Author
|
Topic: I'm afraid of Americans
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 12 February 2008 12:59 PM
quote: In evaluating allegations that U.S. military forces deprived four British men of human rights during two years they were held captive in Guantanamo Bay prison, a U.S. appeals court found an innovative way to let the Bush administration off the hook. Two of three judges ruled the men -- because they are not U.S. citizens and, technically, were not imprisoned in the U.S. -- were not legally "persons" and, therefore, had no rights to violate.While those judges were defying common sense and decency by denying legal personhood to living human beings, an appeals court in Boston has been reviewing an April 2007 decision by Federal Judge Paul Barbadoro that engaged in a different form of judicial activism -- granting human rights to corporations. Barbadoro struck down a New Hampshire law that prevented pharmaceutical corporations from learning exactly what drugs doctors prescribe and how much they prescribe. The law aims to protect doctors and, indirectly, their patients, from drug companies pressuring doctors to choose their products. The judge's grounds? He claims corporations, as legal persons.
Corporations are persons, human beings are not.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 13 February 2008 03:06 PM
quote: * A person not possessing a Real ID Act-compliant identification card could not enter any federal building, or an office of his or her congressman or senator or the U.S. Capitol. This effectively denies that person their fundamental rights to assembly and to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment. * A person seeking to exercise their right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment could henceforth be denied that ability if they do not possess a precious Real ID card, because the federal bureaucracy known as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives probably will decree that such a form of identification is necessary to meet federal requirements for purchasing a firearm. * Very possibly the Real ID card will be required in order to vote in any election for federal office. * A veteran may be denied access to a VA hospital because he or she lacks the requisite Real ID card, perhaps because they did not have the money required to purchase it or because they could not locate the background forms the Department of Homeland Security required to obtain one. * A business traveler, unable to afford to travel by private jet, is denied the ability to make a living because their job requires air travel and they do not have a Real ID card — even though they demonstrably pose no danger whatsoever to their fellow travelers. * Even though individual states, such as Georgia, may provide greater legal protection for private information of its residents than other states or the federal government, this will mean nothing in the Real ID Act world, because all the data under that law will be subject to the lower federal standards, thereby subjecting residents to a higher likelihood of identity theft than they would risk under the laws of their state. * And, they would have no recourse to correct erroneous data, or prevent identity theft pursuant to the Real ID regulations.
AJC
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
saga
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13017
|
posted 21 February 2008 09:42 PM
It looks like something good did come out of it:Because the plaintiffs and legal team all shared the long-term aim of safeguarding the rights of political activists and ensuring effective community oversight of law enforcement, they made substantial contributions from the settlement to provide the seed money for the Northwest Constitutional Rights Center. The difficulty of litigating the Portland protest cases has made it very clear that individuals with limited income are hindered in their efforts to access the courts to pursue enforcement of their rights. ... The generosity and dedication of these individuals solidified the Northwest Constitutional Rights Center as a community resource with a vision to create a just and equitable city, where law enforcement treats all people with dignity and respect. Individual community support of time, money and resources will determine whether or not the NW Center continues to grow and fight. Sit-Lie Ordinance Slapped by Circuit Judge Sit/Lie Ordinance Stories || 2004.06.23 05:35 Sit Lie Ordinance Declared Unconstitutional The newly formed National Lawyers Guild Northwest Constitutional Rights Center won a major victory today with the holding by Circuit Court Judge Marylin E. Litzenberger, that the "Sit-Lie" ordinance is unconstitutional. Thanks to Adam Arms for arguing and representing the defendants: Todd Kurlylowicz, Jayson Dunlap and Victoria Taylor. I also want to thank and take note of the Defendants' courage and conviction in challenging this ordinance that was crafted for the sole purpose of making homelessness illegal. We have overcome. --Alan Graf
From: Canada | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 28 February 2008 07:43 PM
Cross the border, say something nice about Osama bin Laden, and you will never have to worry about those things again. quote: The U.S. military has designated an Afghan journalist working for CTV in Afghanistan an enemy combatant, according to reports. Jawed Ahmad, has been held for four months at a compound in Bagram, 50 kilometres north of Kabul, Associated Press reported. Maj. Chris Belcher told the news agency that the "enemy combatant review board" had "credible information" that Mr. Ahmad was dangerous. It is not known why Mr. Ahmad was detained. "He was afforded an opportunity to provide a statement to the board, and the board determined there was credible information to detain him as an unlawful enemy combatant," Maj. Belcher told AP. "As an unlawful enemy combatant, he posed a threat to coalition forces and the government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan," he said, adding that "Mr. Ahmad was in no way targeted because of his work as a journalist."
Not targeted for his work as a journalist. Isn't that believable? Another Afghan journalist has been sentenced to death for downloading an article about women. I guess the Afghanis are learning our values.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 29 February 2008 02:06 PM
quote: Former teacher Paul King says he used to be one of those people who said lock 'em up throw away the key.However King has changed his mind since being arrested on public intoxication last July. A video shows deputies pushed him against a glass wall as he was being frisked, threw him to the ground for no apparent reason, held his neck back more than 2 minutes as he was being put into a restraint chair, put a hood over his face and then appeared to try to hide the action from cameras by moving paperwork to cover his head. King says it's something like out of Guantanamo. King says when he was out of camera view, two deputies took him out of the restraining chair and says they both started kneeing him up against a bench or a wall, as he was pleading please, please, please. But it didn't stop there. King says they made him say you're a f***ing p***y. And he says they were hurting him so he said “ I'm a f***ing p****y and the deputies all laughed.
It seems abuse of people is part of American culture
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|