ... In most of the world "liberal", while it does relate to political and press freedoms, also refers to untrammelled free enterprise.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 31 December 2005 07:53 PM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Most infuriating of all "I support the NDP and post on babble, so trolls call me a Liberal."
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Left Turn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8662

posted 31 December 2005 11:19 PM      Profile for Left Turn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We don't need to reclaim the word "liberal" from the conservatives, we need to reclaim the word "socialism" from those who would bury it forever, or pretend that it means the same thing as social democracy (it doesn't).

The right loves it when the left self-identifies as "liberal" rather than as "socialist". When the left plays on turf defined by the right, the right wins. The other problem ist that when the left self-indentifies as "liberal" rather than "socialist" it plays into the false notion that the main differences between the right and left are social in nautre, rather than economic. Capitalism is, and remains, the supreme enemy of the working class. Only a left that self-identifies as socialist can recognize the neddto replace Capitalism with socialism.

[ 31 December 2005: Message edited by: Left Turn ]


From: Burnaby, BC | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 01 January 2006 12:00 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes. While socialists and Bolsheviks haggled over whether capitalism should be re-worked or scrapped altogther in Germany, Keynes was busy trying to save capitalism from itself by borrowing socialist ideas. We can thank the Baron of Tilton for the fix we're still in today. They should have buried capitalism after 1929 - doused stacks and stacks of money with guzzoline and set it ablaze. What we have now is an abomination of socialism and capitalism. There are no liberals anymore. They've lost their souls and become assimilated by capital.

Autocrats are like day old socks. Eventually, you've just got to change them.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca