babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Court: Teen-sex sentence 'cruel and unusual' punishment

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Court: Teen-sex sentence 'cruel and unusual' punishment
radiobirdman
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14115

posted 26 October 2007 07:54 AM      Profile for radiobirdman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I did a search, but couldn't find anything related to this topic. Let me know if this is not the proper forum.

web page

quote:
ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- The Georgia Supreme Court on Friday ordered that Genarlow Wilson be released from prison, ruling 4-3 that his sentence for a teen sex conviction was cruel and unusual punishment.

Wilson was convicted in 2005 of having oral sex with a consenting 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

He has served two years in prison.


If the Georgia SC ruled his sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, I wonder if he has any options for compensation?


From: Canada | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged
I AM WOMAN
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14593

posted 27 October 2007 07:09 AM      Profile for I AM WOMAN     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Is 15 the age of consent in Ga ? Would it make a difference if she was 14 ? or 13 ? What about if he was 40 ? What about if the genders were reversed, like Mary Kay Letourno ?
From: tall building | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 27 October 2007 07:15 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Wilson was convicted in 2005 of having oral sex with a consenting 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

The Tories are reintroducing their age of consent legislation. Does anyone know if there is a "close in age" exemption in the current draft (I don't believe there was the last time the Tories tried to pass the bill). If not, the scenario above may be coming to Canada soon.


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 27 October 2007 07:20 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The last one had a 5-year close-in-age provision, so I assume this one does too.

That doesn't change the fact that there is no demonstrated need for any increase in the age of consent, other than pandering to extremist religious socon anti-youth prejudices.

It also doesn't change the fact that the age of consent for forms of sexual activity not blessed by the Bible will still remain at 18.

And it doesn't change the fact that despite the above, all parties in the House will support this legislation, either because they share the prejudices themselves, or they lack the guts to answer questions about it.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
I AM WOMAN
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14593

posted 27 October 2007 07:34 AM      Profile for I AM WOMAN     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't have a big problem with these laws. They are put in place to protect minors from sexual exploitation from adults. I think honorable people can agree to or disagree on where the age of consent should be, but, I think adults should NOT be having sex with children, Period.
From: tall building | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged
1234567
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14443

posted 27 October 2007 07:42 AM      Profile for 1234567     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The Tories are reintroducing their age of consent legislation.

And they should have a higher age of consent to protect youth from adults.

And there should also be a clause in the age consent law about consent between two minors.

something like this:

If you are 14, minor consent is 15 to 17

If you are 15 to 17 minor consent is to 18

I'm basing this on grade levels. When I went to high school, alot of grade 12 boys went out with grade 9s,10s and 11s.

Any better ideas?


From: speak up, even if your voice shakes | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 27 October 2007 08:24 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I believe 16 is the age the Tories are raising it to, not 18.
From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
bliter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14536

posted 27 October 2007 10:34 AM      Profile for bliter   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So obscenely harsh that one may wonder whether the one who awarded the punishment suffered sexual hangups. With the four to three verdict to overturn, one may even have doubts about the three.

The "tortured" prisoner (that's how I see it) being black, doubtless, didn't help.

No mention of penalty, if any, for the female half of the consensual act.

[ 27 October 2007: Message edited by: bliter ]

[ 27 October 2007: Message edited by: bliter ]


From: delta | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
1234567
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14443

posted 27 October 2007 10:39 AM      Profile for 1234567     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, it's quite a change. I remember when Amy Fisher was turned into the vixen at a mere 16 and blamed for everything by the media and Buttafuco was left alone. Not that it justifies the sentencing of this recent case. Maybe it has more to do with were it happened. Georgia, isn't that state pretty right wing Christian. don't know, feel free to correct me.
From: speak up, even if your voice shakes | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 October 2007 10:51 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just read the Wikipedia article on Fisher and Buttafuoco. I'm not sure why they shouldn't have left Buttafuoco alone - it doesn't sound like he had anything to do with the shooting.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
1234567
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14443

posted 27 October 2007 10:54 AM      Profile for 1234567     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It wasn't just the shooting. She's admitted to that being her own idea. It was the way the media painted her at the time. She was only 16 and he was over 30 and yet SHE was the aggressor, I felt bad for her, and there was hardly anything in the press of what a man that age was doing with such a young girl. I was just making a point that maybe the way that the media portrays that kind of thinking has changed but now that I really think about it, I doubt it.
From: speak up, even if your voice shakes | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 October 2007 11:11 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, he WAS charged with statutory rape and did time for it. I'm sure that must have been covered by the media.

I agree with you that the sexual demonization of Fisher was wrong, having read more on it now.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
I AM WOMAN
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14593

posted 28 October 2007 11:10 AM      Profile for I AM WOMAN     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bliter:

No mention of penalty, if any, for the female half of the consensual act.

The female was the one that was underage. Why would she be penalized ?


From: tall building | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca